Bob Carpenter Center · at Delaware
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEL 75–71 · win probability DEL 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
COLG 2, DEL 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COLG 14.7%, DEL 18.3%. Forced: COLG 15.2%, DEL 14.0%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: COLG plays 68.6 a game (202nd fastest), DEL 65.3 (337th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COLG 26.6%, DEL 20.8%. Defensive: COLG 70.7%, DEL 68.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: COLG 29.7, DEL 30.6. Allowed: COLG 33.8, DEL 30.2
Home court
DEL at home. This season: DEL 0-0 at home, COLG 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COLG 59%, DEL 46%. Transfers in: COLG 0, DEL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
DEL offense vs COLG defense
Offense 237th of 366 against a defense 214th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: COLG 53.3 and allows 52.2; DEL 53.3 and allows 51.5
Even
COLG offense vs DEL defense
Offense 205th of 366 against a defense 187th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
COLG has played the 178th-hardest schedule, DEL the 195th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Three-pointers
COLG hits 35.6% and allows 34.8%; DEL hits 36.8% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 35.0% and 46.2% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEL -3.7 | — |
| Total | — | 146.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | COLG 71.4 · DEL 75.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEL -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | COLG 33.2 · DEL 35.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COLG 0–1 DELDEL leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · COLG 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022-23 | DEL 72 vs COLG 68 | COLG -6 | DEL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Colgate
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-80 | +22.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-68 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-83 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 65-84 | +30.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 94-95 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 69-67 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 72-62 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 77-85 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 60-90 | +27.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 69-78 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 64-62 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-78 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-80 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 95-76 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-79 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 76-77 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 69-55 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 78-59 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 74-70 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 80-84 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 58-85 | -2.5 | L −29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 101-98 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-70 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-85 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 90-77 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+11.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−8.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+3.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
+11.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
+9.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+4.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
+8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+1.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−2.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
−12.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+1.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−0.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−3.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
−12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
−2.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+10.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−2.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
−6.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
−5.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
−4.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
+3.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
+13.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
−4.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
−5.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−29.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
−5.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
−9.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+6.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+4.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−14.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+29.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
−15.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
−5.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+27.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
−8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+19.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−6.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
+5.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+15.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−2.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−22.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
+12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
+15.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+31.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−10.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
+11.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
+8.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
+6.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
−26.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
−4.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
+1.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
+24.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−2.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
+48.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
+12.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+11.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−1.5
over 17under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-78 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-85 | +35.5 | W +18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-70 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-79 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 73-60 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-75 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 70-58 | +21.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-88 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 65-57 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 43-61 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-52 | +8.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 60-72 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-70 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-97 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 51-67 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-64 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 69-75 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 89-88 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 68-66 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-80 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 83-80 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 38-81 | +2.5 | L −40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−5.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
+18.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+6.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−11.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
+14.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
−21.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
−10.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
+33.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
−23.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−0.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−16.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+1.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
+23.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−0.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+4.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
−2.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
−24.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−0.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
+22.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−8.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+4.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+6.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
+10.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+18.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+3.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
−1.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
−2.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+3.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−40.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−1.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
−11.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+13.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−15.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
−9.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
+5.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
+17.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
−24.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
+9.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−7.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−27.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+4.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
−29.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−12.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+14.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
+13.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
+30.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−16.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
−0.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−3.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+11.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+43.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
−13.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+7.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+35.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
+6.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
+16.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+28.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+15.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−13.5
over 16under 14avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Colgate 1, Delaware 1, even 3
ColgateBetterDelaware
G J. Ahayere7.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 32
=Even
G D. Dinkins TR11.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 21
F A. Alekseyenko14.9 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 75
←COLGBig
G A. Kazanecki5 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
F S. Wright12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 60
=No call
G J. Brown12 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
F C. Wright1.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
=No call
G M. Ellison3.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F A. Odetoyinbo1.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 20
→DELSmall
F K. Nzeh TR11.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
ColgateBetterDelaware
COLG offense205th of 366 · -6.3
=Even
DEL defense187th of 366 · -4.3
COLG defense214th of 366 · -5.5
=Even
DEL offense237th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-1.6 · 1 player
←COLGBig
Backcourt-9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 4 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
←COLGSmall
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCOLG betterDEL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Ahayere25 minC. Pugh1 minJ. Niv1 minP. JonesNewB. ForrestNewI. SkinnNew
Forwards
A. Alekseyenko30 minS. Wright26 minC. Wright12 minA. Odetoyinbo11 minE. Brown7 minC. Brennan4 min
Guards
D. Dinkins34 min · TRA. Kazanecki29 minJ. Brown23 minM. Ellison20 minC. Bailey18 min · TRD. Harris-Smith17 min · TR
Forwards
K. Nzeh29 min · TRE. Alvin20 min · TRJ. Taylor16 minF. EgbunaNew
Centers
S. Solano4 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.6 #154 | Points per game | 67.9 #316 |
| 1.11 #121 | Points per possession | 1.04 #269 |
| 68.6 #202 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #337 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #91 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #89 |
| 35.6 #81 | 3-point % | 36.8 #31 |
| 35.0 #275 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.2 #44 |
| 29.7 #316 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #291 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #50 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #287 |
| 26.6 #309 | Offensive rebound rate | 20.8 #362 |
| 14.2 #130 | Assists per game | 12.2 #271 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.2 #222 | Points allowed | 74.1 #156 |
| 1.11 #230 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #298 |
| 52.2 #224 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #185 |
| 34.8 #238 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #255 |
| 15.2 #268 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #334 |
| 70.7 #125 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #206 |
| 6.1 #230 | Steals per game | 5.7 #273 |
| 2.9 #249 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #219 |
Colgate
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh69–76
- Wvs Loyola MD90–77
- L@ Navy69–85
- Lvs Lafayette69–70
- Wvs Loyola MD101–98
A week or more of rest.
Delaware
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech38–81
- Wvs Sam Houston83–80
- L@ Kennesaw St82–90
- L@ Jax State70–80
- L@ MTSU66–78
A week or more of rest.