Knapp Center · at Drake
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DRKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DRKE 81–67 · win probability DRKE 89%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DRKE has more of the edges
SOU 2, DRKE 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SOU offense vs DRKE defense
Offense 296th of 366 against a defense 132nd, on the model’s ratings
DRKE offense vs SOU defense
Offense 168th of 366 against a defense 309th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
SOU has played the 269th-hardest schedule, DRKE the 147th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: SOU plays 72.3 a game (28th fastest), DRKE 68.4 (209th). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SOU 2%, DRKE 51%. Transfers in: SOU 8, DRKE 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SOU 16.6%, DRKE 15.0%. Forced: SOU 18.6%, DRKE 14.6%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SOU 49.1 and allows 53.2; DRKE 51.4 and allows 52.6
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SOU 31.4%, DRKE 26.6%. Defensive: SOU 68.7%, DRKE 70.1%
Home court
DRKE at home. This season: DRKE 0-0 at home, SOU 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SOU 39.8, DRKE 33.5. Allowed: SOU 42.9, DRKE 32.0
Even
Three-pointers
SOU hits 34.8% and allows 36.7%; DRKE hits 34.0% and allows 36.4%. Threes are 32.0% and 45.7% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DRKE -14.0 | — |
| Total | — | 148.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | SOU 67.2 · DRKE 81.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DRKE -8.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | SOU 30.6 · DRKE 38.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Southern
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-11
65% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 77-109 | +26.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 82-100 | +24.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 93-99 | +23.5 | W +17.5 | 157.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-80 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 75-73 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 69-95 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 83-86 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 67-75 | +12.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-111 | +26.5 | L −17.5 | 169.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 55-90 | +33.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 84-73 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 85-89 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 59-67 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | @ | W 77-73 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-53 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 74-75 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-69 | -20.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 73-78 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 96-91 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-68 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 69-68 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 87-82 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 73-74 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 87-73 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-82 | -8.5 | L −19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 79-82 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 88-85 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 84-81 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 66-72 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
−5.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+6.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+17.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−8.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
−1.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
−3.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+0.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
+4.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
−17.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−1.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+4.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
−11.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−12.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
+7.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
+19.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−10.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
−9.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
−12.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
−0.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+6.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−5.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
−0.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−5.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+8.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
−19.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
−5.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
+8.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+1.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
−1.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
ARK
L 77-109
+35.5
5
@
MARQ
L 82-100
+26.5
18
@
WASH
L 93-99
+34.5
21
@
SJSU
L 66-80
−4.5
29
@
NWST
W 75-73
+3.5
8
@
TEX
L 69-95
+5.5
10
@
TXST
L 83-86
+26.5
16
@
CBU
L 67-75
−13.5
21
@
BAY
L 67-111
+8.5
29
@
ILL
L 55-90
−18.5
3
vs
TXSO
W 84-73
+3.5
5
vs
PV
L 85-89
+13.5
10
@
FAMU
L 59-67
−27.5
12
@
BCU
W 77-73
−1.5
17
@
GRAM
W 71-53
−29.5
24
vs
UAPB
L 74-75
−5.5
28
vs
MVSU
W 80-69
+7.5
31
@
ALCN
L 73-78
+3.5
2
@
JKST
W 96-91
+34.5
7
vs
AAMU
W 81-68
+5.5
9
vs
ALST
W 69-68
−12.5
14
@
PV
W 87-82
+9.5
16
@
TXSO
L 73-74
−4.5
21
vs
GRAM
W 87-73
+17.5
26
vs
FAMU
L 71-82
+5.5
28
vs
BCU
L 79-82
+7.5
3
@
ALST
W 71-64
−18.5
5
@
AAMU
W 88-85
+27.5
12
vs
UAPB
W 84-81
+13.5
13
vs
FAMU
W 73-70
+1.5
14
vs
PV
L 66-72
−7.5
over 20under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Drake
32 games played
Straight up
12-20
38% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg +3.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 6 | vs | L 79-81 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-61 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 71-62 | +7.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 62-71 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 84-74 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 137.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 108-57 | -17.5 | W +33.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 5 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 94-99 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 193 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 72-81 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 66-65 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 56-73 | +4.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 74-72 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 66-93 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 144.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 76-73 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-74 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 101-90 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 156.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-62 | +3.5 | W +17.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-78 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-87 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 90-103 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 76-86 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 76-81 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-80 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 62-86 | +8.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 61-66 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 71-74 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 53-75 | +4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 67-63 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 100-79 | +12.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 51-72 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
−2.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
−9.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−9.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
+16.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
+2.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+14.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+33.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
−10.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−1.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
+3.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−12.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−4.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
−20.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+2.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+8.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
−1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+15.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
+17.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
−4.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
−11.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
−3.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+0.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
−8.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
−8.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
−15.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−3.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−0.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−17.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
+9.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+33.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAU
W 77-71
+3.5
6
vs
RMU
L 79-81
+8.5
14
vs
SIUE
L 59-61
−22.5
17
@
COFC
W 71-62
−20.5
28
vs
LSU
L 62-71
−18.5
29
vs
GT
W 84-74
+20.5
2
vs
WIU
W 108-57
+26.5
5
vs
UAB
L 69-74
−5.5
13
vs
NDSU
L 94-99
+47.5
18
@
MUR
L 72-81
−3.5
21
@
EVAN
W 66-65
−10.5
29
vs
ILST
L 56-73
−16.5
4
vs
INST
W 74-72
−3.5
7
@
BRAD
L 66-93
+14.5
10
vs
BEL
L 76-78
+5.5
14
@
SIU
W 76-73
+4.5
17
@
UIC
L 67-74
+1.5
21
vs
MUR
W 101-90
+34.5
24
@
INST
W 76-62
−13.5
28
vs
EVAN
W 82-78
+16.5
31
vs
BRAD
L 73-87
+9.5
3
@
BEL
L 90-103
+38.5
6
@
ILST
L 76-86
+17.5
9
vs
VAL
L 76-81
+12.5
12
vs
UIC
L 70-80
+3.5
15
@
UNI
L 62-86
+9.5
18
vs
SIU
L 61-66
−22.5
25
@
VAL
L 71-74
−1.5
1
vs
UNI
L 53-75
−9.5
5
vs
SIU
W 67-63
−10.5
6
vs
BEL
W 100-79
+26.5
7
vs
UIC
L 51-72
−21.5
over 18under 14avg +3.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Drake has the better starters
Position by position: Southern 2, Drake 3, even 0
SouthernBetterDrake
G J. Page TR12.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 42
←SOUSmall
G A. Alia6.8 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 27
G D. Dormu TR5.4 pts · 1.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 14
→DRKESmall
G O. Larson10 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 42
G M. Ferguson TR5.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 9
→DRKEBig
G E. Shetlar9 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 57
F R. King TR4.7 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 42
←SOUSmall
F G. Oldham TR5.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 21
C I. Olajuwon TR3.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 20
→DRKEBig
F J. Carroll TR10.7 pts · 8.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
SouthernBetterDrake
SOU offense296th of 366 · -9.2
→DRKEBig
DRKE defense132nd of 366 · -2.5
SOU defense309th of 366 · -8.0
→DRKEBig
DRKE offense168th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-5.4 · 3 players
→DRKESmall
Backcourt-3.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.5 · 2 players
Bench-3.3 · 4 players
→DRKEBig
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestSOU betterDRKE betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Page30 min · TRD. Dormu19 min · TRM. Ferguson17 min · TRL. Larvadain11 min · TRS. Van Dorn3 min · TRJ. HunterNew
Forwards
R. King13 min · TRA. HallNew
Centers
I. Olajuwon14 min · TRN. Boyde11 min · TRL. Bell5 min
Guards
A. Alia32 minO. Larson29 minE. Shetlar28 minD. Kindell17 min · TRD. IjadimbolaNewL. RushNew
Forwards
G. Oldham26 min · TRJ. Carroll25 min · TRG. Goodbary13 minJ. BurnsNewM. FlemonsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.2 #136 | Points per game | 73.9 #200 |
| 1.06 #239 | Points per possession | 1.08 #182 |
| 72.3 #28 | Pace (possessions) | 68.4 #209 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #287 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #179 |
| 34.8 #129 | 3-point % | 34.0 #172 |
| 32.0 #329 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.7 #53 |
| 39.8 #61 | Free throw rate | 33.5 #223 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #169 | Turnover rate | 15.0 #64 |
| 31.4 #144 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.6 #310 |
| 13.9 #156 | Assists per game | 13.1 #202 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.2 #324 | Points allowed | 76.3 #225 |
| 1.11 #236 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #261 |
| 53.2 #274 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.6 #246 |
| 36.7 #339 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.4 #323 |
| 18.6 #67 | Turnovers forced | 14.6 #315 |
| 68.7 #217 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.1 #155 |
| 8.3 #26 | Steals per game | 5.2 #319 |
| 3.8 #97 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #241 |
Southern
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View66–72
- Wvs Florida A&M73–70
- Wvs AR-Pine Bluff84–81
- W@ Alabama A&M88–85
- W@ Alabama St71–64
A week or more of rest.
Drake
12-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-15 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UIC51–72
- Wvs Belmont100–79
- Wvs S Illinois67–63
- Lvs Northern Iowa53–75
- L@ Valparaiso71–74
A week or more of rest.