Kennedy Family Athletic Complex · at UMass Lowell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UML | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MRST 72–69 · win probability MRST 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MRST has more of the edges
MRST 4, UML 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: MRST 25.7, UML 34.9. Allowed: MRST 37.6, UML 28.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MRST 17.0%, UML 18.0%. Forced: MRST 19.4%, UML 14.2%
UML offense vs MRST defense
Offense 286th of 366 against a defense 135th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: MRST 49.3 and allows 45.6; UML 49.8 and allows 53.5
Three-pointers
MRST hits 32.2% and allows 28.6%; UML hits 32.2% and allows 34.6%. Threes are 34.6% and 31.3% of their shots
Home court
UML at home. This season: UML 0-0 at home, MRST 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MRST plays 66.8 a game (286th fastest), UML 68.9 (189th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MRST 29.1%, UML 32.7%. Defensive: MRST 71.7%, UML 70.7%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MRST 31%, UML 16%. Transfers in: MRST 1, UML 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Schedule so far
MRST has played the 339th-hardest schedule, UML the 312th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
MRST offense vs UML defense
Offense 322nd of 366 against a defense 318th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | MRST -3.1 | — |
| Total | — | 141.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | MRST 72.2 · UML 69.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | MRST -1.9 | — |
| 1H total | 66.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | MRST 34 · UML 32.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Marist
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-19
37% overs · avg −3.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 62-66 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 9 | @ | W 75-56 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 138.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 54-56 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 130.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 78-55 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 64-56 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 80-68 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 76-87 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 70-51 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 58-64 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 59-69 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 83-38 | -4.5 | W +40.5 | 148.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 9 | @ | W 76-72 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 71-49 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 131.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 82-67 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 55-68 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 50-69 | +1.5 | L −17.5 | 133.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-64 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 88-86 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 58-46 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 128.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-52 | -14.5 | W +14.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-63 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 56-81 | +2.5 | L −22.5 | 128.5 | O 137 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 63-67 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 20 | @ | W 84-70 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 56-63 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-75 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-58 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 128.5 | U 115 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
+8.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
+20.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−8.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
−1.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+15.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−0.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+4.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+6.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
−4.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
+12.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−3.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−12.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
+40.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
−1.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
+11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+6.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−19.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−17.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
+3.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
−7.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
+2.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
+14.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−4.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
−22.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−6.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+8.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−5.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−11.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+3.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
XAV
L 62-66
−11.5
9
@
DART
W 75-56
−7.5
16
vs
HARV
L 54-56
−20.5
21
vs
ARMY
W 76-65
+8.5
25
vs
LEH
W 78-55
+0.5
5
vs
MSM
W 64-56
−16.5
7
vs
MAN
W 80-68
+7.5
13
@
BRY
W 82-74
+24.5
16
@
GT
L 76-87
+21.5
21
vs
STBK
W 70-51
−16.5
29
@
QUIN
L 58-64
−23.5
2
@
SPU
L 59-69
−5.5
4
vs
IONA
W 83-38
−27.5
9
@
SHU
W 76-72
+4.5
11
@
RID
W 71-49
−11.5
17
vs
FAIR
W 82-67
+7.5
19
vs
MRMK
L 55-68
−10.5
22
@
SIE
L 50-69
−14.5
24
vs
QUIN
W 71-64
−4.5
30
@
CAN
W 88-86
+44.5
1
@
NIA
W 58-46
−24.5
5
vs
RID
W 81-52
−2.5
7
@
FAIR
L 60-63
−15.5
12
@
MRMK
L 56-81
+8.5
15
vs
SIE
L 63-67
−3.5
20
@
MAN
W 84-70
+11.5
22
vs
SHU
W 65-63
−18.5
1
vs
SPU
L 56-63
−13.5
7
vs
QUIN
W 77-75
+16.5
8
vs
MRMK
L 57-58
−13.5
over 11under 19avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
UMass Lowell
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg +1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 47-110 | +36.5 | L −26.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 10 | vs | L 67-73 | -10.5 | L −16.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 72-86 | +13.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 75-109 | +30.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 77-87 | +21.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 66-68 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 75-64 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-80 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 71-75 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 87-82 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 62-90 | +33.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-71 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 77-63 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 73-68 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 64-73 | -8.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 68-77 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 56-79 | +2.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 61-66 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 91-77 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 56-81 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 89-79 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 88-69 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 78-56 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 92-79 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 64-66 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 60-84 | +2.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 67-56 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 81-76 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 10 | @ | L 69-91 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
CONN
L 47-110
−26.5
10
vs
NHVN
L 67-73
−16.5
13
@
COLU
L 72-86
−0.5
16
@
WAKE
L 75-109
−3.5
19
@
BRAD
L 77-87
+11.5
22
@
SPU
L 66-68
+6.5
26
@
STO
W 75-64
+13.5
6
@
MASS
L 60-80
−8.5
13
@
QUIN
L 71-75
+8.5
16
vs
SHU
W 87-82
+7.5
21
@
BU
L 76-88
−6.5
29
@
IOWA
L 62-90
+5.5
3
vs
UALB
W 83-71
+9.5
8
@
BRY
W 77-63
+16.5
10
@
BING
W 73-68
−1.5
15
vs
NJIT
L 64-73
−17.5
22
vs
UVM
L 68-77
−4.5
24
@
UMBC
L 56-79
−20.5
29
@
UNH
L 61-66
−1.5
31
vs
ME
W 91-77
+9.5
5
@
NJIT
L 56-81
−23.5
7
@
UALB
W 89-79
+14.5
12
vs
BRY
W 88-69
+14.5
19
vs
UNH
W 78-56
+18.5
21
vs
BING
W 92-79
+3.5
26
@
UVM
L 64-66
+7.5
28
vs
UMBC
L 60-84
−21.5
3
@
ME
W 67-56
+9.5
7
vs
UALB
W 81-76
+2.5
10
@
UMBC
L 69-91
−14.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
CONN
L 47-110
+5.5
10
vs
NHVN
L 67-73
−2.5
13
@
COLU
L 72-86
+1.5
16
@
WAKE
L 75-109
+18.5
19
@
BRAD
L 77-87
+14.5
22
@
SPU
L 66-68
−13.5
26
@
STO
W 75-64
−9.5
6
@
MASS
L 60-80
−15.5
13
@
QUIN
L 71-75
−7.5
16
vs
SHU
W 87-82
+17.5
21
@
BU
L 76-88
+18.5
29
@
IOWA
L 62-90
+6.5
3
vs
UALB
W 83-71
+3.5
8
@
BRY
W 77-63
−3.5
10
@
BING
W 73-68
−5.5
15
vs
NJIT
L 64-73
−8.5
22
vs
UVM
L 68-77
−0.5
24
@
UMBC
L 56-79
−16.5
29
@
UNH
L 61-66
−19.5
31
vs
ME
W 91-77
+31.5
5
@
NJIT
L 56-81
−12.5
7
@
UALB
W 89-79
+24.5
12
vs
BRY
W 88-69
+15.5
19
vs
UNH
W 78-56
−17.5
21
vs
BING
W 92-79
+24.5
26
@
UVM
L 64-66
−16.5
28
vs
UMBC
L 60-84
−6.5
3
@
ME
W 67-56
−16.5
7
vs
UALB
W 81-76
+10.5
10
@
UMBC
L 69-91
+12.5
over 14under 16avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Marist has the better starters
Position by position: Marist 1, UMass Lowell 0, even 4
MaristBetterUMass Lowell
G J. Collins-Roberts7.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 27
←MRSTSmall
G C. Jones TR4.3 pts · 0.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 6
G J. Graham TR11.1 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 43
=Even
G J. Newton TR7.1 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 55
F M. Parker5 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
=No call
G I. Walter1.6 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
C T. Watson6.1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F V. Okojie4.3 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 11
C J. Gabriel2 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Harris TR5.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 59
MaristBetterUMass Lowell
MRST offense322nd of 366 · -10.5
=Even
UML defense318th of 366 · -8.2
MRST defense135th of 366 · -2.6
←MRSTBig
UML offense286th of 366 · -8.9
Backcourt-3.3 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-3.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 3 players
←MRSTSmall
Frontcourt-1.7 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.7 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestMRST betterUML betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Collins-Roberts31 minJ. Graham28 min · TRJ. WilliamsNewC. SweeneyNewB. ArnoldNewD. ChessNew
Forwards
M. Parker15 minE. OnyiaNewL. RodriguezNew
Centers
T. Watson11 minJ. Gabriel7 minL. FranzNew
Guards
C. Jones18 min · TRJ. Newton17 min · TRI. Walter8 minK. GilesNewJ. CannadyNewM. EllisNew
Forwards
V. Okojie18 minJ. Harris11 min · TRJ. Roberson7 minD. HandNewE. DialloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.9 #301 | Points per game | 71.7 #253 |
| 1.04 #276 | Points per possession | 1.04 #272 |
| 66.8 #286 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #189 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.3 #276 | Effective FG% | 49.8 #247 |
| 32.2 #272 | 3-point % | 32.2 #269 |
| 34.6 #285 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.3 #336 |
| 25.7 #360 | Free throw rate | 34.9 #183 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.0 #202 | Turnover rate | 18.0 #269 |
| 29.1 #233 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.7 #98 |
| 15.0 #89 | Assists per game | 11.9 #294 |
| Defense | ||
| 63.9 #4 | Points allowed | 77.4 #249 |
| 0.95 #3 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #277 |
| 45.6 #5 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.5 #284 |
| 28.6 #2 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.6 #226 |
| 19.4 #35 | Turnovers forced | 14.2 #329 |
| 71.7 #77 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.7 #126 |
| 7.1 #116 | Steals per game | 5.1 #326 |
| 3.1 #200 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #222 |
Marist
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Merrimack57–58
- Wvs Quinnipiac77–75
- Lvs Saint Peter's56–63
- Wvs Sacred Heart65–63
- W@ Manhattan84–70
A week or more of rest.
UMass Lowell
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-8 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMBC69–91
- Wvs UAlbany81–76
- W@ Maine67–56
- Lvs UMBC60–84
- L@ Vermont64–66
A week or more of rest.