Reilly Center · at St Bonaventure
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SBU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SBU 78–71 · win probability SBU 74%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SBU has more of the edges
BUF 1, SBU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: BUF 39.6, SBU 30.0. Allowed: BUF 31.4, SBU 33.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BUF 27.1%, SBU 34.5%. Defensive: BUF 68.9%, SBU 70.2%
Context
Schedule so far
BUF has played the 198th-hardest schedule, SBU the 109th. A record against a soft schedule means less
SBU offense vs BUF defense
Offense 169th of 366 against a defense 257th, on the model’s ratings
BUF offense vs SBU defense
Offense 215th of 366 against a defense 131st, on the model’s ratings
Home court
SBU at home. This season: SBU 0-0 at home, BUF 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BUF 16.2%, SBU 16.8%. Forced: BUF 17.8%, SBU 17.1%
Even
Three-pointers
BUF hits 37.9% and allows 35.1%; SBU hits 37.4% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 45.5% and 31.3% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: BUF 55.4 and allows 55.1; SBU 52.4 and allows 53.3
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BUF 8%, SBU 18%. Transfers in: BUF 7, SBU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: BUF plays 68.2 a game (219th fastest), SBU 68.0 (228th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SBU -7.3 | — |
| Total | — | 148.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | BUF 70.7 · SBU 78 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SBU -4.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | BUF 32.7 · SBU 36.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
BUF 1–4 SBUSBU leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · SBU has won the last 3 meetings · BUF 3-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | SBU 77 @ BUF 69 | BUF +5.5 | SBU W |
| Dec 7, 2024-25 | BUF 55 @ SBU 65 | SBU -17.5 | BUF W |
| Dec 2, 2023-24 | SBU 80 @ BUF 65 | BUF +9.5 | SBU W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | SBU 66 @ BUF 83 | BUF +2.5 | BUF W |
| Dec 4, 2021-22 | BUF 65 @ SBU 68 | SBU -3.5 | BUF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Buffalo
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-79 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 66-53 | +18.5 | W +31.5 | 153.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 94-90 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 78-70 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 73-71 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 29 | @ | W 71-53 | -9.5 | W +8.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-77 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 83-79 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 70-73 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 88-71 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 81-67 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 85-72 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 80-91 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 81-87 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 102-105 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | O 207 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 63-82 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 67-68 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-78 | +7.5 | W +18.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 83-95 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 69-81 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 63-53 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 70-72 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 86-82 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 85-99 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 70-75 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 72-67 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 78-99 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | O 177 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-73 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 158.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
USM
W 85-79
+2.5
7
vs
GB
W 83-76
+3.5
11
@
DEP
W 66-53
+31.5
18
vs
UVM
W 94-90
+5.5
24
vs
VMI
W 78-70
+2.5
26
vs
BUCK
W 73-71
−2.5
29
@
CAN
W 71-53
+8.5
6
vs
SBU
L 69-77
−2.5
9
@
UMBC
W 83-79
+0.5
14
@
ECU
L 70-73
−1.5
20
@
WMU
W 88-71
+14.5
31
@
NIU
W 81-67
+7.5
3
vs
BALL
W 85-72
+6.5
10
@
OHIO
L 80-91
−6.5
13
vs
KENT
L 81-87
−3.5
17
@
M-OH
L 102-105
+7.5
20
vs
AKR
L 63-82
−10.5
23
vs
MASS
L 67-68
−2.5
27
@
BGSU
W 89-78
+18.5
31
vs
OHIO
L 83-95
−14.5
3
vs
M-OH
L 71-73
+2.5
7
@
USA
L 69-81
−8.5
11
@
BALL
W 63-53
+11.5
17
vs
NIU
L 70-72
−11.5
21
@
MASS
W 86-82
+11.5
24
@
AKR
L 85-99
+1.5
28
vs
CMU
L 70-75
−10.5
3
vs
EMU
W 72-67
−0.5
6
@
TOL
L 78-99
−15.5
12
vs
AKR
L 70-73
+9.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
USM
W 85-79
+10.5
7
vs
GB
W 83-76
+11.5
11
@
DEP
W 66-53
−34.5
18
vs
UVM
W 94-90
+42.5
24
vs
VMI
W 78-70
−2.5
26
vs
BUCK
W 73-71
−2.5
29
@
CAN
W 71-53
−15.5
6
vs
SBU
L 69-77
+1.5
9
@
UMBC
W 83-79
+16.5
14
@
ECU
L 70-73
−3.5
20
@
WMU
W 88-71
+8.5
31
@
NIU
W 81-67
−4.5
3
vs
BALL
W 85-72
+11.5
10
@
OHIO
L 80-91
+14.5
13
vs
KENT
L 81-87
+2.5
17
@
M-OH
L 102-105
+44.5
20
vs
AKR
L 63-82
−21.5
23
vs
MASS
L 67-68
−24.5
27
@
BGSU
W 89-78
+16.5
31
vs
OHIO
L 83-95
+21.5
3
vs
M-OH
L 71-73
−21.5
7
@
USA
L 69-81
+4.5
11
@
BALL
W 63-53
−25.5
17
vs
NIU
L 70-72
−3.5
21
@
MASS
W 86-82
+16.5
24
@
AKR
L 85-99
+23.5
28
vs
CMU
L 70-75
−6.5
3
vs
EMU
W 72-67
−4.5
6
@
TOL
L 78-99
+21.5
12
vs
AKR
L 70-73
−15.5
over 16under 14avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
St Bonaventure
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
13-20
39% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 89-70 | -21.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-66 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 84-80 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 75-61 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-85 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 67-58 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-77 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-88 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 92-81 | -21.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 82-89 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 80-89 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-81 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 64-68 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-78 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 84-70 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 62-97 | +8.5 | L −26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 87-79 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-77 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 70-72 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 70-67 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-71 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 94-99 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 94-76 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 58-71 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 82-91 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-68 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 99-80 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 63-57 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-68 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRAD
W 69-63
+4.5
8
vs
CAN
W 89-70
−2.5
12
vs
SIE
W 75-66
−0.5
15
vs
YSU
W 84-80
−5.5
20
vs
RMU
W 75-61
+2.5
25
vs
UNC
L 70-85
−4.5
27
vs
ECU
W 67-58
−1.5
30
@
FAU
W 70-65
+6.5
6
@
BUF
W 77-69
+2.5
10
vs
COLG
W 85-77
−1.5
13
vs
OHIO
L 83-88
−11.5
20
vs
LEM
W 92-81
−10.5
31
@
VCU
L 82-89
+2.5
7
vs
RICH
L 80-89
−15.5
10
vs
FOR
L 77-81
−12.5
14
@
JOES
L 64-68
−5.5
17
@
LAS
L 74-78
−9.5
20
vs
LUC
W 84-70
+3.5
23
vs
SLU
L 62-97
−26.5
28
@
DUQ
W 87-79
+11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 73-77
−2.5
3
@
DAY
L 70-72
+5.5
7
@
FOR
W 70-67
+1.5
14
vs
DUQ
L 73-78
−6.5
18
vs
JOES
L 65-71
−11.5
21
@
RICH
L 94-99
−3.5
26
vs
URI
W 94-76
+15.5
28
@
GMU
L 58-71
−9.5
4
@
GW
L 82-91
−1.5
7
vs
DAV
L 63-68
−9.5
11
vs
LAS
W 99-80
+11.5
12
vs
GMU
W 63-57
+8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 63-68
+0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRAD
W 69-63
−7.5
8
vs
CAN
W 89-70
+22.5
12
vs
SIE
W 75-66
+0.5
15
vs
YSU
W 84-80
+17.5
20
vs
RMU
W 75-61
−10.5
25
vs
UNC
L 70-85
+2.5
27
vs
ECU
W 67-58
−19.5
30
@
FAU
W 70-65
−11.5
6
@
BUF
W 77-69
+1.5
10
vs
COLG
W 85-77
+19.5
13
vs
OHIO
L 83-88
+20.5
20
vs
LEM
W 92-81
+21.5
31
@
VCU
L 82-89
+13.5
7
vs
RICH
L 80-89
+15.5
10
vs
FOR
L 77-81
+15.5
14
@
JOES
L 64-68
−15.5
17
@
LAS
L 74-78
+10.5
20
vs
LUC
W 84-70
+6.5
23
vs
SLU
L 62-97
−0.5
28
@
DUQ
W 87-79
+15.5
31
vs
GMU
L 73-77
+7.5
3
@
DAY
L 70-72
−2.5
7
@
FOR
W 70-67
−4.5
14
vs
DUQ
L 73-78
−1.5
18
vs
JOES
L 65-71
−11.5
21
@
RICH
L 94-99
+45.5
26
vs
URI
W 94-76
+25.5
28
@
GMU
L 58-71
−17.5
4
@
GW
L 82-91
+15.5
7
vs
DAV
L 63-68
−10.5
11
vs
LAS
W 99-80
+32.5
12
vs
GMU
W 63-57
−23.5
13
vs
DAY
L 63-68
−10.5
over 19under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Buffalo has the better starters
Position by position: Buffalo 2, St Bonaventure 1, even 2
BuffaloBetterSt Bonaventure
G D. Steffe TR9.9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 39
→SBUSmall
G A. Fulton TR10.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
G D. Ducommun TR10.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 15
=No call
G I. Ermakov2.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
G J. Starling TR10.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 55
←BUFSmall
F R. Kalambay TR4.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
F J. Pitre TR5.9 pts · 6.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 30
=Even
F J. Grahovac4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 33
F A. Lorick TR10.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 75
←BUFBig
F M. Blackwood TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 22
BuffaloBetterSt Bonaventure
BUF offense215th of 366 · -6.6
→SBUSmall
SBU defense131st of 366 · -2.4
BUF defense257th of 366 · -6.7
→SBUSmall
SBU offense169th of 366 · -5.2
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
→SBUBig
Backcourt-0.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
←BUFSmall
Frontcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Bench-3.9 · 4 players
→SBUBig
Bench-0.6 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestBUF betterSBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Steffe31 min · TRD. Ducommun31 min · TRJ. Starling29 min · TRM. Tyne19 min · TRK. Jones10 minH. Reede9 min · TR
Forwards
J. Pitre25 min · TRA. Lorick22 min · TRM. Buteliauskas6 minB. JohnNewT. KuskaNew
Guards
A. Fulton29 min · TRI. Ermakov10 minA. Lonati8 minJ. DeRose1 minR. HeathNewZ. PhilipkoskiNew
Forwards
R. Kalambay21 min · TRJ. Grahovac18 minM. Blackwood12 min · TRJ. IkpotokinNewC. BlankenbergNew
Centers
B. BillNewC. DialloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.5 #106 | Points per game | 76.2 #138 |
| 1.14 #73 | Points per possession | 1.12 #104 |
| 68.2 #219 | Pace (possessions) | 68.0 #228 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.4 #30 | Effective FG% | 52.4 #129 |
| 37.9 #20 | 3-point % | 37.4 #22 |
| 45.5 #57 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.3 #335 |
| 39.6 #65 | Free throw rate | 30.0 #310 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.2 #152 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #189 |
| 27.1 #291 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.5 #60 |
| 14.1 #138 | Assists per game | 15.4 #73 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #244 | Points allowed | 75.4 #201 |
| 1.13 #279 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #245 |
| 55.1 #333 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.3 #278 |
| 35.1 #252 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #299 |
| 17.8 #105 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #144 |
| 68.9 #209 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.2 #150 |
| 7.6 #72 | Steals per game | 7.5 #80 |
| 2.8 #262 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #41 |
Buffalo
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Akron70–73
- L@ Toledo78–99
- Wvs E Michigan72–67
- Lvs C Michigan70–75
- L@ Akron85–99
A week or more of rest.
St Bonaventure
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-15 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton63–68
- Wvs George Mason63–57
- Wvs La Salle99–80
- Lvs Davidson63–68
- L@ G Washington82–91
A week or more of rest.