Air Force Falcons at Wright State Raiders: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:00 PM ETNutter Center · at Wright St

LineWRST -10.5moved 1 toward WRST

Total159.5up 3 from 156.5

Season records: Air Force and Wright St
AF	This season	WRST
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects WRST 75–69 · win probability WRST 73%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

WRST -10.5

moved 1 toward WRST

Total

159.5

model 143.9 · Under by 15.5

Model edge

AF by 3.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

59% WRST

52% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: WRST has more of the edges

AF 1, WRST 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

WRSTBig

Three-pointers

AF hits 30.6% and allows 37.6%; WRST hits 36.4% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 41.8% and 34.2% of their shots

WRSTBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: AF 21.4%, WRST 32.8%. Defensive: AF 68.7%, WRST 70.6%

WRSTBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: AF 48.9 and allows 56.4; WRST 54.3 and allows 52.4

WRSTBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: AF 21.9%, WRST 16.1%. Forced: AF 15.1%, WRST 16.6%

Context

Schedule so far

AF has played the 119th-hardest schedule, WRST the 264th. A record against a soft schedule means less

AFBig

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: AF 100%, WRST 32%. Transfers in: AF 0, WRST 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

WRSTSmall

AF offense vs WRST defense

Offense 290th of 366 against a defense 215th, on the model’s ratings

WRSTSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: AF 35.1, WRST 37.4. Allowed: AF 36.6, WRST 33.3

WRSTSmall

Home court

WRST at home. This season: WRST 0-0 at home, AF 0-0 away

Context

Tempo

About 68 possessions: AF plays 67.4 a game (259th fastest), WRST 69.1 (171st). Faster games mean more points

Even

WRST offense vs AF defense

Offense 148th of 366 against a defense 149th, on the model’s ratings

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 10 to 14.5	1928	88%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	988	88%	50%	51%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 155 to 159.5	1555	74%	51%	49%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenWRST -9.5

1 → WRST

NowWRST -10.5

1 pt toward WRST

Total

Open156.5

▲ 3

Now159.5

Up 3 since the open

Moneyline

AF +450 · WRST -625

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened WRST -9.5 · now WRST -10.5 · moved 1 toward WRSTmodel WRST -7

model WRST -7

Nov 1line modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

AF +10.5Spread

WRST -10.5

Bets

41%59%

Money

48%52%

Over 159.5TotalUnder 159.5

Bets

9%91%

Money

29%71%

Money is 20 pts ahead of bets on Over 159.5

AFWinner

WRST

Bets

99%

Money

99%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	AF	WRST	Over	Under	AF	WRST
BetMGMMGM	-10.5-105	+10.5-115	159.5-110	159.5-110	+450	-625
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-10.5-105	+10.5-115	159.5-105	159.5-115	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-10.5-118	+10.5-108	160.5-112	160.5-114	+375	-560
BetUSBetUS	-10.5-105	+10.5-115	160-110	160-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-10.5-105	+10.5-115	159-110	159-110	+425	-600
DraftKingsDK	-10.5-105	+10.5-115	159.5-110	159.5-110	+470	-650
FanDuelFD	-10.5-110	+10.5-110	159.5-115	159.5-105	+450	-630
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-10.5-101	+10.5-111	159.5-103	159.5-113	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	WRST -10.5	WRST -6.9	AF +3.6
Total	159.5	143.9	Under 15.6
Projected score	—	AF 68.5 · WRST 75.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	WRST -4.0	—
1H total	67.3	—
1H projected score	AF 31.7 · WRST 35.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
AF WWLWL	10-22	31%	5-7	9-21
WRST WWWLW	21-12	64%	7-7	12-10

Venue/role: AF away, as underdog; WRST home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
AF OUOUU	18-14	56%	3-29
WRST OUOUO	16-17	48%	21-12

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
AF	0-10 0%	3-7 30%	7-3 70%
WRST	7-3 70%	7-3 70%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Air Force

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 8	vs IDST	W59–48WU
Nov 11	vs LUC	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ PAC	L65–80LO

Wright St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs FAU	No recent meeting
Nov 10	@ TOL	L71–81LU
Nov 13	@ SAM	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

AF 0–1 WRSTWRST leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · AF 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 30, 2024-25	AF 57 @ WRST 70	WRST -8.5	WRST W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Air Force

32 games played

Straight up

3-29

9% wins

Against the spread

10-22

31% covers · avg −4.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-14

56% overs · avg 0 pts vs the total

Straight up

3-299%

L L L L W W W L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L

25 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

10-2231%

L L W L L W W L L L W W W L L L L L L L L W L L L L L W W L W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1456%

U U O U U O O U U O U O U U O O O O U O U O O O O O O O U O U U

2 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@BEL	L 63-79	+15.5	L −0.5	144.5	U 142
Nov 8	vsAPSU	L 54-74	+1.5	L −18.5	136.5	U 128
Nov 11	vsLIU	L 72-76	+5.5	W +1.5	137.5	O 148
Nov 15	vsM-OH	L 61-76	+10.5	L −4.5	143.5	U 137
Nov 19	vsALST	W 66-64	-2.5	L −0.5	138.5	U 130
Nov 21	vsSIUE	W 77-63	+2.5	W +16.5	130.5	O 140
Nov 23	vsIUIN	W 98-85	-3.5	W +9.5	175.5	O 183
Nov 26	vsUNCO	L 53-71	+4.5	L −13.5	146.5	U 124
Nov 29	vsSDAK	L 63-80	+3.5	L −13.5	147.5	U 143
Dec 3	vsPAC	L 65-80	+5.5	L −9.5	134.5	O 145
Dec 7	@NAVY	L 56-61	+9.5	W +4.5	133.5	U 117
Dec 17	@SDSU	L 58-81	+24.5	W +1.5	135.5	O 139
Dec 30	vsWYO	L 56-68	+14.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 124
Jan 3	@UNLV	L 39-67	+14.5	L −13.5	142.5	U 106
Jan 6	vsUSU	L 62-99	+22.5	L −14.5	139.5	O 161
Jan 10	vsUNM	L 49-91	+16.5	L −25.5	138.5	O 140
Jan 13	@SJSU	L 62-70	+5.5	L −2.5	128.5	O 132
Jan 17	vsNEV	L 66-81	+14.5	L −0.5	134.5	O 147
Jan 20	@CSU	L 52-81	+19.5	L −9.5	133.5	U 133
Jan 24	@BOIS	L 54-96	+23.5	L −18.5	137.5	O 150
Jan 31	vsFRES	L 62-79	+9.5	L −7.5	141.5	U 141
Feb 3	@GCU	L 57-81	+26.5	W +2.5	137.5	O 138
Feb 7	vsSDSU	L 54-88	+22.5	L −11.5	139.5	O 142
Feb 10	vsCSU	L 74-91	+16.5	L −0.5	137.5	O 165
Feb 14	@FRES	L 63-93	+14.5	L −15.5	142.5	O 156
Feb 17	@UNM	L 61-98	+28.5	L −8.5	148.5	O 159
Feb 21	vsUNLV	L 66-91	+16.5	L −8.5	153.5	O 157
Feb 24	vsSJSU	L 80-86	+6.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 166
Feb 28	@WYO	L 62-66	+20.5	W +16.5	145.5	U 128
Mar 3	vsGCU	L 60-86	+19.5	L −6.5	143.5	O 146
Mar 7	@NEV	L 59-74	+24.5	W +9.5	144.5	U 133
Mar 11	vsNEV	L 45-80	+19.5	L −15.5	140.5	U 125

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

BEL

L 63-79

−0.5

APSU

L 54-74

−18.5

LIU

L 72-76

+1.5

M-OH

L 61-76

−4.5

ALST

W 66-64

−0.5

SIUE

W 77-63

+16.5

IUIN

W 98-85

+9.5

UNCO

L 53-71

−13.5

SDAK

L 63-80

−13.5

PAC

L 65-80

−9.5

NAVY

L 56-61

+4.5

SDSU

L 58-81

+1.5

WYO

L 56-68

+2.5

UNLV

L 39-67

−13.5

USU

L 62-99

−14.5

UNM

L 49-91

−25.5

SJSU

L 62-70

−2.5

NEV

L 66-81

−0.5

CSU

L 52-81

−9.5

BOIS

L 54-96

−18.5

FRES

L 62-79

−7.5

GCU

L 57-81

+2.5

SDSU

L 54-88

−11.5

CSU

L 74-91

−0.5

FRES

L 63-93

−15.5

UNM

L 61-98

−8.5

UNLV

L 66-91

−8.5

SJSU

L 80-86

+0.5

WYO

L 62-66

+16.5

GCU

L 60-86

−6.5

NEV

L 59-74

+9.5

NEV

L 45-80

−15.5

covered 10didn’t cover 22avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

BEL

L 63-79

−2.5

APSU

L 54-74

−8.5

LIU

L 72-76

+10.5

M-OH

L 61-76

−6.5

ALST

W 66-64

−8.5

SIUE

W 77-63

+9.5

IUIN

W 98-85

+7.5

UNCO

L 53-71

−22.5

SDAK

L 63-80

−4.5

PAC

L 65-80

+10.5

NAVY

L 56-61

−16.5

SDSU

L 58-81

+3.5

WYO

L 56-68

−22.5

UNLV

L 39-67

−36.5

USU

L 62-99

+21.5

UNM

L 49-91

+1.5

SJSU

L 62-70

+3.5

NEV

L 66-81

+12.5

CSU

L 52-81

−0.5

BOIS

L 54-96

+12.5

FRES

L 62-79

−0.5

GCU

L 57-81

+0.5

SDSU

L 54-88

+2.5

CSU

L 74-91

+27.5

FRES

L 63-93

+13.5

UNM

L 61-98

+10.5

UNLV

L 66-91

+3.5

SJSU

L 80-86

+20.5

WYO

L 62-66

−17.5

GCU

L 60-86

+2.5

NEV

L 59-74

−11.5

NEV

L 45-80

−15.5

over 18under 14avg 0 ptslonger = bigger margin

Wright St

33 games played

Straight up

21-12

64% wins

Against the spread

21-12

64% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line

Over / Under

16-17

48% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total

Straight up

21-1264%

L L W L W L L W L L W W W W W W W L W W W L W L W W L W W W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

21-1264%

W L W W W L W W W L L W W L L W W L W W W L L L W W L W W W W L W

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

16-1748%

U U U U U O U O O O U O U U O O O O O U O U U U O U O U O U O U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 6	@CAL	L 67-77	+14.5	W +4.5	148.5	U 144
Nov 11	vsTOL	L 71-81	-5.5	L −15.5	159.5	U 152
Nov 15	vsRAD	W 92-59	+6.5	W +39.5	156.5	U 151
Nov 16	vsKENT	L 72-76	+4.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 148
Nov 25	@STET	W 79-62	-9.5	W +7.5	147.5	U 141
Nov 28	@BTLR	L 69-94	+14.5	L −10.5	150.5	O 163
Dec 3	@YSU	L 68-69	+3.5	W +2.5	144.5	U 137
Dec 7	vsGB	W 86-58	-6.5	W +21.5	142.5	O 144
Dec 13	@MRSH	L 74-76	+3.5	W +1.5	149.5	O 150
Dec 16	vsM-OH	L 76-83	+1.5	L −5.5	149.5	O 159
Dec 22	vsEMU	W 70-64	-10.5	L −4.5	142.5	U 134
Dec 29	vsOAK	W 88-73	-3.5	W +11.5	159.5	O 161
Jan 1	vsMILW	W 76-70	-3.5	W +2.5	147.5	U 146
Jan 4	@IUIN	W 81-77	-8.5	L −4.5	162.5	U 158
Jan 9	@DETM	W 84-82	-5.5	L −3.5	148.5	O 166
Jan 11	@OAK	W 94-84	+4.5	W +14.5	161.5	O 178
Jan 15	vsYSU	W 93-83	-4.5	W +5.5	141.5	O 176
Jan 21	vsCLE	L 79-85	-15.5	L −21.5	156.5	O 164
Jan 24	vsNKU	W 88-80	-1.5	W +6.5	155.5	O 168
Jan 30	@MILW	W 76-69	-2.5	W +4.5	151.5	U 145
Feb 1	@GB	W 83-75	-3.5	W +4.5	144.5	O 158
Feb 4	@RMU	L 66-72	-1.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 138
Feb 7	vsPFW	W 73-68	-6.5	L −1.5	150.5	U 141
Feb 12	vsDETM	L 74-77	-11.5	L −14.5	151.5	U 151
Feb 15	@CLE	W 102-90	-7.5	W +4.5	157.5	O 192
Feb 19	vsIUIN	W 85-73	-11.5	W +0.5	160.5	U 158
Feb 22	vsRMU	L 68-81	-4.5	L −17.5	146.5	O 149
Feb 25	@PFW	W 74-70	-1.5	W +2.5	150.5	U 144
Feb 28	@NKU	W 92-91	+3.5	W +4.5	153.5	O 183
Mar 4	vsCLE	W 90-61	-14.5	W +14.5	162.5	U 151
Mar 9	vsNKU	W 103-90	+1.5	W +14.5	157.5	O 193
Mar 10	vsDETM	W 66-63	-4.5	L −1.5	153.5	U 129
Mar 20	vsUVA	L 73-82	+17.5	W +8.5	146.5	O 155

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

CAL

L 67-77

+4.5

TOL

L 71-81

−15.5

RAD

W 92-59

+39.5

KENT

L 72-76

+0.5

STET

W 79-62

+7.5

BTLR

L 69-94

−10.5

YSU

L 68-69

+2.5

W 86-58

+21.5

MRSH

L 74-76

+1.5

M-OH

L 76-83

−5.5

EMU

W 70-64

−4.5

OAK

W 88-73

+11.5

MILW

W 76-70

+2.5

IUIN

W 81-77

−4.5

DETM

W 84-82

−3.5

OAK

W 94-84

+14.5

YSU

W 93-83

+5.5

CLE

L 79-85

−21.5

NKU

W 88-80

+6.5

MILW

W 76-69

+4.5

W 83-75

+4.5

RMU

L 66-72

−7.5

PFW

W 73-68

−1.5

DETM

L 74-77

−14.5

CLE

W 102-90

+4.5

IUIN

W 85-73

+0.5

RMU

L 68-81

−17.5

PFW

W 74-70

+2.5

NKU

W 92-91

+4.5

CLE

W 90-61

+14.5

NKU

W 103-90

+14.5

DETM

W 66-63

−1.5

UVA

L 73-82

+8.5

covered 21didn’t cover 12avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

CAL

L 67-77

−4.5

TOL

L 71-81

−7.5

RAD

W 92-59

−5.5

KENT

L 72-76

−9.5

STET

W 79-62

−6.5

BTLR

L 69-94

+12.5

YSU

L 68-69

−7.5

W 86-58

+1.5

MRSH

L 74-76

+0.5

M-OH

L 76-83

+9.5

EMU

W 70-64

−8.5

OAK

W 88-73

+1.5

MILW

W 76-70

−1.5

IUIN

W 81-77

−4.5

DETM

W 84-82

+17.5

OAK

W 94-84

+16.5

YSU

W 93-83

+34.5

CLE

L 79-85

+7.5

NKU

W 88-80

+12.5

MILW

W 76-69

−6.5

W 83-75

+13.5

RMU

L 66-72

−9.5

PFW

W 73-68

−9.5

DETM

L 74-77

−0.5

CLE

W 102-90

+34.5

IUIN

W 85-73

−2.5

RMU

L 68-81

+2.5

PFW

W 74-70

−6.5

NKU

W 92-91

+29.5

CLE

W 90-61

−11.5

NKU

W 103-90

+35.5

DETM

W 66-63

−24.5

UVA

L 73-82

+8.5

over 16under 17avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Air Force 1, Wright St 1, even 3

Air ForceBetterWright St

G K. Sanders12.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.8 ast Score 77

Even

G C. O'Hara TR14.2 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.2 ast Score 66

G E. Greenberg6.6 pts · 2.3 reb · 1 ast Score 18

Even

G D. Pangonis8.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.2 ast Score 30

F L. Hobin11.4 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast Score 26

Even

G C. Traylor TR3.8 pts · 1.1 reb · 2 ast Score 21

F E. Robinson7.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 1.6 ast Score 39

WRSTBig

G A. Holden5.8 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.5 ast Score 78

F C. Walker10.4 pts · 5 reb · 0.8 ast Score 82

AFSmall

F K. Pickett8.5 pts · 5.5 reb · 1 ast Score 67

Air ForceBetterWright St

AF offense290th of 366 · -8.9

WRSTSmall

WRST defense215th of 366 · -5.6

AF defense149th of 366 · -3.3

Even

WRST offense148th of 366 · -4.5

Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players

Even

Backcourt-2.5 · 4 players

Frontcourt-1.3 · 3 players

WRSTSmall

Frontcourt+0.6 · 1 player

Bench-7.9 · 5 players

WRSTBig

Bench-0.7 · 2 players

Score, worst to bestAF betterWRST betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Air Force

Guards

K. Sanders30 minE. Greenberg27 minA. Patterson14 minJ. Hinds12 minE. Taite2 minT. KeeneNew

Forwards

L. Hobin29 minE. Robinson28 minC. Walker22 minR. Dering14 minK. Gilles13 minB. Martin5 min

Centers

W. Celichowski21 minM. CaslaruNew

Wright St

Guards

C. O'Hara33 min · TRD. Pangonis27 minC. Traylor17 min · TRA. Holden14 minI. Milijasevic8 min · TRP. DouglasNew

Forwards

K. Pickett23 minS. JohnsonNewN. LewisNew

Centers

N. Djapa10 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

AF61.5 #362

WRST79.8 #72

Points per possession

AF0.91 #363

WRST1.16 #54

Pace (possessions)

AF67.4 #259

WRST69.1 #171

Shooting

Effective FG%

AF48.9 #292

WRST54.3 #56

3-point %

AF30.6 #332

WRST36.4 #44

3-point attempt rate

AF41.8 #139

WRST34.2 #290

Free throw rate

AF35.1 #174

WRST37.4 #120

Possessions

Turnover rate

AF21.9 #362

WRST16.1 #149

Offensive rebound rate

AF21.4 #360

WRST32.8 #91

Assists per game

AF12.2 #273

WRST13.2 #199

Defense

Points allowed

AF79.9 #316

WRST75.6 #206

Points allowed per possession

AF1.19 #352

WRST1.09 #201

Opponent effective FG%

AF56.4 #350

WRST52.4 #238

Opponent 3-point %

AF37.6 #352

WRST34.3 #203

Turnovers forced

AF15.1 #280

WRST16.6 #179

Defensive rebound rate

AF68.7 #215

WRST70.6 #129

Steals per game

AF5.6 #281

WRST7.1 #114

Blocks per game

AF2.4 #316

WRST4.4 #47

AF		WRST
Scoring
61.5 #362	Points per game	79.8 #72
0.91 #363	Points per possession	1.16 #54
67.4 #259	Pace (possessions)	69.1 #171
Shooting
48.9 #292	Effective FG%	54.3 #56
30.6 #332	3-point %	36.4 #44
41.8 #139	3-point attempt rate	34.2 #290
35.1 #174	Free throw rate	37.4 #120
Possessions
21.9 #362	Turnover rate	16.1 #149
21.4 #360	Offensive rebound rate	32.8 #91
12.2 #273	Assists per game	13.2 #199
Defense
79.9 #316	Points allowed	75.6 #206
1.19 #352	Points allowed per possession	1.09 #201
56.4 #350	Opponent effective FG%	52.4 #238
37.6 #352	Opponent 3-point %	34.3 #203
15.1 #280	Turnovers forced	16.6 #179
68.7 #215	Defensive rebound rate	70.6 #129
5.6 #281	Steals per game	7.1 #114
2.4 #316	Blocks per game	4.4 #47

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Air Force

3-29 in 2025-26 overall · 0-21 in conference · Mountain West Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Nevada45–80
L@ Nevada59–74
Lvs Grand Canyon60–86
L@ Wyoming62–66
Lvs San José St80–86

A week or more of rest.

Wright St

21-12 in 2025-26 overall · 18-5 in conference · Horizon League

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Virginia73–82
Wvs Detroit Mercy66–63
Wvs N Kentucky103–90
Wvs Cleveland St90–61
W@ N Kentucky92–91

A week or more of rest.