EagleBank Arena · at George Mason
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GMU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GMU 84–58 · win probability GMU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GMU has more of the edges
COPP 1, GMU 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
COPP offense vs GMU defense
Offense 351st of 366 against a defense 64th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: COPP 45.9 and allows 55.4; GMU 52.7 and allows 49.5
GMU offense vs COPP defense
Offense 106th of 366 against a defense 324th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
COPP has played the 313th-hardest schedule, GMU the 118th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
COPP hits 30.7% and allows 38.3%; GMU hits 33.3% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 35.2% and 35.2% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: COPP 38.5, GMU 41.1. Allowed: COPP 42.9, GMU 28.9
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COPP 30.4%, GMU 31.3%. Defensive: COPP 65.3%, GMU 71.7%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: COPP plays 69.3 a game (159th fastest), GMU 64.7 (351st). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COPP 68%, GMU 24%. Transfers in: COPP 3, GMU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COPP 22.3%, GMU 15.8%. Forced: COPP 17.6%, GMU 15.5%
Home court
GMU at home. This season: GMU 0-0 at home, COPP 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GMU -25.5 | — |
| Total | — | 141.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | COPP 58.1 · GMU 83.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GMU -15.0 | — |
| 1H total | 66.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | COPP 25.7 · GMU 40.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COPP 0–2 GMUGMU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · GMU has won the last 2 meetings · COPP 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2024-25 | COPP 55 @ GMU 93 | GMU -28.5 | GMU W |
| Dec 23, 2022-23 | COPP 53 @ GMU 91 | GMU -11.5 | GMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Coppin St
30 games played
Straight up
6-24
20% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 61-83 | +28.5 | W +6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 59-87 | +17.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 70-84 | +18.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 50-100 | +34.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 59-82 | +10.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 62-72 | +18.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | O 134 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-101 | +32.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 68-65 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 84-95 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 49-91 | +31.5 | L −10.5 | 134.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 50-92 | +30.5 | L −11.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 65-87 | +22.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 77-107 | +20.5 | L −9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 55-88 | +20.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 67-97 | +33.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 59-93 | +10.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 53-51 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-88 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 72-74 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-70 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-103 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 80-89 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 53-72 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-47 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 132.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-56 | +10.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 59-57 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 138.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 71-65 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 128.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 70-90 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 66-70 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+6.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
−10.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+4.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−15.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−12.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+8.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
−10.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
+11.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
−1.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
−10.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−11.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+0.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
−9.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−12.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+3.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
−23.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
+10.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
−4.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
−3.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+7.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
−13.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
−5.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−4.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
+19.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
+12.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
+6.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+9.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
−0.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
−0.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MD
L 61-83
+4.5
5
@
LAS
L 59-87
+6.5
9
@
JMU
L 70-84
+12.5
12
@
USF
L 50-100
−17.5
14
vs
CMU
L 59-82
−1.5
15
vs
USA
L 62-72
+0.5
22
@
VCU
L 58-101
+7.5
25
@
RID
W 68-65
−6.5
30
@
L-MD
L 84-95
+35.5
3
@
WVU
L 49-91
+5.5
6
@
LIB
L 50-92
−1.5
9
@
JOES
L 65-87
+5.5
14
@
RAD
L 77-107
+29.5
19
@
NAVY
L 55-88
−2.5
22
@
GTWN
L 67-97
+13.5
29
vs
UMBC
L 59-93
+3.5
3
@
DSU
W 53-51
−35.5
10
vs
NCCU
L 77-88
+21.5
12
vs
SCST
L 72-74
+5.5
17
@
UMES
L 67-70
+3.5
24
@
NORF
L 76-103
+35.5
31
vs
MORG
L 80-89
+13.5
2
vs
HOW
L 53-72
−21.5
7
vs
DSU
W 65-47
−20.5
14
@
NCCU
W 58-56
−29.5
16
@
SCST
W 59-57
−22.5
21
vs
UMES
W 71-65
+7.5
28
vs
NORF
L 69-75
+3.5
2
@
HOW
L 70-90
+19.5
5
@
MORG
L 66-70
−13.5
over 19under 11avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
George Mason
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 70-46 | -14.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 96-90 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 186 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 61-44 | -24.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-57 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-69 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-65 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 82-66 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 99-81 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 62-73 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 73-61 | -16.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 86-79 | -23.5 | L −16.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 80-75 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 61-50 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 67-58 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-80 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 82-74 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 69-64 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 65-74 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 65-71 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 60-52 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-82 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 139.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-72 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 67-82 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-81 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 71-58 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 65-70 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-57 | +7.5 | W +36.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 57-63 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 17 | vs | L 71-77 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
+9.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
−3.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−7.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
+5.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+15.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
+4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+3.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+7.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−6.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−4.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
−16.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
−12.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
−3.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
+4.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
+3.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+7.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
−3.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
+3.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
−10.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
+1.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+2.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−14.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
+1.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
−15.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−15.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
−17.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
−19.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
+9.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
+4.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
+36.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−8.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
−8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WOF
W 70-46
−24.5
7
vs
WIN
W 96-90
+39.5
15
vs
UNH
W 61-44
−39.5
18
vs
JAX
W 79-57
−0.5
24
vs
OHIO
W 92-69
+18.5
25
vs
FAU
W 74-65
−4.5
29
vs
JMU
W 82-66
+6.5
2
vs
COR
W 99-81
+24.5
6
@
VT
L 62-73
−9.5
13
vs
ODU
W 73-61
−10.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 86-79
+18.5
28
vs
PENN
W 83-79
+15.5
31
@
LAS
W 80-75
+20.5
3
vs
URI
W 61-50
−28.5
7
@
FOR
W 67-58
−9.5
10
vs
VCU
W 86-80
+21.5
13
@
LUC
W 82-74
+15.5
19
vs
GW
W 69-64
−20.5
24
@
URI
L 65-74
+3.5
28
vs
DAV
W 60-52
−22.5
31
@
SBU
W 77-73
+7.5
4
vs
DUQ
L 65-71
−7.5
7
vs
JOES
W 60-52
−27.5
10
@
RICH
L 70-82
+12.5
13
@
GW
L 53-72
−24.5
18
vs
DAY
L 67-82
+11.5
25
@
JOES
L 63-81
+7.5
28
vs
SBU
W 71-58
−17.5
3
@
VCU
L 65-70
−12.5
7
vs
SLU
W 86-57
−3.5
12
vs
SBU
L 57-63
−23.5
17
vs
LIB
L 71-77
+6.5
over 15under 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
George Mason has the better starters
Position by position: Coppin St 0, George Mason 5, even 0
Coppin StBetterGeorge Mason
G H. Williams7.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
→GMUBig
G B. Okojie TR20.1 pts · 3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 91
G C. Sparrow5.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 40
→GMUSmall
G M. Valentine TR13.1 pts · 5.2 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
G J. Piercy6.8 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 23
→GMUSmall
G L. Marville TR9.5 pts · 2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 39
F N. Lamizana6.6 pts · 3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 18
→GMUBig
F E. Jones TR12.9 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
F T. Koenig5.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 28
→GMUBig
F E. Adair TR14.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 74
Coppin StBetterGeorge Mason
COPP offense351st of 366 · -12.8
→GMUBig
GMU defense64th of 366 · +1.1
COPP defense324th of 366 · -8.4
→GMUBig
GMU offense106th of 366 · -1.5
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
→GMUBig
Backcourt+2.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.6 · 2 players
→GMUBig
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench-6.3 · 5 players
→GMUBig
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestCOPP betterGMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
H. Williams20 minC. Sparrow19 minJ. Piercy18 minB. Saunders16 minD. Lydner12 minJ. Brown5 min
Forwards
N. Lamizana19 minT. Koenig17 minT. Gapare16 min · TRE. TaylorNewL. LawalNewA. MyersNew
Centers
F. Aire9 min
Guards
B. Okojie35 min · TRM. Valentine32 min · TRL. Marville26 min · TRE. Oliogu-Elabor16 min · TRM. Presley16 minB. O'Connor15 min
Forwards
E. Jones29 min · TRE. Adair26 min · TRM. Marcus24 min · TRE. Kanga13 minR. MendyNewS. PendergrassNew
Centers
J. Nnaji8 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.3 #352 | Points per game | 72.9 #227 |
| 0.93 #362 | Points per possession | 1.13 #93 |
| 69.3 #159 | Pace (possessions) | 64.7 #351 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.9 #350 | Effective FG% | 52.7 #113 |
| 30.7 #326 | 3-point % | 33.3 #214 |
| 35.2 #273 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.2 #270 |
| 38.5 #90 | Free throw rate | 41.1 #44 |
| Possessions | ||
| 22.3 #363 | Turnover rate | 15.8 #121 |
| 30.4 #183 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.3 #149 |
| 11.4 #317 | Assists per game | 12.6 #243 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.0 #334 | Points allowed | 68.0 #31 |
| 1.17 #342 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #89 |
| 55.4 #339 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #83 |
| 38.3 #360 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #91 |
| 17.6 #118 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #254 |
| 65.3 #333 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #79 |
| 6.0 #233 | Steals per game | 5.0 #334 |
| 3.5 #143 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #228 |
Coppin St
6-24 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Morgan St66–70
- L@ Howard70–90
- Lvs Norfolk St69–75
- Wvs MD Eastern71–65
- W@ SC State59–57
A week or more of rest.
George Mason
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Liberty71–77
- Lvs St Bonaventure57–63
- Wvs Saint Louis86–57
- L@ VCU65–70
- Wvs St Bonaventure71–58
A week or more of rest.