Clune Arena · at Air Force
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | AF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects AF 76–67 · win probability AF 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
IDST 4, AF 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IDST 32.8%, AF 21.4%. Defensive: IDST 72.1%, AF 68.7%
Context
Schedule so far
IDST has played the 295th-hardest schedule, AF the 119th. A record against a soft schedule means less
IDST offense vs AF defense
Offense 324th of 366 against a defense 149th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IDST 6%, AF 100%. Transfers in: IDST 1, AF 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
IDST hits 33.6% and allows 34.5%; AF hits 30.6% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 41.9% and 41.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: IDST 51.9 and allows 54.5; AF 48.9 and allows 56.4
AF offense vs IDST defense
Offense 290th of 366 against a defense 349th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IDST 17.1%, AF 21.9%. Forced: IDST 14.6%, AF 15.1%
Home court
AF at home. This season: AF 0-0 at home, IDST 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: IDST 38.0, AF 35.1. Allowed: IDST 38.0, AF 36.6
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: IDST plays 67.3 a game (266th fastest), AF 67.4 (259th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | AF -8.5 | — |
| Total | — | 143.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | IDST 67.3 · AF 75.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | AF -4.9 | — |
| 1H total | 66.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | IDST 31 · AF 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 0-10 0% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
IDST 0–1 AFAF leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · IDST 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2021-22 | IDST 48 @ AF 59 | AF -2.5 | AF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Idaho St
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +5.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-68 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 57-73 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-83 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 55-64 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 81-84 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 82-50 | -1.5 | W +30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 68-59 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-79 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 69-73 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 83-93 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 97-84 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-93 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-85 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-68 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-84 | -6.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 60-69 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-81 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 65-88 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 73-79 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-69 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 75-88 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-99 | +6.5 | L −23.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 73-69 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-76 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-83 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 65-83 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 160.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-65 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 78-85 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
USD
W 71-68
+7.5
9
@
SDSU
L 57-73
+5.5
15
@
SEA
L 74-83
+2.5
18
@
SCU
L 55-64
+5.5
26
vs
SHSU
L 81-84
−1.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 82-50
+30.5
3
@
KC
W 68-59
+3.5
6
vs
DEN
W 93-79
+5.5
10
@
UVU
L 69-73
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
L 83-93
−15.5
1
vs
SAC
W 97-84
+4.5
3
vs
PRST
L 87-93
−9.5
8
@
UNCO
L 72-85
−8.5
10
@
NAU
W 81-79
−2.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 76-68
+5.5
17
vs
EWU
L 66-84
−24.5
22
@
MTST
L 62-74
−6.5
24
@
MONT
L 60-69
−4.5
31
@
WEB
L 79-81
+0.5
2
@
PRST
L 65-88
−15.5
5
vs
NAU
L 73-79
−14.5
7
vs
UNCO
L 61-69
−5.5
12
@
EWU
L 75-88
−10.5
14
@
IDHO
L 69-99
−23.5
19
vs
MONT
W 73-69
+5.5
21
vs
MTST
W 91-76
+16.5
28
vs
WEB
L 73-83
−12.5
2
@
SAC
L 65-83
−19.5
7
vs
NAU
W 73-65
+3.5
8
vs
PRST
L 78-85
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
USD
W 71-68
−13.5
9
@
SDSU
L 57-73
−5.5
15
@
SEA
L 74-83
+18.5
18
@
SCU
L 55-64
−22.5
26
vs
SHSU
L 81-84
+22.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 82-50
−16.5
3
@
KC
W 68-59
−10.5
6
vs
DEN
W 93-79
+29.5
10
@
UVU
L 69-73
+0.5
21
vs
UCD
L 83-93
+32.5
1
vs
SAC
W 97-84
+27.5
3
vs
PRST
L 87-93
+37.5
8
@
UNCO
L 72-85
+1.5
10
@
NAU
W 81-79
+20.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 76-68
−5.5
17
vs
EWU
L 66-84
−2.5
22
@
MTST
L 62-74
−8.5
24
@
MONT
L 60-69
−19.5
31
@
WEB
L 79-81
+8.5
2
@
PRST
L 65-88
+16.5
5
vs
NAU
L 73-79
+10.5
7
vs
UNCO
L 61-69
−20.5
12
@
EWU
L 75-88
+15.5
14
@
IDHO
L 69-99
+21.5
19
vs
MONT
W 73-69
−7.5
21
vs
MTST
W 91-76
+22.5
28
vs
WEB
L 73-83
+3.5
2
@
SAC
L 65-83
−12.5
7
vs
NAU
W 73-65
−4.5
8
vs
PRST
L 78-85
+21.5
over 17under 13avg +5.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Air Force
32 games played
Straight up
3-29
9% wins
Against the spread
10-22
31% covers · avg −4.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg 0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-79 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 54-74 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 72-76 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 61-76 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 66-64 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 130.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 98-85 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 175.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 53-71 | +4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 63-80 | +3.5 | L −13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 65-80 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 134.5 | O 145 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 56-61 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 133.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 58-81 | +24.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 56-68 | +14.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 39-67 | +14.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 6 | vs | L 62-99 | +22.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 49-91 | +16.5 | L −25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 62-70 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 128.5 | O 132 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-81 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 52-81 | +19.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 54-96 | +23.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-79 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 57-81 | +26.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 54-88 | +22.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | L 74-91 | +16.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 63-93 | +14.5 | L −15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 61-98 | +28.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 66-91 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 80-86 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-66 | +20.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 60-86 | +19.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 59-74 | +24.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 45-80 | +19.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−0.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−18.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+1.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−4.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−0.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+16.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+9.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−13.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−13.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
−9.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+1.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
+2.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−13.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
−14.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
−25.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
−2.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
−0.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
−18.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−7.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+2.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
−11.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
−0.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
−15.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
−8.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
−8.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+0.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
+16.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
−6.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
+9.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BEL
L 63-79
−2.5
8
vs
APSU
L 54-74
−8.5
11
vs
LIU
L 72-76
+10.5
15
vs
M-OH
L 61-76
−6.5
19
vs
ALST
W 66-64
−8.5
21
vs
SIUE
W 77-63
+9.5
23
vs
IUIN
W 98-85
+7.5
26
vs
UNCO
L 53-71
−22.5
29
vs
SDAK
L 63-80
−4.5
3
vs
PAC
L 65-80
+10.5
7
@
NAVY
L 56-61
−16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 58-81
+3.5
30
vs
WYO
L 56-68
−22.5
3
@
UNLV
L 39-67
−36.5
6
vs
USU
L 62-99
+21.5
10
vs
UNM
L 49-91
+1.5
13
@
SJSU
L 62-70
+3.5
17
vs
NEV
L 66-81
+12.5
20
@
CSU
L 52-81
−0.5
24
@
BOIS
L 54-96
+12.5
31
vs
FRES
L 62-79
−0.5
3
@
GCU
L 57-81
+0.5
7
vs
SDSU
L 54-88
+2.5
10
vs
CSU
L 74-91
+27.5
14
@
FRES
L 63-93
+13.5
17
@
UNM
L 61-98
+10.5
21
vs
UNLV
L 66-91
+3.5
24
vs
SJSU
L 80-86
+20.5
28
@
WYO
L 62-66
−17.5
3
vs
GCU
L 60-86
+2.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-74
−11.5
11
vs
NEV
L 45-80
−15.5
over 18under 14avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Idaho St 0, Air Force 0, even 5
Idaho StBetterAir Force
G L. Birley0.5 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Sanders12.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 77
G E. Harel TR0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Greenberg6.6 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 18
G A. Goffe NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Hobin11.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 26
G J. Dorsey NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F E. Robinson7.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 39
F Q. Patterson0.9 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F C. Walker10.4 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 82
Idaho StBetterAir Force
IDST offense324th of 366 · -10.6
→AFBig
AF defense149th of 366 · -3.3
IDST defense349th of 366 · -9.6
→AFSmall
AF offense290th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-0.3 · 4 players
←IDSTSmall
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.3 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-1.3 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-7.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestIDST betterAF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Birley4 minE. Harel1 min · TRA. GoffeNewJ. DorseyNewM. MorrisNewT. VirgilNew
Forwards
Q. Patterson7 minM. JohnsonNewI. PalmerNewK. DeMuynckNewM. JohnsonNewB. LowenbachNew
Guards
K. Sanders30 minE. Greenberg27 minA. Patterson14 minJ. Hinds12 minE. Taite2 minT. KeeneNew
Forwards
L. Hobin29 minE. Robinson28 minC. Walker22 minR. Dering14 minK. Gilles13 minB. Martin5 min
Centers
W. Celichowski21 minM. CaslaruNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.6 #213 | Points per game | 61.5 #362 |
| 1.10 #135 | Points per possession | 0.91 #363 |
| 67.3 #266 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #259 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.9 #151 | Effective FG% | 48.9 #292 |
| 33.6 #192 | 3-point % | 30.6 #332 |
| 41.9 #137 | 3-point attempt rate | 41.8 #139 |
| 38.0 #104 | Free throw rate | 35.1 #174 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #213 | Turnover rate | 21.9 #362 |
| 32.8 #94 | Offensive rebound rate | 21.4 #360 |
| 11.8 #302 | Assists per game | 12.2 #273 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #255 | Points allowed | 79.9 #316 |
| 1.14 #314 | Points allowed per possession | 1.19 #352 |
| 54.5 #315 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.4 #350 |
| 34.5 #220 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #352 |
| 14.6 #316 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #280 |
| 72.1 #63 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #215 |
| 5.2 #322 | Steals per game | 5.6 #281 |
| 4.0 #78 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #316 |
Idaho St
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland St78–85
- Wvs N Arizona73–65
- L@ Sacramento St65–83
- Lvs Weber St73–83
- Wvs Montana St91–76
A week or more of rest.
Air Force
3-29 in 2025-26 overall · 0-21 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nevada45–80
- L@ Nevada59–74
- Lvs Grand Canyon60–86
- L@ Wyoming62–66
- Lvs San José St80–86
A week or more of rest.