Jadwin Gymnasium · at Princeton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PRIN 72–70 · win probability PRIN 60%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PRIN has more of the edges
MONM 2, PRIN 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MONM 16.7%, PRIN 17.1%. Forced: MONM 19.8%, PRIN 14.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MONM 37%, PRIN 100%. Transfers in: MONM 5, PRIN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
MONM hits 34.2% and allows 33.9%; PRIN hits 33.9% and allows 31.1%. Threes are 34.4% and 44.5% of their shots
MONM offense vs PRIN defense
Offense 173rd of 366 against a defense 115th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: MONM plays 67.9 a game (234th fastest), PRIN 65.0 (344th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: MONM 49.6 and allows 50.0; PRIN 49.6 and allows 52.0
Context
Schedule so far
MONM has played the 190th-hardest schedule, PRIN the 137th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
PRIN at home. This season: PRIN 0-0 at home, MONM 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MONM 31.2%, PRIN 27.2%. Defensive: MONM 67.2%, PRIN 71.5%
Even
PRIN offense vs MONM defense
Offense 177th of 366 against a defense 144th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MONM 32.7, PRIN 34.6. Allowed: MONM 32.2, PRIN 34.0
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PRIN -2.8 | — |
| Total | — | 141.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | MONM 69.5 · PRIN 72.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PRIN -1.6 | — |
| 1H total | 66.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | MONM 32.4 · PRIN 34 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
MONM 2–3 PRINPRIN leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · MONM 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025-26 | PRIN 58 @ MONM 63 | MONM -5.5 | PRIN W |
| Dec 10, 2024-25 | MONM 67 @ PRIN 71 | PRIN -13.5 | MONM W |
| Nov 18, 2023-24 | PRIN 82 @ MONM 57 | MONM +8.5 | PRIN W |
| Dec 10, 2022-23 | MONM 54 @ PRIN 91 | PRIN -15.5 | PRIN W |
| Nov 24, 2021-22 | PRIN 64 @ MONM 76 | MONM -1 | MONM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Monmouth
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-73 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 58-70 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-78 | +21.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 79-83 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-58 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-79 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 65-73 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 65-68 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-48 | +8.5 | W +22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-70 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 64-67 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 51-73 | -5.5 | L −27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 81-68 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-73 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-81 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 57-73 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 76-75 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 93-73 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-69 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-57 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-83 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 65-57 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 74-64 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−8.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
+3.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+16.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−1.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+4.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
−10.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+12.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−0.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
−1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−10.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
−11.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
+4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−4.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
+22.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
+13.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
+4.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−27.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+9.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−0.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+19.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
−7.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−14.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+2.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+21.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
−2.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+9.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
+12.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+2.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
+4.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
+8.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−10.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
−7.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+5.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−7.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+16.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
+16.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+20.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−18.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
+1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−5.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
+14.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
−5.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−19.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
−26.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
−5.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
−8.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−3.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+5.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−7.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+12.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
+19.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−10.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+13.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+32.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
+4.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
+3.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−12.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+5.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
−20.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+23.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
−14.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
−13.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
+10.5
over 16under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Princeton
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-104 | +13.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 57-76 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-89 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 70-57 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-88 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 75-79 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-79 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-60 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-63 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 56-59 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-65 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 75-69 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-60 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 69-71 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 63-53 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 64-87 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-68 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-61 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 65-89 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 65-75 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 71-80 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 56-58 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 130.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-61 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 53-78 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
−21.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
+5.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
+3.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
−17.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
+10.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
−14.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+4.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+0.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
+3.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
+0.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+1.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−5.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
+4.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+9.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
−1.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
+23.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
−2.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−3.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
+5.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−15.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+17.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
+2.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−20.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
−8.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
−6.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
+1.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+19.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
+16.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
−10.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
−11.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
+3.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
−18.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+8.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+12.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
−28.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
−18.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+4.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−19.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
−13.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+7.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
+8.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
−6.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
+33.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−7.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
−18.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−7.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+8.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
−23.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−1.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
+2.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
+21.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
−16.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+0.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−6.5
over 13under 15avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Princeton has the better starters
Position by position: Monmouth 0, Princeton 3, even 2
MonmouthBetterPrinceton
G J. Collins6.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 18
→PRINBig
G J. Hicke15.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 85
G J. Sanders TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 39
→PRINSmall
G J. Stanton11.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 64
G L. Walker TR14.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Clark6.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
G A. Walker TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 47
→PRINSmall
G D. Davis14.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 69
F S. Spartalis10.5 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 54
=Even
F M. Abdullahi9.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 54
MonmouthBetterPrinceton
MONM offense173rd of 366 · -5.3
→PRINSmall
PRIN defense115th of 366 · -1.5
MONM defense144th of 366 · -3.1
=Even
PRIN offense177th of 366 · -5.5
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
→PRINBig
Backcourt+0.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
←MONMBig
Bench-4.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMONM betterPRIN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Collins35 minJ. Sanders30 min · TRL. Walker28 min · TRA. Walker28 min · TRM. Durr21 min · TRJ. Dobuol6 min
Forwards
S. Spartalis24 minO. Harvey3 minS. Osei3 min · TRQ. Peters2 minD. PerryNewS. MarjanovicNew
Guards
J. Hicke35 minJ. Stanton32 minL. Clark29 minD. Davis28 minS. Whitfield12 minP. Seals8 min
Forwards
M. Abdullahi29 minJ. Huggins22 minC. Happy19 minJ. Hammond7 minC. McSweeney5 minW. Kutzler1 min
Centers
W. HiggsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #241 | Points per game | 67.5 #324 |
| 1.07 #212 | Points per possession | 1.04 #268 |
| 67.9 #234 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #344 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #259 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #260 |
| 34.2 #156 | 3-point % | 33.9 #177 |
| 34.4 #288 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.5 #78 |
| 32.7 #244 | Free throw rate | 34.6 #192 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #176 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #216 |
| 31.2 #157 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #287 |
| 13.7 #167 | Assists per game | 12.5 #254 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.9 #73 | Points allowed | 72.4 #114 |
| 1.04 #74 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #242 |
| 50.0 #103 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #209 |
| 33.9 #174 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.1 #36 |
| 19.8 #28 | Turnovers forced | 14.2 #328 |
| 67.2 #287 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.5 #82 |
| 7.6 #69 | Steals per game | 4.6 #349 |
| 4.2 #57 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #341 |
Monmouth
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra69–75
- Wvs Campbell74–64
- Wvs Drexel65–57
- W@ Northeastern89–83
- Wvs Elon73–57
A week or more of rest.
Princeton
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Yale53–78
- Wvs Dartmouth82–61
- Lvs Harvard56–58
- L@ Brown71–80
- Lvs Columbia65–75
A week or more of rest.