Case Gym · at Boston U
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COLU 74–71 · win probability COLU 61%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
COLU 2, BU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COLU 36.0%, BU 28.0%. Defensive: COLU 72.8%, BU 72.0%
Context
Schedule so far
COLU has played the 169th-hardest schedule, BU the 293rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
BU offense vs COLU defense
Offense 305th of 366 against a defense 198th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: COLU 28.6, BU 31.4. Allowed: COLU 33.5, BU 30.5
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: COLU plays 67.8 a game (237th fastest), BU 65.2 (340th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BU at home. This season: BU 0-0 at home, COLU 0-0 away
Even
COLU offense vs BU defense
Offense 163rd of 366 against a defense 201st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: COLU 53.5 and allows 51.2; BU 57.5 and allows 53.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COLU 61%, BU 52%. Transfers in: COLU 1, BU 1. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Three-pointers
COLU hits 35.9% and allows 35.2%; BU hits 38.9% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 37.5% and 43.8% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COLU 19.3%, BU 17.7%. Forced: COLU 15.1%, BU 13.0%
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelCOLU -3.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model145.7
Model edge—
Projected score
COLU 74.4 · BU 71.3
Win probability
COLU 61%
1st half
Spread
COLU -2.0
Total
68.2
Projected score
COLU 35.1 · BU 33.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COLU 1–0 BUCOLU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · COLU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025-26 | BU 49 @ COLU 54 | COLU -4.5 | COLU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Columbia
26 games played
Straight up
14-12
54% wins
Against the spread
14-12
54% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-53 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 62-89 | +32.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 86-72 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 54-49 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 82-67 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 95-70 | -3.5 | W +21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 106-77 | -3.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 72-70 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-65 | -13.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 73-77 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 5 | @ | W 104-99 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 54-79 | -5.5 | L −30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 74-91 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 79-69 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 72-67 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-80 | -5.5 | L −17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 67-88 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 67-76 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-65 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 63-64 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-62 | -5.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 54-60 | +6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 114 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 71-81 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 152 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
+10.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
+5.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+0.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
+0.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+12.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+21.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+25.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−1.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+14.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
−8.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−9.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+8.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−30.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
−8.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
−7.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
+7.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
+0.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
−17.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−19.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−7.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+8.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−7.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+12.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
+0.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
−5.5
covered 14didn’t cover 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
NHVN
W 71-53
−24.5
10
@
CONN
L 62-89
−4.5
13
vs
UML
W 86-72
+1.5
18
vs
BU
W 54-49
−41.5
21
@
LEH
W 82-67
+5.5
23
vs
LONG
W 95-70
+11.5
26
@
FAIR
W 106-77
+32.5
3
vs
HOF
W 72-70
−2.5
6
vs
UALB
W 93-65
+13.5
9
@
STBK
L 73-77
+3.5
21
@
CAL
L 56-74
−23.5
28
@
UNF
W 90-82
+9.5
5
@
COR
W 104-99
+32.5
10
vs
HARV
L 54-79
−12.5
17
@
BRWN
L 80-86
+22.5
19
@
YALE
L 74-91
+14.5
24
@
DART
W 79-69
−8.5
30
vs
PENN
W 72-67
−14.5
31
vs
PRIN
L 68-80
+8.5
7
vs
COR
L 67-88
−16.5
13
@
PENN
L 67-76
−5.5
14
@
PRIN
W 75-65
+2.5
21
vs
DART
L 63-64
−23.5
27
vs
BRWN
W 80-62
+1.5
28
vs
YALE
L 54-60
−33.5
6
@
HARV
L 71-81
+15.5
over 14under 12avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Boston U
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +8.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-75 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 52-76 | +17.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 90-77 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 79-91 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-54 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 103 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 87-96 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 65-74 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 82-88 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 59-69 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 64-77 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 88-76 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 62-64 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 83-67 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 100-91 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 191 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 91-93 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 57-74 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 79-80 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 50-58 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 97-103 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 2 | @ | W 72-64 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-69 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 85-68 | -2.5 | W +14.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-69 | -5.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 85-58 | +2.5 | W +29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 67-70 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-63 | -8.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 68-65 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 75-73 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Mar 8 | @ | W 73-72 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 11 | @ | L 60-74 | -2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+3.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−6.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+9.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
−14.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−0.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+5.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+5.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−1.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
−11.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−18.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−10.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+6.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
−0.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−3.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+14.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
−6.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−18.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
−0.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+6.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−6.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
−7.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
+5.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+3.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+14.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+7.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
+29.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−5.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
+6.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
+6.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+0.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+7.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−16.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
NE
W 76-75
+8.5
7
@
NU
L 52-76
−8.5
12
vs
BRWN
W 90-77
+37.5
15
vs
MRMK
L 79-91
+34.5
18
@
COLU
L 49-54
−41.5
22
vs
HARV
W 75-74
+12.5
25
@
PSU
L 87-96
+40.5
29
@
NKU
L 65-74
−4.5
6
@
UNH
L 82-88
+35.5
10
vs
ME
L 59-69
−0.5
13
@
DART
L 64-77
−3.5
21
vs
UML
W 88-76
+18.5
31
@
NAVY
L 77-82
+21.5
3
vs
AMER
L 62-64
−16.5
7
@
LAF
W 83-67
+7.5
10
vs
ARMY
W 100-91
+50.5
14
vs
LEH
L 91-93
+39.5
17
@
L-MD
L 57-74
−17.5
21
vs
LAF
W 77-73
+4.5
24
@
COLG
L 79-80
+11.5
28
vs
NAVY
L 50-58
−30.5
31
@
BUCK
L 97-103
+61.5
2
@
HC
W 72-64
−3.5
7
vs
L-MD
W 78-69
+1.5
11
@
ARMY
W 85-68
+12.5
14
vs
BUCK
W 82-69
+13.5
16
vs
COLG
W 85-58
−2.5
22
@
LEH
L 67-70
−4.5
25
vs
HC
W 78-63
−0.5
28
@
AMER
W 68-65
−7.5
5
vs
AMER
W 75-73
+6.5
8
@
NAVY
W 73-72
+8.5
11
@
LEH
L 60-74
−4.5
over 19under 14avg +8.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Columbia has the better starters
Position by position: Columbia 2, Boston U 0, even 3
ColumbiaBetterBoston U
G M. Franklin9.4 pts · 4.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 48
←COLUBig
G A. Abdullah8.2 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 13
G G. O'Keefe7.9 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 45
=Even
G D. Tisinger6.1 pts · 2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 37
G H. Sanders4.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 38
=No call
G K. Alexander1 pts · 2 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
F M. Ritter6.9 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 21
=Even
F S. Hughes9.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 10
F C. Igoe8.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 72
←COLUBig
F Q. Nielsen1 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 5
ColumbiaBetterBoston U
COLU offense163rd of 366 · -4.9
=Even
BU defense201st of 366 · -5.0
COLU defense198th of 366 · -4.8
←COLUSmall
BU offense305th of 366 · -9.5
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
←COLUSmall
Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.1 · 2 players
←COLUBig
Frontcourt-4.3 · 2 players
Bench-1.9 · 4 players
→BUSmall
Bench-0.1 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestCOLU betterBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Franklin24 minG. O'Keefe21 minH. Sanders15 minJ. Cunningham4 minD. VesseyNewN. RomanelliNew
Forwards
M. Ritter25 minC. Igoe20 minD. Langford11 min · TRR. Nweke8 minL. Coleman4 minN. ClarksonNew
Guards
A. Abdullah30 minD. Tisinger20 minK. Alexander11 minP. Carr2 minA. ZakheimNewJ. TerryNew
Forwards
S. Hughes30 minQ. Nielsen8 minM. Oberti4 min · TRA. Bhesania3 minM. BaptisteNewD. LloydNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.9 #167 | Points per game | 74.5 #176 |
| 1.10 #130 | Points per possession | 1.14 #72 |
| 67.8 #237 | Pace (possessions) | 65.2 #340 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.5 #83 | Effective FG% | 57.5 #11 |
| 35.9 #61 | 3-point % | 38.9 #5 |
| 37.5 #221 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.8 #92 |
| 28.6 #337 | Free throw rate | 31.4 #270 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.3 #332 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #252 |
| 36.0 #23 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.0 #269 |
| 15.0 #90 | Assists per game | 14.2 #131 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #145 | Points allowed | 74.5 #174 |
| 1.09 #188 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #310 |
| 51.2 #168 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.6 #288 |
| 35.2 #258 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #330 |
| 15.1 #282 | Turnovers forced | 13.0 #353 |
| 72.8 #42 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #65 |
| 5.7 #270 | Steals per game | 4.7 #346 |
| 3.0 #235 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #181 |
Columbia
14-12 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Harvard71–81
- Lvs Yale54–60
- Wvs Brown80–62
- Lvs Dartmouth63–64
- W@ Princeton75–65
A week or more of rest.
Boston U
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 12-9 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh60–74
- W@ Navy73–72
- Wvs American75–73
- W@ American68–65
- Wvs Holy Cross78–63
A week or more of rest.