Viejas Arena · at San Diego St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SDSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SDSU 87–66 · win probability SDSU 96%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SDSU has more of the edges
CSUF 1, SDSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SDSU offense vs CSUF defense
Offense 86th of 366 against a defense 344th, on the model’s ratings
CSUF offense vs SDSU defense
Offense 272nd of 366 against a defense 70th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: CSUF 51.4 and allows 54.3; SDSU 52.7 and allows 48.2
Context
Schedule so far
CSUF has played the 164th-hardest schedule, SDSU the 80th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CSUF 15.3%, SDSU 17.2%. Forced: CSUF 19.4%, SDSU 20.2%
Home court
SDSU at home. This season: SDSU 0-0 at home, CSUF 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 73 possessions: CSUF plays 75.5 a game (3rd fastest), SDSU 70.6 (89th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CSUF 39%, SDSU 20%. Transfers in: CSUF 1, SDSU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: CSUF 37.8, SDSU 39.0. Allowed: CSUF 35.3, SDSU 38.5
Even
Three-pointers
CSUF hits 34.2% and allows 34.0%; SDSU hits 34.5% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 43.1% and 33.8% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CSUF 24.6%, SDSU 29.5%. Defensive: CSUF 71.7%, SDSU 68.9%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SDSU -20.4 | — |
| Total | — | 153.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | CSUF 66.3 · SDSU 86.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SDSU -12.0 | — |
| 1H total | 71.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | CSUF 29.8 · SDSU 41.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CSUF 0–3 SDSUSDSU leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · SDSU has won the last 3 meetings · CSUF 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | CSUF 57 @ SDSU 83 | SDSU -15.5 | SDSU W |
| Nov 7, 2022-23 | CSUF 57 @ SDSU 80 | SDSU -23.5 | CSUF W |
| Dec 8, 2021-22 | CSUF 56 @ SDSU 66 | SDSU -12.5 | CSUF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fullerton
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-12
61% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 82-92 | +15.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 65-93 | +22.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 73-85 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 85-103 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 88-80 | +11.5 | W +19.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 93-97 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 83-69 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 4 | vs | L 91-94 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 177.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 59-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 105-86 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 165.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 89-94 | +19.5 | W +14.5 | 176.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 63-110 | +21.5 | L −25.5 | 170.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 95-84 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 64-86 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 88-71 | +13.5 | W +30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-79 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 173.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-74 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-81 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 71-61 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 93-78 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 173.5 | U 171 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 78-72 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-66 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 86-82 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 65-86 | +7.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 93-92 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 85-87 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-71 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 90-77 | +5.5 | W +18.5 | 170.5 | U 167 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 82-70 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-78 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+5.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−5.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−5.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
−11.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+19.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+4.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
+12.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
−4.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+22.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+14.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
−25.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+14.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−18.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
+30.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
+5.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−1.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−12.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
+6.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
+13.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−5.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
+0.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
+6.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+6.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−13.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
−0.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+2.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+1.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
+6.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
+18.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
+10.5
13
vs
HAW
L 63-78
−9.5
covered 19didn’t cover 12avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
WYO
L 82-92
+19.5
10
@
CAL
L 65-93
−4.5
15
vs
PAC
L 73-85
−1.5
21
@
PORT
L 85-103
+23.5
22
vs
STMN
W 88-80
+5.5
23
vs
UNCO
L 93-97
+25.5
29
vs
PEPP
W 83-69
−9.5
4
vs
CP
L 91-94
+7.5
13
@
DEN
W 105-86
+25.5
21
@
OKST
L 89-94
+6.5
28
@
SMU
L 63-110
+2.5
1
vs
UCSB
W 95-84
+23.5
3
vs
UCI
L 64-86
−10.5
8
@
UCSD
W 88-71
−7.5
10
vs
CSUN
W 86-79
−8.5
15
@
UCD
L 69-74
−23.5
17
@
UCR
L 72-81
−4.5
22
vs
LBSU
W 71-61
−28.5
24
@
CP
W 93-78
−2.5
31
@
UCSB
L 69-83
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 78-72
−6.5
7
vs
CSUB
W 82-66
−9.5
12
@
LBSU
W 86-82
+11.5
14
@
UCI
L 65-86
−3.5
19
vs
UCD
W 93-92
+28.5
21
@
CSUB
W 88-80
+7.5
28
vs
HAW
L 85-87
+13.5
5
vs
UCSD
W 75-71
−10.5
7
@
CSUN
W 90-77
−3.5
12
vs
UCD
W 82-70
−3.5
13
vs
HAW
L 63-78
−16.5
over 13under 18avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
San Diego St
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 77-45 | -25.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 73-57 | -21.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 107-108 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 215 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 54-94 | +6.5 | L −33.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 97-80 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 141.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 81-91 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 77-66 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 89-71 | -17.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 81-58 | -24.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 45-68 | +13.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 81-68 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 110-107 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | O 217 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 73-68 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 71-52 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-57 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 83-79 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 82-71 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 73-50 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-71 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 72-63 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-54 | -22.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 71-57 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 63-73 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-83 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 77-86 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 89-86 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 71-62 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 64-62 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 62-73 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
+6.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
−15.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−33.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+19.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
−7.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
+2.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+0.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
−1.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−9.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+1.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
−1.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
+6.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
+4.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
+15.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
−1.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−2.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+7.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
+13.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
+1.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−3.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+11.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
+6.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−17.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
−12.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+18.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
−3.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
−7.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
−6.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
+2.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−0.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−8.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
LBSU
W 77-45
−13.5
9
vs
IDST
W 73-57
−5.5
18
vs
TROY
L 107-108
+77.5
24
vs
MICH
L 54-94
−0.5
25
vs
ORE
W 97-80
+35.5
26
vs
BAY
L 81-91
+23.5
3
vs
UVU
W 77-66
−1.5
10
vs
LAM
W 89-71
+24.5
17
vs
AF
W 81-58
+3.5
20
vs
ARIZ
L 45-68
−40.5
30
@
SJSU
W 81-68
+7.5
3
vs
BOIS
W 110-107
+78.5
6
@
NEV
W 73-68
−0.5
10
vs
FRES
W 71-52
−23.5
14
@
WYO
W 74-57
−17.5
17
vs
UNM
W 83-79
+13.5
21
@
GCU
L 69-70
−6.5
24
@
UNLV
W 82-71
+3.5
28
vs
CSU
W 73-50
−16.5
31
@
USU
L 66-71
−10.5
3
vs
WYO
W 72-63
−6.5
7
@
AF
W 88-54
+2.5
14
vs
NEV
W 71-57
−11.5
17
vs
GCU
L 63-73
−3.5
21
@
CSU
L 74-83
+17.5
25
vs
USU
W 89-72
+14.5
28
@
UNM
L 76-81
+6.5
3
@
BOIS
L 77-86
+19.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 89-86
+21.5
12
vs
CSU
W 71-62
−9.5
13
vs
UNM
W 64-62
−24.5
14
vs
USU
L 62-73
−10.5
over 15under 17avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
San Diego St has the better starters
Position by position: Fullerton 0, San Diego St 3, even 2
FullertonBetterSan Diego St
G C. Williams9.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 39
→SDSUSmall
G C. Gladden TR14.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 67
G B. Nunn5 pts · 2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 13
→SDSUBig
G N. Anderson TR16 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
G D. White2.8 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 0
→SDSUBig
G I. Sy TR10 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 57
G T. Jenkins TR0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G E. Harrington7.9 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 63
F K. De Luna4.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 7
=No call
F B. Cherry TR15.3 pts · 6.8 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
FullertonBetterSan Diego St
CSUF offense272nd of 366 · -8.3
→SDSUBig
SDSU defense70th of 366 · +0.8
CSUF defense344th of 366 · -9.2
→SDSUBig
SDSU offense86th of 366 · +0.3
Backcourt-6.1 · 4 players
→SDSUBig
Backcourt+3.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.1 · 1 player
→SDSUSmall
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
Bench-0.1 · 1 player
→SDSUSmall
Bench+0.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestCSUF betterSDSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Williams27 minB. Nunn19 minD. White13 minT. Jenkins3 min · TRM. Quinlan2 minD. McConnellNew
Forwards
K. De Luna18 minR. ReynoldsNew
Guards
C. Gladden34 min · TRN. Anderson30 min · TRI. Sy28 min · TRE. Harrington21 minR. Gonzales2 minL. DavisNew
Forwards
B. Cherry29 min · TRT. Simmons14 minT. Majak3 minS. MashebinuNewL. SkoricNewL. VinciniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.3 #60 | Points per game | 76.8 #120 |
| 1.07 #208 | Points per possession | 1.09 #159 |
| 75.5 #3 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #89 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #180 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #116 |
| 34.2 #162 | 3-point % | 34.5 #144 |
| 43.1 #108 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.8 #301 |
| 37.8 #107 | Free throw rate | 39.0 #81 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #82 | Turnover rate | 17.2 #224 |
| 24.6 #345 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.5 #222 |
| 15.0 #85 | Assists per game | 14.6 #110 |
| Defense | ||
| 82.2 #342 | Points allowed | 71.3 #84 |
| 1.08 #181 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #31 |
| 54.3 #307 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.2 #41 |
| 34.0 #185 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #164 |
| 19.4 #34 | Turnovers forced | 20.2 #19 |
| 71.7 #80 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #208 |
| 7.9 #45 | Steals per game | 7.7 #62 |
| 2.8 #258 | Blocks per game | 4.6 #27 |
Fullerton
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hawai'i63–78
- Wvs UC Davis82–70
- W@ CSU Northridge90–77
- Wvs UC San Diego75–71
- Lvs Hawai'i85–87
A week or more of rest.
San Diego St
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah State62–73
- Wvs New Mexico64–62
- Wvs Colorado St71–62
- Wvs UNLV89–86
- L@ Boise St77–86
A week or more of rest.