Moody Coliseum (Dallas) · at SMU
Line
SMU -25.5moved 1 toward SOU
Total157.5up 2 from 155.5
| This season | SMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SMU 90–63 · win probability SMU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
SMU -25.5
moved 1 toward SOU
Total
157.5
model 153.6 · Under by 4
Model edge
SMU by 1.5
model vs market
Public on the spread
94% SOU
92% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SMU has more of the edges
SOU 0, SMU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SMU offense vs SOU defense
Offense 45th of 366 against a defense 309th, on the model’s ratings
SOU offense vs SMU defense
Offense 296th of 366 against a defense 69th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SOU has played the 270th-hardest schedule, SMU the 70th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: SOU 49.1 and allows 53.2; SMU 55.6 and allows 51.6
Three-pointers
SOU hits 34.8% and allows 36.7%; SMU hits 37.1% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 32.0% and 35.9% of their shots
Home court
SMU at home. This season: SMU 0-0 at home, SOU 0-0 away
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SOU 31.4%, SMU 35.4%. Defensive: SOU 68.7%, SMU 68.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SOU 2%, SMU 20%. Transfers in: SOU 8, SMU 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SOU 16.6%, SMU 15.8%. Forced: SOU 18.6%, SMU 16.8%
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: SOU plays 72.3 a game (28th fastest), SMU 71.1 (68th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SOU 39.8, SMU 30.4. Allowed: SOU 42.9, SMU 32.1
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 20 or more | 1165 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1090 | 99% | 50% | 52% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog | 4513 | 74% | 51% | 50% |
| Games with a total of 155 to 159.5 | 1555 | 74% | 51% | 49% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenSMU -26.5
1 → SOU
NowSMU -25.5
1 pt toward SOU
Total
Open155.5
▲ 2
Now157.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
SOU +3000 · SMU -10000
Line movement
Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened SMU -26.5 · now SMU -25.5 · moved 1 toward SOUmodel SMU -27
model SMU -27
Opened 155.5 · now 157.5 · moved 2 upmodel 153.5
model 153.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
5 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOU | SMU | Over | Under | SOU | SMU | |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -25.5-105 | +25.5-115 | 157.5-115 | 157.5-105 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -25.5-108 | +25.5-118 | 155.5-113 | 155.5-113 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -25.5-105 | +25.5-115 | 157.5-115 | 157.5-105 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -25.5-108 | +25.5-112 | 157.5-112 | 157.5-108 | +3000 | -10000 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -25.5-101 | +25.5-111 | 157.5-113 | 157.5-103 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SMU -25.5 | SMU -26.8 | SMU +1.3 |
| Total | 157.5 | 153.6 | Under 3.9 |
| Projected score | — | SOU 63.4 · SMU 90.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SMU -15.8 | — |
| 1H total | 71.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SOU 28 · SMU 43.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 77-109 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 82-100 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 93-99 | +23.5 | W +17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 69-95 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 83-86 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-75 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-111 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-90 | +33.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 85-89 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 59-67 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-53 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-69 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 96-91 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-68 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 69-68 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-82 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-74 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-73 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-82 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-82 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 88-85 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-81 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
−5.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+6.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+17.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
−1.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
−3.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+0.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
+4.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
−17.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−1.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+4.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
−11.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
+7.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
+19.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−10.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
−9.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
−12.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
−0.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+6.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−5.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
−0.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+8.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
−19.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
−5.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
+8.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+1.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
−1.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
+35.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+26.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+34.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−4.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
+3.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
+5.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+26.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
−13.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
+8.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−18.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+3.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
+13.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−27.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
−1.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
−29.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−5.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
+7.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
+3.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
+34.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+5.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−12.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
+9.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−4.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+17.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
+5.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
+7.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
−18.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+27.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
+13.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−7.5
over 20under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
SMU
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-14
59% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-76 | -21.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 69-58 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 102-91 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 106-60 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 100-69 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-72 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 87-81 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-88 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-80 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 77-89 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 99-82 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 110-63 | -21.5 | W +25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-83 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 70-74 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 77-76 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 91-79 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-80 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-88 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 83-84 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-67 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 89-81 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 95-85 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-70 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 69-73 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 75-95 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 86-69 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 58-62 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 79-89 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
−1.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−12.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+0.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
−5.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
+10.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
+16.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−6.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+7.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+14.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
−10.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
−7.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+25.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+12.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−0.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+8.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−7.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−1.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+13.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−8.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−4.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+0.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+14.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
−2.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−2.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+14.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+8.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−8.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
−21.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−9.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
−11.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+13.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
+3.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
−16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
+27.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−33.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+28.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
+8.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
−2.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
−3.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−4.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+5.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+8.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
+7.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
+24.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+2.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+24.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−5.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+1.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−2.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−13.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+12.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−0.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−1.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+7.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+5.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
+15.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−0.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+11.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+13.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−21.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
+14.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−10.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
+10.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+0.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
−44.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
+5.5
over 20under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SMU has the better starters
Position by position: Southern 0, SMU 5, even 0
SouthernBetterSMU
G J. Page TR12.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 42
→SMUBig
G R. Brumbaugh TR19.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 95
G D. Dormu TR5.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 14
→SMUBig
G D. Terrell TR13.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 89
G M. Ferguson TR5.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→SMUBig
G O. Sellers TR10.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 78
F R. King TR4.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 42
→SMUSmall
G J. Patrick TR7.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 59
C I. Olajuwon TR3.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
→SMUBig
F J. Munch TR7.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 69
SouthernBetterSMU
SOU offense296th of 366 · -9.2
→SMUBig
SMU defense69th of 366 · +0.8
SOU defense309th of 366 · -8.0
→SMUBig
SMU offense45th of 366 · +4.2
Backcourt-5.4 · 3 players
→SMUBig
Backcourt+8.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
→SMUSmall
Frontcourt+0.7 · 1 player
Bench-3.3 · 4 players
→SMUBig
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSOU betterSMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Page30 min · TRD. Dormu19 min · TRM. Ferguson17 min · TRL. Larvadain11 min · TRS. Van Dorn3 min · TRJ. HunterNew
Forwards
R. King13 min · TRA. HallNew
Centers
I. Olajuwon14 min · TRN. Boyde11 min · TRL. Bell5 min
Guards
R. Brumbaugh36 min · TRD. Terrell33 min · TRO. Sellers29 min · TRJ. Patrick20 min · TRN. Kalischer-Stork1 minG. NormandNew
Forwards
J. Munch21 min · TRJ. Toombs20 minJ. Stewart16 min · TRN. Codie16 min · TRJ. O'Neal15 minN. Walls3 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #136 | Points per game | 84.1 #19 |
| 1.06 #239 | Points per possession | 1.19 #26 |
| 72.3 #28 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #68 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #287 | Effective FG% | 55.6 #27 |
| 34.8 #129 | 3-point % | 37.1 #27 |
| 32.0 #329 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.9 #252 |
| 39.8 #61 | Free throw rate | 30.4 #301 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #169 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #119 |
| 31.4 #144 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.4 #37 |
| 13.9 #156 | Assists per game | 16.9 #27 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #324 | Points allowed | 77.9 #265 |
| 1.11 #236 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #199 |
| 53.2 #274 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.6 #189 |
| 36.7 #339 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #188 |
| 18.6 #67 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #171 |
| 68.7 #217 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #237 |
| 8.3 #26 | Steals per game | 7.0 #129 |
| 3.8 #97 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #132 |
Southern
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View66–72
- Wvs Florida A&M73–70
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff84–81
- W@ Alabama A&M88–85
- W@ Alabama St71–64
A week or more of rest.
SMU
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Miami OH79–89
- Lvs Louisville58–62
- Wvs Syracuse86–69
- L@ Florida St78–91
- Lvs Miami69–77
A week or more of rest.