Stan Sheriff Center · at Hawai'i
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | HAW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects HAW 77–67 · win probability HAW 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: HAW has more of the edges
UTA 0, HAW 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UTA offense vs HAW defense
Offense 289th of 366 against a defense 150th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UTA plays 67.3 a game (265th fastest), HAW 73.0 (19th). Faster games mean more points
Shooting
Effective FG%: UTA 47.2 and allows 47.5; HAW 52.0 and allows 46.8
HAW offense vs UTA defense
Offense 136th of 366 against a defense 211th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
HAW at home. This season: HAW 0-0 at home, UTA 0-0 away
Free throws
Free throw rate: UTA 42.5, HAW 41.4. Allowed: UTA 40.9, HAW 35.6
Context
Schedule so far
UTA has played the 268th-hardest schedule, HAW the 242nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UTA 34.9%, HAW 31.3%. Defensive: UTA 69.9%, HAW 74.7%
Even
Three-pointers
UTA hits 29.1% and allows 26.9%; HAW hits 31.7% and allows 30.3%. Threes are 30.7% and 39.8% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UTA 20.7%, HAW 18.8%. Forced: UTA 18.0%, HAW 16.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UTA 7%, HAW 10%. Transfers in: UTA 5, HAW 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | HAW -10.6 | — |
| Total | — | 144.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | UTA 66.7 · HAW 77.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | HAW -6.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | UTA 30.6 · HAW 36.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 1-9 10% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UT Arlington
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-23
23% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 56-74 | +13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 67-49 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 18 | @ | W 84-76 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-71 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 74-73 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 63-83 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 58-50 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | U 108 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 60-76 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | @ | W 69-57 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 63-69 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 63-51 | +2.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 114 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 86-77 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-72 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 134.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 56-52 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-86 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 71-64 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 80-61 | -9.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-87 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 84-87 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 139.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-81 | +12.5 | L −8.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 63-67 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 73-78 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 63-50 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-66 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-68 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 65-60 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 64-57 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 131.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 69-63 | -4.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 65-67 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNM
L 56-74
−4.5
15
vs
MOST
W 67-49
+14.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-76
+10.5
21
vs
CAM
L 67-71
−2.5
22
@
WEB
W 74-73
+3.5
29
vs
SFA
W 66-61
+3.5
2
@
ARST
L 63-83
−14.5
11
@
RGV
W 58-50
+12.5
17
@
STAN
L 60-76
−5.5
22
@
ORU
W 69-57
+8.5
29
vs
TAR
L 63-69
−8.5
1
vs
CBU
W 63-51
+14.5
3
@
SUU
W 86-77
+3.5
10
vs
ACU
W 82-72
+6.5
15
@
UTU
W 56-52
+5.5
17
@
UVU
L 74-86
−0.5
21
vs
TAR
W 71-64
+3.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-61
+9.5
31
vs
CBU
L 77-87
−8.5
5
@
UTU
L 84-87
−1.5
7
@
UVU
L 60-81
−8.5
12
@
ACU
L 63-67
−2.5
14
vs
SUU
L 73-78
−13.5
19
vs
UTU
W 63-50
+8.5
21
vs
UVU
L 54-66
−5.5
26
@
CBU
L 56-68
−5.5
5
@
TAR
W 65-60
+6.5
7
@
ACU
W 64-57
+8.5
12
vs
SUU
W 69-63
+1.5
13
vs
UVU
L 65-67
+6.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNM
L 56-74
−15.5
15
vs
MOST
W 67-49
−27.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-76
+21.5
21
vs
CAM
L 67-71
−13.5
22
@
WEB
W 74-73
−2.5
29
vs
SFA
W 66-61
−11.5
2
@
ARST
L 63-83
−5.5
11
@
RGV
W 58-50
−37.5
17
@
STAN
L 60-76
−3.5
22
@
ORU
W 69-57
−10.5
29
vs
TAR
L 63-69
−4.5
1
vs
CBU
W 63-51
−20.5
3
@
SUU
W 86-77
+24.5
10
vs
ACU
W 82-72
+19.5
15
@
UTU
W 56-52
−33.5
17
@
UVU
L 74-86
+16.5
21
vs
TAR
W 71-64
−7.5
29
vs
SUU
W 80-61
−3.5
31
vs
CBU
L 77-87
+29.5
5
@
UTU
L 84-87
+31.5
7
@
UVU
L 60-81
−0.5
12
@
ACU
L 63-67
−4.5
14
vs
SUU
L 73-78
+7.5
19
vs
UTU
W 63-50
−27.5
21
vs
UVU
L 54-66
−17.5
26
@
CBU
L 56-68
−10.5
5
@
TAR
W 65-60
−11.5
7
@
ACU
W 64-57
−10.5
12
vs
SUU
W 69-63
−9.5
13
vs
UVU
L 65-67
−4.5
over 7under 23avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Hawai'i
31 games played
Straight up
22-9
71% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +0.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 59-60 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 100-74 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 88-56 | -41.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 86-56 | -15.5 | W +14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 68-62 | -16.5 | L −10.5 | 149.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 76-83 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-55 | -18.5 | W +18.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 75-69 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-59 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 66-61 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 1 | @ | W 88-45 | -8.5 | W +34.5 | 149.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 73-83 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 15 | @ | W 86-66 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 62-77 | -2.5 | L −17.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 98-71 | -17.5 | W +9.5 | 144.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-68 | -10.5 | W +10.5 | 158.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-87 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 144.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 89-82 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 72-67 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 89-74 | -13.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-84 | -2.5 | L −26.5 | 162.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 75-86 | -11.5 | L −22.5 | 160.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-75 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 87-85 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 93-74 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 150.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 75-84 | -14.5 | L −23.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 78-63 | -5.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 71-64 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 78-97 | +14.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
+10.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+7.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−9.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
+14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−10.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
−8.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
+18.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−7.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
+34.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
−7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−3.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
+14.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−17.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+9.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
+10.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
−9.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
−1.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−1.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+1.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−26.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
−22.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
−2.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+2.5
28
@
CSUF
W 87-85
−1.5
5
vs
UCR
W 93-74
+6.5
7
vs
LBSU
L 75-84
−23.5
13
vs
CSUF
W 78-63
+9.5
14
vs
UCI
W 71-64
+8.5
19
vs
ARK
L 78-97
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
ORE
L 59-60
−25.5
10
vs
ETAM
W 100-74
+28.5
12
vs
MVSU
W 88-56
−7.5
14
vs
MAN
W 86-56
−14.5
15
vs
UTU
W 68-62
−19.5
20
vs
ASU
L 76-83
+15.5
28
vs
UND
W 92-55
−2.5
13
vs
UTEP
W 66-61
−11.5
1
@
UCR
W 88-45
−16.5
3
@
UCSD
L 73-83
+7.5
10
vs
UCI
W 67-66
−7.5
15
@
CP
W 86-66
−8.5
17
@
UCSB
L 62-77
−4.5
22
vs
CSUB
W 98-71
+24.5
24
vs
CSUN
W 89-68
−1.5
29
@
UCI
L 76-87
+18.5
31
@
LBSU
W 89-82
+26.5
7
vs
UCSD
W 72-67
−10.5
12
@
CSUB
W 89-74
+11.5
14
@
CSUN
L 60-84
−18.5
19
vs
CP
L 75-86
+0.5
21
vs
UCSB
W 78-75
+7.5
26
@
UCD
W 77-73
+3.5
28
@
CSUF
W 87-85
+13.5
5
vs
UCR
W 93-74
+16.5
7
vs
LBSU
L 75-84
+8.5
13
vs
CSUF
W 78-63
−16.5
14
vs
UCI
W 71-64
−6.5
19
vs
ARK
L 78-97
+16.5
over 14under 15avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: UT Arlington 1, Hawai'i 1, even 3
UT ArlingtonBetterHawai'i
G M. Panoam TR0.9 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Trujillo TR12.3 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 39
F T. McDaniels TR12 pts · 6.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 68
←UTASmall
G I. Kerr6.6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 38
F M. Goodman3.2 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 11
→HAWBig
F Z. Davidson TR12.9 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 69
F B. McGlothin TR0 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C B. Dengdit TR10.8 pts · 5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 62
F N. Bundalo TR0.5 pts · 0.5 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C H. Dan TR5.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 36
UT ArlingtonBetterHawai'i
UTA offense289th of 366 · -8.9
→HAWBig
HAW defense150th of 366 · -3.3
UTA defense211th of 366 · -5.4
→HAWSmall
HAW offense136th of 366 · -3.9
Backcourt-0.3 · 1 player
←UTASmall
Backcourt-2.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.8 · 4 players
→HAWSmall
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
Bench+0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Bench-0.4 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestUTA betterHAW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Panoam6 min · TRN. Shelby3 min · TRJ. SmithNewT. HankinsNewK. MikalauskasNewJ. ParkerNew
Forwards
T. McDaniels27 min · TRM. Goodman13 minB. McGlothin5 min · TRN. Bundalo3 min · TRT. SimicNewS. HadnotNew
Guards
C. Trujillo34 min · TRI. Kerr21 minT. CuffNewJ. MatingouNewL. AwanNewS. BelnapNew
Forwards
Z. Davidson24 min · TRM. Adams12 min · TRM. Joses9 min · TRK. HamptonNew
Centers
B. Dengdit23 min · TRH. Dan15 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.7 #320 | Points per game | 78.7 #86 |
| 1.01 #319 | Points per possession | 1.08 #186 |
| 67.3 #265 | Pace (possessions) | 73.0 #19 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.2 #332 | Effective FG% | 52.0 #148 |
| 29.1 #352 | 3-point % | 31.7 #298 |
| 30.7 #345 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #175 |
| 42.5 #24 | Free throw rate | 41.4 #38 |
| Possessions | ||
| 20.7 #354 | Turnover rate | 18.8 #315 |
| 34.9 #50 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.3 #154 |
| 10.7 #345 | Assists per game | 13.3 #187 |
| Defense | ||
| 67.8 #29 | Points allowed | 71.2 #76 |
| 1.01 #30 | Points allowed per possession | 0.98 #10 |
| 47.5 #29 | Opponent effective FG% | 46.8 #19 |
| 26.9 #1 | Opponent 3-point % | 30.3 #13 |
| 18.0 #93 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #167 |
| 69.9 #166 | Defensive rebound rate | 74.7 #11 |
| 7.3 #97 | Steals per game | 6.5 #175 |
| 3.5 #148 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #73 |
UT Arlington
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Utah Valley65–67
- Wvs Southern Utah69–63
- W@ Abilene Chrstn64–57
- W@ Tarleton St65–60
- L@ CA Baptist56–68
A week or more of rest.
Hawai'i
22-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-6 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Arkansas78–97
- Wvs UC Irvine71–64
- Wvs Fullerton78–63
- Lvs Long Beach St75–84
- Wvs UC Riverside93–74
A week or more of rest.