Simon Skjodt Assembly Hall · at Indiana
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | IU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects IU 91–63 · win probability IU 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: IU has more of the edges
BELL 1, IU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
IU offense vs BELL defense
Offense 41st of 366 against a defense 345th, on the model’s ratings
BELL offense vs IU defense
Offense 239th of 366 against a defense 38th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
BELL has played the 229th-hardest schedule, IU the 48th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: BELL 59.4 and allows 59.4; IU 56.1 and allows 49.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: BELL 22.4%, IU 26.9%. Defensive: BELL 65.8%, IU 70.8%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: BELL 56%, IU 19%. Transfers in: BELL 1, IU 8. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Three-pointers
BELL hits 38.1% and allows 40.4%; IU hits 34.7% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 41.2% and 50.5% of their shots
Home court
IU at home. This season: IU 0-0 at home, BELL 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: BELL 35.0, IU 35.0. Allowed: BELL 34.3, IU 37.0
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: BELL plays 66.7 a game (288th fastest), IU 67.4 (260th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: BELL 15.4%, IU 15.1%. Forced: BELL 15.1%, IU 15.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | IU -27.9 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | BELL 63.4 · IU 91.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | IU -16.5 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | BELL 27.9 · IU 44.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 3-7 30% | 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Bellarmine
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
19-11
63% covers · avg +2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-10
67% overs · avg +9.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 59-104 | +23.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 71-98 | +28.5 | W +1.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 86-94 | +3.5 | L −4.5 | 156.5 | O 180 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 79-86 | +24.5 | W +17.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 70-58 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-81 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-80 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 79-64 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 85-99 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 85-87 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 76-98 | +7.5 | L −14.5 | 169.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 84-78 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-82 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 146.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 71-81 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 154.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 69-89 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 77-70 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 114-117 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 164.5 | O 231 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 77-74 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 78-75 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 163.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 92-71 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 148.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-65 | +2.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 76-84 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 70-90 | +9.5 | L −10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 72-75 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 92-95 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 111-97 | +5.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 82-79 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 73-86 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
−21.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+1.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
−4.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+17.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
+8.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
+7.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
+3.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+0.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
+16.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+20.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
−3.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
−14.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+8.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
−13.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
+1.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
−14.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+11.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
−6.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
+0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
+8.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+16.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
+18.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+0.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
−10.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
+0.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
−1.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−7.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+19.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+1.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
−6.5
covered 19didn’t cover 11avg +2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
UGA
L 59-104
+12.5
8
@
KSU
L 71-98
+0.5
15
vs
WOF
L 86-94
+23.5
19
@
ND
L 79-86
+14.5
24
@
CIT
W 70-58
−28.5
25
vs
HCU
W 74-69
−1.5
6
@
MUR
L 68-81
−8.5
13
vs
NKU
L 76-80
+9.5
17
vs
UTC
W 79-64
−3.5
23
@
UK
L 85-99
+31.5
1
@
WGA
L 85-87
+20.5
3
@
QUC
L 76-98
+4.5
8
vs
CARK
W 84-78
+7.5
10
vs
UNA
L 73-82
+8.5
15
@
LIP
L 71-81
−2.5
17
@
EKU
L 69-89
+1.5
22
@
JAX
W 77-70
+8.5
24
@
UNF
L 114-117
+66.5
28
vs
WGA
W 77-74
−0.5
31
vs
QUC
W 78-75
−10.5
5
vs
STET
W 92-71
+14.5
7
vs
FGCU
W 81-65
−5.5
11
@
CARK
L 76-84
+9.5
14
@
APSU
L 70-90
+6.5
18
vs
LIP
L 72-75
−7.5
21
vs
EKU
L 92-95
+33.5
25
@
UNA
L 68-73
−5.5
28
vs
APSU
W 111-97
+54.5
4
vs
JAX
W 82-79
+16.5
6
vs
CARK
L 73-86
+4.5
over 20under 10avg +9.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Indiana
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 98-51 | -30.5 | W +16.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 100-77 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 156.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 101-70 | -24.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 69-61 | -28.5 | L −20.5 | 157.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 73-53 | -32.5 | L −12.5 | 155.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 86-69 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 164.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 100-56 | -29.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 64-73 | -7.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-87 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 113-72 | -14.5 | W +26.5 | 152.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-72 | +3.5 | L −8.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 78-58 | -38.5 | L −18.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 81-60 | -21.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 90-80 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 84-66 | -7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-83 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 60-81 | +6.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 57-74 | -3.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 72-86 | +15.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 72-67 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 98-97 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 195 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 75-81 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-77 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 92-74 | -10.5 | W +7.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 51-71 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 64-93 | +11.5 | L −17.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 68-72 | -9.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 64-77 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 77-47 | -7.5 | W +22.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 78-91 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 61-74 | -6.5 | L −19.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
AAMU
W 98-51
+16.5
9
vs
MARQ
W 100-77
+19.5
12
vs
MILW
W 101-70
+6.5
16
vs
UIW
W 69-61
−20.5
20
vs
LIN
W 73-53
−12.5
25
vs
KSU
W 86-69
+6.5
29
vs
BCU
W 100-56
+14.5
3
@
MINN
L 64-73
−16.5
6
vs
LOU
L 78-87
−5.5
9
vs
PSU
W 113-72
+26.5
13
@
UK
L 60-72
−8.5
20
vs
CHST
W 78-58
−18.5
22
vs
SIE
W 81-60
−0.5
4
vs
WASH
W 90-80
+0.5
7
@
MD
W 84-66
+10.5
10
vs
NEB
L 77-83
−10.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-81
−14.5
17
vs
IOWA
L 57-74
−20.5
20
@
MICH
L 72-86
+1.5
23
@
RUTG
W 82-59
+15.5
27
vs
PUR
W 72-67
+9.5
31
@
UCLA
W 98-97
+4.5
3
@
USC
L 75-81
−7.5
7
vs
WIS
W 78-77
−2.5
9
vs
ORE
W 92-74
+7.5
15
@
ILL
L 51-71
−11.5
20
@
PUR
L 64-93
−17.5
24
vs
NU
L 68-72
−13.5
1
vs
MSU
L 64-77
−10.5
4
vs
MINN
W 77-47
+22.5
7
@
OSU
L 78-91
−9.5
11
vs
NU
L 61-74
−19.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
AAMU
W 98-51
+1.5
9
vs
MARQ
W 100-77
+20.5
12
vs
MILW
W 101-70
+5.5
16
vs
UIW
W 69-61
−27.5
20
vs
LIN
W 73-53
−29.5
25
vs
KSU
W 86-69
−9.5
29
vs
BCU
W 100-56
+7.5
3
@
MINN
L 64-73
−7.5
6
vs
LOU
L 78-87
+2.5
9
vs
PSU
W 113-72
+32.5
13
@
UK
L 60-72
−24.5
20
vs
CHST
W 78-58
−16.5
22
vs
SIE
W 81-60
−4.5
4
vs
WASH
W 90-80
+17.5
7
@
MD
W 84-66
+2.5
10
vs
NEB
L 77-83
+9.5
13
@
MSU
L 60-81
−4.5
17
vs
IOWA
L 57-74
−15.5
20
@
MICH
L 72-86
−5.5
23
@
RUTG
W 82-59
−6.5
27
vs
PUR
W 72-67
−11.5
31
@
UCLA
W 98-97
+50.5
3
@
USC
L 75-81
+2.5
7
vs
WIS
W 78-77
−2.5
9
vs
ORE
W 92-74
+22.5
15
@
ILL
L 51-71
−31.5
20
@
PUR
L 64-93
+6.5
24
vs
NU
L 68-72
−5.5
1
vs
MSU
L 64-77
−3.5
4
vs
MINN
W 77-47
−14.5
7
@
OSU
L 78-91
+20.5
11
vs
NU
L 61-74
−7.5
over 14under 18avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Indiana has the better starters
Position by position: Bellarmine 0, Indiana 5, even 0
BellarmineBetterIndiana
G K. Goodin11.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2 ast
Score 31
→IUBig
G M. Burton TR18.5 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 98
G T. Doyle10 pts · 2.9 reb · 4 ast
Score 35
→IUBig
G B. Lindsay TR12.3 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 75
F S. Donald6.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 12
→IUBig
G J. Mustaf TR10.4 pts · 4.3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 65
F J. Wassler3.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 4
→IUBig
F A. Sherrell TR11.1 pts · 6.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 98
F T. Tornatta TR3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 26
→IUBig
C S. Yigitoglu TR10.7 pts · 7.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 64
BellarmineBetterIndiana
BELL offense239th of 366 · -7.3
→IUBig
IU defense38th of 366 · +3.0
BELL defense345th of 366 · -9.2
→IUBig
IU offense41st of 366 · +4.8
Backcourt-3.8 · 2 players
→IUBig
Backcourt+6.3 · 3 players
Frontcourt-4.9 · 3 players
→IUBig
Frontcourt+5.8 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
→IUSmall
Bench+0.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestBELL betterIU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
K. Goodin33 minT. Doyle28 minG. Whitaker7 minG. Neal3 minT. Clark2 minJ. GizziNew
Forwards
S. Donald27 minJ. Wassler12 minT. Tornatta9 min · TRA. McAfeeNewB. KlopfensteinNewE. HarrellNew
Guards
M. Burton30 min · TRB. Lindsay29 min · TRJ. Mustaf28 min · TRJ. Monden21 min · TRD. Harris10 min · TRD. Snively2 min
Forwards
A. Sherrell24 min · TRS. Alexis21 minT. Sisley13 minB. Winker3 min · TRV. KarvalaNewT. ManhertzNew
Centers
S. Yigitoglu29 min · TRC. SokolovNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 #80 | Points per game | 78.2 #93 |
| 1.18 #34 | Points per possession | 1.16 #46 |
| 66.7 #288 | Pace (possessions) | 67.4 #260 |
| Shooting | ||
| 59.4 #3 | Effective FG% | 56.1 #22 |
| 38.1 #17 | 3-point % | 34.7 #138 |
| 41.2 #145 | 3-point attempt rate | 50.5 #14 |
| 35.0 #178 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #179 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #100 | Turnover rate | 15.1 #71 |
| 22.4 #354 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #300 |
| 14.8 #98 | Assists per game | 16.6 #34 |
| Defense | ||
| 83.3 #350 | Points allowed | 72.2 #109 |
| 1.25 #365 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #131 |
| 59.4 #365 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.0 #68 |
| 40.4 #364 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #128 |
| 15.1 #277 | Turnovers forced | 15.1 #284 |
| 65.8 #320 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.8 #122 |
| 5.8 #255 | Steals per game | 4.7 #348 |
| 1.7 #356 | Blocks per game | 2.7 #278 |
Bellarmine
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs C Arkansas73–86
- Wvs Jacksonville82–79
- Wvs Austin Peay111–97
- L@ North Alabama68–73
- Lvs E Kentucky92–95
A week or more of rest.
Indiana
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Northwestern61–74
- L@ Ohio State78–91
- Wvs Minnesota77–47
- Lvs Michigan St64–77
- Lvs Northwestern68–72
A week or more of rest.