Trask Coliseum · at UNC Wilmington
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNCW 78–72 · win probability UNCW 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 150.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCW has more of the edges
KENT 0, UNCW 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: KENT plays 73.3 a game (17th fastest), UNCW 66.1 (310th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
KENT hits 35.0% and allows 35.0%; UNCW hits 35.0% and allows 29.7%. Threes are 44.9% and 38.8% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: KENT 43.5, UNCW 40.4. Allowed: KENT 39.5, UNCW 31.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: KENT 51.4 and allows 52.1; UNCW 50.4 and allows 47.5
Turnovers
Turnover rate: KENT 17.9%, UNCW 14.9%. Forced: KENT 16.1%, UNCW 14.9%
UNCW offense vs KENT defense
Offense 131st of 366 against a defense 196th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UNCW at home. This season: UNCW 0-0 at home, KENT 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
KENT has played the 179th-hardest schedule, UNCW the 228th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: KENT 35.3%, UNCW 35.3%. Defensive: KENT 70.7%, UNCW 72.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: KENT 19%, UNCW 35%. Transfers in: KENT 5, UNCW 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
KENT offense vs UNCW defense
Offense 128th of 366 against a defense 119th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNCW -5.5 | — |
| Total | — | 150.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | KENT 72.3 · UNCW 77.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNCW -3.1 | — |
| 1H total | 70.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | KENT 33.5 · UNCW 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
KENT 1–0 UNCWKENT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · KENT 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2025-26 | UNCW 77 @ KENT 86 | KENT -3.5 | KENT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Kent State
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −2.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 97-103 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 200 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 110-102 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 86-77 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 102-95 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-72 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-78 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 91-71 | -15.5 | W +4.5 | 172.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 96-84 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 78-88 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 69-59 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 60-101 | +24.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-73 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 96-93 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 85-87 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 87-81 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 101-107 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | O 208 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 72-57 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 52-69 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-66 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 95-91 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-68 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 78-71 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 83-81 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 70-92 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | U 162 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 102-76 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-78 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 86-75 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 58-79 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TROY
L 97-103
−9.5
7
vs
COR
W 110-102
+1.5
10
vs
UNCW
W 86-77
+5.5
15
vs
CLE
W 102-95
−4.5
16
vs
WRST
W 76-72
−0.5
18
vs
EKU
W 93-78
+4.5
22
vs
CLE
W 91-71
+4.5
3
vs
APSU
W 96-84
+3.5
14
@
PORT
L 78-88
−17.5
20
@
MASS
W 69-59
+8.5
29
@
PUR
L 60-101
−16.5
3
vs
NIU
W 77-73
−12.5
6
vs
BGSU
W 96-93
−0.5
10
@
CMU
L 85-87
−12.5
13
@
BUF
W 87-81
+3.5
16
vs
TOL
W 87-84
−2.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 101-107
−7.5
24
@
EMU
W 76-75
−3.5
27
vs
OHIO
W 72-57
+9.5
30
@
AKR
L 52-69
−6.5
3
@
TOL
W 75-72
+1.5
7
@
USM
L 65-66
−5.5
11
vs
EMU
W 95-91
−6.5
14
@
BALL
W 75-68
−0.5
17
@
BGSU
W 78-71
+8.5
24
vs
CMU
W 83-81
−9.5
27
vs
AKR
L 70-92
−18.5
3
@
NIU
W 102-76
+15.5
6
vs
WMU
W 86-78
−5.5
12
vs
OHIO
W 86-75
+7.5
13
vs
AKR
L 68-75
−0.5
18
@
ILST
L 58-79
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TROY
L 97-103
+57.5
7
vs
COR
W 110-102
+47.5
10
vs
UNCW
W 86-77
+6.5
15
vs
CLE
W 102-95
+31.5
16
vs
WRST
W 76-72
−9.5
18
vs
EKU
W 93-78
+9.5
22
vs
CLE
W 91-71
−10.5
3
vs
APSU
W 96-84
+26.5
14
@
PORT
L 78-88
+5.5
20
@
MASS
W 69-59
−35.5
29
@
PUR
L 60-101
+5.5
3
vs
NIU
W 77-73
−7.5
6
vs
BGSU
W 96-93
+33.5
10
@
CMU
L 85-87
+15.5
13
@
BUF
W 87-81
+2.5
16
vs
TOL
W 87-84
+2.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 101-107
+40.5
24
@
EMU
W 76-75
−3.5
27
vs
OHIO
W 72-57
−33.5
30
@
AKR
L 52-69
−45.5
3
@
TOL
W 75-72
−14.5
7
@
USM
L 65-66
−19.5
11
vs
EMU
W 95-91
+40.5
14
@
BALL
W 75-68
−0.5
17
@
BGSU
W 78-71
−2.5
24
vs
CMU
W 83-81
+7.5
27
vs
AKR
L 70-92
−4.5
3
@
NIU
W 102-76
+29.5
6
vs
WMU
W 86-78
+6.5
12
vs
OHIO
W 86-75
−0.5
13
vs
AKR
L 68-75
−20.5
18
@
ILST
L 58-79
−17.5
over 17under 15avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
UNC Wilmington
32 games played
Straight up
25-7
78% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-14
56% overs · avg −2.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | @ | L 77-86 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 73-60 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 85-60 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 81-73 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 70-57 | -11.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 87-57 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 138.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 88-62 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 70-69 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-63 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 130.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 73-70 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 66-67 | -15.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 87-78 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-53 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 49-45 | -12.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 87-78 | -4.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-71 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-75 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 70-77 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 82-73 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 78-85 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 76-64 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 65-54 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 70-66 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 137.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 79-69 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 88-65 | -13.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 76-79 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 76-57 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 70-85 | -6.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 17 | @ | W 68-67 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 21 | vs | L 61-80 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
−5.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−1.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
+18.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+3.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
+1.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+21.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+7.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−7.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
−5.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
−1.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−16.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
−1.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−0.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−8.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+4.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
−2.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
−3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−4.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+3.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+10.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
−11.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
+13.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
+2.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
+1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+2.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
+1.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+9.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
+14.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
−21.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
+5.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
−15.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
@
KENT
L 77-86
+6.5
15
vs
UPST
W 73-60
−22.5
18
vs
ECU
W 85-60
−0.5
21
@
RAD
W 81-73
+2.5
26
vs
SELA
W 70-57
−10.5
28
vs
NAVY
W 87-57
+5.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 88-62
+2.5
3
vs
MRSH
W 70-69
−11.5
6
@
UL
W 70-63
+2.5
13
@
VAL
W 73-70
+6.5
20
vs
HOW
L 66-67
−8.5
29
@
NCAT
W 87-78
+18.5
31
vs
DREX
W 65-53
−19.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 49-45
−46.5
8
@
NE
W 87-78
+22.5
10
@
STBK
W 75-71
+12.5
17
vs
CAM
W 78-75
+3.5
22
@
W&M
L 70-77
−12.5
24
@
HAMP
W 75-67
+5.5
29
@
TOW
W 82-73
+19.5
5
vs
W&M
L 78-85
+3.5
9
@
COFC
W 76-64
−8.5
12
vs
ELON
W 65-54
−30.5
14
vs
HOF
W 70-66
−1.5
19
vs
MONM
W 79-69
+3.5
21
@
CAM
W 73-68
−9.5
26
vs
NCAT
W 88-65
+6.5
1
vs
COFC
L 76-79
+8.5
3
@
ELON
W 76-57
−12.5
8
vs
CAM
L 70-85
+5.5
17
@
YALE
W 68-67
−13.5
21
vs
DAY
L 61-80
+2.5
over 18under 14avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Kent State 1, UNC Wilmington 1, even 3
Kent StateBetterUNC Wilmington
G C. Henry TR11.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 66
=Even
G W. Kermoury TR13.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 75
G C. Willis TR6.3 pts · 3 reb · 3.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Pettway TR8.8 pts · 2.1 reb · 2 ast
Score 64
G Q. Woidke9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 69
=Even
F G. Walsh9.1 pts · 6.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 57
F C. Williams TR9.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 52
←KENTSmall
F S. Elliott TR4.1 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 23
F G. Nwabude TR5.1 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 57
→UNCWSmall
C P. Wessler13.5 pts · 9.4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 87
Kent StateBetterUNC Wilmington
KENT offense128th of 366 · -3.5
=Even
UNCW defense119th of 366 · -1.8
KENT defense196th of 366 · -4.8
→UNCWSmall
UNCW offense131st of 366 · -3.7
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt+1.0 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
→UNCWSmall
Frontcourt+2.5 · 3 players
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestKENT betterUNCW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Henry29 min · TRC. Willis27 min · TRQ. Woidke20 minB. Moss5 minD. Lakatos1 minJ. SumlinNew
Forwards
C. Williams24 min · TRG. Nwabude19 min · TRL. Diouf13 min · TRD. Briscoe8 minL. Vanderwarker4 minJ. TownsendNew
Guards
W. Kermoury27 min · TRT. Pettway22 min · TRJ. Lamothe15 minX. Brown12 min · TRM. Smith3 minC. LusterNew
Forwards
G. Walsh26 minS. Elliott17 min · TRT. NelsonNewM. ProdanovicNewW. SewardNew
Centers
P. Wessler27 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 82.3 #31 | Points per game | 74.6 #174 |
| 1.12 #102 | Points per possession | 1.13 #84 |
| 73.3 #17 | Pace (possessions) | 66.1 #310 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #175 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #220 |
| 35.0 #118 | 3-point % | 35.0 #124 |
| 44.9 #69 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.8 #194 |
| 43.5 #15 | Free throw rate | 40.4 #54 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.9 #268 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #57 |
| 35.3 #39 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #40 |
| 15.1 #81 | Assists per game | 13.1 #204 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.6 #328 | Points allowed | 68.1 #32 |
| 1.10 #221 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #56 |
| 52.1 #219 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #30 |
| 35.0 #246 | Opponent 3-point % | 29.7 #6 |
| 16.1 #219 | Turnovers forced | 14.9 #297 |
| 70.7 #124 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.4 #51 |
| 6.5 #174 | Steals per game | 5.1 #330 |
| 3.3 #184 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #312 |
Kent State
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 15-5 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Illinois St58–79
- Lvs Akron68–75
- Wvs Ohio86–75
- Wvs W Michigan86–78
- W@ N Illinois102–76
A week or more of rest.
UNC Wilmington
25-7 in 2025-26 overall · 15-4 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton61–80
- W@ Yale68–67
- Lvs Campbell70–85
- W@ Elon76–57
- Lvs Charleston76–79
A week or more of rest.