Joseph G. Echols Hall · at Norfolk St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | NORF | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ODU 75–72 · win probability ODU 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ODU has more of the edges
ODU 5, NORF 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
ODU has played the 188th-hardest schedule, NORF the 343rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
NORF offense vs ODU defense
Offense 314th of 366 against a defense 222nd, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: ODU 34.7, NORF 43.5. Allowed: ODU 42.0, NORF 45.3
Shooting
Effective FG%: ODU 50.6 and allows 50.8; NORF 49.3 and allows 51.7
ODU offense vs NORF defense
Offense 240th of 366 against a defense 301st, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ODU 26.0%, NORF 32.5%. Defensive: ODU 69.7%, NORF 67.7%
Home court
NORF at home. This season: NORF 0-0 at home, ODU 0-0 away
Three-pointers
ODU hits 36.0% and allows 32.0%; NORF hits 34.2% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 36.2% and 30.6% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ODU 34%, NORF 8%. Transfers in: ODU 4, NORF 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: ODU plays 70.8 a game (81st fastest), NORF 69.1 (172nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ODU 15.4%, NORF 18.7%. Forced: ODU 14.5%, NORF 18.8%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ODU -2.7 | — |
| Total | — | 147.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | ODU 74.9 · NORF 72.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ODU -1.7 | — |
| 1H total | 68.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | ODU 35.3 · NORF 33.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
ODU 2–0 NORFODU leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · ODU has won the last 2 meetings · ODU 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | NORF 57 @ ODU 60 | ODU -8.5 | NORF W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | NORF 62 @ ODU 68 | ODU -7.5 | NORF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Old Dominion
32 games played
Straight up
11-21
34% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-87 | +16.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 60-57 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-96 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-99 | +10.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-56 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 75-88 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-86 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 58-73 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 77-83 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 75-71 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 79-85 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-72 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-55 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 81-86 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 88-97 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 87-80 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 84-88 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+1.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−5.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
−7.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
−19.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
+20.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
−0.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+8.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−4.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+3.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
+4.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
+11.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
−5.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−0.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
−9.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
−5.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
+8.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
+5.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+2.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+9.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
−0.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
+13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
−14.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
−20.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
+9.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+1.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
+19.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+4.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
−0.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
−1.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+6.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
−2.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+5.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−32.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
+13.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
+17.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
−12.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
+3.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+16.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−0.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+9.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
−10.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
−3.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
+2.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−23.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
+17.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
+17.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
−8.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+8.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+7.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
+7.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
−13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
+1.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
+9.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
−6.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+4.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
−14.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+19.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
+19.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
+25.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+4.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
+9.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+14.5
over 21under 11avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Norfolk St
28 games played
Straight up
11-17
39% wins
Against the spread
13-15
46% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-10
64% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | L 78-81 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 57-60 | +8.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 41-51 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 62-60 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 67-75 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 61-98 | +35.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-68 | +10.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 67-97 | +26.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-80 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 135.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 82-72 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 72-71 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 22 | vs | L 70-89 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 54-63 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 126.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-69 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 66-64 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 132.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 12 | vs | L 70-74 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-82 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 103-76 | -13.5 | W +13.5 | 143.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 78-79 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 60-88 | +7.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 75-68 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 75-58 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 70-66 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 90-71 | -10.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 75-69 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 84-90 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 76-84 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 82-88 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
−0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
+5.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
+3.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−0.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+7.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
−1.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
+9.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
−3.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
−13.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+4.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+11.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
−7.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−5.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−3.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
−9.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+1.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+13.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
−8.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
−20.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
+2.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
+7.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
+2.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+8.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+0.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
−9.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
−1.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
−13.5
covered 13didn’t cover 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
W&M
L 78-81
+0.5
11
@
ODU
L 57-60
−32.5
14
@
TOW
L 41-51
−46.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 62-60
−11.5
23
@
WYO
L 67-75
+0.5
29
@
ARIZ
L 61-98
+12.5
6
@
JMU
L 67-68
−3.5
10
@
BAY
L 67-97
+15.5
18
vs
GRAM
L 68-80
+12.5
19
vs
JKST
W 82-72
+13.5
21
@
UTEP
W 72-71
+6.5
22
vs
UCI
L 70-89
+22.5
28
@
UL
L 54-63
−9.5
3
@
NCCU
L 67-69
−5.5
10
@
DSU
W 66-64
−2.5
12
vs
UMES
L 70-74
+11.5
17
@
SCST
W 89-82
+31.5
24
vs
COPP
W 103-76
+35.5
26
vs
MORG
L 78-79
+4.5
31
@
HOW
L 60-88
+1.5
7
vs
NCCU
W 75-68
−5.5
14
vs
DSU
W 75-58
−1.5
16
@
UMES
W 70-66
−0.5
21
vs
SCST
W 90-71
+20.5
28
@
COPP
W 75-69
+3.5
2
@
MORG
L 84-90
+17.5
5
vs
HOW
L 76-84
+10.5
12
vs
SCST
L 82-88
+25.5
over 18under 10avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Old Dominion 2, Norfolk St 2, even 1
Old DominionBetterNorfolk St
G B. Benjamin TR5.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
→NORFSmall
G B. Laster TR6.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 51
G Z. Wiggins6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 46
←ODUSmall
G A. Newton3.6 pts · 1.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
G S. Hubbard3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 10
=Even
F J. Gupton TR7.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 22
F Z. Weluche-Ume TR11.1 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
←ODUSmall
F B. Gardner TR3.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 3
F J. Turner6.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
→NORFSmall
F J. Riley TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 56
Old DominionBetterNorfolk St
ODU offense240th of 366 · -7.3
←ODUSmall
NORF defense301st of 366 · -7.7
ODU defense222nd of 366 · -5.8
←ODUSmall
NORF offense314th of 366 · -10.1
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
→NORFSmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.9 · 2 players
←ODUSmall
Frontcourt-4.2 · 3 players
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
→NORFBig
Bench-0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestODU betterNORF betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Benjamin20 min · TRZ. Wiggins18 minS. Hubbard16 minK. Thurmon11 min · TRC. Parker3 minR. Hellams2 min
Forwards
Z. Weluche-Ume31 min · TRJ. Turner21 minK. Howze10 min · TRB. Nacey8 minJ. NwekeNewL. MartiniNew
Guards
B. Laster19 min · TRA. Newton16 minA. Torrence1 minC. WalkerNewD. CamaraNewJ. SkyersNew
Forwards
J. Gupton25 min · TRB. Gardner16 min · TRJ. Riley11 min · TRM. MitchellNew
Centers
J. JordanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.7 #150 | Points per game | 71.6 #257 |
| 1.06 #217 | Points per possession | 1.04 #274 |
| 70.8 #81 | Pace (possessions) | 69.1 #172 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #203 | Effective FG% | 49.3 #277 |
| 36.0 #60 | 3-point % | 34.2 #157 |
| 36.2 #245 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.6 #347 |
| 34.7 #189 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #13 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #95 | Turnover rate | 18.7 #311 |
| 26.0 #323 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #108 |
| 12.9 #218 | Assists per game | 11.3 #326 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.7 #283 | Points allowed | 74.7 #181 |
| 1.12 #263 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #160 |
| 50.8 #145 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.7 #196 |
| 32.0 #62 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #61 |
| 14.5 #321 | Turnovers forced | 18.8 #58 |
| 69.7 #176 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.7 #270 |
| 5.7 #275 | Steals per game | 6.5 #180 |
| 3.1 #208 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #264 |
Old Dominion
11-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern84–88
- Wvs UL Monroe87–80
- W@ Georgia St81–73
- L@ Marshall88–97
- L@ Southern Miss81–86
A week or more of rest.
Norfolk St
11-17 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs SC State82–88
- Lvs Howard76–84
- L@ Morgan St84–90
- W@ Coppin St75–69
- Wvs SC State90–71
A week or more of rest.