Tue, Dec 30, 2025, 9:00 PM ESTValero Alamo Bowl · Neutral site
Closing spread
USC -4.5
✓ TCU W
Total
56.5
▲ Over · 57 pts
Model before kickoff
USC 34–29 TCU
✗ USC (66%) lost
Closing line · DraftKings
SourceDraftKings closing line
OpenUSC -5.5
CloseUSC -4.5
Total58.5 → 56.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenUSC -5.5
1 → TCU
CloseUSC -4.5
1 pt toward TCU
Total
Open58.5
▼ 2
Close56.5
Down 2 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened USC -5.5 · closed USC -4.5 · moved 1 toward TCUmodel USC -10.5
model USC -10.5
Opened 58.5 · closed 56.5 · moved 2 downmodel 63
model 63
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Neutral-site favorites of 3.5–5.5 since 2023: won 56%, covered 44% (41 games)ⓘ
Lines that moved 1–1.5 pts toward the underdog: that team covered 49% (321 games since 2024)ⓘ
Closing line · DraftKings
SourceDraftKings closing line
OpenUSC -5.5
CloseUSC -4.5
Total58.5 → 56.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Similar games
The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out
In the 10 games most like
USC as a 4.5-point neutral-site favorite against TCU, the favorite won 5, covered 3, and 4 went over the total.
Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up togames
This game: TCU won 30–27 outright; the favorite didn’t cover, as in 7 of the 10 similar games. 57 points went over 56.5, as in 4 of 10.
Favorite won
5 of 1050%
Normal range · usually 62%
Favorite covered
3 of 1030%
Normal range · usually 50%
Went over
4 of 1040%
Normal range · usually 50%
All three sit in the normal range for favorites of this size, so history shows no clear lean. Average result: favorite by 2.2 against an average line of 5.6; 54.4 points a game (usually 52.9). Of the 3 overs, 1 had cashed by the end of Q3. When games like this go over ›
All 10 games
| Match | Game | Line | Final | Covered | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very close |
2023 · Postseason · very close · similar situation & spread |
-3.5 | 31–37 | L | O61.5 |
| Close |
2023 · Postseason · close · similar spread & season form |
-3.5 | 28–19 | W | U48.5 |
| Close |
2025 · Week 10 · close · similar season form & spread |
-7 | 24–20 | L | U50.5 |
| Close |
2023 · Postseason · close · similar situation & spread |
-4 | 3–14 | L | U51 |
| Close |
2024 · Postseason · close · similar situation & season form |
-7.25 | 44–41 | L | O52 |
| Close | 2022 · Postseason · close · similar situation |
-8 | 45–51 | L | O56 |
| Close |
2023 · Week 5 · close · similar total & season form |
-6.5 | 34–22 | W | O54 |
| Close |
2025 · Week 15 · close · similar season form |
-3.5 | 20–27 | L | U58.5 |
| Close | 2022 · Postseason · close · similar situation & season form |
-3 | 20–27 | L | U67 |
| Close |
2024 · Postseason · close · similar season form & situation |
-9.5 | 34–3 | W | U59.5 |
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2022 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found
Signals
The data signal, and 1 trend and market move behind it
No clear signal on the spread
Slight Under trend Miss
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.
Total moved down 2
58.5 → 56.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Totals
Over/under before kickoff
Went over in OT. Of 526 earlier overs in games with totals 52.5–60.5, 33% had cashed by the end of Q3.
When games like this go over ›Last 10 games
Before kickoff, this and last season
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Matchup stats
Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
USC+14.0 →+17.6▲ 3.6#12
TCU+7.9 →+8.1▲ 0.2#36
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW16
Longer bar = better
#8
Offense
◀ USC better#40
#74
Defense
Even#64
+0.3 #49
Turnovers
◀ USC better0.0 #72
65 plays #89
Pace
TCU faster ▶69 plays #46
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
| USC off | TCU def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 36.5 #12 | 25.2 #72 | USC |
| Yards / play | 7.21 #5 | 5.47 #61 | USC |
| PPA / play | +0.29 #9 | +0.08 #63 | USC |
| Success rate | 50% #7 | 41% #59 | USC |
| TCU off | USC def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / game | 30.8 #41 | 22.4 #49 | Even |
| Yards / play | 6.19 #30 | 5.57 #67 | TCU |
| PPA / play | +0.16 #42 | +0.07 #58 | Even |
| Success rate | 44% #48 | 45% #122 | TCU |
Points by quarter and half
Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 136 FBS teams
USC scoring against the TCU defense
| Q1 | Q2 | 1H | Q3 | Q4 | 2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7.8 #26 | 9.7 #41 | 17.4 #28 | 9.3 #9 | 9.8 #12 | 19.1 #7 | |
3.3 #24 | 7.8 #73 | 11.1 #43 | 5.1 #59 | 9.0 #124 | 14.1 #102 |
TCU scoring against the USC defense
| Q1 | Q2 | 1H | Q3 | Q4 | 2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 #42 | 9.9 #37 | 16.6 #38 | 6.1 #61 | 8.1 #38 | 14.2 #44 | |
5.4 #72 | 7.8 #73 | 13.2 #79 | 5.3 #69 | 3.9 #15 | 9.3 #27 |
Game conditions
At kickoff
Home field
Neutral site
No home edge
Weather
Indoors
Dome or closed roof
Rest
USC31d bye
TCU31d bye
Even
Tempo
Average 134 plays
slowavg 134fast
Quarterback
TCU backup QB started
Not the usual starter
Schedules, links & other games
Previous and next games, standings, ESPN, and the rest of the week

