Lawler Arena · at Merrimack
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MRMK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MRMK 73–66 · win probability MRMK 72%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 138.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MRMK has more of the edges
BU 2, MRMK 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BU 17.7%, MRMK 14.8%. Forced: BU 13.0%, MRMK 20.4%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BU 28.0%, MRMK 24.8%. Defensive: BU 72.0%, MRMK 60.1%
BU offense vs MRMK defense
Offense 305th of 366 against a defense 139th, on the model’s ratings
MRMK offense vs BU defense
Offense 316th of 366 against a defense 201st, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MRMK at home. This season: MRMK 0-0 at home, BU 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
BU hits 38.9% and allows 36.6%; MRMK hits 32.7% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 43.8% and 46.1% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BU 52%, MRMK 37%. Transfers in: BU 1, MRMK 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
BU has played the 296th-hardest schedule, MRMK the 286th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: BU plays 65.2 a game (340th fastest), MRMK 64.4 (357th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BU 57.5 and allows 53.6; MRMK 49.1 and allows 46.7
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BU 31.4, MRMK 38.2. Allowed: BU 30.5, MRMK 37.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MRMK -6.8 | — |
| Total | — | 138.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | BU 65.8 · MRMK 72.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MRMK -3.9 | — |
| 1H total | 64.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | BU 30.4 · MRMK 34.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | |
| 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BU 3–2 MRMKBU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · MRMK has won the last 2 meetings · BU 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025-26 | MRMK 91 @ BU 79 | BU -2.5 | MRMK W |
| Dec 13, 2024-25 | BU 61 @ MRMK 64 | MRMK -4.5 | BU W |
| Dec 30, 2023-24 | MRMK 63 @ BU 74 | BU +1.5 | BU W |
| Dec 2, 2022-23 | BU 68 @ MRMK 54 | MRMK +3.5 | BU W |
| Nov 28, 2021-22 | MRMK 60 @ BU 61 | BU -6 | MRMK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Boston U
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +8.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-76 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-91 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-54 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 87-96 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-69 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-77 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 83-67 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 100-91 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 91-93 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 57-74 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 79-80 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 50-58 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 97-103 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-64 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-69 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 85-68 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 85-58 | +2.5 | W +29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 67-70 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 68-65 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-73 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 73-72 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | @ | L 60-74 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+3.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−6.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+9.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
−14.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−0.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+5.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+5.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−1.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
−11.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−18.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−10.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+6.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
−0.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−3.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+14.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
−6.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−18.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
−0.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+6.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−6.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
−7.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
+5.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+3.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+14.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+7.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
+29.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−5.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
+6.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
+6.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+0.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+7.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−16.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+8.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−8.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+37.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
+34.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−41.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+12.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+40.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−4.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
+35.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−0.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−3.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+18.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
+21.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−16.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+7.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+50.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
+39.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−17.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
+4.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+11.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−30.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
+61.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
−3.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+1.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+12.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+13.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
−2.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−4.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
−0.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
−7.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+6.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+8.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−4.5
over 19under 14avg +8.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Merrimack
34 games played
Straight up
23-11
68% wins
Against the spread
20-14
59% covers · avg +2.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-22
35% overs · avg −3.3 pts vs the total
Against the spread
20-1459%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 66-75 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 57-95 | +23.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 62-76 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 91-79 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 45-80 | +36.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 65-77 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 58-78 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 66-60 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 68-66 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 74-63 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 59-56 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 59-66 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 80-72 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 75-65 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 73-66 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 63-59 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 132.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 63-76 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 83-71 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 68-55 | +6.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 60-61 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 67-59 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 75-58 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 87-70 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 73-47 | -8.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-56 | -2.5 | W +22.5 | 128.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 56-49 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 88-86 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-67 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 73-66 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 126.5 | O 139 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 70-48 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | U 118 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 58-57 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 128.5 | U 115 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 54-64 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 128.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
SDST
L 66-75
−2.5
6
@
AUB
L 57-95
−14.5
11
@
TAR
L 62-76
−9.5
15
@
BU
W 91-79
+14.5
19
vs
ME
W 72-65
+0.5
21
@
FLA
L 45-80
+1.5
28
@
PENN
L 65-77
−9.5
29
vs
HOF
L 58-78
−14.5
30
vs
LAS
W 66-60
+8.5
4
vs
RID
W 68-66
−7.5
7
vs
FAIR
W 74-63
+7.5
10
@
PRIN
W 59-56
+5.5
14
@
UVM
L 59-66
−0.5
29
@
SHU
W 80-72
+9.5
2
vs
MSM
W 75-65
+6.5
4
vs
MAN
W 73-66
+0.5
9
@
SIE
W 63-59
+9.5
11
@
SPU
L 63-76
−11.5
17
vs
QUIN
W 83-71
+13.5
19
@
MRST
W 68-55
+19.5
22
@
IONA
L 60-61
−2.5
24
vs
SPU
W 67-59
+5.5
1
vs
SHU
W 75-58
+11.5
5
@
MSM
W 87-70
+14.5
7
@
RID
W 73-47
+17.5
12
vs
MRST
W 81-56
+22.5
15
@
QUIN
W 56-49
+10.5
20
vs
SIE
W 79-72
+4.5
22
vs
IONA
W 88-86
−4.5
27
@
CAN
L 62-67
−13.5
1
@
NIA
W 73-66
−0.5
6
vs
SHU
W 70-48
+15.5
8
vs
MRST
W 58-57
−1.5
10
vs
SIE
L 54-64
−12.5
covered 20didn’t cover 14avg +2.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
SDST
L 66-75
−2.5
6
@
AUB
L 57-95
+3.5
11
@
TAR
L 62-76
−4.5
15
@
BU
W 91-79
+34.5
19
vs
ME
W 72-65
+6.5
21
@
FLA
L 45-80
−33.5
28
@
PENN
L 65-77
−10.5
29
vs
HOF
L 58-78
+0.5
30
vs
LAS
W 66-60
−6.5
4
vs
RID
W 68-66
−4.5
7
vs
FAIR
W 74-63
−7.5
10
@
PRIN
W 59-56
−19.5
14
@
UVM
L 59-66
−11.5
29
@
SHU
W 80-72
+7.5
2
vs
MSM
W 75-65
−1.5
4
vs
MAN
W 73-66
−9.5
9
@
SIE
W 63-59
−10.5
11
@
SPU
L 63-76
+5.5
17
vs
QUIN
W 83-71
+12.5
19
@
MRST
W 68-55
−10.5
22
@
IONA
L 60-61
−22.5
24
vs
SPU
W 67-59
−8.5
1
vs
SHU
W 75-58
−14.5
5
@
MSM
W 87-70
+22.5
7
@
RID
W 73-47
−17.5
12
vs
MRST
W 81-56
+8.5
15
@
QUIN
W 56-49
−36.5
20
vs
SIE
W 79-72
+17.5
22
vs
IONA
W 88-86
+37.5
27
@
CAN
L 62-67
−0.5
1
@
NIA
W 73-66
+12.5
6
vs
SHU
W 70-48
−25.5
8
vs
MRST
W 58-57
−13.5
10
vs
SIE
L 54-64
−10.5
over 12under 22avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Merrimack has the better starters
Position by position: Boston U 1, Merrimack 2, even 2
Boston UBetterMerrimack
G A. Abdullah8.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
→MRMKSmall
G T. Dorset11.7 pts · 3.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 45
G D. Tisinger6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 37
←BUSmall
G D. Anglin TR9.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 19
G K. Alexander1 pts · 2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G A. Vladimir Soqui Urbano TR2 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F S. Hughes9.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
=Even
F T. Brogna6.1 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 16
F Q. Nielsen1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 5
→MRMKSmall
F E. Wilborn TR2.3 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 30
Boston UBetterMerrimack
BU offense305th of 366 · -9.5
→MRMKBig
MRMK defense139th of 366 · -2.9
BU defense201st of 366 · -5.0
←BUSmall
MRMK offense316th of 366 · -10.3
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.3 · 2 players
→MRMKSmall
Frontcourt-3.0 · 2 players
Bench-0.1 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.6 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestBU betterMRMK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Abdullah30 minD. Tisinger20 minK. Alexander11 minP. Carr2 minA. ZakheimNewJ. TerryNew
Forwards
S. Hughes30 minQ. Nielsen8 minM. Oberti4 min · TRA. Bhesania3 minM. BaptisteNewD. LloydNew
Guards
T. Dorset36 minD. Anglin28 min · TRA. Vladimir Soqui Urbano10 min · TRA. LesburtNewJ. AndersonNewQ. KwasniakNew
Forwards
T. Brogna29 minE. Wilborn9 min · TRD. Veillette8 minJ. MooreNewD. MunroNewJ. SkoricNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.5 #176 | Points per game | 68.5 #304 |
| 1.14 #72 | Points per possession | 1.06 #221 |
| 65.2 #340 | Pace (possessions) | 64.4 #357 |
| Shooting | ||
| 57.5 #11 | Effective FG% | 49.1 #288 |
| 38.9 #5 | 3-point % | 32.7 #243 |
| 43.8 #92 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.1 #46 |
| 31.4 #270 | Free throw rate | 38.2 #99 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.7 #252 | Turnover rate | 14.8 #55 |
| 28.0 #269 | Offensive rebound rate | 24.8 #343 |
| 14.2 #131 | Assists per game | 12.4 #257 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #174 | Points allowed | 66.5 #19 |
| 1.14 #310 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #62 |
| 53.6 #288 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.7 #17 |
| 36.6 #330 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.3 #12 |
| 13.0 #353 | Turnovers forced | 20.4 #16 |
| 72.0 #65 | Defensive rebound rate | 60.1 #365 |
| 4.7 #346 | Steals per game | 8.2 #32 |
| 3.3 #181 | Blocks per game | 5.2 #13 |
Boston U
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh60–74
- W@ Navy73–72
- Wvs American75–73
- W@ American68–65
- Wvs Holy Cross78–63
A week or more of rest.
Merrimack
23-11 in 2025-26 overall · 19-4 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Siena54–64
- Wvs Marist58–57
- Wvs Sacred Heart70–48
- W@ Niagara73–66
- L@ Canisius62–67
A week or more of rest.