Delta Center · Neutral site
Line
BYU -3.5moved 1 toward BYU
Total160.5up 1 from 159.5
| This season | BYU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BYU 79–77 · win probability BYU 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
BYU -3.5
moved 1 toward BYU
Total
160.5
model 156.3 · Under by 4
Model edge
OSU by 2
model vs market
Public on the spread
76% OSU
74% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: OSU has more of the edges
OSU 2, BYU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
OSU hits 35.7% and allows 31.9%; BYU hits 34.5% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 40.1% and 39.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: OSU plays 67.2 a game (275th fastest), BYU 70.6 (90th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: OSU 30.4%, BYU 34.3%. Defensive: OSU 70.0%, BYU 70.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: OSU 56.2 and allows 50.2; BYU 54.4 and allows 51.2
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: OSU 15.3%, BYU 15.2%. Forced: OSU 15.6%, BYU 16.4%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: OSU 37.2, BYU 34.4. Allowed: OSU 34.7, BYU 28.9
Context
Schedule so far
OSU has played the 33rd-hardest schedule, BYU the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
BYU offense vs OSU defense
Offense 24th of 366 against a defense 35th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: OSU 37%, BYU 35%. Transfers in: OSU 4, BYU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
OSU offense vs BYU defense
Offense 36th of 366 against a defense 33rd, on the model’s ratings
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral-site favorites of 3 to 6.5 | 928 | 66% | 50% | 47% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1736 | 67% | 50% | 49% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite | 6763 | 75% | 50% | 51% |
| Games with a total of 160 to 164.5 | 787 | 78% | 50% | 54% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenBYU -2.5
1 → BYU
NowBYU -3.5
1 pt toward BYU
Total
Open159.5
▲ 1
Now160.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
OSU +135 · BYU -160
Line movement
Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened BYU -2.5 · now BYU -3.5 · moved 1 toward BYUmodel BYU -1.5
model BYU -1.5
Opened 159.5 · now 160.5 · moved 1 upmodel 156.5
model 156.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Over 160.5TotalUnder 160.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Money is 32 pts ahead of bets on OSU
Books
8 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSU | BYU | Over | Under | OSU | BYU | |
| BetMGMMGM | — | — | 160.5-105 | 160.5-115 | +135 | -160 |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -3.5-105 | +3.5-115 | 160.5-105 | 160.5-115 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -3.5-114 | +3.5-109 | 160.5-110 | 160.5-113 | +125 | -155 |
| BetUSBetUS | -3.5-105 | +3.5-115 | 160.5-105 | 160.5-115 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | -3.5-115 | +3.5-105 | 160-110 | 160-110 | +135 | -160 |
| DraftKingsDK | -3.5-110 | +3.5-110 | 160.5-105 | 160.5-115 | +136 | -162 |
| FanDuelFD | -3.5-110 | +3.5-110 | 160.5-110 | 160.5-110 | +136 | -164 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -3.5-101 | +3.5-111 | 160.5-103 | 160.5-113 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | BYU -3.5 | BYU -1.4 | OSU +2.1 |
| Total | 160.5 | 156.3 | Under 4.2 |
| Projected score | — | OSU 77.4 · BYU 78.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BYU -0.7 | — |
| 1H total | 73.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | OSU 36.2 · BYU 36.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Ohio State
34 games played
Straight up
21-13
62% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +1.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 118-102 | -33.5 | L −17.5 | 172.5 | O 220 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 94-68 | -24.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 75-53 | -23.5 | L −1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 64-63 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 91-58 | -26.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 113-60 | -30.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 66-67 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 86-82 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 80-88 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 89-88 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 89-63 | -28.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 80-73 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 69-72 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 72-62 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 74-81 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 82-74 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 62-74 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 26 | vs | W 84-78 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-92 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 61-82 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 89-82 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 86-69 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 60-66 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 57-74 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 82-74 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 94-62 | -7.5 | W +24.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 91-78 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 72-69 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 67-71 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-66 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
−17.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+1.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−1.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−8.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
+6.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+22.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−6.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+2.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
−4.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
−2.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
+1.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−2.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
−2.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−5.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
+11.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−5.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+7.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+0.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
+4.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
−5.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
−5.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
+13.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−12.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
−0.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
+15.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
+4.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+14.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+24.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+9.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+4.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
+8.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
IUIN
W 118-102
+47.5
7
vs
PFW
W 94-68
+2.5
11
vs
APP
W 75-53
−19.5
16
vs
ND
W 64-63
−29.5
20
vs
WMU
W 91-58
−10.5
25
vs
MSM
W 113-60
+21.5
28
@
PITT
L 66-67
−15.5
6
@
NU
W 86-82
+12.5
9
vs
ILL
L 80-88
+5.5
13
vs
WVU
W 89-88
+31.5
20
vs
UNC
L 70-71
−16.5
23
vs
GRAM
W 89-63
−1.5
2
@
RUTG
W 80-73
+1.5
5
vs
NEB
L 69-72
−14.5
8
@
ORE
W 72-62
−18.5
11
@
WASH
L 74-81
−0.5
17
vs
UCLA
W 86-74
+13.5
20
vs
MINN
W 82-74
+12.5
23
@
MICH
L 62-74
−29.5
26
vs
PSU
W 84-78
+8.5
31
@
WIS
L 82-92
+18.5
5
@
MD
W 82-62
−6.5
8
vs
MICH
L 61-82
−18.5
11
vs
USC
W 89-82
+18.5
14
vs
UVA
L 66-70
−10.5
17
vs
WIS
W 86-69
−2.5
22
@
MSU
L 60-66
−20.5
25
@
IOWA
L 57-74
−10.5
1
vs
PUR
W 82-74
+6.5
4
@
PSU
W 94-62
+3.5
7
vs
IU
W 91-78
+20.5
12
vs
IOWA
W 72-69
+0.5
13
vs
MICH
L 67-71
−17.5
19
vs
TCU
L 64-66
−15.5
over 16under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
BYU
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-17
51% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 71-66 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-53 | -38.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-68 | -35.5 | L −18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-70 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 72-62 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-60 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 100-53 | -33.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 93-57 | -23.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 85-67 | -33.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 109-81 | -34.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 83-73 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 104-76 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 89-84 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 168.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-78 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 83-86 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 92-99 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 66-77 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 99-94 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-86 | -15.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 68-75 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 84-97 | -14.5 | L −27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 68-90 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-76 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 105-91 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 68-48 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 66-73 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−4.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
+6.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−18.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+23.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
+2.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
−5.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
+12.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−1.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
+13.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+12.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
−15.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
−6.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
+2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+10.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
−9.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−7.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
−1.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
−5.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
−15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−9.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+1.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
−11.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
+4.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
+12.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
−27.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
−10.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
−20.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
+3.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+2.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
+16.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
+2.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−16.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
−14.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−11.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+13.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+2.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
−31.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
+11.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
−2.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−21.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
−2.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+0.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
+5.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
+21.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
−18.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+11.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
+4.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−16.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
+0.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
+2.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
+12.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
+23.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+34.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
+14.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
−22.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
−6.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
+18.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
+8.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
+6.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
−1.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+27.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
−25.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
−7.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−6.5
over 18under 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Ohio State has the better starters
Position by position: Ohio State 1, BYU 0, even 4
Ohio StateBetterBYU
G J. Mobley15.7 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 93
=Even
G R. Wright18.1 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 97
G J. Pippen TR13.9 pts · 4 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 90
=Even
G C. Chandler TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 84
G J. Williams TR14.9 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 92
=Even
F J. Kohler TR12.5 pts · 8.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 96
G C. Givens TR9.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 65
←OSUSmall
F J. Wahlin TR5.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
F A. Bynum9.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 73
=No call
F D. Baker7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
Ohio StateBetterBYU
OSU offense36th of 366 · +5.2
=Even
BYU defense33rd of 366 · +3.5
OSU defense35th of 366 · +3.3
=Even
BYU offense24th of 366 · +7.2
Backcourt+9.1 · 4 players
←OSUSmall
Backcourt+6.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
→BYUBig
Frontcourt+4.5 · 3 players
Bench+1.0 · 3 players
←OSUSmall
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestOSU betterBYU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Mobley32 minJ. Pippen31 min · TRJ. Williams30 min · TRC. Givens26 min · TRB. Nash2 minM. HerroNew
Forwards
A. Bynum29 minA. Jelavic16 min · TRJ. OjianwunaNewA. ThompsonNewA. SmithNewV. LazarevicNew
Centers
I. Njegovan11 min
Guards
R. Wright35 minC. Chandler27 min · TRN. PickensNew
Forwards
J. Kohler28 min · TRJ. Wahlin21 min · TRD. Baker20 minT. Betsey18 min · TRK. Mboup16 minB. KozlowskiNew
Centers
A. Stewart1 min · TRP. OstojicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.3 #76 | Points per game | 83.5 #22 |
| 1.18 #31 | Points per possession | 1.18 #32 |
| 67.2 #275 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #90 |
| Shooting | ||
| 56.2 #19 | Effective FG% | 54.4 #54 |
| 35.7 #72 | 3-point % | 34.5 #145 |
| 40.1 #170 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #177 |
| 37.2 #122 | Free throw rate | 34.4 #198 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #91 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #78 |
| 30.4 #185 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.3 #61 |
| 14.5 #117 | Assists per game | 13.3 #192 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.6 #120 | Points allowed | 75.4 #202 |
| 1.08 #164 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #133 |
| 50.2 #114 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #174 |
| 31.9 #57 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #269 |
| 15.6 #243 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #194 |
| 70.0 #160 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #145 |
| 4.8 #340 | Steals per game | 7.2 #109 |
| 2.4 #311 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #40 |
Ohio State
21-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs TCU64–66
- Lvs Michigan67–71
- Wvs Iowa72–69
- Wvs Indiana91–78
- W@ Penn State94–62
A week or more of rest.
BYU
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas71–79
- Lvs Houston66–73
- Wvs West Virginia68–48
- Wvs Kansas St105–91
- Wvs Texas Tech82–76
A week or more of rest.