Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles at Mississippi State Bulldogs: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:30 PM ETHumphrey Coliseum · at Mississippi St

LineMSST -17.5moved 1 toward TNTC

Total157.5no move

Season records: Tennessee Tech and Mississippi St
TNTC	This season	MSST
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MSST 89–66 · win probability MSST 97%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

MSST -17.5

moved 1 toward TNTC

Total

157.5

model 154.8 · Under by 2.5

Model edge

MSST by 5

model vs market

Public on the spread

97% TNTC

76% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: MSST has more of the edges

TNTC 1, MSST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

Context

Schedule so far

TNTC has played the 353rd-hardest schedule, MSST the 26th. A record against a soft schedule means less

MSSTBig

MSST offense vs TNTC defense

Offense 34th of 366 against a defense 288th, on the model’s ratings

MSSTBig

TNTC offense vs MSST defense

Offense 276th of 366 against a defense 88th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: TNTC plays 68.3 a game (214th fastest), MSST 72.3 (29th). Faster games mean more points

MSSTSmall

Three-pointers

TNTC hits 31.1% and allows 35.8%; MSST hits 32.4% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 36.5% and 40.1% of their shots

MSSTSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: TNTC 48.9 and allows 51.5; MSST 51.5 and allows 50.9

TNTCSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: TNTC 35.5, MSST 30.6. Allowed: TNTC 31.3, MSST 32.3

MSSTSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: TNTC 19.1%, MSST 16.0%. Forced: TNTC 15.0%, MSST 12.8%

MSSTSmall

Home court

MSST at home. This season: MSST 0-0 at home, TNTC 0-0 away

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: TNTC 31.3%, MSST 29.8%. Defensive: TNTC 69.3%, MSST 69.3%

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: TNTC 18%, MSST 23%. Transfers in: TNTC 6, MSST 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 15 to 19.5	993	94%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	632	93%	49%	53%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 155 to 159.5	1555	74%	51%	49%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenMSST -18.5

1 → TNTC

NowMSST -17.5

1 pt toward TNTC

Total

Open157.5

no move

Now157.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

TNTC +1300 · MSST -2800

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened MSST -18.5 · now MSST -17.5 · moved 1 toward TNTCmodel MSST -22.5

model MSST -22.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

TNTC +17.5Spread

MSST -17.5

Bets

97%

Money

76%24%

Money is 21 pts ahead of bets on MSST -17.5

Over 157.5TotalUnder 157.5

Bets

17%83%

Money

19%81%

TNTCWinner

MSST

Bets

97%

Money

98%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	TNTC	MSST	Over	Under	TNTC	MSST
BetMGMMGM	-18.5-118	+18.5-102	157.5-105	157.5-115	+1100	-2500
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-17.5-105	+17.5-115	157.5-110	157.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-18.5-113	+18.5-113	157.5-110	157.5-115	+1300	-10000
BetUSBetUS	-17.5-105	+17.5-115	157.5-110	157.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-17.5-105	+17.5-115	157-110	157-110	+1000	-2500
DraftKingsDK	-17.5-105	+17.5-115	157.5-105	157.5-115	+1300	-2800
FanDuelFD	-18.5-115	+18.5-105	157.5-110	157.5-110	+1400	-4000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-17.5-101	+17.5-111	157.5-108	157.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	MSST -17.5	MSST -22.3	MSST +4.8
Total	157.5	154.8	Under 2.7
Projected score	—	TNTC 66.2 · MSST 88.5

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	MSST -13.1	—
1H total	72.3	—
1H projected score	TNTC 29.6 · MSST 42.7	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
TNTC WWWLL	14-14	50%	9-8	11-9
MSST LLLLL	10-22	31%	4-12	5-10

Venue/role: TNTC away, as underdog; MSST home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
TNTC OUUUO	14-14	50%	10-18
MSST UUOOU	16-16	50%	13-19

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
TNTC	6-4 60%	6-4 60%	5-5 50%
MSST	2-8 20%	2-8 20%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Tennessee Tech

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 8	vs WKU	L70–82WU
Nov 12	@ IU	No recent meeting
Nov 18	@ UNCA	L55–61LU

Mississippi St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs NWST	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs JKST	W69–59LU
Nov 13	vs XAV	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Tennessee Tech

28 games played

Straight up

10-18

36% wins

Against the spread

14-14

50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-14

50% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

10-1836%

L L L W L L L W W L L L L W L L L L W W W L L W W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

14-1450%

W W L W L L W W W L L L L W L L L W W W W L L W W W L L

2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

14-1450%

U U U O O O O U O O O U U U U O O U O O O U U O U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@WKU	L 70-82	+14.5	W +2.5	153.5	U 152
Nov 7	@CLT	L 65-70	+12.5	W +7.5	146.5	U 135
Nov 17	vsWGA	L 59-61	-4.5	L −6.5	152.5	U 120
Nov 19	@UPST	W 88-84	+2.5	W +6.5	150.5	O 172
Nov 26	@UK	L 54-104	+37.5	L −12.5	157.5	O 158
Nov 29	@UGA	L 81-123	+34.5	L −7.5	160.5	O 204
Dec 3	@LIP	L 80-83	+10.5	W +7.5	152.5	O 163
Dec 6	@WGA	W 87-59	+1.5	W +29.5	150.5	U 146
Dec 18	vsSEMO	W 85-74	+2.5	W +13.5	155.5	O 159
Dec 20	vsUTM	L 62-86	+2.5	L −21.5	145.5	O 148
Dec 30	vsTNST	L 76-88	+1.5	L −10.5	155.5	O 164
Jan 1	@LR	L 58-77	+1.5	L −17.5	144.5	U 135
Jan 8	@EIU	L 61-71	-1.5	L −11.5	140.5	U 132
Jan 10	@WIU	W 59-54	-3.5	W +1.5	143.5	U 113
Jan 15	vsUSI	L 54-71	-5.5	L −22.5	142.5	U 125
Jan 17	vsMORE	L 70-76	-1.5	L −7.5	141.5	O 146
Jan 22	@LIN	L 68-89	+8.5	L −12.5	151.5	O 157
Jan 24	@SIUE	L 58-62	+7.5	W +3.5	135.5	U 120
Jan 31	vsLR	W 87-77	+1.5	W +11.5	141.5	O 164
Feb 2	@TNST	W 90-85	+7.5	W +12.5	153.5	O 175
Feb 5	vsWIU	W 97-72	-9.5	W +15.5	143.5	O 169
Feb 7	vsEIU	L 54-60	-4.5	L −10.5	140.5	U 114
Feb 12	@MORE	L 66-73	+4.5	L −2.5	143.5	U 139
Feb 14	@USI	W 82-74	-1.5	W +6.5	140.5	O 156
Feb 19	vsSIUE	W 62-52	+1.5	W +11.5	134.5	U 114
Feb 21	vsLIN	W 72-57	+1.5	W +16.5	151.5	U 129
Feb 26	@UTM	L 49-64	+7.5	L −7.5	134.5	U 113
Feb 28	@SEMO	L 73-89	+7.5	L −8.5	141.5	O 162

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

WKU

L 70-82

+2.5

CLT

L 65-70

+7.5

WGA

L 59-61

−6.5

UPST

W 88-84

+6.5

L 54-104

−12.5

UGA

L 81-123

−7.5

LIP

L 80-83

+7.5

WGA

W 87-59

+29.5

SEMO

W 85-74

+13.5

UTM

L 62-86

−21.5

TNST

L 76-88

−10.5

L 58-77

−17.5

EIU

L 61-71

−11.5

WIU

W 59-54

+1.5

USI

L 54-71

−22.5

L 70-76

−7.5

LIN

L 68-89

−12.5

SIUE

L 58-62

+3.5

W 87-77

+11.5

TNST

W 90-85

+12.5

WIU

W 97-72

+15.5

EIU

L 54-60

−10.5

L 66-73

−2.5

USI

W 82-74

+6.5

SIUE

W 62-52

+11.5

LIN

W 72-57

+16.5

UTM

L 49-64

−7.5

SEMO

L 73-89

−8.5

covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

WKU

L 70-82

−1.5

CLT

L 65-70

−11.5

WGA

L 59-61

−32.5

UPST

W 88-84

+21.5

L 54-104

+0.5

UGA

L 81-123

+43.5

LIP

L 80-83

+10.5

WGA

W 87-59

−4.5

SEMO

W 85-74

+3.5

UTM

L 62-86

+2.5

TNST

L 76-88

+8.5

L 58-77

−9.5

EIU

L 61-71

−8.5

WIU

W 59-54

−30.5

USI

L 54-71

−17.5

L 70-76

+4.5

LIN

L 68-89

+5.5

SIUE

L 58-62

−15.5

W 87-77

+22.5

TNST

W 90-85

+21.5

WIU

W 97-72

+25.5

EIU

L 54-60

−26.5

L 66-73

−4.5

USI

W 82-74

+15.5

SIUE

W 62-52

−20.5

LIN

W 72-57

−22.5

UTM

L 49-64

−21.5

SEMO

L 73-89

+20.5

over 14under 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Mississippi St

32 games played

Straight up

13-19

41% wins

Against the spread

10-22

31% covers · avg −4.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

16-16

50% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

13-1941%

W L W L L W L W L W W W W W W L L L L L W L L L W W L L L L L L

6 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

10-2231%

L L L L L L L W L W L W W W W L L L L L W W L L W W L L L L L L

6 straight misses ATS0 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

16-1650%

U O U O O U O O U O O U U O U O O U U U U O U U O O O U U O O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 5	vsUNA	W 86-62	-24.5	L −0.5	151.5	U 148
Nov 10	vsISU	L 80-96	+5.5	L −10.5	150.5	O 176
Nov 15	vsSELA	W 75-68	-27.5	L −20.5	150.5	U 143
Nov 20	vsKSU	L 77-98	-2.5	L −23.5	164.5	O 175
Nov 21	vsUNM	L 78-80	-6.5	L −8.5	151.5	O 158
Nov 24	vsNOLA	W 81-78	-23.5	L −20.5	160.5	U 159
Nov 28	vsSMU	L 81-87	-1.5	L −7.5	162.5	O 168
Dec 3	@GT	W 85-73	-1.5	W +10.5	150.5	O 158
Dec 7	vsSF	L 62-65	-4.5	L −7.5	150.5	U 127
Dec 13	vsUTAH	W 82-74	-1.5	W +6.5	153.5	O 156
Dec 16	vsLIU	W 87-83	-16.5	L −12.5	152.5	O 170
Dec 20	vsMEM	W 71-66	-3.5	W +1.5	153.5	U 137
Dec 29	vsALST	W 94-56	-17.5	W +20.5	154.5	U 150
Jan 3	@TEX	W 101-98	+9.5	W +12.5	157.5	O 199
Jan 7	vsOU	W 72-53	-1.5	W +17.5	158.5	U 125
Jan 10	@UK	L 68-92	+10.5	L −13.5	152.5	O 160
Jan 13	vsALA	L 82-97	+4.5	L −10.5	171.5	O 179
Jan 17	vsMISS	L 67-68	-3.5	L −4.5	147.5	U 135
Jan 21	@TA&M	L 68-88	+8.5	L −11.5	163.5	U 156
Jan 24	vsVAN	L 56-88	+7.5	L −24.5	159.5	U 144
Jan 28	@LSU	W 80-66	+7.5	W +21.5	154.5	U 146
Jan 31	@MIZ	L 79-84	+6.5	W +1.5	146.5	O 163
Feb 7	vsARK	L 68-88	+5.5	L −14.5	163.5	U 156
Feb 11	vsTENN	L 64-73	+8.5	L −0.5	147.5	U 137
Feb 14	@MISS	W 90-78	+3.5	W +15.5	146.5	O 168
Feb 18	vsAUB	W 91-85	+5.5	W +11.5	155.5	O 176
Feb 21	@SC	L 89-97	-1.5	L −9.5	151.5	O 186
Feb 25	@ALA	L 75-100	+12.5	L −12.5	176.5	U 175
Feb 28	vsMIZ	L 64-88	+1.5	L −22.5	154.5	U 152
Mar 3	@FLA	L 74-108	+20.5	L −13.5	161.5	O 182
Mar 7	vsUGA	L 96-102	+5.5	L −0.5	167.5	O 198
Mar 11	vsAUB	L 61-79	+8.5	L −9.5	160.5	U 140

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

UNA

W 86-62

−0.5

ISU

L 80-96

−10.5

SELA

W 75-68

−20.5

KSU

L 77-98

−23.5

UNM

L 78-80

−8.5

NOLA

W 81-78

−20.5

SMU

L 81-87

−7.5

W 85-73

+10.5

L 62-65

−7.5

UTAH

W 82-74

+6.5

LIU

W 87-83

−12.5

MEM

W 71-66

+1.5

ALST

W 94-56

+20.5

TEX

W 101-98

+12.5

W 72-53

+17.5

L 68-92

−13.5

ALA

L 82-97

−10.5

MISS

L 67-68

−4.5

TA&M

L 68-88

−11.5

VAN

L 56-88

−24.5

LSU

W 80-66

+21.5

MIZ

L 79-84

+1.5

ARK

L 68-88

−14.5

TENN

L 64-73

−0.5

MISS

W 90-78

+15.5

AUB

W 91-85

+11.5

L 89-97

−9.5

ALA

L 75-100

−12.5

MIZ

L 64-88

−22.5

FLA

L 74-108

−13.5

UGA

L 96-102

−0.5

AUB

L 61-79

−9.5

covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

UNA

W 86-62

−3.5

ISU

L 80-96

+25.5

SELA

W 75-68

−7.5

KSU

L 77-98

+10.5

UNM

L 78-80

+6.5

NOLA

W 81-78

−1.5

SMU

L 81-87

+5.5

W 85-73

+7.5

L 62-65

−23.5

UTAH

W 82-74

+2.5

LIU

W 87-83

+17.5

MEM

W 71-66

−16.5

ALST

W 94-56

−4.5

TEX

W 101-98

+41.5

W 72-53

−33.5

L 68-92

+7.5

ALA

L 82-97

+7.5

MISS

L 67-68

−12.5

TA&M

L 68-88

−7.5

VAN

L 56-88

−15.5

LSU

W 80-66

−8.5

MIZ

L 79-84

+16.5

ARK

L 68-88

−7.5

TENN

L 64-73

−10.5

MISS

W 90-78

+21.5

AUB

W 91-85

+20.5

L 89-97

+34.5

ALA

L 75-100

−1.5

MIZ

L 64-88

−2.5

FLA

L 74-108

+20.5

UGA

L 96-102

+30.5

AUB

L 61-79

−20.5

over 16under 16avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Mississippi St has the better starters

Position by position: Tennessee Tech 1, Mississippi St 3, even 1

Tennessee TechBetterMississippi St

G T. Mosquera TR13.8 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.3 ast Score 55

MSSTBig

G J. Hubbard22.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.6 ast Score 99

G T. Owens7.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.5 ast Score 17

MSSTBig

G R. Johnson TR14.8 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast Score 86

G D. Hackett TR13.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.4 ast Score 78

Even

G T. Simpkins TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.2 ast Score 83

G C. Newton TR10.5 pts · 2 reb · 1.2 ast Score 55

TNTCSmall

F K. Sanders TR5.2 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast Score 31

G C. Hollenbeck TR5 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.9 ast Score 6

MSSTBig

C N. Okafor TR11.2 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.9 ast Score 71

Tennessee TechBetterMississippi St

TNTC offense276th of 366 · -8.4

MSSTBig

MSST defense88th of 366 · -0.1

TNTC defense288th of 366 · -7.2

MSSTBig

MSST offense34th of 366 · +5.5

Backcourt-4.8 · 5 players

MSSTBig

Backcourt+9.6 · 3 players

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

No call

Frontcourt+0.6 · 2 players

Bench-1.4 · 3 players

Even

Bench-2.0 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestTNTC betterMSST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Tennessee Tech

Guards

T. Mosquera32 min · TRT. Owens28 minD. Hackett28 min · TRC. Newton26 min · TRC. Hollenbeck17 min · TRC. GonzalesNew

Forwards

D. Christensen13 min · TRM. Turner8 minC. Sanders8 min · TRD. GreenNewS. ArnoldNewK. FoxNew

Mississippi St

Guards

J. Hubbard33 minR. Johnson29 min · TRT. Simpkins25 min · TRK. Grace12 minA. Magee11 min · TRC. PaulNew

Forwards

K. Sanders20 min · TRT. Bassong19 min · TRT. ReedNew

Centers

N. Okafor23 min · TRG. CholNewT. BartlettNewT. ReedNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

TNTC70.3 #280

MSST77.6 #103

Points per possession

TNTC1.03 #287

MSST1.07 #205

Pace (possessions)

TNTC68.3 #214

MSST72.3 #29

Shooting

Effective FG%

TNTC48.9 #293

MSST51.5 #172

3-point %

TNTC31.1 #316

MSST32.4 #262

3-point attempt rate

TNTC36.5 #238

MSST40.1 #169

Free throw rate

TNTC35.5 #164

MSST30.6 #288

Possessions

Turnover rate

TNTC19.1 #325

MSST16.0 #143

Offensive rebound rate

TNTC31.3 #151

MSST29.8 #210

Assists per game

TNTC11.0 #337

MSST12.8 #231

Defense

Points allowed

TNTC75.6 #207

MSST81.8 #338

Points allowed per possession

TNTC1.11 #231

MSST1.13 #299

Opponent effective FG%

TNTC51.5 #186

MSST50.9 #154

Opponent 3-point %

TNTC35.8 #295

MSST33.9 #179

Turnovers forced

TNTC15.0 #285

MSST12.8 #358

Defensive rebound rate

TNTC69.3 #192

MSST69.3 #190

Steals per game

TNTC5.4 #312

MSST5.8 #260

Blocks per game

TNTC2.7 #275

MSST4.4 #44

TNTC		MSST
Scoring
70.3 #280	Points per game	77.6 #103
1.03 #287	Points per possession	1.07 #205
68.3 #214	Pace (possessions)	72.3 #29
Shooting
48.9 #293	Effective FG%	51.5 #172
31.1 #316	3-point %	32.4 #262
36.5 #238	3-point attempt rate	40.1 #169
35.5 #164	Free throw rate	30.6 #288
Possessions
19.1 #325	Turnover rate	16.0 #143
31.3 #151	Offensive rebound rate	29.8 #210
11.0 #337	Assists per game	12.8 #231
Defense
75.6 #207	Points allowed	81.8 #338
1.11 #231	Points allowed per possession	1.13 #299
51.5 #186	Opponent effective FG%	50.9 #154
35.8 #295	Opponent 3-point %	33.9 #179
15.0 #285	Turnovers forced	12.8 #358
69.3 #192	Defensive rebound rate	69.3 #190
5.4 #312	Steals per game	5.8 #260
2.7 #275	Blocks per game	4.4 #44

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Tennessee Tech

10-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ SE Missouri73–89
L@ UT Martin49–64
Wvs Lindenwood Lions72–57
Wvs SIUE62–52
W@ Southern Indiana Screaming Eagles82–74

A week or more of rest.

Mississippi St

13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Southeastern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Auburn61–79
Lvs Georgia96–102
L@ Florida74–108
Lvs Missouri64–88
L@ Alabama75–100

A week or more of rest.