Siena Saints at Bryant Bulldogs: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 8:00 PM ETChace Athletic Center · at Bryant

LineSIE -2.5moved 5 toward SIE

Total150.5up 6 from 144.5

Season records: Siena and Bryant
SIE	This season	BRY
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects SIE 71–69 · win probability SIE 57%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

SIE -2.5

moved 5 toward SIE

Total

150.5

model 139.7 · Under by 11

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: SIE has more of the edges

SIE 6, BRY 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

SIEBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: SIE 15.8%, BRY 20.2%. Forced: SIE 17.0%, BRY 14.6%

SIEBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: SIE 50.4 and allows 48.5; BRY 46.9 and allows 52.7

SIEBig

Three-pointers

SIE hits 30.6% and allows 32.4%; BRY hits 30.0% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 32.2% and 47.9% of their shots

SIEBig

BRY offense vs SIE defense

Offense 306th of 366 against a defense 194th, on the model’s ratings

SIESmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: SIE 31.8%, BRY 27.7%. Defensive: SIE 70.5%, BRY 69.0%

SIESmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: SIE 33.4, BRY 29.4. Allowed: SIE 27.5, BRY 33.5

Context

Schedule so far

SIE has played the 320th-hardest schedule, BRY the 261st. A record against a soft schedule means less

BRYSmall

SIE offense vs BRY defense

Offense 309th of 366 against a defense 254th, on the model’s ratings

BRYSmall

Home court

BRY at home. This season: BRY 0-0 at home, SIE 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 65 possessions: SIE plays 64.4 a game (354th fastest), BRY 65.2 (338th). Faster games mean more points

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: SIE 28%, BRY 29%. Transfers in: SIE 1, BRY 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Road favorites of under 3	1412	54%	50%	50%
Non-conference games at this spread	1094	54%	49%	50%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenBRY -2.5

5 → SIE

NowSIE -2.5

5 pts toward SIE

Total

Open144.5

▲ 6

Now150.5

Up 6 since the open

Moneyline

SIE -146 · BRY +119

Line movement

Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened BRY -2.5 · now SIE -3.5 · moved 6 toward SIEmodel SIE -2

model SIE -2

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

Over 150.5TotalUnder 150.5

Bets

57%43%

Money

61%39%

SIEWinner

BRY

Bets

64%36%

Money

89%11%

Money is 25 pts ahead of bets on SIE

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

5 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	SIE	BRY	Over	Under	SIE	BRY
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	+3.5-105	-3.5-115	150.5-110	150.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	+2.5-107	-2.5-120	151.5-109	151.5-117	-150	+117
BovadaBovada	+3.5-105	-3.5-115	150.5-110	150.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	+2.5-118	-2.5-102	150.5-110	150.5-110	-142	+120
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	+3.5-101	-3.5-111	150.5-108	150.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	SIE -2.5	SIE -2.1	BRY +0.4
Total	150.5	139.7	Under 10.8
Projected score	—	SIE 70.9 · BRY 68.8

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	SIE -1.4	—
1H total	65.4	—
1H projected score	SIE 33.4 · BRY 32	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
SIE WWWWW	21-14	60%	9-7	16-12
BRY LLWLL	11-18	38%	6-5	6-14

Venue/role: SIE away, as favorite; BRY home, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
SIE UUUUU	11-24	31%	23-12
BRY OUUOO	13-16	45%	7-22

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
SIE	6-4 60%	7-3 70%	1-9 10%
BRY	3-7 30%	3-7 30%	7-3 70%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Siena

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 8	vs PRIN	No recent meeting
Nov 10	@ DAY	No recent meeting
Nov 14	vs BRWN	W62–46WU

Bryant

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ QUIN	No recent meeting
Nov 8	vs FAIR	No recent meeting
Nov 10	@ PROV	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

SIE 2–1 BRYSIE leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · SIE has won the last 2 meetings · SIE 2-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 3, 2025-26	BRY 66 @ SIE 82	SIE -13.5	SIE W
Nov 8, 2024-25	SIE 90 @ BRY 88	BRY -10.5	SIE W
Dec 6, 2023-24	BRY 67 @ SIE 51	SIE +8	BRY W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Siena

35 games played

Straight up

23-12

66% wins

Against the spread

21-14

60% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

11-24

31% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

23-1266%

W W L L W W W W W W W L L L W L W L W W W W W W L L W L W L W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1460%

W W W L L L W W L W W L W L W L W L W W W L W L L L W L W L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

11-2431%

U U O U U O U U U O U O U U O U U O U O U O O O U U U O U U U U U U U

7 straight unders0 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsBRY	W 82-66	-13.5	W +2.5	148.5	U 148
Nov 7	@BRWN	W 62-46	-3.5	W +12.5	142.5	U 108
Nov 12	@SBU	L 66-75	+9.5	W +0.5	140.5	O 141
Nov 17	vsCOLG	L 69-72	-6.5	L −9.5	146.5	U 141
Nov 21	vsUALB	W 73-63	-10.5	L −0.5	140.5	U 136
Nov 24	@HC	W 73-69	-9.5	L −5.5	137.5	O 142
Nov 28	vsLONG	W 70-63	-5.5	W +1.5	145.5	U 133
Nov 29	@AMER	W 59-55	-2.5	W +1.5	137.5	U 114
Nov 30	vsME	W 64-60	-9.5	L −5.5	127.5	U 124
Dec 5	vsNIA	W 83-54	-12.5	W +16.5	129.5	O 137
Dec 7	vsCAN	W 74-52	-17.5	W +4.5	131.5	U 126
Dec 17	@UVM	L 69-83	+2.5	L −11.5	134.5	O 152
Dec 22	@IU	L 60-81	+21.5	W +0.5	145.5	U 141
Jan 2	@IONA	L 72-75	-1.5	L −4.5	149.5	U 147
Jan 4	@RID	W 74-65	-8.5	W +0.5	135.5	O 139
Jan 9	vsMRMK	L 59-63	-5.5	L −9.5	132.5	U 122
Jan 11	@MSM	W 67-50	-2.5	W +14.5	139.5	U 117
Jan 14	vsSHU	L 80-86	-8.5	L −14.5	139.5	O 166
Jan 17	@MAN	W 74-59	-6.5	W +8.5	144.5	U 133
Jan 19	vsFAIR	W 85-77	-6.5	W +1.5	142.5	O 162
Jan 22	vsMRST	W 69-50	-1.5	W +17.5	133.5	U 119
Jan 30	@NIA	W 82-79	-9.5	L −6.5	128.5	O 161
Feb 1	@CAN	W 78-63	-8.5	W +6.5	135.5	O 141
Feb 5	vsIONA	W 79-72	-8.5	L −1.5	140.5	O 151
Feb 7	@SPU	L 65-70	-1.5	L −6.5	135.5	U 135
Feb 13	vsQUIN	L 62-74	-3.5	L −15.5	144.5	U 136
Feb 15	@MRST	W 67-63	+2.5	W +6.5	133.5	U 130
Feb 20	@MRMK	L 72-79	+2.5	L −4.5	133.5	O 151
Feb 22	vsSPU	W 72-63	-5.5	W +3.5	135.5	U 135
Feb 27	@FAIR	L 58-72	-1.5	L −15.5	142.5	U 130
Mar 1	vsRID	W 76-61	-14.5	W +0.5	137.5	U 137
Mar 7	vsMSM	W 63-58	-2.5	W +2.5	135.5	U 121
Mar 8	vsFAIR	W 76-61	-1.5	W +13.5	138.5	U 137
Mar 10	vsMRMK	W 64-54	+2.5	W +12.5	128.5	U 118
Mar 19	vsDUKE	L 65-71	+28.5	W +22.5	137.5	U 136

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

BRY

W 82-66

+2.5

BRWN

W 62-46

+12.5

SBU

L 66-75

+0.5

COLG

L 69-72

−9.5

UALB

W 73-63

−0.5

W 73-69

−5.5

LONG

W 70-63

+1.5

AMER

W 59-55

+1.5

W 64-60

−5.5

NIA

W 83-54

+16.5

CAN

W 74-52

+4.5

UVM

L 69-83

−11.5

L 60-81

+0.5

IONA

L 72-75

−4.5

RID

W 74-65

+0.5

MRMK

L 59-63

−9.5

MSM

W 67-50

+14.5

SHU

L 80-86

−14.5

MAN

W 74-59

+8.5

FAIR

W 85-77

+1.5

MRST

W 69-50

+17.5

NIA

W 82-79

−6.5

CAN

W 78-63

+6.5

IONA

W 79-72

−1.5

SPU

L 65-70

−6.5

QUIN

L 62-74

−15.5

MRST

W 67-63

+6.5

MRMK

L 72-79

−4.5

SPU

W 72-63

+3.5

FAIR

L 58-72

−15.5

RID

W 76-61

+0.5

MSM

W 63-58

+2.5

FAIR

W 76-61

+13.5

MRMK

W 64-54

+12.5

DUKE

L 65-71

+22.5

covered 21didn’t cover 14avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

BRY

W 82-66

−0.5

BRWN

W 62-46

−34.5

SBU

L 66-75

+0.5

COLG

L 69-72

−5.5

UALB

W 73-63

−4.5

W 73-69

+4.5

LONG

W 70-63

−12.5

AMER

W 59-55

−23.5

W 64-60

−3.5

NIA

W 83-54

+7.5

CAN

W 74-52

−5.5

UVM

L 69-83

+17.5

L 60-81

−4.5

IONA

L 72-75

−2.5

RID

W 74-65

+3.5

MRMK

L 59-63

−10.5

MSM

W 67-50

−22.5

SHU

L 80-86

+26.5

MAN

W 74-59

−11.5

FAIR

W 85-77

+19.5

MRST

W 69-50

−14.5

NIA

W 82-79

+32.5

CAN

W 78-63

+5.5

IONA

W 79-72

+10.5

SPU

L 65-70

−0.5

QUIN

L 62-74

−8.5

MRST

W 67-63

−3.5

MRMK

L 72-79

+17.5

SPU

W 72-63

−0.5

FAIR

L 58-72

−12.5

RID

W 76-61

−0.5

MSM

W 63-58

−14.5

FAIR

W 76-61

−1.5

MRMK

W 64-54

−10.5

DUKE

L 65-71

−1.5

over 11under 24avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Bryant

29 games played

Straight up

7-22

24% wins

Against the spread

11-18

38% covers · avg −4.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

13-16

45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total

Straight up

7-2224%

L L W L L L L W L L L L W L L W L L L W L W L L L L W L L

2 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

11-1838%

L L W L W W W W L W L L W L L W L L L W L W L L L L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

13-1645%

U U O U U U U O O U O U U U U O O U U O U O O O O U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@SIE	L 66-82	+13.5	L −2.5	148.5	U 148
Nov 7	@GT	L 45-74	+15.5	L −13.5	138.5	U 119
Nov 12	vsDART	W 82-75	-1.5	W +5.5	151.5	O 157
Nov 16	@VAL	L 50-68	+6.5	L −11.5	143.5	U 118
Nov 19	@VT	L 61-78	+24.5	W +7.5	151.5	U 139
Nov 23	@CONN	L 49-72	+36.5	W +13.5	147.5	U 121
Nov 29	@HARV	L 53-56	+7.5	W +4.5	137.5	U 109
Dec 2	vsSTO	W 77-65	-6.5	W +5.5	134.5	O 142
Dec 5	@BRWN	L 56-75	+6.5	L −12.5	130.5	O 131
Dec 10	@IONA	L 63-69	+8.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 132
Dec 13	vsMRST	L 74-82	+1.5	L −6.5	131.5	O 156
Dec 22	@HPU	L 47-93	+19.5	L −26.5	153.5	U 140
Jan 3	@ME	W 56-51	-1.5	W +3.5	125.5	U 107
Jan 8	vsUML	L 63-77	-2.5	L −16.5	143.5	U 140
Jan 10	@UALB	L 46-71	+3.5	L −21.5	136.5	U 117
Jan 15	vsUMBC	W 79-74	+1.5	W +6.5	135.5	O 153
Jan 19	@NJIT	L 55-79	+1.5	L −22.5	132.5	O 134
Jan 24	vsUVM	L 52-62	+8.5	L −1.5	133.5	U 114
Jan 29	@BING	L 60-63	-2.5	L −5.5	130.5	U 123
Jan 31	vsUNH	W 92-84	-1.5	W +6.5	131.5	O 176
Feb 5	vsUALB	L 63-65	-1.5	L −3.5	133.5	U 128
Feb 7	vsME	W 73-67	-2.5	W +3.5	128.5	O 140
Feb 12	@UML	L 69-88	+4.5	L −14.5	141.5	O 157
Feb 14	@UVM	L 63-90	+13.5	L −13.5	133.5	O 153
Feb 19	vsBING	L 67-79	-4.5	L −16.5	134.5	O 146
Feb 26	@UMBC	L 58-70	+11.5	L −0.5	138.5	U 128
Feb 28	vsNJIT	W 69-52	+1.5	W +18.5	138.5	U 121
Mar 3	@UNH	L 83-88	+2.5	L −2.5	135.5	O 171
Mar 7	@UVM	L 57-77	+11.5	L −8.5	130.5	O 134

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SIE

L 66-82

−2.5

L 45-74

−13.5

DART

W 82-75

+5.5

VAL

L 50-68

−11.5

L 61-78

+7.5

CONN

L 49-72

+13.5

HARV

L 53-56

+4.5

STO

W 77-65

+5.5

BRWN

L 56-75

−12.5

IONA

L 63-69

+2.5

MRST

L 74-82

−6.5

HPU

L 47-93

−26.5

W 56-51

+3.5

UML

L 63-77

−16.5

UALB

L 46-71

−21.5

UMBC

W 79-74

+6.5

NJIT

L 55-79

−22.5

UVM

L 52-62

−1.5

BING

L 60-63

−5.5

UNH

W 92-84

+6.5

UALB

L 63-65

−3.5

W 73-67

+3.5

UML

L 69-88

−14.5

UVM

L 63-90

−13.5

BING

L 67-79

−16.5

UMBC

L 58-70

−0.5

NJIT

W 69-52

+18.5

UNH

L 83-88

−2.5

UVM

L 57-77

−8.5

covered 11didn’t cover 18avg −4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SIE

L 66-82

−0.5

L 45-74

−19.5

DART

W 82-75

+5.5

VAL

L 50-68

−25.5

L 61-78

−12.5

CONN

L 49-72

−26.5

HARV

L 53-56

−28.5

STO

W 77-65

+7.5

BRWN

L 56-75

+0.5

IONA

L 63-69

−14.5

MRST

L 74-82

+24.5

HPU

L 47-93

−13.5

W 56-51

−18.5

UML

L 63-77

−3.5

UALB

L 46-71

−19.5

UMBC

W 79-74

+17.5

NJIT

L 55-79

+1.5

UVM

L 52-62

−19.5

BING

L 60-63

−7.5

UNH

W 92-84

+44.5

UALB

L 63-65

−5.5

W 73-67

+11.5

UML

L 69-88

+15.5

UVM

L 63-90

+19.5

BING

L 67-79

+11.5

UMBC

L 58-70

−10.5

NJIT

W 69-52

−17.5

UNH

L 83-88

+35.5

UVM

L 57-77

+3.5

over 13under 16avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Bryant has the better starters

Position by position: Siena 0, Bryant 1, even 4

SienaBetterBryant

G T. Yildizoglu TR10.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.4 ast Score 30

Even

G T. Tabales9 pts · 2 reb · 3.3 ast Score 20

G B. Coyle8.7 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast Score 17

No call

G F. Vassalluzzo0 pts · 0.2 reb · 0 ast Not ranked

G I. Henderson3.8 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.5 ast Score 12

BRYSmall

F A. Pasha TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.7 ast Score 39

G O. Schlager2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.6 ast Not ranked

No call

F K. Harvey10.9 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.1 ast Score 64

G C. Torres0.5 pts · 0 reb · 0.3 ast Not ranked

No call

F E. Chatfield TR2.6 pts · 1 reb · 1.4 ast Not ranked

SienaBetterBryant

SIE offense309th of 366 · -9.6

BRYSmall

BRY defense254th of 366 · -6.6

SIE defense194th of 366 · -4.7

SIESmall

BRY offense306th of 366 · -9.5

Backcourt-7.7 · 5 players

BRYBig

Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players

FrontcourtNo numbers yet

No call

Frontcourt-1.8 · 3 players

BenchNo numbers yet

No call

Bench-0.0 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestSIE betterBRY betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Siena

Guards

T. Yildizoglu32 min · TRB. Coyle31 minI. Henderson14 minO. Schlager10 minC. Torres3 minR. DucharmeNew

Bryant

Guards

T. Tabales28 minF. Vassalluzzo1 minJ. Sepe1 minM. DeOrsey1 minR. WoernerNew

Forwards

A. Pasha33 min · TRK. Harvey27 minE. Chatfield13 min · TRO. Nnani1 min · TRD. ThompsonNewC. LyonsNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

SIE70.4 #276

BRY63.0 #358

Points per possession

SIE1.09 #154

BRY0.96 #351

Pace (possessions)

SIE64.4 #354

BRY65.2 #338

Shooting

Effective FG%

SIE50.4 #222

BRY46.9 #340

3-point %

SIE30.6 #330

BRY30.0 #343

3-point attempt rate

SIE32.2 #327

BRY47.9 #25

Free throw rate

SIE33.4 #226

BRY29.4 #322

Possessions

Turnover rate

SIE15.8 #126

BRY20.2 #351

Offensive rebound rate

SIE31.8 #133

BRY27.7 #276

Assists per game

SIE13.5 #182

BRY11.4 #314

Defense

Points allowed

SIE65.8 #12

BRY73.3 #138

Points allowed per possession

SIE1.02 #44

BRY1.13 #283

Opponent effective FG%

SIE48.5 #48

BRY52.7 #257

Opponent 3-point %

SIE32.4 #82

BRY36.3 #320

Turnovers forced

SIE17.0 #154

BRY14.6 #313

Defensive rebound rate

SIE70.5 #133

BRY69.0 #203

Steals per game

SIE5.8 #262

BRY5.9 #250

Blocks per game

SIE3.1 #205

BRY3.9 #88

SIE		BRY
Scoring
70.4 #276	Points per game	63.0 #358
1.09 #154	Points per possession	0.96 #351
64.4 #354	Pace (possessions)	65.2 #338
Shooting
50.4 #222	Effective FG%	46.9 #340
30.6 #330	3-point %	30.0 #343
32.2 #327	3-point attempt rate	47.9 #25
33.4 #226	Free throw rate	29.4 #322
Possessions
15.8 #126	Turnover rate	20.2 #351
31.8 #133	Offensive rebound rate	27.7 #276
13.5 #182	Assists per game	11.4 #314
Defense
65.8 #12	Points allowed	73.3 #138
1.02 #44	Points allowed per possession	1.13 #283
48.5 #48	Opponent effective FG%	52.7 #257
32.4 #82	Opponent 3-point %	36.3 #320
17.0 #154	Turnovers forced	14.6 #313
70.5 #133	Defensive rebound rate	69.0 #203
5.8 #262	Steals per game	5.9 #250
3.1 #205	Blocks per game	3.9 #88

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Siena

23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 16-7 in conference · Metro Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Duke65–71
Wvs Merrimack64–54
Wvs Fairfield76–61
Wvs Mount St Marys63–58
Wvs Rider76–61

A week or more of rest.

Bryant

7-22 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Vermont57–77
L@ New Hampshire83–88
Wvs NJIT69–52
L@ UMBC58–70
Lvs Binghamton67–79

A week or more of rest.