Hynes Athletics Center · at Iona
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IONA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects IONA 78–68 · win probability IONA 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: IONA has more of the edges
KC 0, IONA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
KC hits 28.4% and allows 37.5%; IONA hits 35.1% and allows 30.6%. Threes are 36.8% and 45.9% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: KC 45.8 and allows 56.3; IONA 51.9 and allows 48.9
KC offense vs IONA defense
Offense 321st of 366 against a defense 204th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
KC has played the 235th-hardest schedule, IONA the 326th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: KC 26.4%, IONA 27.8%. Defensive: KC 64.1%, IONA 68.8%
IONA offense vs KC defense
Offense 262nd of 366 against a defense 335th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: KC 0%, IONA 31%. Transfers in: KC 5, IONA 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
IONA at home. This season: IONA 0-0 at home, KC 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: KC plays 71.8 a game (45th fastest), IONA 69.8 (129th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: KC 18.2%, IONA 17.2%. Forced: KC 16.4%, IONA 16.6%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: KC 29.2, IONA 29.3. Allowed: KC 31.4, IONA 28.8
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | IONA -10.2 | — |
| Total | — | 146.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | KC 68 · IONA 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | IONA -5.9 | — |
| 1H total | 68.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | KC 31.2 · IONA 37.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-10 0% | 0-10 0% | 6-4 60% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
KC 0–1 IONAIONA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · KC 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | IONA 105 @ KC 91 | KC +4.5 | IONA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kansas City
28 games played
Straight up
1-27
4% wins
Against the spread
5-23
18% covers · avg −6.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 78-101 | +12.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 91-105 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 196 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 55-71 | +31.5 | W +15.5 | 159.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 45-81 | +23.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 67-80 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-82 | +10.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 59-68 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 66-90 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 60-64 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-89 | +30.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 79-91 | +27.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 74-87 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-66 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-97 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 79-81 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 83-99 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-90 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 61-69 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 64-99 | +17.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 75-82 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 60-69 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 64-104 | +12.5 | L −27.5 | 154.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-85 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-95 | +19.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 59-73 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-94 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 62-84 | +8.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
SIU
L 78-101
−10.5
11
vs
IONA
L 91-105
−9.5
15
@
TEX
L 55-71
+15.5
19
@
TCU
L 45-81
−12.5
24
@
LIN
L 67-80
−8.5
29
@
WEB
L 61-82
−10.5
3
vs
IDST
L 59-68
−3.5
6
@
EWU
L 66-90
−14.5
10
vs
WEB
L 60-64
+3.5
16
@
OU
L 67-89
+8.5
18
@
OKST
L 79-91
+15.5
31
@
DEN
L 74-87
−3.5
3
@
OMA
W 73-66
+15.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 73-97
−14.5
10
vs
UND
L 79-81
−3.5
15
@
SDAK
L 83-99
−8.5
17
@
SDST
L 62-90
−14.5
24
vs
OMA
L 60-77
−12.5
28
vs
DEN
L 61-69
−4.5
1
@
STMN
L 64-99
−17.5
4
vs
SDAK
L 75-82
−4.5
12
@
ORU
L 60-69
−2.5
14
vs
STMN
L 64-104
−27.5
19
@
UND
L 70-85
−5.5
21
@
NDSU
L 59-95
−16.5
26
vs
SDST
L 59-73
−1.5
28
vs
ORU
L 70-94
−20.5
4
vs
ORU
L 62-84
−13.5
covered 5didn’t cover 23avg −6.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
SIU
L 78-101
+37.5
11
vs
IONA
L 91-105
+39.5
15
@
TEX
L 55-71
−33.5
19
@
TCU
L 45-81
−24.5
24
@
LIN
L 67-80
−5.5
29
@
WEB
L 61-82
−12.5
3
vs
IDST
L 59-68
−10.5
6
@
EWU
L 66-90
+4.5
10
vs
WEB
L 60-64
−26.5
16
@
OU
L 67-89
+2.5
18
@
OKST
L 79-91
+8.5
31
@
DEN
L 74-87
+4.5
3
@
OMA
W 73-66
−9.5
8
vs
NDSU
L 73-97
+25.5
10
vs
UND
L 79-81
+13.5
15
@
SDAK
L 83-99
+25.5
17
@
SDST
L 62-90
+0.5
24
vs
OMA
L 60-77
−11.5
28
vs
DEN
L 61-69
−31.5
1
@
STMN
L 64-99
+11.5
4
vs
SDAK
L 75-82
+0.5
12
@
ORU
L 60-69
−21.5
14
vs
STMN
L 64-104
+13.5
19
@
UND
L 70-85
+4.5
21
@
NDSU
L 59-95
+5.5
26
vs
SDST
L 59-73
−20.5
28
vs
ORU
L 70-94
+14.5
4
vs
ORU
L 62-84
−3.5
over 16under 12avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Iona
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg 0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-73 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 105-91 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | O 196 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 76-71 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 89-69 | -2.5 | W +17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 75-96 | +11.5 | L −9.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 91-84 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 75-80 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 1 | @ | W 89-66 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 68-89 | -2.5 | L −23.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-69 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 163.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 69-63 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-91 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | U 155 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 83-78 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 59-66 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 75-72 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 38-83 | +4.5 | L −40.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 71-53 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 74-48 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-77 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 61-60 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-57 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 70-71 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 72-79 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 76-83 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 69-63 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 68-70 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 132.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 72-64 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 86-88 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-58 | -11.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 69-65 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 80-91 | -3.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 171 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
HOF
W 81-73
+9.5
11
@
KC
W 105-91
+9.5
14
vs
FOR
W 76-71
−0.5
18
vs
PRIN
W 89-69
+17.5
21
vs
AKR
L 75-96
−9.5
22
vs
ORST
W 91-84
+10.5
24
vs
GB
L 75-80
−10.5
1
@
DEL
W 89-66
+21.5
5
vs
QUIN
L 68-89
−23.5
7
@
SHU
W 81-69
+13.5
10
vs
BRY
W 69-63
−2.5
13
@
SJU
L 64-91
+1.5
20
@
UVM
W 83-78
+11.5
29
@
MSM
L 59-66
−9.5
2
vs
SIE
W 75-72
+4.5
4
@
MRST
L 38-83
−40.5
9
vs
NIA
W 71-53
+7.5
11
vs
CAN
W 74-48
+14.5
14
@
RID
L 68-72
−11.5
19
@
SPU
L 63-77
−10.5
22
vs
MRMK
W 61-60
+2.5
24
vs
MAN
W 66-57
+1.5
30
vs
FAIR
L 70-71
−2.5
5
@
SIE
L 72-79
+1.5
7
vs
MSM
L 76-83
−10.5
13
@
CAN
W 69-63
+1.5
15
@
NIA
L 68-70
−5.5
20
vs
SPU
W 72-64
+6.5
22
@
MRMK
L 86-88
+4.5
27
vs
RID
W 80-58
+10.5
1
@
MAN
W 69-65
+1.5
5
vs
SHU
L 80-91
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
HOF
W 81-73
+9.5
11
@
KC
W 105-91
+39.5
14
vs
FOR
W 76-71
−10.5
18
vs
PRIN
W 89-69
+3.5
21
vs
AKR
L 75-96
−2.5
22
vs
ORST
W 91-84
+17.5
24
vs
GB
L 75-80
+4.5
1
@
DEL
W 89-66
+5.5
5
vs
QUIN
L 68-89
−6.5
7
@
SHU
W 81-69
−13.5
10
vs
BRY
W 69-63
−14.5
13
@
SJU
L 64-91
−4.5
20
@
UVM
W 83-78
+8.5
29
@
MSM
L 59-66
−28.5
2
vs
SIE
W 75-72
−2.5
4
@
MRST
L 38-83
−27.5
9
vs
NIA
W 71-53
−16.5
11
vs
CAN
W 74-48
−19.5
14
@
RID
L 68-72
−1.5
19
@
SPU
L 63-77
−1.5
22
vs
MRMK
W 61-60
−22.5
24
vs
MAN
W 66-57
−30.5
30
vs
FAIR
L 70-71
−5.5
5
@
SIE
L 72-79
+10.5
7
vs
MSM
L 76-83
+17.5
13
@
CAN
W 69-63
−5.5
15
@
NIA
L 68-70
+5.5
20
vs
SPU
W 72-64
−4.5
22
@
MRMK
L 86-88
+37.5
27
vs
RID
W 80-58
−3.5
1
@
MAN
W 69-65
−17.5
5
vs
SHU
L 80-91
+21.5
over 12under 20avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kansas City has the better starters
Position by position: Kansas City 2, Iona 1, even 2
Kansas CityBetterIona
G C. Daughtery TR10 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 45
=Even
G K. Vanderhorst TR9.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 44
G J. Smith TR9.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 3 ast
Score 43
←KCSmall
G M. Kheil TR9.2 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 17
G M. Samar TR4.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 28
→IONASmall
G K. Akametu11 pts · 5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 53
F S. Hartmann TR8.2 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Disu TR11 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 50
F A. Diop TR5.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
←KCSmall
F A. Fall2.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
Kansas CityBetterIona
KC offense321st of 366 · -10.5
→IONASmall
IONA defense204th of 366 · -5.0
KC defense335th of 366 · -8.8
→IONASmall
IONA offense262nd of 366 · -8.0
Backcourt-3.0 · 3 players
←KCSmall
Backcourt-4.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.8 · 2 players
←KCSmall
Frontcourt-3.0 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestKC betterIONA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Daughtery27 min · TRJ. Smith25 min · TRM. Samar16 min · TRE. MoskowitzNewD. JacksonNewC. LoveNew
Forwards
S. Hartmann24 min · TRA. Diop19 min · TRR. ButirinsNewJ. SickingNewA. BakhtadzeNewM. Bruce-McCrommonNew
Guards
K. Vanderhorst30 min · TRM. Kheil30 min · TRK. Akametu24 minO. Hourruitiner2 minP. LefasNewD. DoyleNew
Forwards
A. Disu28 min · TRA. Fall19 minL. Jungers16 minK. Mitchell11 min · TRS. Ibine Ayo8 min · TRO. OdutayoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.0 #334 | Points per game | 73.8 #206 |
| 0.93 #361 | Points per possession | 1.06 #228 |
| 71.8 #45 | Pace (possessions) | 69.8 #129 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.8 #352 | Effective FG% | 51.9 #149 |
| 28.4 #360 | 3-point % | 35.1 #105 |
| 36.8 #235 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #49 |
| 29.2 #330 | Free throw rate | 29.3 #326 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.2 #282 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #220 |
| 26.4 #314 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.8 #274 |
| 11.3 #324 | Assists per game | 14.0 #147 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.8 #359 | Points allowed | 73.1 #136 |
| 1.18 #348 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #85 |
| 56.3 #348 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.9 #64 |
| 37.5 #350 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.6 #25 |
| 16.4 #193 | Turnovers forced | 16.6 #180 |
| 64.1 #353 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.8 #212 |
| 6.4 #192 | Steals per game | 6.6 #159 |
| 3.1 #195 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #227 |
Kansas City
1-27 in 2025-26 overall · 1-16 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Oral Roberts62–84
- Lvs Oral Roberts70–94
- Lvs S Dakota St59–73
- L@ N Dakota St59–95
- L@ North Dakota70–85
A week or more of rest.
Iona
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Sacred Heart80–91
- W@ Manhattan69–65
- Wvs Rider80–58
- L@ Merrimack86–88
- Wvs Saint Peter's72–64
A week or more of rest.