Moody Coliseum (Dallas) · at SMU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SMU 92–63 · win probability SMU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SMU has more of the edges
PV 1, SMU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SMU offense vs PV defense
Offense 45th of 366 against a defense 359th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
PV has played the 331st-hardest schedule, SMU the 70th. A record against a soft schedule means less
PV offense vs SMU defense
Offense 310th of 366 against a defense 69th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PV 26.7%, SMU 35.4%. Defensive: PV 64.6%, SMU 68.4%
Three-pointers
PV hits 32.9% and allows 35.0%; SMU hits 37.1% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 30.6% and 35.9% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: PV 47.4 and allows 50.9; SMU 55.6 and allows 51.6
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PV 15.8%, SMU 15.8%. Forced: PV 19.0%, SMU 16.8%
Home court
SMU at home. This season: SMU 0-0 at home, PV 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PV 6%, SMU 20%. Transfers in: PV 5, SMU 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: PV plays 72.7 a game (20th fastest), SMU 71.1 (68th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: PV 41.6, SMU 30.4. Allowed: PV 42.6, SMU 32.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SMU -28.8 | — |
| Total | — | 154.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | PV 63.1 · SMU 91.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SMU -17.0 | — |
| 1H total | 72.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | PV 27.7 · SMU 44.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 9-1 90% | 2-8 20% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PV 0–1 SMUSMU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · PV 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2024-25 | PV 69 @ SMU 110 | SMU -31.5 | SMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Prairie View
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
23-10
70% covers · avg +2.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 62-105 | +20.5 | L −22.5 | 156.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 67-94 | +30.5 | W +3.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 73-91 | +35.5 | W +17.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 68-69 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 85-82 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 69-72 | +16.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 85-97 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 168.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 90-104 | +29.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 82-111 | +29.5 | W +0.5 | 177.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 72-76 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 89-85 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-69 | -18.5 | L −17.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 73-61 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-82 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 75-76 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 80-95 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 60-80 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 152.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 85-78 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 76-82 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 96-100 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 82-87 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 68-63 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 72-62 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 82-84 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 85-76 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 72-51 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 70-59 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 65-56 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 71-67 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 74-55 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 72-66 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 67-55 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 55-114 | +35.5 | L −23.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
WICH
L 62-105
−22.5
12
@
OKST
L 67-94
+3.5
17
@
MIZ
L 73-91
+17.5
22
vs
UTM
L 68-69
+9.5
23
vs
UNF
W 85-82
−0.5
30
@
UNT
L 69-72
+13.5
13
@
SDAK
L 85-97
−5.5
22
@
LSU
L 90-104
+15.5
29
@
TA&M
L 82-111
+0.5
3
@
GRAM
L 72-76
+3.5
5
@
SOU
W 89-85
+11.5
10
vs
MVSU
W 70-69
−17.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 73-61
+8.5
17
@
JKST
L 78-82
−2.5
19
@
ALCN
L 75-76
−3.5
24
vs
ALST
L 80-95
−13.5
27
vs
AAMU
L 60-80
−22.5
31
vs
TXSO
W 85-78
+8.5
7
@
BCU
L 76-82
+4.5
9
@
FAMU
L 96-100
−0.5
14
vs
SOU
L 82-87
+0.5
16
vs
GRAM
W 68-63
+6.5
19
@
MVSU
W 72-62
+1.5
21
@
UAPB
L 82-84
+1.5
26
vs
JKST
W 85-76
+5.5
28
vs
ALCN
W 72-51
+16.5
5
@
TXSO
W 70-59
+12.5
10
vs
ALCN
W 65-56
+2.5
11
vs
BCU
W 71-67
+9.5
13
vs
AAMU
W 74-55
+20.5
14
vs
SOU
W 72-66
+9.5
18
vs
LEH
W 67-55
+15.5
20
vs
FLA
L 55-114
−23.5
covered 23didn’t cover 10avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
WICH
L 62-105
+10.5
12
@
OKST
L 67-94
−7.5
17
@
MIZ
L 73-91
−2.5
22
vs
UTM
L 68-69
−18.5
23
vs
UNF
W 85-82
+6.5
30
@
UNT
L 69-72
−0.5
13
@
SDAK
L 85-97
+13.5
22
@
LSU
L 90-104
+32.5
29
@
TA&M
L 82-111
+15.5
3
@
GRAM
L 72-76
−7.5
5
@
SOU
W 89-85
+13.5
10
vs
MVSU
W 70-69
−13.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 73-61
−30.5
17
@
JKST
L 78-82
−0.5
19
@
ALCN
L 75-76
−1.5
24
vs
ALST
L 80-95
+16.5
27
vs
AAMU
L 60-80
−12.5
31
vs
TXSO
W 85-78
+5.5
7
@
BCU
L 76-82
+0.5
9
@
FAMU
L 96-100
+46.5
14
vs
SOU
L 82-87
+9.5
16
vs
GRAM
W 68-63
−20.5
19
@
MVSU
W 72-62
−19.5
21
@
UAPB
L 82-84
+6.5
26
vs
JKST
W 85-76
−0.5
28
vs
ALCN
W 72-51
−27.5
5
@
TXSO
W 70-59
−25.5
10
vs
ALCN
W 65-56
−21.5
11
vs
BCU
W 71-67
−9.5
13
vs
AAMU
W 74-55
−11.5
14
vs
SOU
W 72-66
−7.5
18
vs
LEH
W 67-55
−18.5
20
vs
FLA
L 55-114
+14.5
over 13under 20avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin
SMU
34 games played
Straight up
20-14
59% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-14
59% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 96-76 | -21.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 69-58 | -23.5 | L −12.5 | 160.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 102-91 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 193 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 106-60 | -35.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 100-69 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-72 | -23.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 87-81 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 69-88 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 93-80 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 164.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 77-89 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 99-82 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 110-63 | -21.5 | W +25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-83 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 70-74 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-82 | +15.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 77-76 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-72 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 91-79 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-80 | -11.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 74-88 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 83-84 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 86-67 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 89-81 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-79 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 95-85 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 94-70 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 69-73 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 75-95 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 69-77 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 86-69 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 58-62 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 79-89 | -6.5 | L −16.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
−1.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−12.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+0.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
−5.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
+10.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
+16.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−6.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+7.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+14.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
−10.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
−7.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+25.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+12.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−0.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+8.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−7.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−1.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+13.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−8.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−4.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+0.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+14.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
−2.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−2.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+14.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+8.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−8.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
−21.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−9.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
−11.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+13.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
+3.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
−16.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TAR
W 96-76
+27.5
6
vs
AMCC
W 69-58
−33.5
11
vs
MUR
W 102-91
+28.5
15
vs
BTLR
W 87-85
+8.5
18
vs
UAPB
W 106-60
−2.5
21
vs
ARST
W 100-69
−3.5
24
vs
RAD
W 89-72
−4.5
28
@
MSST
W 87-81
+5.5
3
@
VAN
L 69-88
−8.5
7
vs
TA&M
W 93-80
+8.5
13
vs
LSU
L 77-89
+7.5
21
vs
CARK
W 99-82
+24.5
28
vs
CSUF
W 110-63
+2.5
3
vs
UNC
W 97-83
+24.5
7
@
CLEM
L 70-74
−5.5
10
@
DUKE
L 75-82
+1.5
14
vs
VT
W 77-76
−2.5
17
vs
UVA
L 68-72
−13.5
20
@
WAKE
W 91-79
+12.5
24
vs
FSU
W 83-80
−0.5
31
@
LOU
L 74-88
−1.5
3
vs
NCSU
L 83-84
+7.5
7
@
PITT
W 86-67
+5.5
10
vs
ND
W 89-81
+15.5
14
@
SYR
L 78-79
−0.5
17
vs
LOU
W 95-85
+11.5
21
vs
BC
W 94-70
+13.5
25
@
CAL
L 69-73
−21.5
28
@
STAN
L 75-95
+14.5
4
vs
MIA
L 69-77
−10.5
7
@
FSU
L 78-91
+10.5
10
vs
SYR
W 86-69
+0.5
11
vs
LOU
L 58-62
−44.5
18
vs
M-OH
L 79-89
+5.5
over 20under 14avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
SMU has the better starters
Position by position: Prairie View 0, SMU 3, even 2
Prairie ViewBetterSMU
G D. Williams TR7.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 14
→SMUBig
G R. Brumbaugh TR19.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 95
G M. Eley TR13 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 98
=Even
G D. Terrell TR13.6 pts · 3.8 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 89
G S. Tidor TR4.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 21
→SMUBig
G O. Sellers TR10.3 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 78
G E. Mitchell2.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 7
→SMUBig
G J. Patrick TR7.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 59
F J. Wharton TR1.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Munch TR7.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 69
Prairie ViewBetterSMU
PV offense310th of 366 · -9.7
→SMUBig
SMU defense69th of 366 · +0.8
PV defense359th of 366 · -10.4
→SMUBig
SMU offense45th of 366 · +4.2
Backcourt-2.4 · 4 players
→SMUBig
Backcourt+8.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→SMUSmall
Frontcourt+0.7 · 1 player
Bench+0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench+0.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPV betterSMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Williams26 min · TRM. Eley19 min · TRS. Tidor12 min · TRE. Mitchell12 minJ. LeeNewM. BellNew
Forwards
J. Wharton7 min · TRJ. Fazande1 min · TRE. PageNewD. BynumNewB. AjieroNew
Guards
R. Brumbaugh36 min · TRD. Terrell33 min · TRO. Sellers29 min · TRJ. Patrick20 min · TRN. Kalischer-Stork1 minG. NormandNew
Forwards
J. Munch21 min · TRJ. Toombs20 minJ. Stewart16 min · TRN. Codie16 min · TRJ. O'Neal15 minN. Walls3 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.8 #170 | Points per game | 84.1 #19 |
| 1.03 #286 | Points per possession | 1.19 #26 |
| 72.7 #20 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #68 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.4 #330 | Effective FG% | 55.6 #27 |
| 32.9 #237 | 3-point % | 37.1 #27 |
| 30.6 #348 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.9 #252 |
| 41.6 #35 | Free throw rate | 30.4 #301 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #122 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #119 |
| 26.7 #305 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.4 #37 |
| 10.8 #341 | Assists per game | 16.9 #27 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #295 | Points allowed | 77.9 #265 |
| 1.08 #182 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #199 |
| 50.9 #149 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.6 #189 |
| 35.0 #247 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.1 #188 |
| 19.0 #49 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #171 |
| 64.6 #344 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #237 |
| 7.0 #127 | Steals per game | 7.0 #129 |
| 4.9 #19 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #132 |
Prairie View
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Florida55–114
- Wvs Lehigh67–55
- Wvs Southern72–66
- Wvs Alabama A&M74–55
- Wvs Bethune71–67
A week or more of rest.
SMU
20-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Miami OH79–89
- Lvs Louisville58–62
- Wvs Syracuse86–69
- L@ Florida St78–91
- Lvs Miami69–77
A week or more of rest.