Baptist Health Arena · at E Kentucky
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | EKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects EKU 79–77 · win probability EKU 58%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 155.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BELL has more of the edges
BELL 5, EKU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, EKU 32.5%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, EKU 68.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, EKU 30.7. Allowed: BELL 34.3, EKU 38.5
BELL offense vs EKU defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 340th, on the model’s ratings
EKU offense vs BELL defense
Offense 244th of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), EKU 69.8 (128th). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, EKU 16.9%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, EKU 14.8%
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; EKU 52.1 and allows 56.1
Home court
EKU at home. This season: EKU 0-0 at home, BELL 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, EKU 29%. Transfers in: BELL 1, EKU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, EKU the 273rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; EKU hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%. Threes are 41.2% and 50.8% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | EKU -2.3 | — |
| Total | — | 155.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 76.5 · EKU 78.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | EKU -1.3 | — |
| 1H total | 72.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 35.6 · EKU 36.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
BELL 3–7 EKUEKU leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · EKU has won the last 2 meetings · BELL 4-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025-26 | EKU 95 @ BELL 92 | BELL +1.5 | EKU W |
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | BELL 69 @ EKU 89 | EKU -5.5 | EKU W |
| Feb 20, 2024-25 | EKU 74 @ BELL 80 | BELL +8.5 | BELL W |
| Jan 18, 2024-25 | BELL 69 @ EKU 72 | EKU -14.5 | BELL W |
| Feb 17, 2023-24 | EKU 75 @ BELL 65 | BELL +6.5 | EKU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
E Kentucky
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | vs | L 79-87 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 62-92 | +28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 78-93 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-95 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 71-82 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 77-83 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-89 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 68-59 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 62-59 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 57-88 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 89-91 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-88 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-75 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-69 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 85-87 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 81-90 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-74 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-88 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 61-75 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 81-80 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 95-92 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 79-96 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 77-80 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 76-92 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
−6.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−1.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
−4.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
−16.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−6.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
−4.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+1.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
+2.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−4.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
+5.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−16.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+2.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
−13.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+2.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
+5.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
+5.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+14.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
−10.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
−3.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
−5.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
−4.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
+0.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+2.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−7.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
−10.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
−6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+1.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
−14.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−1.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
−21.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
+3.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−14.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
+9.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
+14.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−3.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
+6.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+12.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
−22.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−10.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
−21.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−3.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+15.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
+7.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+19.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
−2.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
−7.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+1.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
+5.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
+14.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
+20.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
+19.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
−4.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+36.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−24.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
+11.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
+6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+33.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
+9.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−0.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
+12.5
over 19under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
E Kentucky has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 0, E Kentucky 1, even 4
BellarmineBetterE Kentucky
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
G J. Holt7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 38
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
=No call
G D. King TR2.3 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
=Even
F S. Lasu TR5.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 15
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
→EKUSmall
F A. Ball7.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 20
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
=Even
F Y. Paul4.2 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
BellarmineBetterE Kentucky
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
←BELLSmall
EKU defense340th of 366 · -9.1
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
→EKUSmall
EKU offense244th of 366 · -7.4
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
→EKUSmall
Backcourt-1.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-5.3 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
→EKUSmall
Bench-0.4 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestBELL betterEKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
J. Holt20 minD. King8 min · TRO. Hamama7 min · TRM. Miles1 minJ. McCarterNewD. VasserNew
Forwards
S. Lasu23 min · TRA. Ball20 minY. Paul17 minD. DujmovicNewJ. LoweNewM. CamaraNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 77.5 #107 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.11 #123 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #128 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 52.1 #141 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 35.0 #111 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.8 #10 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 30.7 #286 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #194 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #106 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 14.1 #139 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 83.1 #346 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #354 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.1 #346 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.2 #312 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 14.8 #304 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.3 #241 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 6.1 #228 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #245 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
E Kentucky
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Stetson76–92
- Lvs Lipscomb77–80
- Lvs Queens University Royals79–96
- W@ Bellarmine95–92
- Wvs West Georgia81–80
A week or more of rest.