Mohegan Sun Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | URI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects URI 74–69 · win probability URI 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 142.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MONM has more of the edges
MONM 2, URI 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
MONM hits 34.2% and allows 33.9%; URI hits 31.1% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 34.4% and 43.5% of their shots
MONM offense vs URI defense
Offense 173rd of 366 against a defense 86th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MONM has played the 190th-hardest schedule, URI the 117th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MONM 16.7%, URI 19.1%. Forced: MONM 19.8%, URI 21.2%
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MONM 32.7, URI 38.4. Allowed: MONM 32.2, URI 42.6
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: MONM plays 67.9 a game (234th fastest), URI 66.5 (293rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
URI offense vs MONM defense
Offense 123rd of 366 against a defense 144th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MONM 31.2%, URI 31.0%. Defensive: MONM 67.2%, URI 68.2%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MONM 37%, URI 46%. Transfers in: MONM 5, URI 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MONM 49.6 and allows 50.0; URI 50.1 and allows 50.4
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | URI -5.3 | — |
| Total | — | 142.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | MONM 68.6 · URI 73.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | URI -3.0 | — |
| 1H total | 66.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | MONM 31.8 · URI 34.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Monmouth
33 games played
Straight up
18-15
55% wins
Against the spread
17-16
52% covers · avg +1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-73 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 58-70 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 73-78 | +21.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 71-70 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 80-73 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 79-83 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 63-58 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-79 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 65-73 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 75-85 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 76-62 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 65-68 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-48 | +8.5 | W +22.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 81-70 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 64-67 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 51-73 | -5.5 | L −27.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 81-68 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 63-65 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 88-73 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 83-81 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 57-73 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 76-75 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 93-73 | +1.5 | W +21.5 | 133.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 72-71 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 69-79 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-74 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 82-69 | -3.5 | W +9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 73-57 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | @ | W 89-83 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 65-57 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 74-64 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 133.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−8.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
+3.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+16.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−1.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+4.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
−10.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+12.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−0.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
−1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−10.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
−11.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
+4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−4.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
+22.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
+13.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
+4.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−27.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+9.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−0.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+19.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
−7.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−14.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+2.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+21.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
−0.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
−2.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−6.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+9.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
+12.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+2.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
+4.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
+8.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
−1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 16avg +1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
LAS
L 60-73
−10.5
13
@
HALL
L 58-70
−7.5
18
@
SYR
L 73-78
+5.5
23
vs
RMU
W 71-70
−7.5
28
vs
BALL
W 80-73
+16.5
29
vs
LEM
L 79-83
+16.5
30
@
LAF
W 88-74
+20.5
3
vs
PRIN
W 63-58
−18.5
6
@
GT
L 67-79
+1.5
14
@
FAIR
L 65-73
−5.5
17
vs
QUIN
L 75-85
+14.5
21
vs
LEH
W 76-62
−5.5
31
vs
CAM
L 65-68
−19.5
3
@
TOW
W 62-48
−26.5
8
vs
W&M
W 81-70
−5.5
10
@
HOF
L 64-67
−8.5
15
vs
DREX
L 51-73
−3.5
19
vs
NE
W 81-68
+5.5
22
@
HAMP
L 63-65
−7.5
24
@
CAM
W 88-73
+12.5
29
vs
NCAT
W 83-81
+19.5
31
vs
HOF
L 57-73
−10.5
5
@
STBK
W 76-75
+13.5
12
@
DREX
W 93-73
+32.5
15
vs
TOW
W 72-71
+4.5
19
@
UNCW
L 69-79
+3.5
21
@
COFC
L 63-74
−12.5
26
vs
STBK
W 82-69
+5.5
28
vs
ELON
W 73-57
−20.5
3
@
NE
W 89-83
+23.5
8
vs
DREX
W 65-57
−14.5
9
vs
CAM
W 74-64
−13.5
10
vs
HOF
L 69-75
+10.5
over 16under 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Rhode Island
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-62 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-82 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 80-57 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-61 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 86-77 | +8.5 | W +17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 55-62 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-65 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 90-75 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 66-56 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-90 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-66 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 62-45 | -21.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 107 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 85-77 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 57-61 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 50-61 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-79 | -11.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 70-45 | +2.5 | W +27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 75-84 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 69-68 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 61-76 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-77 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-75 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 46-59 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 76-94 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 55-61 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 64-52 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 49-61 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+12.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−20.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
+6.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
+3.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+17.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−9.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+10.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+11.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−3.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
−11.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−0.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−4.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
−2.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−13.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−4.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
−18.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
+27.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
−5.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
+4.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+10.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+14.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−12.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
−0.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
+0.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
−8.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+14.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−16.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
−15.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−8.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
+9.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−10.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+2.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−6.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
−14.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
−9.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+9.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−23.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+0.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+15.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−16.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
+1.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−16.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−31.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
+17.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−27.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−28.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
+15.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
−19.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
+11.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
−7.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+3.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+18.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−9.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
+16.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
−6.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+5.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−30.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
+25.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−25.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
−27.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−26.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−10.5
over 14under 18avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Rhode Island has the better starters
Position by position: Monmouth 0, Rhode Island 3, even 2
MonmouthBetterRhode Island
G J. Collins6.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 18
→URIBig
G D. Williamson TR14.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 63
G J. Sanders TR10.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 4.4 ast
Score 39
=Even
G J. Hinton12.6 pts · 3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 51
G L. Walker TR14.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Fontenet TR6.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
G A. Walker TR7.8 pts · 3.7 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 47
→URIBig
G J. Tripp12 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 90
F S. Spartalis10.5 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
Score 54
→URISmall
F M. Deniusas TR12.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 70
MonmouthBetterRhode Island
MONM offense173rd of 366 · -5.3
→URISmall
URI defense86th of 366 · -0.0
MONM defense144th of 366 · -3.1
=Even
URI offense123rd of 366 · -3.2
Backcourt-5.3 · 4 players
→URIBig
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestMONM betterURI betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Collins35 minJ. Sanders30 min · TRL. Walker28 min · TRA. Walker28 min · TRM. Durr21 min · TRJ. Dobuol6 min
Forwards
S. Spartalis24 minO. Harvey3 minS. Osei3 min · TRQ. Peters2 minD. PerryNewS. MarjanovicNew
Guards
D. Williamson37 min · TRJ. Hinton32 minJ. Fontenet28 min · TRJ. Tripp25 minJ. Harper12 minB. Loer4 min
Forwards
M. Deniusas27 min · TRM. Sow20 minJ. PerryNewN. RaupelisNewT. MartinNewD. MabilonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.0 #241 | Points per game | 69.9 #288 |
| 1.07 #212 | Points per possession | 1.05 #255 |
| 67.9 #234 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #293 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #259 | Effective FG% | 50.1 #231 |
| 34.2 #156 | 3-point % | 31.1 #318 |
| 34.4 #288 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.5 #103 |
| 32.7 #244 | Free throw rate | 38.4 #92 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #176 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #326 |
| 31.2 #157 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.0 #163 |
| 13.7 #167 | Assists per game | 11.3 #321 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.9 #73 | Points allowed | 68.2 #33 |
| 1.04 #74 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #53 |
| 50.0 #103 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.4 #124 |
| 33.9 #174 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #232 |
| 19.8 #28 | Turnovers forced | 21.2 #10 |
| 67.2 #287 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #248 |
| 7.6 #69 | Steals per game | 8.4 #20 |
| 4.2 #57 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #117 |
Monmouth
18-15 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra69–75
- Wvs Campbell74–64
- Wvs Drexel65–57
- W@ Northeastern89–83
- Wvs Elon73–57
A week or more of rest.
Rhode Island
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duquesne61–67
- L@ Fordham49–61
- Wvs Duquesne64–52
- Lvs Saint Joseph's55–61
- L@ St Bonaventure76–94
A week or more of rest.