University Credit Union Pavilion · at Saint Mary's
Line
SMC -6.5no move
Total147.5up 1 from 146.5
| This season | SMC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SMC 73–66 · win probability SMC 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
SMC -6.5
no move since the open
Total
147.5
model 139.3 · Under by 8
Model edge
SMC by 1
model vs market
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SMC has more of the edges
ILST 0, SMC 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ILST 28.0%, SMC 37.5%. Defensive: ILST 74.6%, SMC 76.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: ILST 31.6, SMC 35.5. Allowed: ILST 32.3, SMC 25.7
Three-pointers
ILST hits 34.9% and allows 33.0%; SMC hits 38.7% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 43.3% and 36.4% of their shots
ILST offense vs SMC defense
Offense 133rd of 366 against a defense 44th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
SMC at home. This season: SMC 0-0 at home, ILST 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
ILST has played the 135th-hardest schedule, SMC the 93rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: ILST plays 67.7 a game (241st fastest), SMC 66.2 (305th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ILST 16.8%, SMC 16.9%. Forced: ILST 16.0%, SMC 15.1%
Even
SMC offense vs ILST defense
Offense 129th of 366 against a defense 102nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ILST 53.6 and allows 49.8; SMC 52.8 and allows 46.8
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ILST 37%, SMC 32%. Transfers in: ILST 5, SMC 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 3 to 6.5 | 3171 | 66% | 50% | 50% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1736 | 67% | 50% | 49% |
| Games with a total of 145 to 149.5 | 3547 | 74% | 49% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenSMC -6.5
no move
NowSMC -6.5
No change since the open
Total
Open146.5
▲ 1
Now147.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
ILST +230 · SMC -285
Line movement
Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened SMC -6.5 · unchangedmodel SMC -7.5
model SMC -7.5
Opened 146.5 · now 148.5 · moved 2 upmodel 139.5
model 139.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Over 147.5TotalUnder 147.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
8 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILST | SMC | Over | Under | ILST | SMC | |
| BetMGMMGM | — | — | 148.5-105 | 148.5-115 | +230 | -285 |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -6.5-115 | +6.5-105 | 148-110 | 148-110 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -6.5-117 | +6.5-109 | 148.5-115 | 148.5-110 | +225 | -295 |
| BetUSBetUS | -6.5-115 | +6.5-105 | 148-110 | 148-110 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -6.5-110 | +6.5-110 | 148-110 | 148-110 | +230 | -280 |
| DraftKingsDK | -6.5-105 | +6.5-115 | 148.5-110 | 148.5-110 | +230 | -285 |
| FanDuelFD | -6.5-110 | +6.5-110 | 148.5-110 | 148.5-110 | +225 | -280 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -6.5-111 | +6.5-101 | 148-108 | 148-108 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SMC -6.5 | SMC -7.5 | SMC +1.0 |
| Total | 147.5 | 139.3 | Under 8.2 |
| Projected score | — | ILST 65.9 · SMC 73.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SMC -4.3 | — |
| 1H total | 65.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | ILST 30.5 · SMC 34.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Illinois St
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-20
43% overs · avg −3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | @ | L 68-72 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-65 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 67-87 | +15.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 82-80 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 94-42 | -12.5 | W +39.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 79-69 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 72-65 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 89-78 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 95-53 | -20.5 | W +21.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 85-65 | -13.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 73-56 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 73-47 | -12.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 59-63 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 89-94 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 88-62 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 59-54 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-80 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 70-65 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 50-54 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | U 104 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 86-76 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 80-88 | -10.5 | L −18.5 | 137.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 86-64 | -8.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 56-83 | -1.5 | L −28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 78-61 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 60-74 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 71-69 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 81-74 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 52-74 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 79-58 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 22 | @ | W 78-75 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 25 | @ | W 61-55 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 66-88 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−2.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
+4.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−4.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
−6.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
+39.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
+3.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
−1.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+21.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+3.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
+8.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
+6.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
+12.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
+13.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
−12.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−14.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
−11.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+20.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−1.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−5.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
+8.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−12.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
−0.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
−18.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+13.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−28.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
+14.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−10.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+6.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+8.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−20.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
+16.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+11.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
+13.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
−14.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
@
OHIO
L 68-72
−21.5
9
vs
COR
W 76-65
−23.5
14
vs
USC
L 67-87
−1.5
16
@
LBSU
W 82-80
+20.5
23
vs
CCU
W 94-42
−10.5
27
vs
CLT
W 79-69
+8.5
28
vs
FUR
W 72-65
−8.5
3
vs
EKU
W 89-78
+12.5
6
vs
CHST
W 95-53
+3.5
13
vs
USU
L 78-83
+12.5
18
@
SIU
W 75-68
−10.5
21
vs
INST
W 85-65
−2.5
29
@
DRKE
W 73-56
−16.5
1
vs
EVAN
W 73-47
−24.5
7
@
VAL
L 71-77
+9.5
10
vs
UIC
L 59-63
−19.5
14
@
INST
L 89-94
+34.5
17
vs
BRAD
W 88-62
+2.5
21
vs
UNI
W 59-54
−19.5
24
@
BEL
L 69-80
−1.5
28
@
MUR
W 70-65
−24.5
3
vs
SIU
L 50-54
−36.5
6
vs
DRKE
W 86-76
+17.5
9
@
EVAN
L 80-88
+30.5
12
vs
VAL
W 86-64
+11.5
15
@
UIC
L 56-83
−1.5
18
vs
MUR
W 78-61
−19.5
21
@
BRAD
L 60-74
−11.5
25
@
UNI
W 71-69
+7.5
1
vs
BEL
W 81-74
+4.5
6
vs
UNI
L 52-74
−4.5
18
vs
KENT
W 79-58
−17.5
22
@
WAKE
W 78-75
+0.5
25
@
DAY
W 61-55
−24.5
2
vs
AUB
L 66-88
+4.5
over 15under 20avg −3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Saint Mary's
32 games played
Straight up
26-6
81% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 84-58 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 87-66 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-60 | -17.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-49 | -14.5 | W +16.5 | 128.5 | O 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 85-72 | -20.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-65 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 77-66 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 71-96 | +4.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 70-61 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 67-68 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-75 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 63-58 | -11.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 78-73 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 72-45 | -19.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 78-57 | -18.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 93-76 | -11.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -15.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-68 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 54-62 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 81-51 | -19.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-69 | -14.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-60 | -20.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 79-54 | -11.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-60 | -24.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 72-61 | -7.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 72-70 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 133.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 83-67 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 86-67 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 70-59 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 71-76 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 50-63 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 113 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+12.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+5.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+12.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+16.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
−7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
+5.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
−20.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
+0.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−3.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
−0.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−6.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
−4.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
+7.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
+2.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+5.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
−9.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−6.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
+10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−8.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
+0.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
+6.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
+13.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
+3.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
−7.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+7.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
+13.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
+13.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−9.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STMN
W 84-58
+0.5
7
vs
UTC
W 87-66
+7.5
11
vs
OHIO
W 90-60
+5.5
14
vs
UNT
W 80-49
+0.5
19
vs
ARST
W 85-72
+7.5
26
vs
WICH
W 70-65
−4.5
27
vs
VT
W 77-66
−1.5
28
vs
VAN
L 71-96
+17.5
7
@
DAV
W 70-61
−6.5
14
vs
BOIS
L 67-68
−4.5
19
vs
FAU
W 88-75
+17.5
22
vs
UNI
W 63-58
−11.5
28
@
LMU
W 78-73
+7.5
30
@
PEPP
W 72-45
−24.5
2
vs
PORT
W 78-57
−11.5
4
vs
SEA
W 93-76
+29.5
10
vs
WSU
W 88-82
+26.5
13
@
SF
W 82-68
+8.5
17
@
SCU
L 54-62
−36.5
21
vs
ORST
W 81-51
−10.5
24
@
PORT
W 75-69
−0.5
31
@
GONZ
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
USD
W 87-60
−1.5
7
vs
SF
W 79-54
−9.5
11
vs
PEPP
W 88-60
+3.5
14
@
PAC
W 72-61
−2.5
18
@
SEA
W 72-70
+8.5
21
@
WSU
W 83-67
+0.5
25
vs
SCU
W 86-67
−0.5
28
vs
GONZ
W 70-59
−14.5
9
vs
SCU
L 71-76
−3.5
19
vs
TA&M
L 50-63
−36.5
over 14under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Saint Mary's has the better starters
Position by position: Illinois St 0, Saint Mary's 2, even 3
Illinois StBetterSaint Mary's
G M. Messina-Moore TR10.9 pts · 3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 57
→SMCSmall
G J. Dent12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 5.7 ast
Score 83
G J. Kinziger11.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 51
=Even
G J. Dent-Smith TR8.2 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 53
G D. Garang TR10.6 pts · 5.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
=Even
G R. Hawke2.5 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 21
G Z. King TR7.1 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 24
→SMCBig
F T. Ndong TR4.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 73
G D. Burch TR9 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
=No call
F K. Gad1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
Illinois StBetterSaint Mary's
ILST offense133rd of 366 · -3.9
→SMCSmall
SMC defense44th of 366 · +2.5
ILST defense102nd of 366 · -0.9
=Even
SMC offense129th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-6.6 · 5 players
→SMCBig
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt+0.5 · 2 players
Bench+3.4 · 4 players
←ILSTBig
Bench-0.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestILST betterSMC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Messina-Moore33 min · TRJ. Kinziger33 minD. Garang30 min · TRZ. King27 min · TRD. Burch23 min · TRM. Klabo16 min
Forwards
C. Walker23 minL. Semona6 min · TRN. ClevelandNewN. AllenNewL. WolfNewM. SzafoniNew
Guards
J. Dent37 minJ. Dent-Smith20 min · TRR. Hawke11 minL. Fennell8 min · TRM. Juzenas6 minD. BivinsNew
Forwards
T. Ndong18 min · TRK. Gad10 minV. Zougris9 min · TRJ. LewisNewT. MacLeanNew
Centers
S. Altuntas8 min · TRJ. GardnerNewF. PavelyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.1 #191 | Points per game | 76.8 #125 |
| 1.09 #151 | Points per possession | 1.17 #39 |
| 67.7 #241 | Pace (possessions) | 66.2 #305 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.6 #77 | Effective FG% | 52.8 #109 |
| 34.9 #126 | 3-point % | 38.7 #7 |
| 43.3 #106 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.4 #242 |
| 31.6 #266 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #162 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #193 | Turnover rate | 16.9 #201 |
| 28.0 #268 | Offensive rebound rate | 37.5 #12 |
| 13.5 #179 | Assists per game | 15.1 #82 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #49 | Points allowed | 65.2 #7 |
| 1.02 #48 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #14 |
| 49.8 #90 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.8 #20 |
| 33.0 #122 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #40 |
| 16.0 #221 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #274 |
| 74.6 #13 | Defensive rebound rate | 76.1 #4 |
| 5.5 #294 | Steals per game | 5.5 #302 |
| 2.3 #326 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #129 |
Illinois St
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn66–88
- W@ Dayton61–55
- W@ Wake Forest78–75
- Wvs Kent State79–58
- Lvs Northern Iowa52–74
A week or more of rest.
Saint Mary's
26-6 in 2025-26 overall · 16-3 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas A&M50–63
- Lvs Santa Clara71–76
- Wvs Gonzaga70–59
- Wvs Santa Clara86–67
- W@ Washington St83–67
A week or more of rest.