Watsco Center · at Miami
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 97–62 · win probability MIA 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 159.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIA has more of the edges
UNF 0, MIA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MIA offense vs UNF defense
Offense 30th of 366 against a defense 363rd, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNF 25.2%, MIA 37.2%. Defensive: UNF 62.4%, MIA 74.1%
UNF offense vs MIA defense
Offense 228th of 366 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNF 17.8%, MIA 16.1%. Forced: UNF 12.8%, MIA 18.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNF 28.8, MIA 37.1. Allowed: UNF 31.4, MIA 29.5
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNF 52.9 and allows 56.3; MIA 55.3 and allows 51.8
Context
Schedule so far
UNF has played the 168th-hardest schedule, MIA the 75th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UNF plays 72.3 a game (31st fastest), MIA 69.2 (170th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MIA at home. This season: MIA 0-0 at home, UNF 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
UNF hits 35.0% and allows 35.1%; MIA hits 34.9% and allows 35.8%. Threes are 51.7% and 31.9% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNF 45%, MIA 52%. Transfers in: UNF 3, MIA 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MIA -34.7 | — |
| Total | — | 159.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNF 62.1 · MIA 96.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MIA -20.5 | — |
| 1H total | 74.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNF 26.9 · MIA 47.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNF 0–2 MIAMIA leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · MIA has won the last 2 meetings · UNF 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2025-26 | UNF 67 @ MIA 105 | MIA -37.5 | MIA W |
| Dec 29, 2023-24 | UNF 55 @ MIA 95 | MIA -19.5 | MIA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Florida
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 64-104 | +43.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-99 | +41.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 78-86 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-92 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 82-85 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 58-109 | +42.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-84 | +30.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 90-113 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 203 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-105 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-102 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-85 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 82-89 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 105-91 | +9.5 | W +23.5 | 157.5 | O 196 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-98 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-85 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 117-114 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 77-84 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 94-100 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-91 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 81-90 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-63 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 76-77 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 76-70 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-85 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 85-93 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
+3.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+8.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+0.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+0.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−1.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
−8.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
+7.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
−12.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
−0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+3.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
−3.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
+10.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−9.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
+4.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+23.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
−16.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+10.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+6.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−5.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+4.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
+13.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−3.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+4.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
+0.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
+10.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−3.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
+12.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−22.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
−1.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+9.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+20.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+6.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−18.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
+0.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
−14.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
+39.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
+0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+9.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
+22.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
−16.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−6.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
−2.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+38.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
+2.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+5.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+66.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−4.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+28.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
−12.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−15.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+7.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
−34.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
−13.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−14.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
−14.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−5.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Miami
35 games played
Straight up
26-9
74% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-14
60% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 86-69 | -18.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 101-61 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 102-61 | -34.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 68-82 | +10.5 | L −3.5 | 171.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 99-72 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-41 | -34.5 | W +21.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 62-72 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 78-65 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 75-66 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-64 | -19.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 104-79 | -35.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 98-81 | -22.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 105-67 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 76-69 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 81-77 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 91-81 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 81-69 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 59-69 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-65 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-76 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-70 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 85-86 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 74-68 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-66 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 77-76 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 67-66 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 83-86 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-54 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 77-69 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-92 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-84 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 80-66 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Mar 22 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
−1.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+23.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+6.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−3.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+7.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
+21.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−2.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
+7.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
+10.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+4.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
−10.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
−5.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
−2.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+5.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
−5.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−5.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−12.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+7.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
−0.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
−12.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
−2.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
+7.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
+6.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−7.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+4.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+7.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
+6.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
+9.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
−4.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
+6.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−18.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+12.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
JAX
W 86-69
+12.5
6
vs
BCU
W 101-61
+7.5
10
vs
STET
W 102-61
+1.5
16
vs
FLA
L 68-82
−21.5
20
vs
ELON
W 99-72
+6.5
23
vs
DSU
W 97-41
−13.5
27
vs
BYU
L 62-72
−31.5
28
vs
GTWN
W 78-65
−8.5
2
@
MISS
W 75-66
−4.5
6
vs
USM
W 88-64
+6.5
13
vs
ULM
W 104-79
+29.5
16
vs
FIU
W 98-81
+17.5
21
vs
UNF
W 105-67
+0.5
30
vs
PITT
W 76-69
+0.5
7
@
WAKE
W 81-77
+0.5
10
vs
GT
W 91-81
+15.5
13
@
ND
W 81-69
+6.5
17
@
CLEM
L 59-69
−15.5
20
vs
FSU
L 63-65
−35.5
24
@
SYR
W 85-76
+11.5
28
vs
STAN
W 79-70
+1.5
31
vs
CAL
L 85-86
+22.5
7
@
BC
W 74-68
+0.5
10
vs
UNC
W 75-66
−15.5
14
@
NCSU
W 77-76
−4.5
17
vs
VT
W 67-66
−15.5
21
@
UVA
L 83-86
+23.5
24
@
FSU
W 83-73
+3.5
28
vs
BC
W 76-54
−13.5
4
@
SMU
W 77-69
−10.5
7
vs
LOU
L 89-92
+25.5
12
vs
LOU
W 78-73
−2.5
13
vs
UVA
L 62-84
−0.5
20
vs
MIZ
W 80-66
+1.5
22
vs
PUR
L 69-79
+1.5
over 21under 14avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Miami has the better starters
Position by position: North Florida 0, Miami 5, even 0
North FloridaBetterMiami
G K. Jackson14.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 38
→MIABig
G B. Bland TR13.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 74
G B. Plummer7.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
→MIABig
G A. Lewis TR12.2 pts · 3 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 92
G M. Lee7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
→MIABig
F D. Goode TR15.7 pts · 8.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 94
G E. Placer TR8.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 21
→MIABig
F S. Henderson13.8 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
G E. Elliott TR4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 8
→MIABig
F M. Reneau18.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 98
North FloridaBetterMiami
UNF offense228th of 366 · -7.0
→MIABig
MIA defense26th of 366 · +4.3
UNF defense363rd of 366 · -12.0
→MIABig
MIA offense30th of 366 · +6.0
Backcourt-12.6 · 5 players
→MIABig
Backcourt+4.0 · 2 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+12.3 · 3 players
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
→MIABig
Bench+3.0 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNF betterMIA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Jackson33 minB. Plummer27 minM. Lee26 minE. Placer26 min · TRE. Elliott22 min · TRG. Jacobs3 min
Forwards
A. Bryant8 min · TRA. BegajNewI. BrownNew
Guards
B. Bland34 min · TRA. Lewis31 min · TRD. Allen24 minN. Dorn23 min · TRL. Cason19 min · TRQ. Berger17 min · TR
Forwards
D. Goode31 min · TRS. Henderson31 minM. Reneau29 minR. Miller19 min · TRM. Allen19 minC. GaskinsNew
Centers
S. Cyril21 min · TRE. RyzhovNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.1 #112 | Points per game | 81.5 #39 |
| 1.06 #218 | Points per possession | 1.18 #38 |
| 72.3 #31 | Pace (possessions) | 69.2 #170 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.9 #106 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #32 |
| 35.0 #117 | 3-point % | 34.9 #127 |
| 51.7 #7 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.9 #331 |
| 28.8 #333 | Free throw rate | 37.1 #125 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.8 #261 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #147 |
| 25.2 #335 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.2 #14 |
| 13.4 #185 | Assists per game | 16.2 #42 |
| Defense | ||
| 89.6 #365 | Points allowed | 71.2 #79 |
| 1.24 #364 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #60 |
| 56.3 #349 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.8 #198 |
| 35.1 #253 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.8 #296 |
| 12.8 #360 | Turnovers forced | 18.3 #87 |
| 62.4 #361 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.1 #19 |
| 4.6 #352 | Steals per game | 7.9 #48 |
| 1.4 #364 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #174 |
North Florida
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Georgia85–93
- Lvs Jacksonville61–85
- Wvs FGCU76–70
- L@ Stetson71–76
- Lvs Austin Peay76–77
A week or more of rest.
Miami
26-9 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Purdue69–79
- Wvs Missouri80–66
- Lvs Virginia62–84
- Wvs Louisville78–73
- Lvs Louisville89–92
A week or more of rest.