Amica Mutual Pavilion · at Providence
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PROV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PROV 88–66 · win probability PROV 97%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PROV has more of the edges
FAIR 3, PROV 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
FAIR has played the 359th-hardest schedule, PROV the 31st. A record against a soft schedule means less
FAIR offense vs PROV defense
Offense 282nd of 366 against a defense 81st, on the model’s ratings
PROV offense vs FAIR defense
Offense 35th of 366 against a defense 195th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FAIR 15.4%, PROV 16.7%. Forced: FAIR 16.8%, PROV 13.1%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: FAIR plays 67.3 a game (263rd fastest), PROV 74.2 (10th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: FAIR 48.8 and allows 51.0; PROV 55.0 and allows 51.4
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FAIR 35.8%, PROV 31.7%. Defensive: FAIR 70.9%, PROV 69.2%
Free throws
Free throw rate: FAIR 27.7, PROV 36.7. Allowed: FAIR 30.4, PROV 32.7
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FAIR 53%, PROV 13%. Transfers in: FAIR 2, PROV 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
FAIR hits 33.2% and allows 34.3%; PROV hits 36.4% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 35.4% and 40.5% of their shots
Home court
PROV at home. This season: PROV 0-0 at home, FAIR 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PROV -22.0 | — |
| Total | — | 153.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | FAIR 66 · PROV 88 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PROV -12.9 | — |
| 1H total | 72.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | FAIR 29.5 · PROV 42.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
FAIR 0–1 PROVPROV leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · FAIR 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2021-22 | FAIR 73 @ PROV 80 | PROV -15 | FAIR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fairfield
33 games played
Straight up
20-13
61% wins
Against the spread
15-18
45% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 68-76 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 8 | @ | W 74-53 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 59-82 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 73-71 | -6.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 85-82 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 97-83 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 77-106 | +3.5 | L −25.5 | 150.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 72-68 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 66-70 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 63-74 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 73-65 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 84-70 | +6.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 66-70 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 81-85 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 83-75 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 68-62 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 98-62 | -6.5 | W +29.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 67-82 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 77-85 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 62-61 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 61-55 | -10.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 71-70 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 65-72 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 92-87 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 63-60 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 74-83 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 78-68 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 85-79 | +6.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-58 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 47-69 | -4.5 | L −26.5 | 145.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 71-60 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 74-55 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 61-76 | +1.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PSU
L 68-76
+7.5
8
@
NJIT
W 74-53
+14.5
10
@
HALL
L 59-82
−8.5
14
vs
STO
W 73-71
−4.5
16
vs
L-MD
W 85-82
−2.5
22
@
LEM
W 97-83
+12.5
26
vs
COLU
L 77-106
−25.5
30
vs
UNH
W 72-68
−5.5
5
@
MAN
L 66-70
−5.5
7
@
MRMK
L 63-74
−7.5
14
vs
MONM
W 73-65
+10.5
18
@
CCSU
W 84-70
+20.5
29
vs
SPU
L 66-70
−6.5
2
@
CAN
L 81-85
−10.5
4
@
NIA
W 83-75
+4.5
9
vs
RID
W 68-62
−2.5
14
vs
MAN
W 98-62
+29.5
17
@
MRST
L 67-82
−6.5
19
@
SIE
L 77-85
−1.5
22
vs
NIA
W 62-61
−9.5
24
vs
CAN
W 61-55
−4.5
30
@
IONA
W 71-70
+2.5
1
vs
QUIN
L 65-72
−4.5
5
@
SHU
W 92-87
+6.5
7
vs
MRST
W 63-60
+4.5
15
@
SPU
L 74-83
−5.5
20
vs
SHU
W 78-68
+5.5
22
@
QUIN
W 85-79
+12.5
27
vs
SIE
W 72-58
+15.5
1
vs
MSM
L 47-69
−26.5
5
vs
MAN
W 71-60
+7.5
6
vs
SPU
W 74-55
+20.5
8
vs
SIE
L 61-76
−13.5
covered 15didn’t cover 18avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PSU
L 68-76
−7.5
8
@
NJIT
W 74-53
−18.5
10
@
HALL
L 59-82
+3.5
14
vs
STO
W 73-71
+0.5
16
vs
L-MD
W 85-82
+31.5
22
@
LEM
W 97-83
+34.5
26
vs
COLU
L 77-106
+32.5
30
vs
UNH
W 72-68
−7.5
5
@
MAN
L 66-70
−19.5
7
@
MRMK
L 63-74
−7.5
14
vs
MONM
W 73-65
−5.5
18
@
CCSU
W 84-70
+10.5
29
vs
SPU
L 66-70
−4.5
2
@
CAN
L 81-85
+25.5
4
@
NIA
W 83-75
+19.5
9
vs
RID
W 68-62
−15.5
14
vs
MAN
W 98-62
+1.5
17
@
MRST
L 67-82
+7.5
19
@
SIE
L 77-85
+19.5
22
vs
NIA
W 62-61
−16.5
24
vs
CAN
W 61-55
−25.5
30
@
IONA
W 71-70
−5.5
1
vs
QUIN
L 65-72
−17.5
5
@
SHU
W 92-87
+23.5
7
vs
MRST
W 63-60
−15.5
15
@
SPU
L 74-83
+15.5
20
vs
SHU
W 78-68
−12.5
22
@
QUIN
W 85-79
+13.5
27
vs
SIE
W 72-58
−12.5
1
vs
MSM
L 47-69
−29.5
5
vs
MAN
W 71-60
−17.5
6
vs
SPU
W 74-55
−8.5
8
vs
SIE
L 61-76
−1.5
over 14under 19avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Providence
33 games played
Straight up
15-18
45% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-11
67% overs · avg +8.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 89-79 | -23.5 | L −13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 101-107 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | O 208 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 106-81 | -19.5 | W +5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 163.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 98-66 | -29.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 83-104 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 166.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 78-90 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 94-64 | -26.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 90-71 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 86-79 | -19.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 110-113 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 164.5 | O 223 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 67-72 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 77-71 | +14.5 | W +20.5 | 166.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 98-103 | +9.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-97 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-88 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 93-88 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 104-105 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 209 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-81 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 81-87 | +15.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 73-87 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 97-87 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 168.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 90-72 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-79 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 167.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-68 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 94-84 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 79-76 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 56-78 | -3.5 | L −25.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 79-80 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 91-81 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 12 | @ | L 72-85 | +11.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
−13.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
−8.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+5.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
−7.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
+8.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
−14.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
+0.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
+3.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+11.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
−12.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+0.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−6.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
+20.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+4.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
−14.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
−3.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+7.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+1.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−8.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+9.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
−5.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+7.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+13.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
−2.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−3.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
+5.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+4.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
+6.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−25.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+8.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HC
W 89-79
+15.5
8
vs
VT
L 101-107
+50.5
11
vs
PENN
W 106-81
+14.5
14
@
COLO
L 88-97
+21.5
18
vs
UNH
W 98-66
+2.5
22
vs
PSU
W 77-65
−23.5
27
vs
WIS
L 83-104
+20.5
28
vs
FLA
L 78-90
−1.5
2
vs
FDU
W 94-64
−4.5
6
vs
URI
W 90-71
+1.5
9
vs
BRWN
W 86-79
+19.5
13
@
BTLR
L 110-113
+58.5
19
vs
HALL
L 67-72
−13.5
3
@
SJU
W 77-71
−18.5
7
vs
CONN
L 98-103
+48.5
10
@
XAV
L 84-97
+15.5
13
vs
VILL
L 82-88
+13.5
16
vs
CREI
W 93-88
+19.5
19
@
MARQ
L 104-105
+41.5
24
vs
GTWN
L 78-81
−0.5
27
@
CONN
L 81-87
+15.5
30
@
VILL
L 73-87
+2.5
4
vs
BTLR
W 97-87
+15.5
7
vs
DEP
W 90-72
+8.5
11
@
HALL
L 80-87
+16.5
14
vs
SJU
L 69-79
−19.5
21
@
DEP
W 71-68
−13.5
25
vs
XAV
W 94-84
+7.5
28
@
CREI
W 79-76
−11.5
4
vs
MARQ
L 56-78
−27.5
7
@
GTWN
L 79-80
+0.5
11
vs
BTLR
W 91-81
+9.5
12
@
SJU
L 72-85
−1.5
over 22under 11avg +8.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Providence has the better starters
Position by position: Fairfield 0, Providence 3, even 2
FairfieldBetterProvidence
G D. Wucherpfennig11.8 pts · 8.3 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 71
=Even
G R. Sabol TR18.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
G T. Williams6.4 pts · 1.4 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
→PROVBig
G M. Mack TR13.6 pts · 3 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 80
G E. Mejia4.9 pts · 2.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 11
→PROVBig
G D. Vanterpool TR15.2 pts · 6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 89
G H. Rawlins3.6 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 4
→PROVBig
G M. Byrd TR10.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 90
F Q. Martin TR12.1 pts · 7.1 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
=Even
G R. Mela9.9 pts · 5.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 81
FairfieldBetterProvidence
FAIR offense282nd of 366 · -8.7
→PROVBig
PROV defense81st of 366 · +0.3
FAIR defense195th of 366 · -4.8
→PROVBig
PROV offense35th of 366 · +5.2
Backcourt-5.9 · 4 players
→PROVBig
Backcourt+8.2 · 5 players
Frontcourt+1.7 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-2.2 · 5 players
→PROVBig
Bench+4.2 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestFAIR betterPROV betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Wucherpfennig32 minT. Williams20 minE. Mejia19 minH. Rawlins17 minN. Rodriguez7 minJ. Ganton2 min
Forwards
Q. Martin32 min · TRM. Radunovic9 min · TRI. Munkadi9 minP. SmithNewO. SackoNewB. JonesNew
Guards
R. Sabol37 min · TRM. Mack32 min · TRD. Vanterpool32 min · TRM. Byrd28 min · TRR. Mela26 minG. Hightower10 min · TR
Forwards
A. Page23 min · TRJ. Bannarbie16 min · TRJ. BardwellNewC. WaltersNewL. MarangonNew
Centers
S. Aletan26 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.9 #226 | Points per game | 85.3 #15 |
| 1.09 #166 | Points per possession | 1.15 #58 |
| 67.3 #263 | Pace (possessions) | 74.2 #10 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.8 #294 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #37 |
| 33.2 #216 | 3-point % | 36.4 #45 |
| 35.4 #262 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.5 #157 |
| 27.7 #346 | Free throw rate | 36.7 #138 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #96 | Turnover rate | 16.7 #174 |
| 35.8 #29 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.7 #135 |
| 12.1 #277 | Assists per game | 14.0 #146 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.9 #104 | Points allowed | 84.0 #356 |
| 1.06 #118 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #292 |
| 51.0 #159 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.4 #179 |
| 34.3 #200 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #265 |
| 16.8 #169 | Turnovers forced | 13.1 #352 |
| 70.9 #116 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.2 #195 |
| 6.5 #183 | Steals per game | 5.4 #313 |
| 3.5 #145 | Blocks per game | 3.9 #86 |
Fairfield
20-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Siena61–76
- Wvs Saint Peter's74–55
- Wvs Manhattan71–60
- Lvs Mount St Marys47–69
- Wvs Siena72–58
A week or more of rest.
Providence
15-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-14 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St John's72–85
- Wvs Butler91–81
- L@ Georgetown79–80
- Lvs Marquette56–78
- W@ Creighton79–76
A week or more of rest.