Texas A&M @ South Carolina: Lines, Model & ATS Trends (Week 10, 2026)

Sat, Nov 7, 2026, 12:00 AM ESTWeek 10 · at South Carolina · Conference game

Kickoff forecast62°F3 mphDryWeather watch ›

Texas A&M

4-3 · Power #24

projected

Sat 12:00 AM ET

South Carolina

3-3 · Power #28

projected

TA&M 44%

56% SC

Spread

—

Total

—

model 52.5

Model line

SC -2

SC 56% to win

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Market

Open → current

Spread

Open—

no open

Now—

Opening line not available

Total

Open—

no open

Now—

ATS

Records before kickoff

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
TA&M LLWLL	3-4	43%	0-2	—
SC LLLLW	2-4	33%	1-3	—

Venue/role: TA&M away; SC home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

Over/under before kickoff

	O-U	Over %	SU
TA&M OUUUU	2-5	29%	4-3
SC UOOOU	4-2	67%	3-3

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Hover for the score and line.

Last 10 games

Before kickoff, this and last season

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
TA&M	5-5 50%	3-7 30%	2-8 20%
SC	4-6 40%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes and ties last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Texas A&M

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 14	vs TENN	L13–20LU
Nov 21	@ OU	No meeting since 2023
Nov 27	vs TEX	L17–27LU

South Carolina

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 14	@ ARK	No meeting since 2023
Nov 21	vs UGA	L14–24WU
Nov 28	@ CLEM	L14–28LU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 3 since 2023

TA&M 2–1 SC TA&M leads · 3 games since 2023 · TA&M has won the last meeting

Date	Result	Line	ATS
Nov 15 2025	South Carolina 30 @ Texas A&M 31	TA&M -16.5	SC W
Nov 2 2024	Texas A&M 20 @ South Carolina 44	TA&M -3.5	SC W
Oct 28 2023	South Carolina 17 @ Texas A&M 30	TA&M -17	SC W

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams

Power rating this season

pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot

TA&M+19.7 →+11.6▼ 8.1#25

SC+9.4 →+11.1▲ 1.7#28

Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW9

TA&M

Longer bar = better

#85

Offense

SC better ▶

#38

#45

Defense

◀ TA&M better

#83

+0.1 #67

Turnovers

◀ TA&M better

−0.5 #108

68 plays #53

Pace

SC faster ▶

73 plays #9

Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense

When TA&M has the ball

Even matchup

	TA&M off	SC def	Edge
Points / game	29.4 #69	25.5 #84	Even
Yards / play	5.11 #118	5.37 #65	SC
PPA / play	+0.11 #86	+0.16 #108	TA&M
Success rate	43% #68	42% #76	Even

When SC has the ball

Even matchup

	SC off	TA&M def	Edge
Points / game	37.7 #17	17.1 #26	Even
Yards / play	6.52 #34	5.41 #68	SC
PPA / play	+0.19 #48	+0.02 #39	Even
Success rate	45% #54	39% #46	Even

Bars show league standing (dashed mark = league middle); Offense and Defense use the average rank across the four stats below. In the tables, a highlighted value and the Edge column mark the side ranked better by at least 15% of the league; defense values are what that team allows. Yards and turnovers from ESPN box scores; PPA from CollegeFootballData (garbage time excluded). Descriptive only: the model already uses these.

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams

TA&M scoring against the SC defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
TA&M scored	5.7 #81	8.7 #76	14.4 #80	5.3 #89	9.7 #18	15.0 #40
SC allowed	3.5 #41	8.5 #91	12.0 #70	6.7 #100	5.5 #50	12.2 #80

SC scoring against the TA&M defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
SC scored	8.0 #34	11.3 #30	19.3 #28	7.0 #43	10.2 #12	17.2 #24
TA&M allowed	3.0 #29	3.9 #17	6.9 #11	8.9 #129	1.4 #1	10.3 #54

Regulation only (overtime is left out). 1H = Q1 + Q2, 2H = Q3 + Q4. #1 scores the most, or allows the fewest. Season to date, not adjusted for opponents.