Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ILST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TLSA 75–74 · win probability TLSA 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TLSA has more of the edges
TLSA 2, ILST 0 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: TLSA 41.4, ILST 31.6. Allowed: TLSA 32.0, ILST 32.3
Three-pointers
TLSA hits 38.5% and allows 32.4%; ILST hits 34.9% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 46.7% and 43.3% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: TLSA plays 70.1 a game (115th fastest), ILST 67.7 (241st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: TLSA 32.8%, ILST 28.0%. Defensive: TLSA 71.0%, ILST 74.6%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: TLSA 18%, ILST 37%. Transfers in: TLSA 7, ILST 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: TLSA 55.4 and allows 49.5; ILST 53.6 and allows 49.8
Context
Schedule so far
TLSA has played the 111th-hardest schedule, ILST the 135th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: TLSA 15.6%, ILST 16.8%. Forced: TLSA 15.4%, ILST 16.0%
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
TLSA offense vs ILST defense
Offense 99th of 366 against a defense 102nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
ILST offense vs TLSA defense
Offense 133rd of 366 against a defense 133rd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TLSA -1.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | TLSA 75 · ILST 73.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TLSA -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | TLSA 35.2 · ILST 34.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Tulsa
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
19-17
53% covers · avg +4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-12
67% overs · avg +4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 82-65 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 88-87 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-75 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-51 | -5.5 | W +24.5 | 149.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-74 | -7.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 117-84 | -25.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 201 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-70 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 82-81 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-85 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 97-48 | -12.5 | W +36.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-72 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-93 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-74 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 99-77 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-66 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 87-81 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-66 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 93-83 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 74-80 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 63-68 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 77-81 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-74 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 100-74 | -21.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-56 | -5.5 | W +28.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 93-66 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-76 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 90-84 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 68-81 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 89-84 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 77-66 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 83-79 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 5 | vs | L 86-92 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
+20.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
−4.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+11.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+0.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
+24.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
+5.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+16.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+7.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+8.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
−1.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
−11.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
+36.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
−7.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
−16.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+8.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+23.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
+10.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
−2.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+7.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+4.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−1.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−15.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
−2.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
−7.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+4.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
+28.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+18.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
−9.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
−1.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−14.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
−0.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
+6.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
−0.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
+7.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 17avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
−6.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
+14.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+6.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+10.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
−17.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
−14.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+29.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+45.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+6.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
+4.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
+14.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
−7.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
+0.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
+7.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+13.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+16.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
−4.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
+15.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+6.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+21.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−8.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−16.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−30.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
+5.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
+1.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+14.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
−10.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+2.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
+4.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
+32.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−3.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
+23.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
−18.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
+7.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
−18.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
+19.5
over 24under 12avg +4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Illinois St
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-65 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 67-87 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 82-80 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-42 | -12.5 | W +39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-65 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-78 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 95-53 | -20.5 | W +21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 85-65 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 73-56 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 73-47 | -12.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 59-63 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 89-94 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-62 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 59-54 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-80 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 50-54 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 80-88 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 86-64 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 56-83 | -1.5 | L −28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-61 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 60-74 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 81-74 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 52-74 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 79-58 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 78-75 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 25 | @ | W 61-55 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 66-88 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−2.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
+4.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−4.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
−6.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
+39.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
+3.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
−1.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+21.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+3.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
+8.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
+6.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
+12.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
+13.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
−12.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−14.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
−11.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+20.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−1.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−5.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
+8.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−12.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
−0.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
−18.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+13.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−28.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
+14.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−10.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+6.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+8.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−20.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
+16.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+11.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
+13.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−21.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
−23.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−1.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
+20.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
−10.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+8.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
−8.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
+12.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+3.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+12.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
−10.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
−2.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
−16.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
−24.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
+9.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−19.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
+34.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+2.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−19.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−1.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
−24.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−36.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
+17.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
+30.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+11.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−1.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
−19.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−11.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+7.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+4.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−4.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
−17.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+0.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
−24.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
+4.5
over 15under 20avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Tulsa has the better starters
Position by position: Tulsa 2, Illinois St 0, even 3
TulsaBetterIllinois St
G K. Williams TR14.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 46
=Even
G M. Messina-Moore TR10.9 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 57
G J. Johnson TR15 pts · 3.5 reb · 2 ast
Score 69
←TLSASmall
G J. Kinziger11.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 51
G B. Moss TR9.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 54
←TLSASmall
G D. Garang TR10.6 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
F M. Emory TR11.3 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 27
=Even
G Z. King TR7.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 24
F C. Loofe TR7.1 pts · 6.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 26
=Even
G D. Burch TR9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
TulsaBetterIllinois St
TLSA offense99th of 366 · -0.8
=Even
ILST defense102nd of 366 · -0.9
TLSA defense133rd of 366 · -2.5
=Even
ILST offense133rd of 366 · -3.9
Backcourt-0.9 · 3 players
←TLSABig
Backcourt-6.6 · 5 players
Frontcourt-3.8 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
→ILSTSmall
Bench+3.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestTLSA betterILST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Williams36 min · TRJ. Johnson33 min · TRB. Moss27 min · TRM. Williams21 min · TRM. Rigsby19 minJ. Lawal13 min
Forwards
M. Emory37 min · TRC. Loofe26 min · TRK. Banks16 min · TRD. DesireNewA. DimitrijevicNew
Guards
M. Messina-Moore33 min · TRJ. Kinziger33 minD. Garang30 min · TRZ. King27 min · TRD. Burch23 min · TRM. Klabo16 min
Forwards
C. Walker23 minL. Semona6 min · TRN. ClevelandNewN. AllenNewL. WolfNewM. SzafoniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.9 #20 | Points per game | 74.1 #191 |
| 1.20 #16 | Points per possession | 1.09 #151 |
| 70.1 #115 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #241 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.4 #29 | Effective FG% | 53.6 #77 |
| 38.5 #10 | 3-point % | 34.9 #126 |
| 46.7 #37 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.3 #106 |
| 41.4 #39 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #266 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.6 #109 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #193 |
| 32.8 #95 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.0 #268 |
| 15.1 #79 | Assists per game | 13.5 #179 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.4 #172 | Points allowed | 69.1 #49 |
| 1.06 #111 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #48 |
| 49.5 #82 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.8 #90 |
| 32.4 #85 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #122 |
| 15.4 #260 | Turnovers forced | 16.0 #221 |
| 71.0 #108 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.6 #13 |
| 6.6 #170 | Steals per game | 5.5 #294 |
| 2.5 #306 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #326 |
Tulsa
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn86–92
- Wvs New Mexico74–69
- Wvs Wichita St83–79
- Wvs UNLV77–66
- Wvs SF Austin89–84
A week or more of rest.
Illinois St
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn66–88
- W@ Dayton61–55
- W@ Wake Forest78–75
- Wvs Kent State79–58
- Lvs Northern Iowa52–74
A week or more of rest.