UNF Arena · at North Florida
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNF 79–75 · win probability UNF 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNF has more of the edges
CIT 2, UNF 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: CIT plays 66.1 a game (313th fastest), UNF 72.3 (31st). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
CIT hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%; UNF hits 35.0% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 47.8% and 51.7% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CIT 27.9%, UNF 25.2%. Defensive: CIT 68.5%, UNF 62.4%
UNF offense vs CIT defense
Offense 228th of 366 against a defense 314th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: CIT 49.5 and allows 57.5; UNF 52.9 and allows 56.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CIT 16.3%, UNF 17.8%. Forced: CIT 14.8%, UNF 12.8%
Context
Schedule so far
CIT has played the 233rd-hardest schedule, UNF the 168th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
UNF at home. This season: UNF 0-0 at home, CIT 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CIT 18%, UNF 45%. Transfers in: CIT 6, UNF 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
CIT offense vs UNF defense
Offense 343rd of 366 against a defense 363rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CIT 30.0, UNF 28.8. Allowed: CIT 33.3, UNF 31.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNF -3.8 | — |
| Total | — | 153.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | CIT 74.9 · UNF 78.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNF -2.1 | — |
| 1H total | 71.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | CIT 34.9 · UNF 37 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
The Citadel
30 games played
Straight up
8-22
27% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 47-76 | +15.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 86-96 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 92-100 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 192 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 58-70 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 65-72 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 41-69 | +8.5 | L −19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 4 | @ | L 63-79 | +18.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 55-71 | +22.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 78-82 | +17.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 56-80 | +18.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 49-74 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-95 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 63-101 | +16.5 | L −21.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-77 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 66-69 | +9.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 82-68 | +6.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-75 | +11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 55-84 | +17.5 | L −11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 80-56 | -2.5 | W +21.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-66 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 64-78 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 78-71 | +9.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 49-87 | +9.5 | L −28.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 54-70 | +11.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 75-78 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 72-93 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 51-72 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 93-90 | +11.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 88-85 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 76-83 | +14.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
BC
L 47-76
−13.5
10
vs
CHSO
L 86-96
−7.5
14
@
WGA
L 92-100
−1.5
24
vs
BELL
L 58-70
−8.5
26
vs
HCU
L 65-72
−5.5
30
vs
PRES
L 41-69
−19.5
4
@
DAV
L 63-79
+2.5
13
@
SC
L 55-71
+6.5
17
@
COFC
L 78-82
+13.5
20
@
RICH
L 56-80
−5.5
30
vs
ETSU
L 49-74
−12.5
3
vs
WOF
L 86-95
+0.5
7
@
MER
L 63-101
−21.5
10
vs
WCU
W 79-77
+8.5
15
@
UNCG
L 66-69
+6.5
17
@
VMI
W 82-68
+20.5
21
vs
FUR
W 77-75
+13.5
23
@
ETSU
L 55-84
−11.5
29
vs
VMI
W 80-56
+21.5
31
vs
UNCG
W 71-66
+7.5
5
@
SAM
L 64-78
−0.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-71
+16.5
11
@
WCU
L 49-87
−28.5
14
vs
MER
L 54-70
−4.5
19
vs
SAM
L 75-78
+7.5
21
vs
UTC
L 72-93
−16.5
25
@
FUR
L 51-72
−5.5
28
@
WOF
W 93-90
+14.5
6
vs
UTC
W 88-85
+10.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 76-83
+7.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
BC
L 47-76
−21.5
10
vs
CHSO
L 86-96
+36.5
14
@
WGA
L 92-100
+41.5
24
vs
BELL
L 58-70
−28.5
26
vs
HCU
L 65-72
−0.5
30
vs
PRES
L 41-69
−23.5
4
@
DAV
L 63-79
+4.5
13
@
SC
L 55-71
−15.5
17
@
COFC
L 78-82
+13.5
20
@
RICH
L 56-80
−10.5
30
vs
ETSU
L 49-74
−17.5
3
vs
WOF
L 86-95
+36.5
7
@
MER
L 63-101
+16.5
10
vs
WCU
W 79-77
+7.5
15
@
UNCG
L 66-69
−13.5
17
@
VMI
W 82-68
+6.5
21
vs
FUR
W 77-75
+9.5
23
@
ETSU
L 55-84
−2.5
29
vs
VMI
W 80-56
−6.5
31
vs
UNCG
W 71-66
−10.5
5
@
SAM
L 64-78
−4.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-71
+6.5
11
@
WCU
L 49-87
−9.5
14
vs
MER
L 54-70
−23.5
19
vs
SAM
L 75-78
+9.5
21
vs
UTC
L 72-93
+20.5
25
@
FUR
L 51-72
−20.5
28
@
WOF
W 93-90
+34.5
6
vs
UTC
W 88-85
+24.5
7
vs
ETSU
L 76-83
+19.5
over 15under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
North Florida
30 games played
Straight up
5-25
17% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 64-104 | +43.5 | W +3.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 66-99 | +41.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 78-86 | +10.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-92 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 82-85 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 63-72 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 58-109 | +42.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-84 | +30.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 90-113 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 203 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 67-105 | +37.5 | L −0.5 | 171.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 83-102 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 74-82 | +18.5 | W +10.5 | 172.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 73-85 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 164.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 82-89 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 105-91 | +9.5 | W +23.5 | 157.5 | O 196 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-98 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 164.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 87-85 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 117-114 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 77-84 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 94-100 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 81-73 | +5.5 | W +13.5 | 166.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 72-91 | +15.5 | L −3.5 | 178.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 81-90 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 56-63 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 76-77 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 71-76 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 76-70 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 160.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 61-85 | +1.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 85-93 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
+3.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+8.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+0.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+0.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−1.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
−8.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
+7.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
−12.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
−0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+3.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
−3.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
+10.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−9.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
+4.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+23.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
−16.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+10.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+6.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−5.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+4.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
+13.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−3.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+4.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
+0.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
+10.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−3.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
+12.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−22.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
FLA
L 64-104
−1.5
12
@
TENN
L 66-99
+9.5
19
@
WOF
L 78-86
+2.5
22
vs
USM
L 83-92
+20.5
23
vs
PV
L 82-85
+6.5
2
vs
SIUE
L 63-72
−18.5
7
@
GONZ
L 58-109
+0.5
13
@
DAY
L 61-84
−14.5
18
@
CHSO
L 90-113
+39.5
21
@
MIA
L 67-105
+0.5
28
vs
COLU
L 82-90
+9.5
1
@
APSU
L 83-102
+22.5
3
@
LIP
L 74-82
−16.5
8
vs
WGA
L 73-85
−6.5
10
vs
QUC
L 82-89
−2.5
15
@
UNA
W 105-91
+38.5
17
@
CARK
L 69-98
+2.5
22
vs
EKU
W 87-85
+5.5
24
vs
BELL
W 117-114
+66.5
29
vs
STET
L 77-84
−4.5
31
vs
LIP
L 94-100
+28.5
5
@
WGA
W 81-73
−12.5
7
@
QUC
L 72-91
−15.5
11
@
FGCU
L 81-90
+7.5
14
@
JAX
L 56-63
−34.5
19
vs
APSU
L 76-77
−13.5
21
@
STET
L 71-76
−14.5
26
vs
FGCU
W 76-70
−14.5
28
vs
JAX
L 61-85
−5.5
4
vs
WGA
L 85-93
+17.5
over 16under 14avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: The Citadel 1, North Florida 1, even 3
The CitadelBetterNorth Florida
G E. Bronson TR5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 13
→UNFSmall
G K. Jackson14.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 38
G C. McKenzie TR2.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G B. Plummer7.2 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 3
G M. Gonzales3.8 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 17
=Even
G M. Lee7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
G K. Davis4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 19
=Even
G E. Placer TR8.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 21
F R. Bethea TR3.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 32
←CITSmall
G E. Elliott TR4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 8
The CitadelBetterNorth Florida
CIT offense343rd of 366 · -11.7
=Even
UNF defense363rd of 366 · -12.0
CIT defense314th of 366 · -8.1
→UNFSmall
UNF offense228th of 366 · -7.0
Backcourt-7.1 · 4 players
←CITBig
Backcourt-12.6 · 5 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.7 · 5 players
→UNFSmall
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestCIT betterUNF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
E. Bronson19 min · TRC. McKenzie16 min · TRM. Gonzales13 minK. Davis12 minC. Cormier9 min · TRJ. Heck2 min
Forwards
R. Bethea13 min · TRT. Mrus10 min · TRJ. Hurlburt9 min · TRC. Bonjasky6 minL. Menefee3 minA. Alexander1 min
Centers
Y. AnsongNew
Guards
K. Jackson33 minB. Plummer27 minM. Lee26 minE. Placer26 min · TRE. Elliott22 min · TRG. Jacobs3 min
Forwards
A. Bryant8 min · TRA. BegajNewI. BrownNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.3 #309 | Points per game | 77.1 #112 |
| 1.03 #283 | Points per possession | 1.06 #218 |
| 66.1 #313 | Pace (possessions) | 72.3 #31 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.5 #265 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #106 |
| 32.0 #283 | 3-point % | 35.0 #117 |
| 47.8 #26 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.7 #7 |
| 30.0 #309 | Free throw rate | 28.8 #333 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.3 #156 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #261 |
| 27.9 #270 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.2 #335 |
| 12.2 #272 | Assists per game | 13.4 #185 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #293 | Points allowed | 89.6 #365 |
| 1.20 #357 | Points allowed per possession | 1.24 #364 |
| 57.5 #361 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.3 #349 |
| 36.6 #335 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #253 |
| 14.8 #306 | Turnovers forced | 12.8 #360 |
| 68.5 #227 | Defensive rebound rate | 62.4 #361 |
| 5.2 #318 | Steals per game | 4.6 #352 |
| 2.5 #304 | Blocks per game | 1.4 #364 |
The Citadel
8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs ETSU76–83
- Wvs Chattanooga88–85
- W@ Wofford93–90
- L@ Furman51–72
- Lvs Chattanooga72–93
A week or more of rest.
North Florida
5-25 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Georgia85–93
- Lvs Jacksonville61–85
- Wvs FGCU76–70
- L@ Stetson71–76
- Lvs Austin Peay76–77
A week or more of rest.