Jones Convocation Center · at Chicago St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CHST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ILST 79–62 · win probability ILST 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ILST has more of the edges
ILST 7, CHST 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: ILST 53.6 and allows 49.8; CHST 45.3 and allows 56.7
CHST offense vs ILST defense
Offense 361st of 366 against a defense 102nd, on the model’s ratings
ILST offense vs CHST defense
Offense 133rd of 366 against a defense 339th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
ILST hits 34.9% and allows 33.0%; CHST hits 32.1% and allows 35.6%. Threes are 43.3% and 30.9% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ILST 28.0%, CHST 28.3%. Defensive: ILST 74.6%, CHST 65.0%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ILST 16.8%, CHST 15.7%. Forced: ILST 16.0%, CHST 20.1%
Context
Schedule so far
ILST has played the 135th-hardest schedule, CHST the 259th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: ILST 31.6, CHST 30.0. Allowed: ILST 32.3, CHST 38.0
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ILST 37%, CHST 8%. Transfers in: ILST 5, CHST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
CHST at home. This season: CHST 0-0 at home, ILST 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: ILST plays 67.7 a game (241st fastest), CHST 66.0 (314th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ILST -17.3 | — |
| Total | — | 141.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | ILST 79.2 · CHST 61.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ILST -10.4 | — |
| 1H total | 66.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | ILST 38.2 · CHST 27.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ILST 3–0 CHSTILST leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · ILST has won the last 3 meetings · ILST 2-0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | CHST 53 @ ILST 95 | ILST -20.5 | ILST W |
| Dec 19, 2022-23 | CHST 52 @ ILST 66 | ILST -7.5 | ILST W |
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | ILST 81 @ CHST 71 | CHST +10 | P |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Illinois St
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-65 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 67-87 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 82-80 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-42 | -12.5 | W +39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-65 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-78 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 95-53 | -20.5 | W +21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 85-65 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 73-56 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 73-47 | -12.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 59-63 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 89-94 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-62 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 59-54 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-80 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 50-54 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 80-88 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 86-64 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 56-83 | -1.5 | L −28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-61 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 60-74 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 81-74 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 52-74 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 79-58 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 78-75 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 25 | @ | W 61-55 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 66-88 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−2.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
+4.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−4.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
−6.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
+39.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
+3.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
−1.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+21.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+3.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
+8.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
+6.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
+12.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
+13.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
−12.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−14.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
−11.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+20.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−1.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−5.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
+8.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−12.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
−0.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
−18.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+13.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−28.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
+14.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−10.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+6.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+8.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−20.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
+16.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+11.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
+13.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−21.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
−23.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−1.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
+20.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
−10.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+8.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
−8.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
+12.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+3.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+12.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
−10.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
−2.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
−16.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
−24.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
+9.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−19.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
+34.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+2.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−19.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−1.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
−24.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−36.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
+17.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
+30.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+11.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−1.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
−19.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−11.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+7.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+4.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−4.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
−17.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+0.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
−24.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
+4.5
over 15under 20avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Chicago St
31 games played
Straight up
6-25
19% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-16
48% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-92 | +24.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 86-108 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 66-98 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-67 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 54-66 | +27.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 54-93 | +31.5 | L −7.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 77-90 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 64-87 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 53-95 | +20.5 | L −21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 84-75 | +15.5 | W +24.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 55-76 | +21.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 58-78 | +38.5 | W +18.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 72-79 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 55-74 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 63-70 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-85 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-72 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 56-62 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 60-81 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 59-61 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-74 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 67-78 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 63-57 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 127.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 80-75 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 68-55 | +2.5 | W +15.5 | 131.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-81 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 59-60 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 70-51 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-73 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-80 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 75-79 | +10.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
−5.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+8.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
−5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
+5.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
+15.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
−7.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
−0.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
−8.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
−21.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+24.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
+0.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
+18.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
−5.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−11.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−2.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+1.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−8.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−7.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−17.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
+7.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+6.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
−2.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
+11.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+1.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
+15.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−11.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
+0.5
21
vs
CCSU
W 70-51
+22.5
26
@
LIU
L 56-73
−5.5
28
@
WAG
L 61-80
−14.5
4
@
LIU
L 75-79
+6.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
DEP
L 62-92
+10.5
6
@
SLU
L 86-108
+38.5
11
@
BTLR
L 66-98
+5.5
15
vs
UIC
L 63-67
−26.5
18
@
MINN
L 54-66
−24.5
20
@
IOWA
L 54-93
+4.5
25
@
PFW
L 77-90
+17.5
28
@
YSU
L 64-87
+4.5
6
@
ILST
L 53-95
+3.5
14
@
LUC
W 84-75
+18.5
16
@
BGSU
L 55-76
−17.5
20
@
IU
L 58-78
−16.5
2
vs
WAG
L 72-79
+4.5
4
vs
LIU
L 55-74
−22.5
8
@
FDU
L 63-70
−10.5
10
@
STO
L 82-85
+31.5
17
vs
LEM
L 57-72
−17.5
19
vs
NHVN
L 56-62
−11.5
23
@
SFPA
L 60-81
−2.5
25
@
MERC
L 59-61
−11.5
31
vs
MERC
W 78-74
+22.5
5
@
CCSU
L 67-78
+6.5
7
@
NHVN
W 63-57
−7.5
9
vs
SFPA
W 80-75
+10.5
12
vs
STO
W 68-55
−8.5
14
@
LEM
L 63-81
−0.5
19
vs
FDU
L 59-60
−12.5
21
vs
CCSU
W 70-51
−17.5
26
@
LIU
L 56-73
−12.5
28
@
WAG
L 61-80
+6.5
4
@
LIU
L 75-79
+16.5
over 15under 16avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Illinois St has the better starters
Position by position: Illinois St 4, Chicago St 0, even 1
Illinois StBetterChicago St
G M. Messina-Moore TR10.9 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 57
←ILSTBig
G M. Price TR6.4 pts · 1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 3
G J. Kinziger11.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 51
←ILSTBig
G A. Carraway TR4.9 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
G D. Garang TR10.6 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
←ILSTSmall
G M. Olafioye TR3.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 2
G Z. King TR7.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 24
=Even
F B. Akanmu TR5.9 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 14
G D. Burch TR9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
←ILSTSmall
F D. Loury TR4.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 1
Illinois StBetterChicago St
ILST offense133rd of 366 · -3.9
←ILSTBig
CHST defense339th of 366 · -9.0
ILST defense102nd of 366 · -0.9
←ILSTBig
CHST offense361st of 366 · -14.2
Backcourt-6.6 · 5 players
←ILSTSmall
Backcourt-7.9 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-4.6 · 2 players
Bench+3.4 · 4 players
←ILSTBig
Bench-2.7 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestILST betterCHST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Messina-Moore33 min · TRJ. Kinziger33 minD. Garang30 min · TRZ. King27 min · TRD. Burch23 min · TRM. Klabo16 min
Forwards
C. Walker23 minL. Semona6 min · TRN. ClevelandNewN. AllenNewL. WolfNewM. SzafoniNew
Guards
M. Price18 min · TRA. Carraway16 min · TRM. Olafioye16 min · TRM. Robinson15 minJ. Pazon11 min · TRW. Lovings-WattsNew
Forwards
B. Akanmu21 min · TRD. Loury17 min · TRK. FomanNewL. Stephane DjiyaNewF. SheriffNewL. HodgesNew
Centers
B. KalonjiNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.1 #191 | Points per game | 65.2 #348 |
| 1.09 #151 | Points per possession | 0.99 #337 |
| 67.7 #241 | Pace (possessions) | 66.0 #314 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #77 | Effective FG% | 45.3 #358 |
| 34.9 #126 | 3-point % | 32.1 #275 |
| 43.3 #106 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.9 #341 |
| 31.6 #266 | Free throw rate | 30.0 #311 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #193 | Turnover rate | 15.7 #114 |
| 28.0 #268 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #255 |
| 13.5 #179 | Assists per game | 11.7 #305 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #49 | Points allowed | 76.5 #231 |
| 1.02 #48 | Points allowed per possession | 1.16 #332 |
| 49.8 #90 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.7 #354 |
| 33.0 #122 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.6 #290 |
| 16.0 #221 | Turnovers forced | 20.1 #21 |
| 74.6 #13 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.0 #339 |
| 5.5 #294 | Steals per game | 8.2 #33 |
| 2.3 #326 | Blocks per game | 1.3 #365 |
Illinois St
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn66–88
- W@ Dayton61–55
- W@ Wake Forest78–75
- Wvs Kent State79–58
- Lvs Northern Iowa52–74
A week or more of rest.
Chicago St
6-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Northeast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Long Island75–79
- L@ Wagner61–80
- L@ Long Island56–73
- Wvs C Connecticut70–51
- Lvs FDU59–60
A week or more of rest.