Rose Hill Gym · at Fordham
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FOR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FOR 79–62 · win probability FOR 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FOR has more of the edges
BU 2, FOR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
BU offense vs FOR defense
Offense 305th of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BU has played the 296th-hardest schedule, FOR the 136th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BU 17.7%, FOR 17.2%. Forced: BU 13.0%, FOR 17.2%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BU 28.0%, FOR 34.1%. Defensive: BU 72.0%, FOR 73.2%
Three-pointers
BU hits 38.9% and allows 36.6%; FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 43.8% and 38.3% of their shots
FOR offense vs BU defense
Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 201st, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FOR at home. This season: FOR 0-0 at home, BU 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: BU 57.5 and allows 53.6; FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BU 31.4, FOR 26.4. Allowed: BU 30.5, FOR 30.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BU 52%, FOR 63%. Transfers in: BU 1, FOR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 65 possessions: BU plays 65.2 a game (340th fastest), FOR 64.8 (349th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FOR -17.6 | — |
| Total | — | 140.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | BU 61.5 · FOR 79 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FOR -10.3 | — |
| 1H total | 65.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | BU 27.7 · FOR 38 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Boston U
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +8.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-76 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-91 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-54 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 87-96 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-69 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-77 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 83-67 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 100-91 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 91-93 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 57-74 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 79-80 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 50-58 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 97-103 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-64 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-69 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 85-68 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 85-58 | +2.5 | W +29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 67-70 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 68-65 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-73 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 73-72 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | @ | L 60-74 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+3.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−6.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+9.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
−14.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−0.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+5.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+5.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−1.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
−11.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−18.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−10.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+6.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
−0.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−3.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+14.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
−6.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−18.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
−0.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+6.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−6.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
−7.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
+5.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+3.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+14.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+7.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
+29.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−5.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
+6.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
+6.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+0.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+7.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−16.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+8.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−8.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+37.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
+34.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−41.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+12.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+40.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−4.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
+35.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−0.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−3.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+18.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
+21.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−16.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+7.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+50.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
+39.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−17.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
+4.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+11.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−30.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
+61.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
−3.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+1.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+12.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+13.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
−2.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−4.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
−0.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
−7.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+6.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+8.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−4.5
over 19under 14avg +8.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Fordham
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-22
24% overs · avg −7.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | L 61-72 | -14.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 63-61 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 71-76 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 69-53 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 62-72 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-70 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 75-54 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 82-53 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 65-47 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 56-63 | +16.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 75-83 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 58-67 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-77 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 56-78 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 63-74 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 63-68 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 64-58 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-65 | +11.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 59-63 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-70 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 68-64 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 62-59 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 63-82 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 84-87 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 61-49 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−25.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−10.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
+0.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
+11.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+9.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
−11.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
+9.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
+20.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
+4.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
+9.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
−5.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−3.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+12.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−4.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−9.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−0.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
+0.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
+25.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
+3.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−1.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
+7.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+8.5
18
vs
LUC
W 62-59
−5.5
21
vs
DAV
W 63-59
+5.5
28
@
VCU
L 63-82
−6.5
4
@
LAS
L 84-87
−6.5
7
vs
URI
W 61-49
+10.5
12
vs
GW
L 62-66
+3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
NJIT
L 61-72
−14.5
11
vs
WAG
W 63-61
−15.5
14
@
IONA
L 71-76
−10.5
20
vs
LIU
W 69-53
−23.5
29
vs
UALB
W 88-68
+12.5
30
vs
COLG
L 62-72
−8.5
6
vs
HC
L 69-70
+0.5
10
vs
FDU
W 75-54
−12.5
13
vs
MAN
W 82-53
−12.5
22
vs
NHVN
W 65-47
−15.5
31
@
DAY
L 56-63
−20.5
4
vs
RICH
L 75-83
+15.5
7
vs
GMU
L 58-67
−9.5
10
@
SBU
W 81-77
+15.5
14
@
SLU
L 56-78
−20.5
17
vs
DUQ
L 63-74
−8.5
21
@
DAV
L 63-68
−4.5
28
vs
LAS
W 64-58
−14.5
31
@
GW
W 79-65
−6.5
3
vs
VCU
L 59-63
−24.5
7
vs
SBU
L 67-70
−4.5
10
@
JOES
W 68-64
−3.5
14
@
URI
W 70-66
+1.5
18
vs
LUC
W 62-59
−14.5
21
vs
DAV
W 63-59
−9.5
28
@
VCU
L 63-82
+0.5
4
@
LAS
L 84-87
+39.5
7
vs
URI
W 61-49
−26.5
12
vs
GW
L 62-66
−16.5
over 7under 22avg −7.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fordham has the better starters
Position by position: Boston U 0, Fordham 4, even 1
Boston UBetterFordham
G A. Abdullah8.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
→FORBig
G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 79
G D. Tisinger6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 37
→FORSmall
G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 68
G K. Alexander1 pts · 2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 82
F S. Hughes9.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
→FORSmall
F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
F Q. Nielsen1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 5
→FORBig
C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 63
Boston UBetterFordham
BU offense305th of 366 · -9.5
→FORBig
FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8
BU defense201st of 366 · -5.0
→FORSmall
FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
→FORBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt-4.3 · 2 players
→FORBig
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.1 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+0.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBU betterFOR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Abdullah30 minD. Tisinger20 minK. Alexander11 minP. Carr2 minA. ZakheimNewJ. TerryNew
Forwards
S. Hughes30 minQ. Nielsen8 minM. Oberti4 min · TRA. Bhesania3 minM. BaptisteNewD. LloydNew
Guards
A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min
Forwards
R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew
Centers
J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.5 #176 | Points per game | 67.5 #323 |
| 1.14 #72 | Points per possession | 1.04 #262 |
| 65.2 #340 | Pace (possessions) | 64.8 #349 |
| Shooting | ||
| 57.5 #11 | Effective FG% | 48.6 #300 |
| 38.9 #5 | 3-point % | 28.9 #356 |
| 43.8 #92 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #205 |
| 31.4 #270 | Free throw rate | 26.4 #354 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.7 #252 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #219 |
| 28.0 #269 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.1 #64 |
| 14.2 #131 | Assists per game | 13.2 #200 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #174 | Points allowed | 66.3 #17 |
| 1.14 #310 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #47 |
| 53.6 #288 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.9 #95 |
| 36.6 #330 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #149 |
| 13.0 #353 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #138 |
| 72.0 #65 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.2 #29 |
| 4.7 #346 | Steals per game | 7.0 #126 |
| 3.3 #181 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #335 |
Boston U
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh60–74
- W@ Navy73–72
- Wvs American75–73
- W@ American68–65
- Wvs Holy Cross78–63
A week or more of rest.
Fordham
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs G Washington62–66
- Wvs Rhode Island61–49
- L@ La Salle84–87
- L@ VCU63–82
- Wvs Davidson63–59
A week or more of rest.