Bob Carpenter Center · at Delaware
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEL 76–66 · win probability DEL 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DEL has more of the edges
BUCK 1, DEL 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
BUCK hits 30.6% and allows 37.0%; DEL hits 36.8% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 42.8% and 46.2% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: BUCK 48.5 and allows 54.7; DEL 53.3 and allows 51.5
BUCK offense vs DEL defense
Offense 316th of 366 against a defense 187th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BUCK 18.9%, DEL 18.3%. Forced: BUCK 17.9%, DEL 14.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: BUCK 29.8, DEL 30.6. Allowed: BUCK 35.3, DEL 30.2
Home court
DEL at home. This season: DEL 0-0 at home, BUCK 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: BUCK plays 67.7 a game (242nd fastest), DEL 65.3 (337th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
BUCK has played the 227th-hardest schedule, DEL the 195th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BUCK 27.0%, DEL 20.8%. Defensive: BUCK 68.7%, DEL 68.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BUCK 39%, DEL 46%. Transfers in: BUCK 2, DEL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
DEL offense vs BUCK defense
Offense 237th of 366 against a defense 237th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEL -9.2 | — |
| Total | — | 142.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | BUCK 66.4 · DEL 75.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEL -5.3 | — |
| 1H total | 66.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | BUCK 30.6 · DEL 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BUCK 2–1 DELBUCK leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · BUCK has won the last 2 meetings · BUCK 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2025-26 | DEL 70 @ BUCK 78 | BUCK -2.5 | BUCK W |
| Nov 4, 2024-25 | BUCK 85 @ DEL 73 | DEL -4.5 | BUCK W |
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | DEL 78 @ BUCK 57 | BUCK +6.5 | DEL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bucknell
33 games played
Straight up
10-23
30% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 78-70 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 73-62 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-73 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 77-83 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 50-84 | +16.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 49-97 | +28.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 66-71 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 72-101 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 77-97 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-73 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 51-38 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 89 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 39-94 | +25.5 | L −29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 58-65 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 55-76 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-67 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-95 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 84-87 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 62-67 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 103-97 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 60-59 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-78 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-76 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-82 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-75 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 63-72 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-73 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-89 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 69-74 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
+5.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
+12.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−5.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
−1.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−19.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
+5.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
+2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
−23.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+3.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−8.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
+10.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−29.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−8.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
+2.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−12.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−3.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+4.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
−10.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
−7.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−2.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+2.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+7.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
+8.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−13.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
−9.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
−7.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−14.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−11.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+4.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
−4.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
+8.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+10.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
−1.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
−8.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−10.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
+20.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−7.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−12.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
−7.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
−2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
+13.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+16.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−4.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
−46.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−0.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−10.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
−0.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−6.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−6.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+7.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
+31.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
+26.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−18.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+21.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+61.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
−22.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−4.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
+0.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
+13.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−8.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−7.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+5.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
+29.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
−24.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+9.5
over 13under 20avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-78 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-85 | +35.5 | W +18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-70 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-79 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 73-60 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-75 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 70-58 | +21.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-88 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 65-57 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 43-61 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-52 | +8.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 60-72 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-70 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-97 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 51-67 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-64 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 69-75 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 89-88 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 68-66 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-80 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 83-80 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 38-81 | +2.5 | L −40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−5.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
+18.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+6.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−11.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
+14.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
−21.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
−10.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
+33.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
−23.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−0.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−16.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+1.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
+23.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−0.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+4.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
−2.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
−24.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−0.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
+22.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−8.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+4.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+6.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
+10.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+18.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+3.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
−1.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
−2.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+3.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−40.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−1.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
−11.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+13.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−15.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
−9.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
+5.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
+17.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
−24.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
+9.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−7.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−27.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+4.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
−29.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−12.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+14.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
+13.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
+30.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−16.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
−0.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−3.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+11.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+43.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
−13.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+7.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+35.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
+6.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
+16.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+28.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+15.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−13.5
over 16under 14avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Bucknell 1, Delaware 1, even 3
BucknellBetterDelaware
G J. Williams7.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 23
=Even
G D. Dinkins TR11.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 21
G A. Pachucki5.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 25
←BUCKSmall
G A. Kazanecki5 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
G K. Marshall TR3.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Brown12 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
G J. Meachem1.5 pts · 0.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 2
=No call
G M. Ellison3.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F L. Soroa Schaller TR5.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 13
→DELSmall
F K. Nzeh TR11.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
BucknellBetterDelaware
BUCK offense316th of 366 · -10.4
→DELBig
DEL defense187th of 366 · -4.3
BUCK defense237th of 366 · -6.2
=Even
DEL offense237th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
←BUCKSmall
Backcourt-9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
→DELSmall
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.9 · 3 players
←BUCKSmall
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBUCK betterDEL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Williams33 minA. Pachucki21 minK. Marshall17 min · TRJ. Meachem10 minM. Lange3 minR. LamunoNew
Forwards
L. Soroa Schaller21 min · TRP. O'Brien10 minK. Welch2 minE. Marten-ConeyNewL. BergsengNewA. RousseauNew
Centers
D. KennardNew
Guards
D. Dinkins34 min · TRA. Kazanecki29 minJ. Brown23 minM. Ellison20 minC. Bailey18 min · TRD. Harris-Smith17 min · TR
Forwards
K. Nzeh29 min · TRE. Alvin20 min · TRJ. Taylor16 minF. EgbunaNew
Centers
S. Solano4 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.4 #327 | Points per game | 67.9 #316 |
| 0.99 #332 | Points per possession | 1.04 #269 |
| 67.7 #242 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #337 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.5 #304 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #89 |
| 30.6 #328 | 3-point % | 36.8 #31 |
| 42.8 #123 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.2 #44 |
| 29.8 #314 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #291 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.9 #319 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #287 |
| 27.0 #295 | Offensive rebound rate | 20.8 #362 |
| 12.7 #235 | Assists per game | 12.2 #271 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.3 #226 | Points allowed | 74.1 #156 |
| 1.13 #289 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #298 |
| 54.7 #323 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #185 |
| 37.0 #344 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #255 |
| 17.9 #100 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #334 |
| 68.7 #216 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #206 |
| 7.2 #105 | Steals per game | 5.7 #273 |
| 1.8 #354 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #219 |
Bucknell
10-23 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Navy69–74
- Wvs Army65–55
- L@ Lehigh79–89
- W@ Army75–73
- Lvs Holy Cross63–72
A week or more of rest.
Delaware
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech38–81
- Wvs Sam Houston83–80
- L@ Kennesaw St82–90
- L@ Jax State70–80
- L@ MTSU66–78
A week or more of rest.