First National Bank Arena · at Arkansas St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ARST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ARST 87–70 · win probability ARST 93%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ARST has more of the edges
UAPB 1, ARST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UAPB 27.9%, ARST 38.2%. Defensive: UAPB 65.8%, ARST 73.0%
ARST offense vs UAPB defense
Offense 122nd of 366 against a defense 365th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: UAPB 50.0 and allows 52.6; ARST 51.7 and allows 50.3
UAPB offense vs ARST defense
Offense 337th of 366 against a defense 252nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UAPB has played the 300th-hardest schedule, ARST the 221st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UAPB 18.7%, ARST 19.8%. Forced: UAPB 16.4%, ARST 14.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UAPB 38.4, ARST 39.1. Allowed: UAPB 43.6, ARST 37.0
Home court
ARST at home. This season: ARST 0-0 at home, UAPB 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: UAPB plays 71.5 a game (53rd fastest), ARST 73.4 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
UAPB hits 33.6% and allows 33.2%; ARST hits 32.9% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 37.1% and 44.9% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UAPB 8%, ARST 6%. Transfers in: UAPB 3, ARST 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ARST -17.0 | — |
| Total | — | 157.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UAPB 70.2 · ARST 87.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ARST -10.0 | — |
| 1H total | 73.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | UAPB 31.8 · ARST 41.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UAPB 0–1 ARSTARST leads · 1 game since 2021-22
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2021-22 | ARST 84 @ UAPB 73 | UAPB +11 | P |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
AR-Pine Bluff
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
13-17
43% covers · avg +1.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-94 | +34.5 | L −9.5 | 160.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 74-83 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-94 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 69-95 | +36.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 75-104 | +41.5 | W +12.5 | 172.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-106 | +35.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 166 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-98 | +20.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 84-111 | +21.5 | L −5.5 | 160.5 | O 195 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 63-62 | +16.5 | W +17.5 | 163.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-76 | +23.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 84-117 | +25.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 95-83 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 90-79 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 74-66 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 12 | @ | L 61-73 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 164.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-71 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 82-87 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-74 | +9.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 78-70 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 67-64 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 84-63 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 61-79 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 70-82 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 64-83 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 84-82 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 69-70 | -14.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 83-48 | -1.5 | W +33.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 81-84 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 165 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WASH
L 50-94
−9.5
6
@
PORT
L 74-83
+3.5
8
@
LMU
L 72-94
−2.5
11
@
OU
L 69-95
+10.5
15
@
VAN
L 75-104
+12.5
18
@
SMU
L 60-106
−10.5
20
@
MRSH
L 70-98
−7.5
23
@
M-OH
L 84-111
−5.5
3
@
UIC
W 63-62
+17.5
6
@
DEP
L 72-76
+19.5
10
@
TLSA
L 84-117
−7.5
3
vs
AAMU
W 95-83
+13.5
5
vs
ALST
W 90-79
+12.5
10
@
TXSO
W 74-66
+9.5
12
@
PV
L 61-73
−8.5
17
vs
FAMU
L 67-71
−6.5
19
vs
BCU
L 82-87
−2.5
24
@
SOU
W 75-74
+10.5
31
@
MVSU
W 78-70
−2.5
4
@
GRAM
W 67-64
+9.5
7
vs
ALCN
W 84-77
−0.5
9
vs
JKST
W 84-63
+13.5
14
@
ALST
L 61-79
−14.5
16
@
AAMU
L 70-82
−8.5
19
vs
TXSO
L 64-83
−20.5
21
vs
PV
W 84-82
−1.5
28
vs
MVSU
L 69-70
−15.5
3
@
JKST
L 78-81
−4.5
5
@
ALCN
W 83-48
+33.5
12
vs
SOU
L 81-84
+1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 17avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WASH
L 50-94
−16.5
6
@
PORT
L 74-83
−7.5
8
@
LMU
L 72-94
+8.5
11
@
OU
L 69-95
−4.5
15
@
VAN
L 75-104
+6.5
18
@
SMU
L 60-106
−2.5
20
@
MRSH
L 70-98
+3.5
23
@
M-OH
L 84-111
+34.5
3
@
UIC
W 63-62
−38.5
6
@
DEP
L 72-76
−8.5
10
@
TLSA
L 84-117
+45.5
3
vs
AAMU
W 95-83
+28.5
5
vs
ALST
W 90-79
+9.5
10
@
TXSO
W 74-66
−22.5
12
@
PV
L 61-73
−30.5
17
vs
FAMU
L 67-71
−11.5
19
vs
BCU
L 82-87
+13.5
24
@
SOU
W 75-74
−5.5
31
@
MVSU
W 78-70
+4.5
4
@
GRAM
W 67-64
−14.5
7
vs
ALCN
W 84-77
+15.5
9
vs
JKST
W 84-63
−8.5
14
@
ALST
L 61-79
−9.5
16
@
AAMU
L 70-82
+7.5
19
vs
TXSO
L 64-83
−5.5
21
vs
PV
W 84-82
+6.5
28
vs
MVSU
L 69-70
−8.5
3
@
JKST
L 78-81
+5.5
5
@
ALCN
W 83-48
−14.5
12
vs
SOU
L 81-84
+13.5
over 14under 16avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Arkansas St
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 89-85 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 65-90 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 86-85 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 72-85 | +20.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 69-100 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-63 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 85-80 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 83-63 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 90-78 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 76-77 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 89-70 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 74-78 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 86-74 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | U 160 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 87-91 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-99 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 165.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 85-68 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 172.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 81-82 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 71-75 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 61-70 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 165.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 70-66 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-54 | -2.5 | W +34.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 103-70 | -20.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 88-92 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 79-62 | -8.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 102-94 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 165.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 89-84 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 81-58 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 77-80 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
OHIO
W 89-85
+7.5
7
@
SFA
L 65-90
−26.5
11
@
MOST
W 86-85
+2.5
19
@
SMC
L 72-85
+7.5
21
@
SMU
L 69-100
−16.5
24
vs
JXST
W 74-63
+6.5
28
vs
NDSU
W 85-80
+1.5
2
vs
UTA
W 83-63
+14.5
6
@
LR
W 90-78
+2.5
13
@
RICE
L 76-77
−3.5
17
@
TXST
W 89-70
+14.5
20
@
USM
W 93-86
+5.5
3
vs
JMU
L 74-78
−14.5
7
vs
TROY
W 86-74
+7.5
10
vs
TXST
W 83-82
−10.5
15
@
USA
L 87-91
−8.5
17
@
TROY
L 74-99
−21.5
22
@
GASO
W 85-68
+15.5
24
@
GAST
L 81-82
−5.5
28
vs
ODU
L 71-75
−13.5
31
vs
MRSH
L 61-70
−12.5
4
@
CCU
W 70-66
−0.5
7
vs
BGSU
W 91-54
+34.5
11
vs
ULM
W 103-70
+12.5
14
vs
USA
L 88-92
−12.5
19
@
UL
W 79-62
+8.5
21
@
ULM
W 102-94
−7.5
24
vs
USM
W 89-84
−4.5
27
vs
UL
W 81-58
+9.5
5
vs
GASO
L 77-80
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
OHIO
W 89-85
+14.5
7
@
SFA
L 65-90
−0.5
11
@
MOST
W 86-85
+18.5
19
@
SMC
L 72-85
+7.5
21
@
SMU
L 69-100
−3.5
24
vs
JXST
W 74-63
−18.5
28
vs
NDSU
W 85-80
+4.5
2
vs
UTA
W 83-63
−5.5
6
@
LR
W 90-78
+20.5
13
@
RICE
L 76-77
−2.5
17
@
TXST
W 89-70
+7.5
20
@
USM
W 93-86
+23.5
3
vs
JMU
L 74-78
−6.5
7
vs
TROY
W 86-74
−0.5
10
vs
TXST
W 83-82
+8.5
15
@
USA
L 87-91
+23.5
17
@
TROY
L 74-99
+7.5
22
@
GASO
W 85-68
−19.5
24
@
GAST
L 81-82
+5.5
28
vs
ODU
L 71-75
−13.5
31
vs
MRSH
L 61-70
−34.5
4
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
7
vs
BGSU
W 91-54
−9.5
11
vs
ULM
W 103-70
+10.5
14
vs
USA
L 88-92
+30.5
19
@
UL
W 79-62
−3.5
21
@
ULM
W 102-94
+30.5
24
vs
USM
W 89-84
+14.5
27
vs
UL
W 81-58
−7.5
5
vs
GASO
L 77-80
−8.5
over 15under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Arkansas St has the better starters
Position by position: AR-Pine Bluff 0, Arkansas St 1, even 4
AR-Pine BluffBetterArkansas St
G J. Tatum TR7.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 25
→ARSTBig
G J. Pyke TR12.3 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 83
G J. Hayes4.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G L. Taylor TR8 pts · 2.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 45
G D. Giddens TR3 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Blue Smith4.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 1 ast
Score 33
G H. Pickett0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Doumbia TR3.1 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 36
F C. Smith TR0.6 pts · 1 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Muon NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
AR-Pine BluffBetterArkansas St
UAPB offense337th of 366 · -11.1
→ARSTSmall
ARST defense252nd of 366 · -6.6
UAPB defense365th of 366 · -12.7
→ARSTBig
ARST offense122nd of 366 · -3.2
Backcourt-5.1 · 4 players
→ARSTBig
Backcourt-0.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.7 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestUAPB betterARST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Tatum27 min · TRJ. Hayes15 minD. Giddens9 min · TRH. Pickett1 minD. CapriottiNewE. HernandezNew
Forwards
C. Smith7 min · TRC. WilliamsonNewM. WilliamsNewJ. NyakundiNew
Guards
J. Pyke26 min · TRL. Taylor25 min · TRR. Blue Smith13 minC. WatsonNewT. FergusonNewC. GeathersNew
Forwards
A. Doumbia14 min · TRD. MuonNewG. BennettNewA. MaigaNewR. OmedNewM. SyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.0 #195 | Points per game | 81.8 #33 |
| 1.04 #277 | Points per possession | 1.11 #117 |
| 71.5 #53 | Pace (possessions) | 73.4 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.0 #233 | Effective FG% | 51.7 #164 |
| 33.6 #190 | 3-point % | 32.9 #240 |
| 37.1 #227 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.9 #70 |
| 38.4 #91 | Free throw rate | 39.1 #78 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.7 #310 | Turnover rate | 19.8 #344 |
| 27.9 #271 | Offensive rebound rate | 38.2 #6 |
| 14.1 #136 | Assists per game | 15.3 #77 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.9 #340 | Points allowed | 78.0 #268 |
| 1.14 #309 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #121 |
| 52.6 #249 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #117 |
| 33.2 #136 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #115 |
| 16.4 #192 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #298 |
| 65.8 #321 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.0 #36 |
| 6.8 #142 | Steals per game | 7.2 #110 |
| 2.9 #244 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #268 |
AR-Pine Bluff
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern81–84
- W@ Alcorn St83–48
- L@ Jackson St78–81
- Lvs Miss Valley St69–70
- Wvs Prairie View84–82
A week or more of rest.
Arkansas St
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern77–80
- Wvs Louisiana81–58
- Wvs Southern Miss89–84
- W@ UL Monroe102–94
- W@ Louisiana79–62
A week or more of rest.