LionTree Arena · at UC San Diego
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UCSD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UCSD 75–69 · win probability UCSD 70%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UCSD has more of the edges
FRES 0, UCSD 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FRES 0%, UCSD 68%. Transfers in: FRES 5, UCSD 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: FRES 50.6 and allows 51.5; UCSD 52.6 and allows 48.4
Context
Schedule so far
FRES has played the 103rd-hardest schedule, UCSD the 205th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FRES offense vs UCSD defense
Offense 176th of 366 against a defense 110th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UCSD at home. This season: UCSD 0-0 at home, FRES 0-0 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FRES 27.9%, UCSD 26.1%. Defensive: FRES 69.4%, UCSD 73.0%
UCSD offense vs FRES defense
Offense 145th of 366 against a defense 190th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: FRES 33.8, UCSD 31.2. Allowed: FRES 28.6, UCSD 29.3
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FRES 18.1%, UCSD 16.5%. Forced: FRES 18.2%, UCSD 16.8%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: FRES plays 69.3 a game (156th fastest), UCSD 69.7 (130th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
FRES hits 32.1% and allows 30.7%; UCSD hits 32.8% and allows 31.6%. Threes are 40.9% and 42.3% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UCSD -6.1 | — |
| Total | — | 144.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | FRES 69.2 · UCSD 75.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UCSD -3.5 | — |
| 1H total | 67.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | FRES 32.1 · UCSD 35.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | |
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 1-9 10% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
FRES 0–1 UCSDUCSD leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · FRES 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2025-26 | UCSD 78 @ FRES 73 | FRES -1.5 | UCSD W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fresno St
31 games played
Straight up
12-19
39% wins
Against the spread
21-10
68% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | L 66-67 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 164.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 82-62 | -6.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-74 | +4.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-78 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 85-76 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 76-53 | -2.5 | W +20.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 71-76 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 58-82 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 87-89 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | U 156 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 63-72 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 65-66 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 70-55 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 52-71 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 79-69 | +3.5 | W +13.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 63-60 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 74-83 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 57-68 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-62 | -9.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 98-96 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-69 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 10 | @ | L 78-91 | +21.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 93-63 | -14.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 82-92 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 78-80 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 53-69 | +7.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 82-68 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 60-85 | +12.5 | L −12.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 63-67 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−10.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+13.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
−6.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
+5.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+4.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+2.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
+20.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−15.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−4.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+1.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
+5.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
+3.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
+13.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−4.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+13.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
+6.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+6.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−6.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
+7.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+3.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
+1.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+8.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+15.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
−0.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+7.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
+4.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−8.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
+6.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−12.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
+3.5
covered 21didn’t cover 10avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
UPST
L 66-67
−31.5
8
vs
LBSU
W 82-62
+1.5
12
vs
UCSD
L 73-78
+2.5
15
vs
UVU
W 75-74
−7.5
18
vs
SFA
W 80-78
+11.5
21
vs
NOLA
W 85-76
+6.5
26
vs
PEPP
W 76-53
−21.5
30
vs
CSUB
L 71-76
−3.5
6
@
ARK
L 58-82
−21.5
10
@
CSUN
L 87-89
+14.5
20
@
UNLV
L 72-84
−3.5
30
vs
USU
L 63-72
−19.5
3
vs
NEV
L 65-66
−15.5
6
@
SJSU
W 70-55
−24.5
10
@
SDSU
L 52-71
−23.5
13
vs
CSU
W 79-69
+8.5
17
vs
WYO
W 63-60
−22.5
21
@
UNM
L 74-83
+5.5
24
vs
GCU
L 57-68
−20.5
31
@
AF
W 79-62
−0.5
3
vs
UNLV
W 98-96
+40.5
7
@
NEV
L 59-69
−21.5
10
@
USU
L 78-91
+16.5
14
vs
AF
W 93-63
+13.5
17
@
WYO
L 82-92
+25.5
21
vs
UNM
L 78-80
+1.5
24
@
CSU
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
BOIS
L 53-69
−27.5
3
vs
SJSU
W 82-68
−1.5
7
@
GCU
L 60-85
−4.5
11
vs
CSU
L 63-67
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
UC San Diego
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-20
38% overs · avg −6.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 78-60 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 78-73 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 75-67 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 91-76 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 87-77 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 87-73 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 70-76 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 80-74 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 93-67 | -5.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | @ | W 67-57 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 80-82 | -12.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 65-67 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 174.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 83-73 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 8 | vs | L 71-88 | -13.5 | L −30.5 | 166.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 69-66 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 79-84 | -7.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 83-62 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 80-74 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 59-61 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 48-62 | -4.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 160.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 77-74 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-72 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 68-51 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 72-66 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 71-69 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-72 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 80-64 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 164.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 71-75 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-63 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 72-69 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-80 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
HCU
W 78-60
+10.5
12
@
FRES
W 78-73
+6.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 75-67
+2.5
24
vs
TEM
W 91-76
+16.5
25
vs
BRAD
W 87-77
+11.5
26
vs
TOW
W 87-73
+12.5
2
@
NEV
L 70-76
−0.5
6
@
LBSU
W 80-74
−2.5
13
vs
TULN
W 93-67
+20.5
16
@
LMU
W 67-57
+8.5
19
vs
USD
L 80-82
−14.5
1
@
CP
L 65-67
−10.5
3
vs
HAW
W 83-73
+7.5
8
vs
CSUF
L 71-88
−30.5
10
@
UCR
W 69-66
−7.5
15
vs
CSUN
L 79-84
−12.5
17
@
CSUB
W 83-62
+12.5
22
@
UCD
W 80-74
+4.5
24
vs
UCI
L 59-61
−4.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 48-62
−18.5
31
@
CSUN
L 64-81
−18.5
5
vs
LBSU
W 77-74
−7.5
7
@
HAW
L 67-72
+1.5
12
vs
UCD
W 68-51
+11.5
14
vs
UCR
W 72-66
−5.5
21
@
UCI
W 71-69
+5.5
26
vs
CSUB
W 84-72
−2.5
28
vs
CP
W 80-64
+8.5
5
@
CSUF
L 71-75
−6.5
7
@
UCSB
W 64-63
+3.5
11
vs
CP
W 72-69
−1.5
12
vs
CSUN
L 70-80
−11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
HCU
W 78-60
−3.5
12
@
FRES
W 78-73
+2.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 75-67
−6.5
24
vs
TEM
W 91-76
+18.5
25
vs
BRAD
W 87-77
+18.5
26
vs
TOW
W 87-73
+21.5
2
@
NEV
L 70-76
−3.5
6
@
LBSU
W 80-74
+8.5
13
vs
TULN
W 93-67
+10.5
16
@
LMU
W 67-57
−26.5
19
vs
USD
L 80-82
+5.5
1
@
CP
L 65-67
−42.5
3
vs
HAW
W 83-73
+7.5
8
vs
CSUF
L 71-88
−7.5
10
@
UCR
W 69-66
−14.5
15
vs
CSUN
L 79-84
+3.5
17
@
CSUB
W 83-62
−2.5
22
@
UCD
W 80-74
+1.5
24
vs
UCI
L 59-61
−26.5
29
vs
UCSB
L 48-62
−35.5
31
@
CSUN
L 64-81
−15.5
5
vs
LBSU
W 77-74
+6.5
7
@
HAW
L 67-72
−10.5
12
vs
UCD
W 68-51
−31.5
14
vs
UCR
W 72-66
−9.5
21
@
UCI
W 71-69
−3.5
26
vs
CSUB
W 84-72
+7.5
28
vs
CP
W 80-64
−20.5
5
@
CSUF
L 71-75
−10.5
7
@
UCSB
W 64-63
−14.5
11
vs
CP
W 72-69
−21.5
12
vs
CSUN
L 70-80
−3.5
over 12under 20avg −6.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UC San Diego has the better starters
Position by position: Fresno St 0, UC San Diego 2, even 3
Fresno StBetterUC San Diego
G D. Lungu TR13.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G R. Barno TR11.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 5 ast
Score 52
G R. Candelino TR11.2 pts · 5 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 76
=Even
G T. Beattie10.7 pts · 5.3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 71
G B. Amuneke TR2.1 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
→UCSDSmall
G C. Wagner TR12 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 50
F B. Henige TR4.9 pts · 5.5 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
→UCSDBig
G T. Eaglestaff TR9.8 pts · 4.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 77
C B. Fall TR0.6 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F L. Beath11.6 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 51
Fresno StBetterUC San Diego
FRES offense176th of 366 · -5.4
→UCSDSmall
UCSD defense110th of 366 · -1.3
FRES defense190th of 366 · -4.4
=Even
UCSD offense145th of 366 · -4.4
Backcourt+1.3 · 3 players
=Even
Backcourt+0.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-3.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestFRES betterUCSD betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Lungu27 min · TRR. Candelino25 min · TRB. Amuneke8 min · TRN. ZulemieNewK. PerryNewQ. RhymesNew
Forwards
B. Henige20 min · TRR. ParsleyNewY. Kesse-BedaNewA. GrangerNewM. VuckovicNewC. SchroederNew
Centers
B. Fall5 min · TR
Guards
R. Barno32 min · TRT. Beattie32 minC. Wagner30 min · TRT. Eaglestaff29 min · TRK. Dotson27 min · TRA. Chaikin25 min
Forwards
L. Beath30 minO. Suutela18 min · TRJ. Vance13 minC. Pendleton8 minJ. HolmesNew
Centers
D. Vukicevic7 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.3 #233 | Points per game | 74.5 #179 |
| 1.04 #266 | Points per possession | 1.07 #211 |
| 69.3 #156 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #130 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #206 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #124 |
| 32.1 #274 | 3-point % | 32.8 #241 |
| 40.9 #146 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.3 #131 |
| 33.8 #218 | Free throw rate | 31.2 #277 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #277 | Turnover rate | 16.5 #165 |
| 27.9 #272 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.1 #320 |
| 12.6 #247 | Assists per game | 14.9 #94 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.5 #142 | Points allowed | 70.5 #63 |
| 1.06 #110 | Points allowed per possession | 1.01 #35 |
| 51.5 #184 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.4 #45 |
| 30.7 #30 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.6 #45 |
| 18.2 #88 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #165 |
| 69.4 #183 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.0 #38 |
| 6.7 #154 | Steals per game | 7.4 #94 |
| 2.2 #331 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #299 |
Fresno St
12-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-14 in conference · Pac-12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Colorado St63–67
- L@ Grand Canyon60–85
- Wvs San José St82–68
- Lvs Boise St53–69
- L@ Colorado St70–74
A week or more of rest.
UC San Diego
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 13-9 in conference · Big West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs CSU Northridge70–80
- Wvs Cal Poly72–69
- W@ Santa Barbara64–63
- L@ Fullerton71–75
- Wvs Cal Poly80–64
A week or more of rest.