Daskalakis Athletic Center · at Drexel
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DREX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DREX 72–70 · win probability DREX 56%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it
COLG 3, DREX 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
DREX offense vs COLG defense
Offense 323rd of 366 against a defense 214th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
COLG hits 35.6% and allows 34.8%; DREX hits 35.5% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 35.0% and 40.0% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COLG 14.7%, DREX 19.1%. Forced: COLG 15.2%, DREX 16.4%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: COLG plays 68.6 a game (202nd fastest), DREX 65.2 (341st). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COLG 59%, DREX 24%. Transfers in: COLG 0, DREX 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
DREX at home. This season: DREX 0-0 at home, COLG 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: COLG 53.3 and allows 52.2; DREX 50.6 and allows 47.1
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COLG 26.6%, DREX 31.2%. Defensive: COLG 70.7%, DREX 69.0%
Even
COLG offense vs DREX defense
Offense 205th of 366 against a defense 175th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
COLG has played the 178th-hardest schedule, DREX the 199th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: COLG 29.7, DREX 31.6. Allowed: COLG 33.8, DREX 35.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DREX -1.6 | — |
| Total | — | 142.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | COLG 70.4 · DREX 72 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DREX -0.8 | — |
| 1H total | 66.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | COLG 32.9 · DREX 33.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COLG 1–1 DREXSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · COLG 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2025-26 | DREX 83 @ COLG 90 | COLG -3.5 | COLG W |
| Nov 9, 2024-25 | COLG 56 @ DREX 73 | DREX +3.5 | DREX W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Colgate
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
12-19
39% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 69-80 | +22.5 | W +11.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-68 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 90-83 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 65-84 | +30.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 17 | @ | W 72-69 | +6.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 94-95 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 69-67 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 72-62 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 77-85 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 60-90 | +27.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 28 | vs | L 69-78 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 85-77 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 76-69 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 64-62 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 148.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-78 | -11.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-80 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 95-76 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 66-70 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-79 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 76-77 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 69-55 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 78-59 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 74-70 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 80-84 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 58-85 | -2.5 | L −29.5 | 145.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 101-98 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 199 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-70 | -8.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 69-85 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 90-77 | -6.5 | W +6.5 | 155.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 69-76 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+11.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−8.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+3.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
+11.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
+9.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+4.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
+8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+1.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−2.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
−12.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+1.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−0.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−3.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
−12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
−2.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+10.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−2.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
−6.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
−5.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
−4.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
+3.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
+13.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
−4.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
−5.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−29.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
−5.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
−9.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+6.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−9.5
covered 12didn’t cover 19avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MSU
L 69-80
+4.5
7
vs
NE
L 65-68
−14.5
11
vs
DREX
W 90-83
+29.5
14
@
ILL
L 65-84
−15.5
17
@
SIE
W 72-69
−5.5
20
@
COR
L 94-95
+27.5
28
vs
UALB
W 69-67
−5.5
30
vs
FOR
W 72-62
−8.5
10
@
SBU
L 77-85
+19.5
21
@
FLA
L 60-90
−6.5
28
vs
HARV
L 69-78
+5.5
31
@
LAF
W 85-77
+15.5
3
@
ARMY
W 76-69
−2.5
7
vs
AMER
W 64-62
−22.5
10
vs
LEH
L 77-78
+12.5
14
@
L-MD
W 86-80
+15.5
17
vs
BUCK
W 95-76
+31.5
21
@
AMER
L 66-70
−10.5
24
vs
BU
W 80-79
+11.5
28
vs
HC
W 79-74
+8.5
31
@
LEH
L 76-77
+6.5
4
vs
ARMY
W 69-55
−26.5
7
@
BUCK
W 78-59
−4.5
11
@
HC
W 74-70
+1.5
14
vs
NAVY
L 80-84
+24.5
16
@
BU
L 58-85
−2.5
21
vs
L-MD
W 101-98
+48.5
25
vs
LAF
L 69-70
−9.5
28
@
NAVY
L 69-85
+12.5
5
vs
L-MD
W 90-77
+11.5
8
@
LEH
L 69-76
−1.5
over 17under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Drexel
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
19-13
59% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 65-76 | +9.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 83-90 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 50-80 | +11.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 75-43 | -13.5 | W +18.5 | 138.5 | U 118 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 68-84 | -4.5 | L −20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-71 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 71-66 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 73-75 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-69 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 66-74 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 75-67 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 63-72 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 53-65 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 67-70 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 56-37 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 64-58 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 73-51 | +5.5 | W +27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 58-59 | +7.5 | W +6.5 | 124.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 83-78 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 58-51 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 61-60 | -7.5 | L −6.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 60-81 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 82-77 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 73-93 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 69-72 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 70-61 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 143.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-62 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 65-60 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 51-62 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | U 113 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 84-77 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 57-65 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
−1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
−3.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−18.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
+18.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−20.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+0.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−0.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+2.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
−6.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
−14.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+3.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+7.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
+0.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
+0.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+1.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
+13.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
+9.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
+27.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
+6.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+0.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
+4.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−6.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−16.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+9.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
−21.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
−0.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
+10.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
+8.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
+3.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+2.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−4.5
covered 19didn’t cover 13avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
JOES
L 65-76
+1.5
11
@
COLG
L 83-90
+29.5
15
vs
SYR
L 50-80
−13.5
18
vs
NJIT
W 75-43
−20.5
21
vs
PENN
L 68-84
−0.5
23
vs
ODU
W 75-71
+3.5
25
@
MORG
W 71-66
−6.5
3
@
AMER
L 73-75
+10.5
6
@
LAS
L 64-69
+3.5
16
vs
HOW
L 66-74
+1.5
19
vs
MSM
W 75-67
+4.5
21
vs
ME
W 74-56
+0.5
29
@
COFC
L 63-72
−7.5
31
@
UNCW
L 53-65
−19.5
3
vs
HOF
L 67-70
+5.5
8
vs
STBK
W 56-37
−39.5
10
vs
W&M
W 64-58
−28.5
15
@
MONM
W 73-51
−3.5
19
@
TOW
L 58-59
−7.5
24
vs
NE
W 83-78
+21.5
29
vs
HAMP
W 58-51
−18.5
31
vs
NCAT
W 61-60
−17.5
5
@
CAM
L 60-81
−0.5
7
@
ELON
W 82-77
+22.5
12
vs
MONM
L 73-93
+32.5
16
@
STBK
L 69-72
+5.5
19
@
NE
W 70-61
−12.5
22
vs
TOW
W 68-62
−0.5
26
vs
CAM
W 65-60
−18.5
3
@
HOF
L 51-62
−20.5
7
vs
NE
W 84-77
+22.5
8
vs
MONM
L 57-65
−14.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Colgate 0, Drexel 0, even 5
ColgateBetterDrexel
G J. Ahayere7.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 32
=Even
G J. Reed7.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 44
F A. Alekseyenko14.9 pts · 6.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 75
=Even
G A. Abram TR3.2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 80
F S. Wright12.5 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 60
=Even
G D. Tingler3.4 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 59
F C. Wright1.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
=Even
F P. Pagonis TR4.1 pts · 3.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 6
F A. Odetoyinbo1.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 20
=Even
F M. de LaPorterie2.9 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 12
ColgateBetterDrexel
COLG offense205th of 366 · -6.3
=Even
DREX defense175th of 366 · -3.9
COLG defense214th of 366 · -5.5
←COLGSmall
DREX offense323rd of 366 · -10.5
Backcourt-1.6 · 1 player
→DREXSmall
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 4 players
←COLGBig
Frontcourt-3.5 · 2 players
Bench-1.1 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.1 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestCOLG betterDREX betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Ahayere25 minC. Pugh1 minJ. Niv1 minP. JonesNewB. ForrestNewI. SkinnNew
Forwards
A. Alekseyenko30 minS. Wright26 minC. Wright12 minA. Odetoyinbo11 minE. Brown7 minC. Brennan4 min
Guards
J. Reed19 minA. Abram11 min · TRD. Tingler10 minM. Davis2 minL. PittmanNewM. HippsNew
Forwards
P. Pagonis18 min · TRM. de LaPorterie13 minR. Akuta5 minC. EdomwonyinNewD. SimonovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.6 #154 | Points per game | 67.3 #328 |
| 1.11 #121 | Points per possession | 1.03 #282 |
| 68.6 #202 | Pace (possessions) | 65.2 #341 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.3 #91 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #204 |
| 35.6 #81 | 3-point % | 35.5 #90 |
| 35.0 #275 | 3-point attempt rate | 40.0 #171 |
| 29.7 #316 | Free throw rate | 31.6 #265 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.7 #50 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #322 |
| 26.6 #309 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.2 #156 |
| 14.2 #130 | Assists per game | 12.8 #226 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.2 #222 | Points allowed | 67.6 #26 |
| 1.11 #230 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #64 |
| 52.2 #224 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.1 #22 |
| 34.8 #238 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.3 #15 |
| 15.2 #268 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #195 |
| 70.7 #125 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.0 #202 |
| 6.1 #230 | Steals per game | 5.8 #254 |
| 2.9 #249 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #144 |
Colgate
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Lehigh69–76
- Wvs Loyola MD90–77
- L@ Navy69–85
- Lvs Lafayette69–70
- Wvs Loyola MD101–98
A week or more of rest.
Drexel
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth57–65
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
- L@ Hofstra51–62
- Wvs Campbell65–60
- Wvs Towson68–62
A week or more of rest.