Truist Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GASO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GASO 78–78 · win probability GASO 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GASO has more of the edges
BELL 2, GASO 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, GASO 14.7%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, GASO 18.7%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), GASO 71.8 (42nd). Faster games mean more points
GASO offense vs BELL defense
Offense 233rd of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
BELL offense vs GASO defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 347th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, GASO 16%. Transfers in: BELL 1, GASO 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, GASO the 279th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, GASO 28.8%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, GASO 64.8%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, GASO 39.6. Allowed: BELL 34.3, GASO 41.4
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; GASO 51.4 and allows 52.3
Even
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; GASO hits 33.4% and allows 34.4%. Threes are 41.2% and 48.9% of their shots
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BELL -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 156.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 78.4 · GASO 78.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BELL -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 73.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 36.7 · GASO 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
GA Southern
35 games played
Straight up
19-16
54% wins
Against the spread
17-17
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 89-92 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-90 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 95-94 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-68 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-98 | +18.5 | L −7.5 | 175.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 64-77 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-62 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-69 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 88-84 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 91-85 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 90-67 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 96-92 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 82-81 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 71-87 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 75-79 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-85 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-83 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 79-76 | — | — | — | — |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-69 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 144.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 71-77 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 101-87 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 162.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-89 | +7.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 66-82 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 99-82 | +7.5 | W +24.5 | 168.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 88-84 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 80-77 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 94-85 | +4.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-72 | +1.5 | W +25.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 82-78 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 160 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-77 | +5.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+2.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
−2.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+4.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
+8.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−7.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−4.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−16.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
+10.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+6.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
−6.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+2.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
+13.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+1.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+2.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+5.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
−13.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
−2.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−10.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−15.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
−0.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−11.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−10.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
−14.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+16.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−3.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
−7.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−10.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+24.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+1.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
+10.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+13.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+25.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
+6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−10.5
covered 17didn’t cover 17avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ECU
L 89-92
+29.5
8
vs
UNCA
W 93-90
+20.5
11
@
FGCU
W 95-94
+25.5
18
@
GT
L 66-68
−30.5
21
@
FSU
L 72-98
−5.5
24
vs
YSU
L 61-67
−35.5
25
vs
UTSA
L 64-77
−19.5
29
vs
HCU
W 80-62
−6.5
3
vs
LT
W 77-69
+0.5
6
@
GWEB
W 88-84
+9.5
13
@
WGA
W 91-85
+21.5
18
vs
GAST
W 90-67
−2.5
20
vs
JMU
W 96-92
+34.5
1
@
CCU
W 82-81
+5.5
3
@
ODU
W 93-86
+17.5
10
@
USA
L 71-87
+9.5
15
vs
ODU
W 87-84
+8.5
17
vs
CCU
L 75-79
−3.5
22
vs
ARST
L 68-85
−19.5
24
vs
TROY
L 78-83
+1.5
31
@
UL
L 60-69
−15.5
4
vs
TXST
L 71-77
−3.5
11
vs
APP
L 65-81
+2.5
14
vs
MRSH
W 101-87
+25.5
19
@
GAST
L 64-66
−24.5
21
@
APP
L 74-89
+15.5
25
@
JMU
L 66-82
−5.5
27
@
MRSH
W 99-82
+12.5
4
vs
ODU
W 88-84
+14.5
5
vs
ARST
W 80-77
−8.5
6
vs
USA
W 94-85
+29.5
7
vs
CCU
W 96-72
+16.5
8
vs
MRSH
W 82-78
−6.5
9
vs
TROY
L 61-77
−14.5
over 19under 15avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Bellarmine has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 2, GA Southern 0, even 3
BellarmineBetterGA Southern
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
=Even
G J. Dixon TR9 pts · 1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 39
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
←BELLSmall
G D. Williams3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 10
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
=No call
G J. Williams1 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
=Even
F T. Claytor TR6.5 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
←BELLSmall
F T. Sotirov2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 1
BellarmineBetterGA Southern
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
←BELLSmall
GASO defense347th of 366 · -9.4
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
→GASOSmall
GASO offense233rd of 366 · -7.2
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
→GASOSmall
Frontcourt-3.7 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestBELL betterGASO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
J. Dixon19 min · TRD. Williams12 minJ. Williams8 minD. GardnerNewA. HendersonNewR. WilliamsNew
Forwards
T. Claytor17 min · TRT. Sotirov11 minE. Smith6 min · TRC. CrissmanNewE. SavaneNewE. JamesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 79.9 #69 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.12 #109 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 71.8 #42 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #176 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 33.4 #207 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.9 #20 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 39.6 #62 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 14.7 #49 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.8 #238 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 10.7 #344 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 80.3 #325 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #259 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.3 #230 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.4 #208 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 18.7 #65 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 64.8 #342 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 8.1 #36 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #128 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
GA Southern
19-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-11 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Troy61–77
- Wvs Marshall82–78
- Wvs Coastal96–72
- Wvs South Alabama94–85
- Wvs Arkansas St80–77
A week or more of rest.