Sat, Nov 2, 2024, 7:30 PM EDTWeek 10 · at South Carolina · Conference game
Weather at kickoff70°F4 mphDryWeather watch ›
7-1 · Power #19
20
final
Final
@
4-3 · Power #13
44
▲ winner
Closing spread
TA&M -3.5
✓ SC W
Total
43.5
▲ Over · 64 pts
Model before kickoff
TA&M 24–21 SC
✗ TA&M (58%) lost
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenTA&M -3.5
CloseTA&M -3.5
Total46.5 → 43.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close
Spread
No change since the open
Total
Down 3 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened TA&M -3.5 · unchangedmodel SC -0.5
Opened 46.5 · closed 43.5 · moved 3 downmodel 44.5
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Road favorites of 2.5–4.5 since 2023: won 55%, covered 45% (110 games)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenTA&M -3.5
CloseTA&M -3.5
Total46.5 → 43.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like TA&M as a 3.5-point road favorite at SC, the favorite won 6, covered 5, and 4 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
This game: SC won 44–20 outright; the favorite didn’t cover, as in 4 of the 10 similar games. 64 points went over 43.5, as in 4 of 10.
Favorite won
6 of 1060%
Normal range · usually 59%
Favorite covered
5 of 956%
Normal range · usually 48%
Went over
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 49%

Only 10 close matches, too few to read much into. Average result: favorite by 0.4 against an average line of 2.7; 41.8 points a game (usually 53.1). Of the 1 over, 1 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Close
2023 · Week 10 · close · similar season form & situation
-2.510–27 L U49.5
Close
KSU @ ISU
2022 · Week 6 · close · similar situation & season form
-110–9 P U45
Close
CLEM @ ND
2022 · Week 10 · close · similar spread & team ratings
-3.514–35 L O43.5
Close
OKST @ WVU
2021 · Week 10 · close · similar situation & spread
-3.524–3 W U49
Close
TA&M @ SC
2022 · Week 8 · close · similar spread & total
-324–30 L O44.5
Close
MICH @ MSU
2021 · Week 9 · close · similar rest & spread
-433–37 L O50.5
Close
2023 · Week 13 · close · similar situation & spread
-242–24 W O45.5
Close
MICH @ PSU
2021 · Week 11 · close · similar team ratings & situation
-2.521–17 W U48
Close
2023 · Week 11 · close · similar total & spread
-1.513–10 W U42
Close
MSU @ IU
2021 · Week 7 · close · similar spread & rest
-3.520–15 W U48.5
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Signals

The data signal, and 3 trends and market moves behind it
Moderate South Carolina ATS trend Hit
Moderate-or-stronger ATS leans went 365-359 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
Slight Under trend Miss
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

South Carolina ATS trend (5-2)
South Carolina have covered 71% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 338-337 (50%)
South Carolina 3-1 ATS as an underdog
Covering consistently in the role they have in this game. · Backtest 2023–26: 271-262 (51%)
Total moved down 3
46.5 → 43.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Loading play-by-play…

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
TA&M+13.5 →+14.7▲ 1.2#14
SC+5.6 →+12.1▲ 6.5#20
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW9

TA&M
Longer bar = better
SC
#48
Offense
◀ TA&M better
#98
#24
Defense
Even
#23
+0.9 #19
Turnovers
◀ TA&M better
+0.6 #33
66 plays #81
Pace
SC faster ▶
69 plays #41
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When TA&M has the ball
Advantage: SC defense
TA&M offSC defEdge
Points / game 32.3 #40 18.7 #22 Even
Yards / play 6.12 #49 4.44 #6 SC
PPA / play +0.18 #49 −0.02 #12 SC
Success rate 44% #55 40% #53 Even
When SC has the ball
Advantage: TA&M defense
SC offTA&M defEdge
Points / game 28.6 #67 18.4 #19 TA&M
Yards / play 5.01 #120 5.21 #46 TA&M
PPA / play +0.07 #102 0.00 #22 TA&M
Success rate 40% #101 35% #8 TA&M

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 134 FBS teams
TA&M scoring against the SC defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
TA&M scored
8.1
#31
9.8
#44
17.9
#33
7.6
#39
6.8
#79
14.4
#51
SC allowed
4.0
#43
7.0
#58
11.0
#50
3.4
#17
4.3
#20
7.7
#11
SC scoring against the TA&M defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
SC scored
8.6
#24
8.0
#76
16.6
#45
4.4
#103
7.6
#55
12.0
#93
TA&M allowed
4.3
#47
2.9
#4
7.1
#6
5.3
#53
6.0
#61
11.3
#54

Game conditions

At kickoff
Home field
SC +2.5
home-field points in the model
Weather
70° · 4 mph
gusts 5 mph · at kickoff
Rest
TA&M7d
SC14d bye
SC +7 days
Tempo
Average 135 plays
slowavg 133fast
Quarterback
TA&M backup QB started
Not the usual starter

Schedules, links & other games

Previous and next games, standings, ESPN, and the rest of the week