Colonial Hall · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UAB | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UAB 74–74 · win probability UAB 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UAB has more of the edges
URI 1, UAB 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: URI 31.0%, UAB 32.5%. Defensive: URI 68.2%, UAB 72.3%
Free throws
Free throw rate: URI 38.4, UAB 36.4. Allowed: URI 42.6, UAB 28.6
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: URI plays 66.5 a game (293rd fastest), UAB 71.2 (61st). Faster games mean more points
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: URI 46%, UAB 10%. Transfers in: URI 3, UAB 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: URI 19.1%, UAB 12.6%. Forced: URI 21.2%, UAB 16.1%
Three-pointers
URI hits 31.1% and allows 34.7%; UAB hits 27.8% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 43.5% and 30.5% of their shots
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: URI 50.1 and allows 50.4; UAB 48.4 and allows 50.0
Even
URI offense vs UAB defense
Offense 123rd of 366 against a defense 141st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
URI has played the 117th-hardest schedule, UAB the 129th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Even
UAB offense vs URI defense
Offense 82nd of 366 against a defense 86th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | URI -0.1 | — |
| Total | — | 148.2 | — |
| Projected score | — | URI 74.2 · UAB 74.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | URI -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 69.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | URI 34.8 · UAB 34.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Rhode Island
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 93-62 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 65-82 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 80-57 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 80-61 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 86-77 | +8.5 | W +17.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 55-62 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-65 | -4.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 90-75 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 66-56 | -13.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-90 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-66 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 62-45 | -21.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 107 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 85-77 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 57-61 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 50-61 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 111 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 72-79 | -11.5 | L −18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 70-45 | +2.5 | W +27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 75-84 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 69-68 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 61-76 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 82-77 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 70-75 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 66-70 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 81-76 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 46-59 | -3.5 | L −16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 76-94 | +2.5 | L −15.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 55-61 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 64-52 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 49-61 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 61-67 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+12.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−20.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
+6.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
+3.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+17.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−9.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+10.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+11.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−3.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
−11.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−0.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−4.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
−2.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−13.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−4.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
−18.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
+27.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
−5.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
+4.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+10.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+14.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−12.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
−0.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
+0.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
−8.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+14.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−16.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
−15.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−8.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
+9.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−10.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
STET
W 93-62
+2.5
7
vs
TLSA
L 65-82
−6.5
11
vs
STO
W 80-57
−14.5
14
vs
UALB
W 80-61
−9.5
18
@
YALE
W 86-77
+9.5
24
vs
TOW
L 55-62
−23.5
25
vs
UVM
W 80-65
+0.5
26
vs
TEM
W 90-75
+15.5
2
vs
BRWN
W 66-56
−16.5
6
@
PROV
L 71-90
+1.5
9
vs
MCN
L 64-66
−16.5
16
vs
CAN
W 62-45
−31.5
22
vs
NE
W 85-77
+17.5
31
vs
LUC
L 57-61
−27.5
3
@
GMU
L 50-61
−28.5
7
vs
LAS
L 72-79
+15.5
10
@
DAV
W 70-45
−19.5
14
vs
VCU
L 75-84
+11.5
21
@
RICH
W 69-68
−7.5
24
vs
GMU
W 74-65
+3.5
27
@
DAY
W 81-76
+18.5
1
@
DUQ
L 61-76
−9.5
7
vs
RICH
W 82-77
+16.5
10
@
GW
L 70-75
−6.5
14
vs
FOR
L 66-70
+1.5
17
vs
SLU
W 81-76
+5.5
21
@
LAS
L 46-59
−30.5
26
@
SBU
L 76-94
+25.5
28
vs
JOES
L 55-61
−25.5
4
vs
DUQ
W 64-52
−27.5
7
@
FOR
L 49-61
−26.5
12
vs
DUQ
L 61-67
−10.5
over 14under 18avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
UAB
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
15-16
48% covers · avg −0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 106-55 | -34.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 70-94 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 162.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 74-77 | -19.5 | L −22.5 | 164.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 91-74 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 168.5 | U 165 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 81-73 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 75-59 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 1 | @ | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 5 | @ | W 74-69 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 85-86 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 101-77 | -18.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | O 178 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 72-47 | -13.5 | W +11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-75 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 109-106 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 163.5 | O 215 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 71-76 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | @ | W 87-85 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 82-69 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 77-99 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 69-82 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 168.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 83-73 | -12.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 80-90 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 8 | vs | W 71-65 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 68-63 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 54-55 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 152.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 76-71 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 78-67 | +5.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 58-62 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 80-74 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 90-83 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 78-83 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+16.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
−4.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−22.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
+18.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+0.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
+5.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
+7.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
+6.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
−7.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+5.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
+11.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−8.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+11.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−8.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
−5.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
+11.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
−23.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−10.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
−2.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
+5.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
−11.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−2.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
+15.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−7.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+6.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
+16.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−8.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+3.5
8
vs
ECU
W 90-83
−3.5
13
vs
CLT
L 78-83
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 16avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MVSU
W 106-55
+15.5
7
@
NCSU
L 70-94
+1.5
11
vs
ALST
L 74-77
−13.5
14
vs
HPU
W 91-74
−3.5
21
vs
USA
W 80-72
+2.5
24
vs
SIU
W 81-73
−7.5
25
vs
UTEP
W 75-59
−12.5
1
@
MTSU
L 61-76
−16.5
5
@
DRKE
W 74-69
−5.5
14
vs
TROY
L 85-86
+15.5
17
vs
CLE
W 101-77
+21.5
21
vs
UNCA
W 72-47
−32.5
31
vs
WICH
L 70-75
−4.5
4
@
USF
W 109-106
+51.5
7
vs
FAU
L 71-76
−15.5
11
@
ECU
W 87-85
+21.5
14
@
TULN
W 82-69
−2.5
18
vs
TLSA
L 77-99
+16.5
22
vs
USF
L 69-82
−17.5
28
@
UTSA
W 83-73
+0.5
31
@
UNT
W 72-68
−1.5
5
vs
MEM
L 80-90
+14.5
8
vs
RICE
W 71-65
−17.5
11
@
TLSA
W 68-63
−30.5
15
vs
TULN
L 54-55
−43.5
18
@
TEM
W 76-71
+3.5
22
@
MEM
W 78-67
−7.5
1
vs
UNT
L 58-62
−22.5
4
@
CLT
W 80-74
+7.5
8
vs
ECU
W 90-83
+21.5
13
vs
CLT
L 78-83
+13.5
over 14under 17avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Rhode Island has the better starters
Position by position: Rhode Island 1, UAB 0, even 4
Rhode IslandBetterUAB
G D. Williamson TR14.7 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 63
=Even
G J. Fernandez TR16.6 pts · 4.6 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 56
G J. Hinton12.6 pts · 3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 51
=Even
G J. Elyzee TR11.1 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 61
G J. Fontenet TR6.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G D. Jones TR16.4 pts · 4 reb · 3.4 ast
Score 91
G J. Tripp12 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 90
←URISmall
G E. Duval TR15.6 pts · 4 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 74
F M. Deniusas TR12.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 70
=Even
G T. Caldwell TR9 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 56
Rhode IslandBetterUAB
URI offense123rd of 366 · -3.2
=Even
UAB defense141st of 366 · -3.1
URI defense86th of 366 · -0.0
=Even
UAB offense82nd of 366 · +0.4
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
→UABBig
Backcourt+2.8 · 5 players
Frontcourt+0.9 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-1.4 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestURI betterUAB betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Williamson37 min · TRJ. Hinton32 minJ. Fontenet28 min · TRJ. Tripp25 minJ. Harper12 minB. Loer4 min
Forwards
M. Deniusas27 min · TRM. Sow20 minJ. PerryNewN. RaupelisNewT. MartinNewD. MabilonNew
Guards
J. Fernandez37 min · TRJ. Elyzee30 min · TRD. Jones29 min · TRE. Duval27 min · TRT. Caldwell20 min · TRS. London20 min
Forwards
A. Alston8 min · TRA. Sandlin-ElNew
Centers
M. MboleNewK. DavisNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.9 #288 | Points per game | 78.2 #92 |
| 1.05 #255 | Points per possession | 1.10 #141 |
| 66.5 #293 | Pace (possessions) | 71.2 #61 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.1 #231 | Effective FG% | 48.4 #305 |
| 31.1 #318 | 3-point % | 27.8 #364 |
| 43.5 #103 | 3-point attempt rate | 30.5 #350 |
| 38.4 #92 | Free throw rate | 36.4 #141 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.1 #326 | Turnover rate | 12.6 #2 |
| 31.0 #163 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.5 #104 |
| 11.3 #321 | Assists per game | 14.2 #135 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.2 #33 | Points allowed | 74.3 #168 |
| 1.03 #53 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #79 |
| 50.4 #124 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.0 #98 |
| 34.7 #232 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #95 |
| 21.2 #10 | Turnovers forced | 16.1 #217 |
| 68.2 #248 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.3 #53 |
| 8.4 #20 | Steals per game | 7.5 #74 |
| 3.7 #117 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #139 |
Rhode Island
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Duquesne61–67
- L@ Fordham49–61
- Wvs Duquesne64–52
- Lvs Saint Joseph's55–61
- L@ St Bonaventure76–94
A week or more of rest.
UAB
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Charlotte78–83
- Wvs East Carolina90–83
- W@ Charlotte80–74
- Lvs North Texas58–62
- W@ Memphis78–67
A week or more of rest.