Thomas M. Ryan Center · at Rhode Island
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | URI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects URI 74–65 · win probability URI 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 139.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: URI has more of the edges
PRIN 2, URI 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
PRIN hits 33.9% and allows 31.1%; URI hits 31.1% and allows 34.7%. Threes are 44.5% and 43.5% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PRIN 17.1%, URI 19.1%. Forced: PRIN 14.2%, URI 21.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PRIN 100%, URI 46%. Transfers in: PRIN 0, URI 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
PRIN offense vs URI defense
Offense 177th of 366 against a defense 86th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: PRIN 49.6 and allows 52.0; URI 50.1 and allows 50.4
Home court
URI at home. This season: URI 0-0 at home, PRIN 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: PRIN 34.6, URI 38.4. Allowed: PRIN 34.0, URI 42.6
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: PRIN plays 65.0 a game (344th fastest), URI 66.5 (293rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PRIN 27.2%, URI 31.0%. Defensive: PRIN 71.5%, URI 68.2%
Context
Schedule so far
PRIN has played the 137th-hardest schedule, URI the 117th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
URI offense vs PRIN defense
Offense 123rd of 366 against a defense 115th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | URI -8.5 | — |
| Total | — | 139.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | PRIN 65.4 · URI 73.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | URI -4.9 | — |
| 1H total | 65.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | PRIN 30.1 · URI 35 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Princeton
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-104 | +13.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 57-76 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-89 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 70-57 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-88 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 75-79 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-79 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-60 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-63 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 56-59 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-65 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 75-69 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-60 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 69-71 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 63-53 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 64-87 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-68 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-61 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 65-89 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 65-75 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 71-80 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 56-58 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 130.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-61 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 53-78 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
−21.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
+5.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
+3.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
−17.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
+10.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
−14.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+4.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+0.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
+3.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
+0.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+1.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−5.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
+4.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+9.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
−1.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
+23.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
−2.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−3.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
+5.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−15.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+17.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
+2.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−20.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
−8.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
−6.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
+1.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+19.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
+16.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
−10.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
−11.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
+3.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
−18.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+8.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+12.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
−28.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
−18.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+4.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−19.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
−13.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+7.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
+8.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
−6.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
+33.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−7.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
−18.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−7.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+8.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
−23.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−1.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
+2.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
+21.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
−16.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+0.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−6.5
over 13under 15avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Rhode Island
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-62 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-82 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 80-57 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-61 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 86-77 | +8.5 | W +17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 55-62 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-65 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 90-75 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 66-56 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-90 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-66 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 62-45 | -21.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 107 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 85-77 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 57-61 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 50-61 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-79 | -11.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 70-45 | +2.5 | W +27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 75-84 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 69-68 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 61-76 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-77 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-75 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 46-59 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 76-94 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 55-61 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 64-52 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 49-61 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+12.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−20.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
+6.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
+3.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+17.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−9.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+10.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+11.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−3.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
−11.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−0.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−4.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
−2.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−13.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−4.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
−18.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
+27.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
−5.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
+4.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+10.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+14.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−12.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
−0.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
+0.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
−8.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+14.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−16.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
−15.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−8.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
+9.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−10.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+2.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−6.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
−14.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
−9.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+9.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−23.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+0.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+15.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−16.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
+1.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−16.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−31.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
+17.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−27.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−28.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
+15.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
−19.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
+11.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
−7.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+3.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+18.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−9.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
+16.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
−6.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+5.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−30.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
+25.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−25.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
−27.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−26.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−10.5
over 14under 18avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Rhode Island has the better starters
Position by position: Princeton 1, Rhode Island 2, even 2
PrincetonBetterRhode Island
G J. Hicke15.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 85
←PRINSmall
G D. Williamson TR14.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 63
G J. Stanton11.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 64
=Even
G J. Hinton12.6 pts · 3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 51
G L. Clark6.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
=No call
G J. Fontenet TR6.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
G D. Davis14.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 69
→URISmall
G J. Tripp12 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 90
F M. Abdullahi9.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 54
→URISmall
F M. Deniusas TR12.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 70
PrincetonBetterRhode Island
PRIN offense177th of 366 · -5.5
→URISmall
URI defense86th of 366 · -0.0
PRIN defense115th of 366 · -1.5
=Even
URI offense123rd of 366 · -3.2
Backcourt+0.9 · 4 players
←PRINSmall
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
Bench-4.6 · 5 players
→URIBig
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestPRIN betterURI betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Hicke35 minJ. Stanton32 minL. Clark29 minD. Davis28 minS. Whitfield12 minP. Seals8 min
Forwards
M. Abdullahi29 minJ. Huggins22 minC. Happy19 minJ. Hammond7 minC. McSweeney5 minW. Kutzler1 min
Centers
W. HiggsNew
Guards
D. Williamson37 min · TRJ. Hinton32 minJ. Fontenet28 min · TRJ. Tripp25 minJ. Harper12 minB. Loer4 min
Forwards
M. Deniusas27 min · TRM. Sow20 minJ. PerryNewN. RaupelisNewT. MartinNewD. MabilonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.5 #324 | Points per game | 69.9 #288 |
| 1.04 #268 | Points per possession | 1.05 #255 |
| 65.0 #344 | Pace (possessions) | 66.5 #293 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #260 | Effective FG% | 50.1 #231 |
| 33.9 #177 | 3-point % | 31.1 #318 |
| 44.5 #78 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.5 #103 |
| 34.6 #192 | Free throw rate | 38.4 #92 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #216 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #326 |
| 27.2 #287 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.0 #163 |
| 12.5 #254 | Assists per game | 11.3 #321 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.4 #114 | Points allowed | 68.2 #33 |
| 1.11 #242 | Points allowed per possession | 1.03 #53 |
| 52.0 #209 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.4 #124 |
| 31.1 #36 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.7 #232 |
| 14.2 #328 | Turnovers forced | 21.2 #10 |
| 71.5 #82 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.2 #248 |
| 4.6 #349 | Steals per game | 8.4 #20 |
| 2.1 #341 | Blocks per game | 3.7 #117 |
Princeton
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Yale53–78
- Wvs Dartmouth82–61
- Lvs Harvard56–58
- L@ Brown71–80
- Lvs Columbia65–75
A week or more of rest.
Rhode Island
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duquesne61–67
- L@ Fordham49–61
- Wvs Duquesne64–52
- Lvs Saint Joseph's55–61
- L@ St Bonaventure76–94
A week or more of rest.