Seattle U Redhawks at Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 11:59 PM ETStan Sheriff Center · at Hawai'i

LineHAW -1.5no move

Total144.5down 2 from 146.5

Season records: Seattle U and Hawai'i
SEA	This season	HAW
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects HAW 71–70 · win probability HAW 54%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

HAW -1.5

no move since the open

Total

144.5

model 141.4 · Under by 3

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: HAW has more of the edges

SEA 3, HAW 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

HAWBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: SEA 23.7%, HAW 31.3%. Defensive: SEA 68.2%, HAW 74.7%

SEABig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: SEA 16.7%, HAW 18.8%. Forced: SEA 21.2%, HAW 16.8%

Context

Schedule so far

SEA has played the 114th-hardest schedule, HAW the 242nd. A record against a soft schedule means less

Context

Tempo

About 71 possessions: SEA plays 69.1 a game (175th fastest), HAW 73.0 (19th). Faster games mean more points

SEASmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: SEA 50%, HAW 10%. Transfers in: SEA 3, HAW 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

HAWSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: SEA 49.8 and allows 48.4; HAW 52.0 and allows 46.8

SEASmall

HAW offense vs SEA defense

Offense 136th of 366 against a defense 76th, on the model’s ratings

HAWSmall

Home court

HAW at home. This season: HAW 0-0 at home, SEA 0-0 away

HAWSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: SEA 34.2, HAW 41.4. Allowed: SEA 33.0, HAW 35.6

Even

SEA offense vs HAW defense

Offense 183rd of 366 against a defense 150th, on the model’s ratings

Even

Three-pointers

SEA hits 33.7% and allows 32.1%; HAW hits 31.7% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 39.4% and 39.8% of their shots

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of under 3	1938	56%	51%	49%
Non-conference games at this spread	1094	54%	49%	50%
Games with a total of 140 to 144.5	3570	72%	50%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenHAW -1.5

no move

NowHAW -1.5

No change since the open

Total

Open146.5

▼ 2

Now144.5

Down 2 since the open

Moneyline

SEA +110 · HAW -130

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened HAW -1.5 · unchangedmodel HAW -1

model HAW -1

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

Over 144.5TotalUnder 144.5

Bets

49%51%

Money

48%52%

SEAWinner

HAW

Bets

23%77%

Money

99%

Money is 22 pts ahead of bets on HAW

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	SEA	HAW	Over	Under	SEA	HAW
BetMGMMGM	-1.5-105	+1.5-115	144.5-115	144.5-105	+105	-130
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-2-105	+2-115	144.5-110	144.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-0.5+102	+0.5-130	144.5-108	144.5-118	+102	-130
BetUSBetUS	-2-105	+2-115	144.5-110	144.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-1.5-105	+1.5-115	144-110	144-110	+110	-130
DraftKingsDK	-1.5-110	+1.5-110	145.5-112	145.5-108	+110	-130
FanDuelFD	-1.5-108	+1.5-112	144.5-115	144.5-105	+104	-125
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-2-101	+2-111	144.5-108	144.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	HAW -1.5	HAW -1.0	SEA +0.5
Total	144.5	141.4	Under 3.1
Projected score	—	SEA 70.2 · HAW 71.2

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	HAW -0.5	—
1H total	66.2	—
1H projected score	SEA 32.9 · HAW 33.3	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
SEA WLLWW	15-18	45%	5-8	7-5
HAW WLWWL	13-16	45%	6-9	11-13

Venue/role: SEA away, as underdog; HAW home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
SEA OUUUO	13-20	39%	19-14
HAW OOUUO	14-15	48%	22-9

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
SEA	6-4 60%	7-3 70%	5-5 50%
HAW	6-4 60%	4-6 40%	7-3 70%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Seattle U

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs PRST	W91–74WO
Nov 11	vs UTSA	W71–68LU
Nov 14	vs IDST	W83–74LO

Hawai'i

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 8	vs UTA	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs PORT	W69–56WU
Nov 18	vs WSU	W62–51WU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Seattle U

33 games played

Straight up

19-14

58% wins

Against the spread

15-18

45% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

13-20

39% overs · avg −5 pts vs the total

Straight up

19-1458%

W L W W W W L W W W W L W L L L W L W L L W L L W L W W W W L W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

15-1845%

L L W L W W L L L W L L W W L L W L W L L L L W W W W L W L L W W

2 straight covers2 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

13-2039%

O U O O U U O O O U U U U U O U U U U U U O U O U O U O O U U U O

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsDEN	W 84-73	-13.5	L −2.5	136.5	O 157
Nov 8	vsCP	L 71-73	-10.5	L −12.5	164.5	U 144
Nov 12	vsEWU	W 94-67	-8.5	W +18.5	148.5	O 161
Nov 15	vsIDST	W 83-74	-11.5	L −2.5	138.5	O 157
Nov 21	@STAN	W 77-69	+10.5	W +18.5	152.5	U 146
Nov 28	vsTXST	W 66-52	-7.5	W +6.5	136.5	U 118
Nov 29	vsUCSB	L 71-74	-2.5	L −5.5	142.5	O 145
Dec 7	vsUTEP	W 75-68	-12.5	L −5.5	136.5	O 143
Dec 17	@UCD	W 79-78	-2.5	L −1.5	143.5	O 157
Dec 19	vsWASH	W 70-66	+7.5	W +11.5	151.5	U 136
Dec 22	@UTSA	W 71-68	-10.5	L −7.5	148.5	U 139
Dec 28	vsSF	L 59-67	-2.5	L −10.5	146.5	U 126
Dec 30	vsWSU	W 69-55	-6.5	W +7.5	144.5	U 124
Jan 2	@GONZ	L 72-80	+24.5	W +16.5	155.5	U 152
Jan 4	@SMC	L 76-93	+11.5	L −5.5	139.5	O 169
Jan 8	@ORST	L 55-68	-4.5	L −17.5	139.5	U 123
Jan 15	vsUSD	W 75-64	-9.5	W +1.5	147.5	U 139
Jan 17	vsGONZ	L 50-71	+9.5	L −11.5	150.5	U 121
Jan 21	vsLMU	W 69-59	-4.5	W +5.5	141.5	U 128
Jan 24	@PAC	L 54-56	+1.5	L −0.5	137.5	U 110
Jan 28	@WSU	L 58-70	+1.5	L −10.5	142.5	U 128
Feb 4	vsPEPP	W 83-81	-12.5	L −10.5	139.5	O 164
Feb 7	@PORT	L 53-54	-3.5	L −4.5	143.5	U 107
Feb 11	@SCU	L 72-84	+12.5	W +0.5	147.5	O 156
Feb 15	vsORST	W 60-50	-6.5	W +3.5	136.5	U 110
Feb 18	vsSMC	L 70-72	+9.5	W +7.5	133.5	O 142
Feb 21	vsPORT	W 71-59	-7.5	W +4.5	140.5	U 130
Feb 25	@PEPP	W 87-80	-7.5	L −0.5	145.5	O 167
Feb 28	@LMU	W 71-66	+1.5	W +6.5	136.5	O 137
Mar 6	vsUSD	W 58-56	-8.5	L −6.5	139.5	U 114
Mar 7	vsPAC	L 58-61	+1.5	L −1.5	129.5	U 119
Mar 17	vsSTMN	W 67-52	-2.5	W +12.5	145.5	U 119
Mar 22	@AUB	L 85-91	+14.5	W +8.5	145.5	O 176

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

DEN

W 84-73

−2.5

L 71-73

−12.5

EWU

W 94-67

+18.5

IDST

W 83-74

−2.5

STAN

W 77-69

+18.5

TXST

W 66-52

+6.5

UCSB

L 71-74

−5.5

UTEP

W 75-68

−5.5

UCD

W 79-78

−1.5

WASH

W 70-66

+11.5

UTSA

W 71-68

−7.5

L 59-67

−10.5

WSU

W 69-55

+7.5

GONZ

L 72-80

+16.5

SMC

L 76-93

−5.5

ORST

L 55-68

−17.5

USD

W 75-64

+1.5

GONZ

L 50-71

−11.5

LMU

W 69-59

+5.5

PAC

L 54-56

−0.5

WSU

L 58-70

−10.5

PEPP

W 83-81

−10.5

PORT

L 53-54

−4.5

SCU

L 72-84

+0.5

ORST

W 60-50

+3.5

SMC

L 70-72

+7.5

PORT

W 71-59

+4.5

PEPP

W 87-80

−0.5

LMU

W 71-66

+6.5

USD

W 58-56

−6.5

PAC

L 58-61

−1.5

STMN

W 67-52

+12.5

AUB

L 85-91

+8.5

covered 15didn’t cover 18avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

DEN

W 84-73

+20.5

L 71-73

−20.5

EWU

W 94-67

+12.5

IDST

W 83-74

+18.5

STAN

W 77-69

−6.5

TXST

W 66-52

−18.5

UCSB

L 71-74

+2.5

UTEP

W 75-68

+6.5

UCD

W 79-78

+13.5

WASH

W 70-66

−15.5

UTSA

W 71-68

−9.5

L 59-67

−20.5

WSU

W 69-55

−20.5

GONZ

L 72-80

−3.5

SMC

L 76-93

+29.5

ORST

L 55-68

−16.5

USD

W 75-64

−8.5

GONZ

L 50-71

−29.5

LMU

W 69-59

−13.5

PAC

L 54-56

−27.5

WSU

L 58-70

−14.5

PEPP

W 83-81

+24.5

PORT

L 53-54

−36.5

SCU

L 72-84

+8.5

ORST

W 60-50

−26.5

SMC

L 70-72

+8.5

PORT

W 71-59

−10.5

PEPP

W 87-80

+21.5

LMU

W 71-66

+0.5

USD

W 58-56

−25.5

PAC

L 58-61

−10.5

STMN

W 67-52

−26.5

AUB

L 85-91

+30.5

over 13under 20avg −5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Hawai'i

31 games played

Straight up

22-9

71% wins

Against the spread

13-16

45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-15

48% overs · avg +0.9 pts vs the total

Straight up

22-971%

L W W W W L W W W W W L W W L W W L W W W L L W W W W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

13-1645%

W W L W L L W––L W L L W L W W L L L W L L L W L W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

14-1548%

U O U U U O U––U U O U U U O U O O U O U O O O O O O U U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	@ORE	L 59-60	+11.5	W +10.5	144.5	U 119
Nov 10	vsETAM	W 100-74	-18.5	W +7.5	145.5	O 174
Nov 12	vsMVSU	W 88-56	-41.5	L −9.5	151.5	U 144
Nov 14	vsMAN	W 86-56	-15.5	W +14.5	156.5	U 142
Nov 15	vsUTU	W 68-62	-16.5	L −10.5	149.5	U 130
Nov 20	vsASU	L 76-83	-1.5	L −8.5	143.5	O 159
Nov 28	vsUND	W 92-55	-18.5	W +18.5	149.5	U 147
Dec 4	vsUCD	W 75-69	—	—	—	—
Dec 6	vsCSUF	W 69-59	—	—	—	—
Dec 13	vsUTEP	W 66-61	-12.5	L −7.5	138.5	U 127
Jan 1	@UCR	W 88-45	-8.5	W +34.5	149.5	U 133
Jan 3	@UCSD	L 73-83	+2.5	L −7.5	148.5	O 156
Jan 10	vsUCI	W 67-66	-4.5	L −3.5	140.5	U 133
Jan 15	@CP	W 86-66	-5.5	W +14.5	160.5	U 152
Jan 17	@UCSB	L 62-77	-2.5	L −17.5	143.5	U 139
Jan 22	vsCSUB	W 98-71	-17.5	W +9.5	144.5	O 169
Jan 24	vsCSUN	W 89-68	-10.5	W +10.5	158.5	U 157
Jan 29	@UCI	L 76-87	+1.5	L −9.5	144.5	O 163
Jan 31	@LBSU	W 89-82	-8.5	L −1.5	144.5	O 171
Feb 7	vsUCSD	W 72-67	-6.5	L −1.5	149.5	U 139
Feb 12	@CSUB	W 89-74	-13.5	W +1.5	151.5	O 163
Feb 14	@CSUN	L 60-84	-2.5	L −26.5	162.5	U 144
Feb 19	vsCP	L 75-86	-11.5	L −22.5	160.5	O 161
Feb 21	vsUCSB	W 78-75	-5.5	L −2.5	145.5	O 153
Feb 26	@UCD	W 77-73	-1.5	W +2.5	146.5	O 150
Feb 28	@CSUF	W 87-85	-3.5	L −1.5	158.5	O 172
Mar 5	vsUCR	W 93-74	-12.5	W +6.5	150.5	O 167
Mar 7	vsLBSU	L 75-84	-14.5	L −23.5	150.5	O 159
Mar 13	vsCSUF	W 78-63	-5.5	W +9.5	157.5	U 141
Mar 14	vsUCI	W 71-64	+1.5	W +8.5	141.5	U 135
Mar 19	vsARK	L 78-97	+14.5	L −4.5	158.5	O 175

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

ORE

L 59-60

+10.5

ETAM

W 100-74

+7.5

MVSU

W 88-56

−9.5

MAN

W 86-56

+14.5

UTU

W 68-62

−10.5

ASU

L 76-83

−8.5

UND

W 92-55

+18.5

UTEP

W 66-61

−7.5

UCR

W 88-45

+34.5

UCSD

L 73-83

−7.5

UCI

W 67-66

−3.5

W 86-66

+14.5

UCSB

L 62-77

−17.5

CSUB

W 98-71

+9.5

CSUN

W 89-68

+10.5

UCI

L 76-87

−9.5

LBSU

W 89-82

−1.5

UCSD

W 72-67

−1.5

CSUB

W 89-74

+1.5

CSUN

L 60-84

−26.5

L 75-86

−22.5

UCSB

W 78-75

−2.5

UCD

W 77-73

+2.5

CSUF

W 87-85

−1.5

UCR

W 93-74

+6.5

LBSU

L 75-84

−23.5

CSUF

W 78-63

+9.5

UCI

W 71-64

+8.5

ARK

L 78-97

−4.5

covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

ORE

L 59-60

−25.5

ETAM

W 100-74

+28.5

MVSU

W 88-56

−7.5

MAN

W 86-56

−14.5

UTU

W 68-62

−19.5

ASU

L 76-83

+15.5

UND

W 92-55

−2.5

UTEP

W 66-61

−11.5

UCR

W 88-45

−16.5

UCSD

L 73-83

+7.5

UCI

W 67-66

−7.5

W 86-66

−8.5

UCSB

L 62-77

−4.5

CSUB

W 98-71

+24.5

CSUN

W 89-68

−1.5

UCI

L 76-87

+18.5

LBSU

W 89-82

+26.5

UCSD

W 72-67

−10.5

CSUB

W 89-74

+11.5

CSUN

L 60-84

−18.5

L 75-86

+0.5

UCSB

W 78-75

+7.5

UCD

W 77-73

+3.5

CSUF

W 87-85

+13.5

UCR

W 93-74

+16.5

LBSU

L 75-84

+8.5

CSUF

W 78-63

−16.5

UCI

W 71-64

−6.5

ARK

L 78-97

+16.5

over 14under 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Seattle U has the better starters

Position by position: Seattle U 2, Hawai'i 1, even 2

Seattle UBetterHawai'i

G T. Boston TR14.5 pts · 3.6 reb · 3.7 ast Score 76

SEABig

G C. Trujillo TR12.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast Score 39

G M. Arington4.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 4 ast Score 41

Even

G I. Kerr6.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast Score 38

F J. Yeo12.3 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast Score 45

HAWSmall

F Z. Davidson TR12.9 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast Score 69

F W. Heimbrodt12.7 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.3 ast Score 72

Even

C B. Dengdit TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.8 ast Score 62

F T. Thrastarson TR9.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.2 ast Score 54

SEASmall

C H. Dan TR5.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.3 ast Score 36

Seattle UBetterHawai'i

SEA offense183rd of 366 · -5.7

Even

HAW defense150th of 366 · -3.3

SEA defense76th of 366 · +0.6

SEASmall

HAW offense136th of 366 · -3.9

Backcourt-0.2 · 2 players

SEASmall

Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players

Frontcourt+0.6 · 3 players

Even

Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players

Bench+0.1 · 3 players

Even

Bench-0.4 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestSEA betterHAW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Seattle U

Guards

T. Boston33 min · TRM. Arington31 minK. HansenNewM. WilliamsNewJ. WhiteNewJ. HarshmanNew

Forwards

J. Yeo32 minW. Heimbrodt32 minT. Thrastarson23 min · TRY. Kawashima3 minR. Adams2 min

Centers

H. Dzellat8 min · TRL. CoulibalyNew

Hawai'i

Guards

C. Trujillo34 min · TRI. Kerr21 minT. CuffNewJ. MatingouNewL. AwanNewS. BelnapNew

Forwards

Z. Davidson24 min · TRM. Adams12 min · TRM. Joses9 min · TRK. HamptonNew

Centers

B. Dengdit23 min · TRH. Dan15 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

SEA70.1 #283

HAW78.7 #86

Points per possession

SEA1.01 #312

HAW1.08 #186

Pace (possessions)

SEA69.1 #175

HAW73.0 #19

Shooting

Effective FG%

SEA49.8 #249

HAW52.0 #148

3-point %

SEA33.7 #186

HAW31.7 #298

3-point attempt rate

SEA39.4 #185

HAW39.8 #175

Free throw rate

SEA34.2 #201

HAW41.4 #38

Possessions

Turnover rate

SEA16.7 #178

HAW18.8 #315

Offensive rebound rate

SEA23.7 #347

HAW31.3 #154

Assists per game

SEA13.2 #201

HAW13.3 #187

Defense

Points allowed

SEA68.2 #34

HAW71.2 #76

Points allowed per possession

SEA0.99 #20

HAW0.98 #10

Opponent effective FG%

SEA48.4 #46

HAW46.8 #19

Opponent 3-point %

SEA32.1 #69

HAW30.3 #13

Turnovers forced

SEA21.2 #9

HAW16.8 #167

Defensive rebound rate

SEA68.2 #249

HAW74.7 #11

Steals per game

SEA7.8 #52

HAW6.5 #175

Blocks per game

SEA4.9 #20

HAW4.0 #73

SEA		HAW
Scoring
70.1 #283	Points per game	78.7 #86
1.01 #312	Points per possession	1.08 #186
69.1 #175	Pace (possessions)	73.0 #19
Shooting
49.8 #249	Effective FG%	52.0 #148
33.7 #186	3-point %	31.7 #298
39.4 #185	3-point attempt rate	39.8 #175
34.2 #201	Free throw rate	41.4 #38
Possessions
16.7 #178	Turnover rate	18.8 #315
23.7 #347	Offensive rebound rate	31.3 #154
13.2 #201	Assists per game	13.3 #187
Defense
68.2 #34	Points allowed	71.2 #76
0.99 #20	Points allowed per possession	0.98 #10
48.4 #46	Opponent effective FG%	46.8 #19
32.1 #69	Opponent 3-point %	30.3 #13
21.2 #9	Turnovers forced	16.8 #167
68.2 #249	Defensive rebound rate	74.7 #11
7.8 #52	Steals per game	6.5 #175
4.9 #20	Blocks per game	4.0 #73

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Seattle U

19-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · West Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Auburn85–91
Wvs St Thomas67–52
Lvs Pacific58–61
Wvs San Diego58–56
W@ LMU71–66

A week or more of rest.

Hawai'i

22-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Mountain West Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Arkansas78–97
Wvs UC Irvine71–64
Wvs Fullerton78–63
Lvs Long Beach St75–84
Wvs UC Riverside93–74

A week or more of rest.