McKale Center at ALKEME Arena · at Arizona
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARIZ | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARIZ 95–53 · win probability ARIZ 100%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARIZ has more of the edges
NAU 0, ARIZ 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
NAU offense vs ARIZ defense
Offense 329th of 366 against a defense 7th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: NAU 23.3%, ARIZ 38.4%. Defensive: NAU 66.6%, ARIZ 73.1%
ARIZ offense vs NAU defense
Offense 4th of 366 against a defense 292nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
NAU has played the 275th-hardest schedule, ARIZ the 11th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: NAU 51.7 and allows 56.9; ARIZ 54.7 and allows 45.3
Three-pointers
NAU hits 35.6% and allows 38.7%; ARIZ hits 36.6% and allows 31.4%. Threes are 36.6% and 26.4% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: NAU 31.8, ARIZ 43.9. Allowed: NAU 32.7, ARIZ 27.1
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: NAU plays 65.5 a game (330th fastest), ARIZ 71.6 (49th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ARIZ at home. This season: ARIZ 0-0 at home, NAU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: NAU 40%, ARIZ 29%. Transfers in: NAU 3, ARIZ 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: NAU 16.0%, ARIZ 15.1%. Forced: NAU 16.6%, ARIZ 16.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARIZ -41.8 | — |
| Total | — | 147.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | NAU 52.8 · ARIZ 94.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARIZ -24.8 | — |
| 1H total | 69.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | NAU 22.1 · ARIZ 46.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 9-1 90% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
NAU 0–2 ARIZARIZ leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · ARIZ has won the last 2 meetings · NAU 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | NAU 49 @ ARIZ 84 | ARIZ -35.5 | NAU W |
| Nov 9, 2021-22 | NAU 52 @ ARIZ 81 | ARIZ -26.5 | ARIZ W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N Arizona
29 games played
Straight up
7-22
24% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 71-77 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 49-84 | +35.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 93-87 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 79-72 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 62-75 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-69 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 48-73 | +16.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 69-78 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 65-57 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 66-90 | +6.5 | L −17.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 64-78 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 68-77 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 65-78 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 69-83 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 52-63 | +11.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 72-98 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-77 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 92-86 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 62-79 | +5.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 79-73 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 53-72 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 68-77 | +6.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-74 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 77-78 | +13.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 58-78 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-88 | +9.5 | L −21.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | L 65-76 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 65-73 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DRKE
L 71-77
+2.5
11
@
ARIZ
L 49-84
+0.5
24
vs
CP
W 93-87
+7.5
26
vs
SEMO
W 79-72
+4.5
3
vs
SDST
L 62-75
−10.5
6
@
NDSU
L 68-69
+11.5
9
@
ASU
L 48-73
−8.5
13
@
USD
L 69-78
−4.5
18
vs
SUU
W 65-57
+2.5
21
@
UIW
L 66-90
−17.5
1
@
MONT
L 64-78
−8.5
3
@
MTST
L 68-77
+1.5
8
vs
WEB
L 65-78
−10.5
10
vs
IDST
L 79-81
+2.5
15
@
SAC
L 69-83
−12.5
17
@
PRST
L 52-63
+0.5
19
vs
MONT
L 72-98
−22.5
24
vs
UNCO
W 81-77
+10.5
29
vs
EWU
W 92-86
+8.5
31
vs
IDHO
L 62-79
−11.5
5
@
IDST
W 79-73
+14.5
7
@
WEB
L 53-72
−11.5
12
vs
PRST
L 68-77
−2.5
14
vs
SAC
W 79-74
+2.5
21
@
UNCO
L 77-78
+12.5
26
@
IDHO
L 58-78
−9.5
28
@
EWU
L 57-88
−21.5
2
vs
MTST
L 65-76
−5.5
7
vs
IDST
L 65-73
−3.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DRKE
L 71-77
+3.5
11
@
ARIZ
L 49-84
−30.5
24
vs
CP
W 93-87
+15.5
26
vs
SEMO
W 79-72
−2.5
3
vs
SDST
L 62-75
−11.5
6
@
NDSU
L 68-69
−10.5
9
@
ASU
L 48-73
−33.5
13
@
USD
L 69-78
−2.5
18
vs
SUU
W 65-57
−28.5
21
@
UIW
L 66-90
+15.5
1
@
MONT
L 64-78
−7.5
3
@
MTST
L 68-77
+1.5
8
vs
WEB
L 65-78
−6.5
10
vs
IDST
L 79-81
+20.5
15
@
SAC
L 69-83
−1.5
17
@
PRST
L 52-63
−25.5
19
vs
MONT
L 72-98
+23.5
24
vs
UNCO
W 81-77
+7.5
29
vs
EWU
W 92-86
+32.5
31
vs
IDHO
L 62-79
−5.5
5
@
IDST
W 79-73
+10.5
7
@
WEB
L 53-72
−25.5
12
vs
PRST
L 68-77
+8.5
14
vs
SAC
W 79-74
−1.5
21
@
UNCO
L 77-78
+3.5
26
@
IDHO
L 58-78
−9.5
28
@
EWU
L 57-88
−1.5
2
vs
MTST
L 65-76
−1.5
7
vs
IDST
L 65-73
−4.5
over 11under 18avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arizona
39 games played
Straight up
36-3
92% wins
Against the spread
23-16
59% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-19
51% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-87 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 93-67 | -33.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-49 | -35.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 71-67 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 103-73 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 98-61 | -35.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 97-68 | -11.5 | W +17.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 96-75 | -2.5 | W +18.5 | 178.5 | U 171 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 96-62 | -34.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 68-45 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 107-71 | -39.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 99-71 | -31.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 97-78 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 101-76 | -17.5 | W +7.5 | 171.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 86-73 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-82 | -21.5 | L −14.5 | 167.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-77 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 77-51 | -13.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-53 | -17.5 | W +17.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 26 | @ | W 86-83 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 87-74 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 163.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-47 | -20.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 9 | @ | L 78-82 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 75-78 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 75-68 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-66 | +6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 87-80 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 84-61 | -9.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 73-57 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 89-79 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 81-59 | -15.5 | W +6.5 | 159.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 79-74 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 20 | vs | W 92-58 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 78-66 | -11.5 | W +0.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 26 | vs | W 109-88 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 166.5 | O 197 |
| Mar 28 | vs | W 79-64 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 73-91 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+9.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−7.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−0.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
+2.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
+8.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
−2.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+1.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+17.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
+18.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
−0.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
+9.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
−3.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
−3.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+1.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+7.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+5.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
−14.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−2.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
+12.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
+17.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+1.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−1.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
+16.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
−9.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−11.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−4.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
+13.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
−0.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
+13.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
+8.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
−3.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
+6.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
−1.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+3.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+3.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
+0.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+12.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
+9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
−19.5
covered 23didn’t cover 16avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
FLA
W 93-87
+15.5
7
vs
UTU
W 93-67
−2.5
11
vs
NAU
W 84-49
−30.5
14
vs
UCLA
W 69-65
−19.5
19
@
CONN
W 71-67
−18.5
24
vs
DEN
W 103-73
+21.5
29
vs
NORF
W 98-61
+12.5
6
vs
AUB
W 97-68
+2.5
13
vs
ALA
W 96-75
−7.5
16
vs
ACU
W 96-62
+12.5
20
vs
SDSU
W 68-45
−40.5
22
vs
BCU
W 107-71
+23.5
29
vs
SDST
W 99-71
+10.5
3
@
UTAH
W 97-78
+12.5
7
vs
KSU
W 101-76
+5.5
10
@
TCU
W 86-73
+1.5
14
vs
ASU
W 89-82
+3.5
17
@
UCF
W 84-77
−4.5
21
vs
CIN
W 77-51
−24.5
24
vs
WVU
W 88-53
−2.5
26
@
BYU
W 86-83
+2.5
31
@
ASU
W 87-74
−2.5
7
vs
OKST
W 84-47
−37.5
9
@
KU
L 78-82
+7.5
14
vs
TTU
L 75-78
−3.5
18
vs
BYU
W 75-68
−22.5
21
@
HOU
W 73-66
−3.5
24
@
BAY
W 87-80
+11.5
28
vs
KU
W 84-61
−6.5
2
vs
ISU
W 73-57
−19.5
7
@
COLO
W 89-79
+11.5
12
vs
UCF
W 81-59
−19.5
13
vs
ISU
W 82-80
+17.5
14
vs
HOU
W 79-74
+14.5
20
vs
LIU
W 92-58
+2.5
22
vs
USU
W 78-66
−9.5
26
vs
ARK
W 109-88
+30.5
28
vs
PUR
W 79-64
−9.5
4
vs
MICH
L 73-91
+6.5
over 20under 19avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arizona has the better starters
Position by position: N Arizona 0, Arizona 2, even 3
N ArizonaBetterArizona
G R. Abelman10.9 pts · 4.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 42
=Even
G D. Dixon TR6.5 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 55
G C. Komin8 pts · 2.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 50
=Even
G J. Mandaquit TR5.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 62
G B. Peterson4.4 pts · 0.7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 7
→ARIZBig
F I. Kharchenkov10.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 83
G M. Majerle TR0.7 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F R. Godfrey TR12 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 96
F D. Anderson TR1.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 6
→ARIZBig
C M. Krivas10.4 pts · 8.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 95
N ArizonaBetterArizona
NAU offense329th of 366 · -10.7
→ARIZBig
ARIZ defense7th of 366 · +8.8
NAU defense292nd of 366 · -7.4
→ARIZBig
ARIZ offense4th of 366 · +11.0
Backcourt-5.2 · 4 players
→ARIZBig
Backcourt-0.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 1 player
→ARIZBig
Frontcourt+10.8 · 3 players
Bench+0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Bench-0.1 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestNAU betterARIZ betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
R. Abelman33 minC. Komin27 minB. Peterson20 minM. Majerle5 min · TRC. Bennett3 min · TRJ. Amundsen1 min
Forwards
D. Anderson7 min · TRL. WieskampNewT. GreenNewL. ToukamNewZ. TannerNew
Centers
N. KeutchaNew
Guards
D. Dixon22 min · TRJ. Mandaquit20 min · TRA. Arnold2 minJ. Cook1 minB. JamesNewC. HolmesNew
Forwards
I. Kharchenkov28 minR. Godfrey25 min · TRE. Otten15 min · TRU. Jarusevicius11 min · TRM. MawutNewE. AiyamenkhueNew
Centers
M. Krivas25 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.1 #311 | Points per game | 86.2 #11 |
| 1.04 #271 | Points per possession | 1.21 #11 |
| 65.5 #330 | Pace (possessions) | 71.6 #49 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.7 #161 | Effective FG% | 54.7 #45 |
| 35.6 #79 | 3-point % | 36.6 #37 |
| 36.6 #236 | 3-point attempt rate | 26.4 #363 |
| 31.8 #260 | Free throw rate | 43.9 #11 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.0 #140 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #76 |
| 23.3 #348 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.4 #5 |
| 12.5 #251 | Assists per game | 16.4 #38 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #257 | Points allowed | 69.4 #53 |
| 1.18 #351 | Points allowed per possession | 0.97 #6 |
| 56.9 #355 | Opponent effective FG% | 45.3 #4 |
| 38.7 #362 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.4 #42 |
| 16.6 #181 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #209 |
| 66.6 #305 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.1 #34 |
| 6.3 #194 | Steals per game | 7.4 #95 |
| 2.7 #287 | Blocks per game | 4.2 #55 |
N Arizona
7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 4-15 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Idaho St65–73
- Lvs Montana St65–76
- L@ E Washington57–88
- L@ Idaho58–78
- L@ N Colorado77–78
A week or more of rest.
Arizona
36-3 in 2025-26 overall · 19-2 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Michigan73–91
- Wvs Purdue79–64
- Wvs Arkansas109–88
- Wvs Utah State78–66
- Wvs Long Island92–58
A week or more of rest.