Sojka Pavilion · at Bucknell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BUCK | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ODU 73–72 · win probability ODU 54%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ODU has more of the edges
ODU 3, BUCK 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
ODU hits 36.0% and allows 32.0%; BUCK hits 30.6% and allows 37.0%. Threes are 36.2% and 42.8% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: ODU 50.6 and allows 50.8; BUCK 48.5 and allows 54.7
BUCK offense vs ODU defense
Offense 317th of 366 against a defense 222nd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ODU plays 70.8 a game (81st fastest), BUCK 67.7 (242nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
BUCK at home. This season: BUCK 0-0 at home, ODU 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
ODU has played the 188th-hardest schedule, BUCK the 227th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ODU 34%, BUCK 39%. Transfers in: ODU 4, BUCK 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ODU 26.0%, BUCK 27.0%. Defensive: ODU 69.7%, BUCK 68.7%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: ODU 34.7, BUCK 29.8. Allowed: ODU 42.0, BUCK 35.3
Even
ODU offense vs BUCK defense
Offense 240th of 366 against a defense 237th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ODU 15.4%, BUCK 18.9%. Forced: ODU 14.5%, BUCK 17.9%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ODU -1.1 | — |
| Total | — | 145.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | ODU 73.1 · BUCK 71.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ODU -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | ODU 34.3 · BUCK 33.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Old Dominion
32 games played
Straight up
11-21
34% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-87 | +16.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 60-57 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-96 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-99 | +10.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-56 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 75-88 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-86 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 58-73 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 77-83 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 75-71 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 79-85 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-72 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-55 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 81-86 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 88-97 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 87-80 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 84-88 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+1.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−5.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
−7.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
−19.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
+20.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
−0.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+8.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−4.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+3.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
+4.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
+11.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
−5.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−0.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
−9.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
−5.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
+8.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
+5.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+2.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+9.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
−0.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
+13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
−14.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
−20.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
+9.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+1.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
+19.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+4.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
−0.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
−1.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+6.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
−2.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+5.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−32.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
+13.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
+17.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
−12.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
+3.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+16.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−0.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+9.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
−10.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
−3.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
+2.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−23.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
+17.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
+17.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
−8.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+8.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+7.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
+7.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
−13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
+1.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
+9.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
−6.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+4.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
−14.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+19.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
+19.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
+25.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+4.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
+9.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+14.5
over 21under 11avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bucknell
33 games played
Straight up
10-23
30% wins
Against the spread
14-19
42% covers · avg −3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-20
39% overs · avg +1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 78-70 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 7 | @ | W 73-62 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-73 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 77-83 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 50-84 | +16.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 49-97 | +28.5 | L −19.5 | 158.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 66-71 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 72-101 | +5.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 77-97 | +23.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 66-73 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 9 | @ | W 51-38 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | U 89 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 39-94 | +25.5 | L −29.5 | 133.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 58-65 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 72-65 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 55-76 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-67 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 76-95 | +8.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 84-87 | -4.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 62-67 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 79-81 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 103-97 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 60-59 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 59-78 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 9 | vs | L 60-76 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-82 | +5.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 57-75 | +3.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 63-72 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 75-73 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 79-89 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 65-55 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 69-74 | +15.5 | W +10.5 | 133.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
+5.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
+12.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−5.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
−1.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−17.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−19.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
+5.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
+2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
−23.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+3.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−8.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
+10.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−29.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−8.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
+2.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−12.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−3.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+4.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
−10.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
−7.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−2.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+2.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+7.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
+8.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−13.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
−9.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
−7.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−14.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−11.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+4.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
−4.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
+8.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+10.5
covered 14didn’t cover 19avg −3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DEL
W 78-70
−1.5
7
@
MSM
W 73-62
−8.5
11
@
PRIN
L 63-73
−10.5
14
vs
HOF
L 77-83
+20.5
17
@
PITT
L 50-84
−7.5
20
@
SJU
L 49-97
−12.5
24
vs
BGSU
L 66-71
−7.5
26
vs
BUF
L 71-73
−2.5
30
vs
COR
L 72-101
+13.5
3
@
AKR
L 77-97
+16.5
6
vs
UMBC
L 66-73
−4.5
9
@
RID
W 51-38
−46.5
20
@
IOWA
L 39-94
−0.5
31
@
HC
L 58-65
−10.5
3
vs
LEH
W 72-65
−0.5
7
@
NAVY
L 55-76
−6.5
10
vs
L-MD
W 70-67
−6.5
14
vs
LAF
W 76-69
+7.5
17
@
COLG
L 76-95
+31.5
21
vs
ARMY
L 84-87
+26.5
24
@
L-MD
L 62-67
−18.5
28
@
LAF
L 79-81
+21.5
31
vs
BU
W 103-97
+61.5
4
@
AMER
W 60-59
−22.5
7
vs
COLG
L 59-78
−4.5
9
vs
NAVY
L 60-76
+0.5
14
@
BU
L 69-82
+13.5
18
vs
AMER
L 57-75
−8.5
22
vs
HC
L 63-72
−7.5
25
@
ARMY
W 75-73
+5.5
28
@
LEH
L 79-89
+29.5
3
vs
ARMY
W 65-55
−24.5
5
@
NAVY
L 69-74
+9.5
over 13under 20avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Old Dominion has the better starters
Position by position: Old Dominion 3, Bucknell 0, even 2
Old DominionBetterBucknell
G B. Benjamin TR5.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
=Even
G J. Williams7.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 23
G Z. Wiggins6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 46
←ODUSmall
G A. Pachucki5.9 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 25
G S. Hubbard3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 10
=No call
G K. Marshall TR3.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Not ranked
F Z. Weluche-Ume TR11.1 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
←ODUSmall
G J. Meachem1.5 pts · 0.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 2
F J. Turner6.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
←ODUSmall
F L. Soroa Schaller TR5.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 13
Old DominionBetterBucknell
ODU offense240th of 366 · -7.3
=Even
BUCK defense237th of 366 · -6.2
ODU defense222nd of 366 · -5.8
←ODUSmall
BUCK offense317th of 366 · -10.4
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
←ODUSmall
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
Frontcourt-2.9 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.0 · 1 player
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
→BUCKSmall
Bench-0.9 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestODU betterBUCK betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Benjamin20 min · TRZ. Wiggins18 minS. Hubbard16 minK. Thurmon11 min · TRC. Parker3 minR. Hellams2 min
Forwards
Z. Weluche-Ume31 min · TRJ. Turner21 minK. Howze10 min · TRB. Nacey8 minJ. NwekeNewL. MartiniNew
Guards
J. Williams33 minA. Pachucki21 minK. Marshall17 min · TRJ. Meachem10 minM. Lange3 minR. LamunoNew
Forwards
L. Soroa Schaller21 min · TRP. O'Brien10 minK. Welch2 minE. Marten-ConeyNewL. BergsengNewA. RousseauNew
Centers
D. KennardNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #150 | Points per game | 67.4 #327 |
| 1.06 #217 | Points per possession | 0.99 #332 |
| 70.8 #81 | Pace (possessions) | 67.7 #242 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #203 | Effective FG% | 48.5 #304 |
| 36.0 #60 | 3-point % | 30.6 #328 |
| 36.2 #245 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.8 #123 |
| 34.7 #189 | Free throw rate | 29.8 #314 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #95 | Turnover rate | 18.9 #319 |
| 26.0 #323 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.0 #295 |
| 12.9 #218 | Assists per game | 12.7 #235 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.7 #283 | Points allowed | 76.3 #226 |
| 1.12 #263 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #289 |
| 50.8 #145 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.7 #323 |
| 32.0 #62 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.0 #344 |
| 14.5 #321 | Turnovers forced | 17.9 #100 |
| 69.7 #176 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #216 |
| 5.7 #275 | Steals per game | 7.2 #105 |
| 3.1 #208 | Blocks per game | 1.8 #354 |
Old Dominion
11-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern84–88
- Wvs UL Monroe87–80
- W@ Georgia St81–73
- L@ Marshall88–97
- L@ Southern Miss81–86
A week or more of rest.
Bucknell
10-23 in 2025-26 overall · 7-13 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Navy69–74
- Wvs Army65–55
- L@ Lehigh79–89
- W@ Army75–73
- Lvs Holy Cross63–72
A week or more of rest.