M.A.C. Center · at Kent State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KENT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KENT 83–71 · win probability KENT 86%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: KENT has more of the edges
EKU 0, KENT 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
KENT offense vs EKU defense
Offense 128th of 366 against a defense 340th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: EKU 30.7, KENT 43.5. Allowed: EKU 38.5, KENT 39.5
Context
Schedule so far
EKU has played the 273rd-hardest schedule, KENT the 179th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: EKU 32.5%, KENT 35.3%. Defensive: EKU 68.3%, KENT 70.7%
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: EKU plays 69.8 a game (128th fastest), KENT 73.3 (17th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
KENT at home. This season: KENT 0-0 at home, EKU 0-0 away
EKU offense vs KENT defense
Offense 244th of 366 against a defense 196th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: EKU 52.1 and allows 56.1; KENT 51.4 and allows 52.1
Even
Three-pointers
EKU hits 35.0% and allows 36.2%; KENT hits 35.0% and allows 35.0%. Threes are 50.8% and 44.9% of their shots
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: EKU 29%, KENT 19%. Transfers in: EKU 3, KENT 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: EKU 16.9%, KENT 17.9%. Forced: EKU 14.8%, KENT 16.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KENT -12.1 | — |
| Total | — | 154.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | EKU 71.2 · KENT 83.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KENT -7.1 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | EKU 32.6 · KENT 39.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
EKU 0–1 KENTKENT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · EKU 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025-26 | EKU 78 @ KENT 93 | KENT -10.5 | KENT W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
E Kentucky
30 games played
Straight up
9-21
30% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-11
63% overs · avg +4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 | vs | L 79-87 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 62-92 | +28.5 | L −1.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 78-93 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 83-95 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 71-82 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 77-83 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 78-89 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 68-59 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-79 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 62-59 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 57-88 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 89-91 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 164.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-88 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 88-80 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-75 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 89-69 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 85-87 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 76-81 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 81-90 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-74 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 100-88 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 61-75 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 160.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 78-84 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 81-80 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 95-92 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 79-96 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 165.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 77-80 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 76-92 | -5.5 | L −21.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
−6.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−1.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
−4.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
−16.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−6.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
−4.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+1.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
+2.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−4.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
+5.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−16.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+2.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
−13.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+2.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
+5.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
+5.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+14.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
−10.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
−3.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
−5.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
−4.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
+0.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+2.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−7.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
−10.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
−6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+1.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
−14.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−1.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
−21.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
10
vs
WKU
L 79-87
+3.5
12
@
VAN
L 62-92
−14.5
18
@
KENT
L 78-93
+9.5
22
vs
MER
L 83-95
+14.5
24
@
NKU
L 71-82
−3.5
29
vs
WOF
L 77-83
+6.5
3
@
ILST
L 78-89
+12.5
10
@
EIU
W 68-59
−22.5
13
vs
M-OH
L 69-79
−10.5
17
@
JXST
W 62-59
−21.5
21
@
WICH
L 57-88
−3.5
1
@
QUC
L 89-91
+15.5
3
@
WGA
L 76-88
+7.5
8
vs
UNA
W 88-80
+19.5
10
vs
CARK
W 79-75
−2.5
15
@
APSU
L 72-74
−7.5
17
vs
BELL
W 89-69
+1.5
22
@
UNF
L 85-87
+5.5
24
@
JAX
L 76-81
+14.5
28
vs
APSU
L 82-90
+20.5
31
@
CARK
L 81-90
+19.5
5
vs
FGCU
W 76-74
−4.5
7
vs
STET
W 100-88
+36.5
11
@
LIP
L 61-75
−24.5
15
@
UNA
L 78-84
+11.5
18
vs
WGA
W 81-80
+6.5
21
@
BELL
W 95-92
+33.5
25
vs
QUC
L 79-96
+9.5
28
vs
LIP
L 77-80
−0.5
4
vs
STET
L 76-92
+12.5
over 19under 11avg +4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kent State
32 games played
Straight up
22-10
69% wins
Against the spread
12-20
38% covers · avg −2.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +4.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 97-103 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 200 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 110-102 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 86-77 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 102-95 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-72 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 93-78 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 91-71 | -15.5 | W +4.5 | 172.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 96-84 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 78-88 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 69-59 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 60-101 | +24.5 | L −16.5 | 155.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-73 | -16.5 | L −12.5 | 157.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 96-93 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 85-87 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 87-81 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 16 | vs | W 87-84 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 168.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 101-107 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 167.5 | O 208 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 76-75 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 72-57 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 162.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 52-69 | +10.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 3 | @ | W 75-72 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 65-66 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 95-91 | -10.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 186 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 75-68 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 78-71 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 83-81 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 70-92 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | U 162 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 102-76 | -10.5 | W +15.5 | 148.5 | O 178 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 86-78 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 86-75 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 161 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 68-75 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 58-79 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 154.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TROY
L 97-103
−9.5
7
vs
COR
W 110-102
+1.5
10
vs
UNCW
W 86-77
+5.5
15
vs
CLE
W 102-95
−4.5
16
vs
WRST
W 76-72
−0.5
18
vs
EKU
W 93-78
+4.5
22
vs
CLE
W 91-71
+4.5
3
vs
APSU
W 96-84
+3.5
14
@
PORT
L 78-88
−17.5
20
@
MASS
W 69-59
+8.5
29
@
PUR
L 60-101
−16.5
3
vs
NIU
W 77-73
−12.5
6
vs
BGSU
W 96-93
−0.5
10
@
CMU
L 85-87
−12.5
13
@
BUF
W 87-81
+3.5
16
vs
TOL
W 87-84
−2.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 101-107
−7.5
24
@
EMU
W 76-75
−3.5
27
vs
OHIO
W 72-57
+9.5
30
@
AKR
L 52-69
−6.5
3
@
TOL
W 75-72
+1.5
7
@
USM
L 65-66
−5.5
11
vs
EMU
W 95-91
−6.5
14
@
BALL
W 75-68
−0.5
17
@
BGSU
W 78-71
+8.5
24
vs
CMU
W 83-81
−9.5
27
vs
AKR
L 70-92
−18.5
3
@
NIU
W 102-76
+15.5
6
vs
WMU
W 86-78
−5.5
12
vs
OHIO
W 86-75
+7.5
13
vs
AKR
L 68-75
−0.5
18
@
ILST
L 58-79
−16.5
covered 12didn’t cover 20avg −2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TROY
L 97-103
+57.5
7
vs
COR
W 110-102
+47.5
10
vs
UNCW
W 86-77
+6.5
15
vs
CLE
W 102-95
+31.5
16
vs
WRST
W 76-72
−9.5
18
vs
EKU
W 93-78
+9.5
22
vs
CLE
W 91-71
−10.5
3
vs
APSU
W 96-84
+26.5
14
@
PORT
L 78-88
+5.5
20
@
MASS
W 69-59
−35.5
29
@
PUR
L 60-101
+5.5
3
vs
NIU
W 77-73
−7.5
6
vs
BGSU
W 96-93
+33.5
10
@
CMU
L 85-87
+15.5
13
@
BUF
W 87-81
+2.5
16
vs
TOL
W 87-84
+2.5
20
vs
M-OH
L 101-107
+40.5
24
@
EMU
W 76-75
−3.5
27
vs
OHIO
W 72-57
−33.5
30
@
AKR
L 52-69
−45.5
3
@
TOL
W 75-72
−14.5
7
@
USM
L 65-66
−19.5
11
vs
EMU
W 95-91
+40.5
14
@
BALL
W 75-68
−0.5
17
@
BGSU
W 78-71
−2.5
24
vs
CMU
W 83-81
+7.5
27
vs
AKR
L 70-92
−4.5
3
@
NIU
W 102-76
+29.5
6
vs
WMU
W 86-78
+6.5
12
vs
OHIO
W 86-75
−0.5
13
vs
AKR
L 68-75
−20.5
18
@
ILST
L 58-79
−17.5
over 17under 15avg +4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Kent State has the better starters
Position by position: E Kentucky 0, Kent State 4, even 1
E KentuckyBetterKent State
G J. Holt7 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 38
→KENTSmall
G C. Henry TR11.1 pts · 3.2 reb · 5.1 ast
Score 66
G D. King TR2.3 pts · 0.5 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Willis TR6.3 pts · 3 reb · 3.3 ast
Not ranked
F S. Lasu TR5.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 15
→KENTBig
G Q. Woidke9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 69
F A. Ball7.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 20
→KENTSmall
F C. Williams TR9.9 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 52
F Y. Paul4.2 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 12
→KENTBig
F G. Nwabude TR5.1 pts · 5.4 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 57
E KentuckyBetterKent State
EKU offense244th of 366 · -7.4
=Even
KENT defense196th of 366 · -4.8
EKU defense340th of 366 · -9.1
→KENTBig
KENT offense128th of 366 · -3.5
Backcourt-1.1 · 2 players
→KENTSmall
Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-5.3 · 3 players
→KENTBig
Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players
Bench-0.4 · 2 players
←EKUSmall
Bench-2.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestEKU betterKENT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Holt20 minD. King8 min · TRO. Hamama7 min · TRM. Miles1 minJ. McCarterNewD. VasserNew
Forwards
S. Lasu23 min · TRA. Ball20 minY. Paul17 minD. DujmovicNewJ. LoweNewM. CamaraNew
Guards
C. Henry29 min · TRC. Willis27 min · TRQ. Woidke20 minB. Moss5 minD. Lakatos1 minJ. SumlinNew
Forwards
C. Williams24 min · TRG. Nwabude19 min · TRL. Diouf13 min · TRD. Briscoe8 minL. Vanderwarker4 minJ. TownsendNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.5 #107 | Points per game | 82.3 #31 |
| 1.11 #123 | Points per possession | 1.12 #102 |
| 69.8 #128 | Pace (possessions) | 73.3 #17 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.1 #141 | Effective FG% | 51.4 #175 |
| 35.0 #111 | 3-point % | 35.0 #118 |
| 50.8 #10 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.9 #69 |
| 30.7 #286 | Free throw rate | 43.5 #15 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.9 #194 | Turnover rate | 17.9 #268 |
| 32.5 #106 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.3 #39 |
| 14.1 #139 | Assists per game | 15.1 #81 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.1 #346 | Points allowed | 80.6 #328 |
| 1.19 #354 | Points allowed per possession | 1.10 #221 |
| 56.1 #346 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.1 #219 |
| 36.2 #312 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.0 #246 |
| 14.8 #304 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #219 |
| 68.3 #241 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.7 #124 |
| 6.1 #228 | Steals per game | 6.5 #174 |
| 2.9 #245 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #184 |
E Kentucky
9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Stetson76–92
- Lvs Lipscomb77–80
- Lvs Queens University Royals79–96
- W@ Bellarmine95–92
- Wvs West Georgia81–80
A week or more of rest.
Kent State
22-10 in 2025-26 overall · 15-5 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Illinois St58–79
- Lvs Akron68–75
- Wvs Ohio86–75
- Wvs W Michigan86–78
- W@ N Illinois102–76
A week or more of rest.