CEFCU Arena · at Illinois St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ILST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ILST 83–67 · win probability ILST 92%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ILST has more of the edges
BELL 0, ILST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ILST offense vs BELL defense
Offense 133rd of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, ILST 28.0%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, ILST 74.6%
BELL offense vs ILST defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 102nd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; ILST 53.6 and allows 49.8
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, ILST the 135th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; ILST hits 34.9% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 41.2% and 43.3% of their shots
Home court
ILST at home. This season: ILST 0-0 at home, BELL 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, ILST 37%. Transfers in: BELL 1, ILST 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), ILST 67.7 (241st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, ILST 31.6. Allowed: BELL 34.3, ILST 32.3
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, ILST 16.8%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, ILST 16.0%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ILST -16.1 | — |
| Total | — | 149.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 66.6 · ILST 82.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ILST -9.4 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 30.2 · ILST 39.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Illinois St
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-65 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 67-87 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 82-80 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-42 | -12.5 | W +39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-65 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-78 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 95-53 | -20.5 | W +21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 85-65 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 73-56 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 73-47 | -12.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 59-63 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 89-94 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-62 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 59-54 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-80 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 50-54 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 80-88 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 86-64 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 56-83 | -1.5 | L −28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-61 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 60-74 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 81-74 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 52-74 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 79-58 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 78-75 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 25 | @ | W 61-55 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 66-88 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−2.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
+4.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−4.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
−6.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
+39.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
+3.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
−1.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+21.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+3.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
+8.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
+6.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
+12.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
+13.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
−12.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−14.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
−11.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+20.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−1.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−5.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
+8.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−12.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
−0.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
−18.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+13.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−28.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
+14.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−10.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+6.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+8.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−20.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
+16.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+11.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
+13.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−21.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
−23.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−1.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
+20.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
−10.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+8.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
−8.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
+12.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+3.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+12.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
−10.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
−2.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
−16.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
−24.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
+9.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−19.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
+34.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+2.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−19.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−1.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
−24.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−36.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
+17.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
+30.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+11.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−1.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
−19.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−11.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+7.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+4.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−4.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
−17.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+0.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
−24.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
+4.5
over 15under 20avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Illinois St has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 0, Illinois St 4, even 1
BellarmineBetterIllinois St
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→ILSTSmall
G M. Messina-Moore TR10.9 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 57
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
→ILSTSmall
G J. Kinziger11.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 51
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→ILSTSmall
G D. Garang TR10.6 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
→ILSTSmall
G Z. King TR7.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 24
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
=Even
G D. Burch TR9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
BellarmineBetterIllinois St
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
→ILSTBig
ILST defense102nd of 366 · -0.9
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
→ILSTBig
ILST offense133rd of 366 · -3.9
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
←BELLSmall
Backcourt-6.6 · 5 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
→ILSTBig
Bench+3.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestBELL betterILST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
M. Messina-Moore33 min · TRJ. Kinziger33 minD. Garang30 min · TRZ. King27 min · TRD. Burch23 min · TRM. Klabo16 min
Forwards
C. Walker23 minL. Semona6 min · TRN. ClevelandNewN. AllenNewL. WolfNewM. SzafoniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 74.1 #191 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.09 #151 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #241 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 53.6 #77 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 34.9 #126 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.3 #106 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #266 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #193 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.0 #268 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 13.5 #179 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 69.1 #49 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.02 #48 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.8 #90 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #122 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 16.0 #221 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.6 #13 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 5.5 #294 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #326 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
Illinois St
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn66–88
- W@ Dayton61–55
- W@ Wake Forest78–75
- Wvs Kent State79–58
- Lvs Northern Iowa52–74
A week or more of rest.