Gill Coliseum · at Oregon St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ORST | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ORST 83–69 · win probability ORST 90%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ORST has more of the edges
MILW 2, ORST 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ORST offense vs MILW defense
Offense 95th of 366 against a defense 297th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
MILW hits 32.3% and allows 36.5%; ORST hits 35.0% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 38.1% and 44.3% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MILW 33.0%, ORST 26.8%. Defensive: MILW 70.8%, ORST 67.9%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MILW 32.1, ORST 43.1. Allowed: MILW 35.9, ORST 35.1
Shooting
Effective FG%: MILW 49.9 and allows 55.5; ORST 50.5 and allows 50.3
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MILW 15.3%, ORST 17.7%. Forced: MILW 15.8%, ORST 15.3%
Context
Schedule so far
MILW has played the 191st-hardest schedule, ORST the 120th. A record against a soft schedule means less
MILW offense vs ORST defense
Offense 180th of 366 against a defense 109th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
ORST at home. This season: ORST 0-0 at home, MILW 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MILW plays 69.1 a game (174th fastest), ORST 67.2 (272nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MILW 40%, ORST 17%. Transfers in: MILW 3, ORST 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ORST -14.7 | — |
| Total | — | 151.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | MILW 68.6 · ORST 83.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ORST -8.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | MILW 31.2 · ORST 39.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Milwaukee
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 90-86 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 76-86 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 92-72 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 70-101 | +24.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 63-80 | +27.5 | W +10.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 58-75 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 81-105 | +12.5 | L −11.5 | 166.5 | O 186 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 74-72 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 68-70 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 88-87 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 81-71 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 77-55 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 60-80 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 70-76 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-79 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 67-85 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 157.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 95-83 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 60-73 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 18 | @ | L 82-100 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 76-88 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 65-64 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 69-76 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 63-76 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 155.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 62-67 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 156.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 92-88 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 75-72 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 86-91 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 70-81 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-65 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 63-84 | +1.5 | L −19.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HAMP
W 90-86
−1.5
8
@
WOF
L 76-86
−13.5
10
vs
LR
W 92-72
+16.5
12
@
IU
L 70-101
−6.5
14
@
TTU
L 63-80
+10.5
22
@
WICH
L 58-75
−6.5
29
@
AKR
L 81-105
−11.5
6
vs
RMU
W 74-72
−2.5
14
vs
INST
L 68-70
−4.5
19
vs
SDST
W 88-87
+2.5
21
@
CLE
W 81-71
+3.5
29
vs
PFW
W 77-55
+18.5
30
@
WIS
L 60-80
−0.5
1
@
WRST
L 70-76
−2.5
5
@
GB
L 76-79
−6.5
9
vs
NKU
L 67-85
−19.5
11
vs
IUIN
W 95-83
+3.5
15
vs
OAK
L 60-73
−10.5
18
@
PFW
L 82-100
−14.5
22
@
RMU
L 76-88
−7.5
24
@
YSU
W 65-64
+7.5
30
vs
WRST
L 69-76
−4.5
1
vs
CLE
L 88-90
−11.5
4
vs
DETM
L 63-76
−19.5
7
@
NKU
L 62-67
+1.5
10
@
IUIN
W 92-88
+1.5
15
vs
GB
W 75-72
+0.5
20
@
DETM
L 86-91
−6.5
22
@
OAK
L 70-81
−5.5
25
vs
YSU
W 78-65
+14.5
4
@
DETM
L 63-84
−19.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HAMP
W 90-86
+29.5
8
@
WOF
L 76-86
+11.5
10
vs
LR
W 92-72
+7.5
12
@
IU
L 70-101
+5.5
14
@
TTU
L 63-80
−22.5
22
@
WICH
L 58-75
−25.5
29
@
AKR
L 81-105
+19.5
6
vs
RMU
W 74-72
−7.5
14
vs
INST
L 68-70
−21.5
19
vs
SDST
W 88-87
+23.5
21
@
CLE
W 81-71
−8.5
29
vs
PFW
W 77-55
−24.5
30
@
WIS
L 60-80
−17.5
1
@
WRST
L 70-76
−1.5
5
@
GB
L 76-79
+10.5
9
vs
NKU
L 67-85
−5.5
11
vs
IUIN
W 95-83
+12.5
15
vs
OAK
L 60-73
−33.5
18
@
PFW
L 82-100
+33.5
22
@
RMU
L 76-88
+11.5
24
@
YSU
W 65-64
−22.5
30
vs
WRST
L 69-76
−6.5
1
vs
CLE
L 88-90
+17.5
4
vs
DETM
L 63-76
−16.5
7
@
NKU
L 62-67
−27.5
10
@
IUIN
W 92-88
+21.5
15
vs
GB
W 75-72
+1.5
20
@
DETM
L 86-91
+23.5
22
@
OAK
L 70-81
−8.5
25
vs
YSU
W 78-65
−4.5
4
@
DETM
L 63-84
−4.5
over 14under 17avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Oregon St
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-65 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 76-73 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 75-87 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 69-73 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 84-91 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 65-73 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 69-75 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 80-58 | -3.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 81-70 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 67-57 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -3.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 78-75 | +12.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 64-102 | +7.5 | L −30.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 70-62 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 53-84 | +4.5 | L −26.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-81 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 68-55 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 76-82 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 140.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 64-81 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 51-81 | +19.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 72-69 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 78-76 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 74-64 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-81 | +19.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 90-63 | +8.5 | W +35.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 50-60 | +6.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 83-73 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 92-82 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 72-93 | +15.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-77 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 56-65 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−7.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
−3.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−1.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+1.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
−10.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
−10.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
−7.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
+18.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+0.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
+8.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
−13.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+15.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
−30.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
+12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−26.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
−7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
+17.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
−3.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+7.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
−18.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
+8.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+5.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
+11.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−0.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+35.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−3.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+0.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+3.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
−5.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+4.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NDSU
W 67-65
−12.5
7
vs
UIC
W 76-73
+2.5
12
vs
UNT
W 66-64
−4.5
17
@
ORE
L 75-87
+20.5
21
vs
EVAN
L 69-73
+5.5
22
vs
IONA
L 84-91
+17.5
24
vs
MASS
L 65-73
−11.5
29
vs
CBU
L 69-75
+6.5
3
vs
UVM
W 80-58
−5.5
6
vs
SUU
W 81-70
+4.5
13
vs
MTST
W 67-57
−16.5
17
vs
SHSU
L 75-85
+6.5
21
@
ASU
W 78-75
+5.5
28
vs
SCU
L 64-102
+15.5
30
vs
SF
W 70-62
−12.5
2
@
PAC
L 53-84
−0.5
4
@
WSU
L 67-81
+7.5
8
vs
SEA
W 68-55
−16.5
10
@
PORT
L 76-82
+12.5
14
vs
LMU
W 76-70
+5.5
17
vs
PAC
L 64-81
+5.5
21
@
SMC
L 51-81
−10.5
28
@
LMU
W 72-69
−0.5
31
@
USD
W 78-76
+3.5
4
vs
WSU
W 74-64
−9.5
7
vs
GONZ
L 61-81
−7.5
12
@
SF
W 90-63
+12.5
15
@
SEA
L 50-60
−26.5
21
vs
PEPP
W 83-73
+7.5
25
vs
USD
W 92-82
+29.5
28
@
SCU
L 72-93
+11.5
8
vs
SF
W 78-77
+10.5
9
vs
GONZ
L 56-65
−24.5
over 19under 14avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Milwaukee 2, Oregon St 2, even 1
MilwaukeeBetterOregon St
G I. Dorceus5.3 pts · 1.5 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 14
→ORSTBig
G J. Lake13.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 87
G T. Norman TR2.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 55
→ORSTBig
G D. Freitag TR20 pts · 4.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 93
F D. Jovanovich12.3 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 78
←MILWSmall
G L. Smiley TR7.8 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 52
F C. Jackson9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 67
←MILWSmall
F J. Rasmussen TR13 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 43
F S. Murchison0.7 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F D. Gory TR13.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 2 ast
Score 80
MilwaukeeBetterOregon St
MILW offense180th of 366 · -5.5
→ORSTSmall
ORST defense109th of 366 · -1.1
MILW defense297th of 366 · -7.6
→ORSTBig
ORST offense95th of 366 · -0.7
Backcourt-2.5 · 2 players
→ORSTBig
Backcourt+5.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.9 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt+1.1 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
→ORSTSmall
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMILW betterORST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
I. Dorceus22 minT. Norman8 min · TRJ. Hansen1 min · TRJ. LovelaceNewD. OmwenoNewA. WomackNew
Forwards
D. Jovanovich31 minC. Jackson23 minS. Murchison5 minA. Amadou3 min · TRN. MalosaNewB. AkoroNew
Guards
J. Lake34 minD. Freitag34 min · TRL. Smiley21 min · TRC. Johnson16 min · TRS. Blakely Drummond1 min · TRJ. LakeNew
Forwards
J. Rasmussen32 min · TRD. Gory30 min · TRP. Pinnis4 min · TRK. TreacherNew
Centers
D. Evans9 min · TRX. Staton5 min · TRY. AklogNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.7 #173 | Points per game | 71.1 #264 |
| 1.09 #172 | Points per possession | 1.06 #232 |
| 69.1 #174 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #272 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.9 #242 | Effective FG% | 50.5 #216 |
| 32.3 #266 | 3-point % | 35.0 #115 |
| 38.1 #212 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #84 |
| 32.1 #256 | Free throw rate | 43.1 #20 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.3 #85 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #254 |
| 33.0 #88 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.8 #303 |
| 12.9 #220 | Assists per game | 13.8 #159 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.9 #317 | Points allowed | 74.2 #159 |
| 1.15 #328 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #223 |
| 55.5 #340 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.3 #119 |
| 36.5 #329 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #116 |
| 15.8 #232 | Turnovers forced | 15.3 #264 |
| 70.8 #121 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #265 |
| 6.5 #176 | Steals per game | 5.5 #293 |
| 3.0 #230 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #115 |
Milwaukee
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Detroit Mercy63–84
- Wvs Youngstown St78–65
- L@ Oakland70–81
- L@ Detroit Mercy86–91
- Wvs Green Bay75–72
A week or more of rest.
Oregon St
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga56–65
- Wvs San Francisco78–77
- L@ Santa Clara72–93
- Wvs San Diego92–82
- Wvs Pepperdine83–73
A week or more of rest.