Spectrum Center · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
DUKE -10.5✓ DUKE covered by 1.5
DUKE -10.5✓ DUKE covered by 1.5Closing total134.5Under by 0.5
 CLEM | This season | DUKE |
|---|---|---|
| 24-9 | Record | 30-2 |
| 17-16 | ATS | 19-13 |
| 14-19 | O/U | 11-21 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CLEM 62–75 DUKE · ✓ DUKE (87%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 22 | 39 | 61 |
| DUKE | 41 | 32 | 73 |
1st half: CLEM 22, DUKE 41 (DUKE by 19). The model had DUKE by 7.5 and a total of 63.8 (actual 63).
Team stats
| CLEM | DUKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 18-55 33% | Field goals | 23-50 46% |
| 7-25 28% | 3-pointers | 9-24 38% |
| 18-23 78% | Free throws | 18-22 82% |
| 27 8 off | Rebounds | 41 9 off |
| 10 | Assists | 9 |
| 7 | Steals | 4 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 6 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 17 | Fouls | 20 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 9 | Fast-break points | 3 |
Players
| CLEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dillon Hunter G | 31 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1-6 | 1-3 |
| Butta Johnson G | 30 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-6 |
| Ace Buckner G | 28 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2-10 | 1-4 |
| RJ Godfrey F | 27 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Jake Wahlin F | 14 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nick Davidson F | 27 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Jestin Porter G | 27 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 4-7 | 3-5 |
| Chase Thompson F | 12 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Dallas Thomas F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Carter Welling, Trent Steinour, Zac Foster, Blake Davidson
| DUKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameron Boozer F | 37 | 24 | 14 | 5 | 6-9 | 3-4 |
| Cayden Boozer G | 37 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 6-12 | 1-2 |
| Isaiah Evans G | 32 | 6 | 10 | 2 | 1-9 | 0-7 |
| Dame Sarr F | 28 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3-7 | 1-4 |
| Maliq Brown F | 21 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Nik Khamenia F | 31 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 5-10 | 3-6 |
| Darren Harris G | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
Did not play: Jack Scott, Ifeanyi Ufochukwu, Patrick Ngongba II, Sebastian Wilkins, Caleb Foster, Cameron Sheffield, Brock Davis
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketDUKE -10.5
ModelDUKE -12.8
Model edgeDUKE +2.3
W DUKE covered
Total
Market134.5
Model136.3
Model edgeOver 1.8
L Under
Projected score
CLEM 61.7 · DUKE 74.6
CLEM 61 · DUKE 73
Win probability
DUKE 87%
1st half
Spread
DUKE -7.5
DUKE -19.0
Total
63.8
63 points
Projected score
CLEM 28.2 · DUKE 35.7
CLEM 22 · DUKE 41
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenDUKE -11.5
1 → CLEM
CloseDUKE -10.5
1 pt toward CLEM
Total
Open133.5
▲ 1
Close134.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
CLEM +455 · DUKE -625
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened DUKE -11.5 · closed DUKE -10.5 · moved 1 toward CLEMmodel DUKE -13
model DUKE -13
Opened 133.5 · closed 134.5 · moved 1 upmodel 136.5
model 136.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
| DUKE | 9-1 90% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
CLEM 2–4 DUKEDUKE leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · CLEM 4-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025-26 | CLEM 54 @ DUKE 67 | DUKE -12.5 | DUKE W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | DUKE 71 @ CLEM 77 | CLEM +6.5 | CLEM W |
| Jan 27, 2023-24 | CLEM 71 @ DUKE 72 | DUKE -7.5 | CLEM W |
| Jan 14, 2022-23 | DUKE 64 @ CLEM 72 | CLEM +2.5 | CLEM W |
| Feb 10, 2021-22 | DUKE 82 @ CLEM 64 | CLEM +7 | DUKE W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clemson
33 games played
Straight up
24-9
73% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-19
42% overs · avg −2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs UNH | W 88-38 | -29.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 7 | vs GWEB | W 97-59 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 11 | vs MORE | W 83-56 | -29.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 15 | @ GTWN | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 17 | vs UNA | W 81-61 | -25.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs WVU | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs UGA | W 97-94 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 28 | vs AAMU | W 92-56 | -27.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ ALA | L 84-90 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 9 | vs BYU | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs MER | W 70-63 | -22.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs SC | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 21 | vs CIN | W 68-65 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ SYR | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ PITT | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 7 | vs SMU | W 74-70 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ ND | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 13 | vs BC | W 74-50 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs MIA | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs NCSU | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ GT | W 77-63 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vsPITT | W 63-52 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 4 | @ STAN | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 7 | @ CAL | W 77-55 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 11 | vs VT | L 66-76 | -8.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 14 | @DUKE | L 54-67 | +12.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 18 | @ WAKE | L 77-85 | -4.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | vs FSU | L 65-70 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs LOU | W 80-75 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @ UNC | L 63-67 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 7 | vsGT | W 79-76 | -15.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 11 | vsWAKE | W 71-62 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 12 | vsUNC | W 80-79 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vsUNH
UNHW 88-38
+20.5
7
vsGWEB
GWEBW 97-59
+8.5
11
vsMORE
MOREW 83-56
−2.5
15
@GTWN
GTWNL 74-79
−6.5
17
vsUNA
UNAW 81-61
−5.5
21
vsWVU
WVUW 70-67
−1.5
23
vsUGA
UGAW 97-94
+1.5
28
vsAAMU
AAMUW 92-56
+8.5
3
@ALA
ALAL 84-90
+2.5
9
vsBYU
BYUL 64-67
+1.5
13
vsMER
MERW 70-63
−15.5
16
vsSC
SCW 68-61
−5.5
21
vsCIN
CINW 68-65
−0.5
31
@SYR
SYRW 64-61
+1.5
3
@PITT
PITTW 73-68
+1.5
7
vsSMU
SMUW 74-70
+0.5
10
@ND
NDW 76-61
+11.5
13
vsBC
BCW 74-50
+8.5
17
vsMIA
MIAW 69-59
+5.5
20
vsNCSU
NCSUL 76-80
−6.5
24
@GT
GTW 77-63
+5.5
31
vsPITT
PITTW 63-52
+0.5
4
@STAN
STANW 66-64
−1.5
7
@CAL
CALW 77-55
+17.5
11
vsVT
VTL 66-76
−18.5
14
@DUKE
DUKEL 54-67
−0.5
18
@WAKE
WAKEL 77-85
−12.5
21
vsFSU
FSUL 65-70
−13.5
28
vsLOU
LOUW 80-75
+7.5
3
@UNC
UNCL 63-67
−1.5
7
vsGT
GTW 79-76
−12.5
11
vsWAKE
WAKEW 71-62
+3.5
12
vsUNC
UNCW 80-79
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vsUNH
UNHW 88-38
−20.5
7
vsGWEB
GWEBW 97-59
+10.5
11
vsMORE
MOREW 83-56
−12.5
15
@GTWN
GTWNL 74-79
+10.5
17
vsUNA
UNAW 81-61
−2.5
21
vsWVU
WVUW 70-67
+4.5
23
vsUGA
UGAW 97-94
+38.5
28
vsAAMU
AAMUW 92-56
+6.5
3
@ALA
ALAL 84-90
+8.5
9
vsBYU
BYUL 64-67
−21.5
13
vsMER
MERW 70-63
−19.5
16
vsSC
SCW 68-61
−13.5
21
vsCIN
CINW 68-65
−7.5
31
@SYR
SYRW 64-61
−15.5
3
@PITT
PITTW 73-68
+5.5
7
vsSMU
SMUW 74-70
−5.5
10
@ND
NDW 76-61
+3.5
13
vsBC
BCW 74-50
−12.5
17
vsMIA
MIAW 69-59
−15.5
20
vsNCSU
NCSUL 76-80
+13.5
24
@GT
GTW 77-63
−2.5
31
vsPITT
PITTW 63-52
−20.5
4
@STAN
STANW 66-64
−8.5
7
@CAL
CALW 77-55
−7.5
11
vsVT
VTL 66-76
+3.5
14
@DUKE
DUKEL 54-67
−13.5
18
@WAKE
WAKEL 77-85
+21.5
21
vsFSU
FSUL 65-70
−10.5
28
vsLOU
LOUW 80-75
+8.5
3
@UNC
UNCL 63-67
−11.5
7
vsGT
GTW 79-76
+9.5
11
vsWAKE
WAKEW 71-62
−10.5
12
vsUNC
UNCW 80-79
+18.5
over 14under 19avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Duke
32 games played
Straight up
30-2
94% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-21
34% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs TEX | W 75-60 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 8 | vs WCU | W 95-54 | -36.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 11 | @ ARMY | W 114-59 | -33.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | vs INST | W 100-62 | -37.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 162 |
| Nov 18 | vs KU | W 78-66 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs NIA | W 100-42 | -39.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 23 | vs HOW | W 93-56 | -43.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 27 | vs ARK | W 80-71 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 2 | vs FLA | W 67-66 | -9.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 6 | @ MSU | W 66-60 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 16 | vs LIP | W 97-73 | -32.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 20 | vs TTU | L 81-82 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 31 | vsGT | W 85-79 | -27.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @FSU | W 91-87 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 6 | @LOU | W 84-73 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 161.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 10 | vsSMU | W 82-75 | -15.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | @CAL | W 71-56 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | @STAN | W 80-50 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 24 | vsWAKE | W 90-69 | -19.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 26 | vsLOU | W 83-52 | -8.5 | W +22.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 31 | @VT | W 72-58 | -13.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 3 | vsBC | W 67-49 | -26.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 7 | @UNC | L 68-71 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 10 | @PITT | W 70-54 | -17.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 14 | vsCLEM | W 67-54 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 16 | vsSYR | W 101-64 | -20.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 21 | vs MICH | W 68-63 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 24 | @ND | W 100-56 | -16.5 | W +27.5 | 141.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs UVA | W 77-51 | -9.5 | W +16.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 2 | @NCSU | W 93-64 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 7 | vsUNC | W 76-61 | -18.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 12 | vsFSU | W 80-79 | -16.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vsTEX
TEXW 75-60
+4.5
8
vsWCU
WCUW 95-54
+4.5
11
@ARMY
ARMYW 114-59
+21.5
14
vsINST
INSTW 100-62
+0.5
18
vsKU
KUW 78-66
+1.5
21
vsNIA
NIAW 100-42
+18.5
23
vsHOW
HOWW 93-56
−6.5
27
vsARK
ARKW 80-71
−3.5
2
vsFLA
FLAW 67-66
−8.5
6
@MSU
MSUW 66-60
+4.5
16
vsLIP
LIPW 97-73
−8.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 81-82
−10.5
31
vsGT
GTW 85-79
−21.5
3
@FSU
FSUW 91-87
−12.5
6
@LOU
LOUW 84-73
+9.5
10
vsSMU
SMUW 82-75
−8.5
14
@CAL
CALW 71-56
+0.5
17
@STAN
STANW 80-50
+18.5
24
vsWAKE
WAKEW 90-69
+1.5
26
vsLOU
LOUW 83-52
+22.5
31
@VT
VTW 72-58
+0.5
3
vsBC
BCW 67-49
−8.5
7
@UNC
UNCL 68-71
−9.5
10
@PITT
PITTW 70-54
−1.5
14
vsCLEM
CLEMW 67-54
+0.5
16
vsSYR
SYRW 101-64
+16.5
21
vsMICH
MICHW 68-63
+8.5
24
@ND
NDW 100-56
+27.5
28
vsUVA
UVAW 77-51
+16.5
2
@NCSU
NCSUW 93-64
+20.5
7
vsUNC
UNCW 76-61
−3.5
12
vsFSU
FSUW 80-79
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vsTEX
TEXW 75-60
−18.5
8
vsWCU
WCUW 95-54
−3.5
11
@ARMY
ARMYW 114-59
+20.5
14
vsINST
INSTW 100-62
−1.5
18
vsKU
KUW 78-66
−5.5
21
vsNIA
NIAW 100-42
−4.5
23
vsHOW
HOWW 93-56
−5.5
27
vsARK
ARKW 80-71
−8.5
2
vsFLA
FLAW 67-66
−24.5
6
@MSU
MSUW 66-60
−15.5
16
vsLIP
LIPW 97-73
+18.5
20
vsTTU
TTUL 81-82
+10.5
31
vsGT
GTW 85-79
+10.5
3
@FSU
FSUW 91-87
+14.5
6
@LOU
LOUW 84-73
−4.5
10
vsSMU
SMUW 82-75
+1.5
14
@CAL
CALW 71-56
−22.5
17
@STAN
STANW 80-50
−18.5
24
vsWAKE
WAKEW 90-69
+5.5
26
vsLOU
LOUW 83-52
−22.5
31
@VT
VTW 72-58
−18.5
3
vsBC
BCW 67-49
−25.5
7
@UNC
UNCL 68-71
−13.5
10
@PITT
PITTW 70-54
−12.5
14
vsCLEM
CLEMW 67-54
−13.5
16
vsSYR
SYRW 101-64
+20.5
21
vsMICH
MICHW 68-63
−20.5
24
@ND
NDW 100-56
+14.5
28
vsUVA
UVAW 77-51
−15.5
2
@NCSU
NCSUW 93-64
+6.5
7
vsUNC
UNCW 76-61
−10.5
12
vsFSU
FSUW 80-79
+8.5
over 11under 21avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clemson
24-9 overall · 14-6 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs North Carolina80–79
- Wvs Wake Forest71–62
- Wvs Georgia Tech79–76
- L@ North Carolina63–67
- Wvs Louisville80–75
1 day since their last game.
Duke
30-2 overall · 18-1 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Florida St80–79
- Wvs North Carolina76–61
- W@ NC State93–64
- Wvs Virginia77–51
- W@ Notre Dame100–56
1 day since their last game.