Pizzitola Sports Center · at Brown
Line
BRWN -8.5moved 1 toward UNH
Total143.5up 1 from 142.5
| This season | BRWN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BRWN 76–66 · win probability BRWN 81%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
BRWN -8.5
moved 1 toward UNH
Total
143.5
model 141.3 · Under by 2
Model edge
BRWN by 1.5
model vs market
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BRWN has more of the edges
UNH 0, BRWN 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
UNH offense vs BRWN defense
Offense 300th of 366 against a defense 124th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNH 47%, BRWN 100%. Transfers in: UNH 3, BRWN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNH 46.7 and allows 53.5; BRWN 48.6 and allows 51.3
Context
Schedule so far
UNH has played the 237th-hardest schedule, BRWN the 176th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
BRWN at home. This season: BRWN 0-0 at home, UNH 0-0 away
Even
BRWN offense vs UNH defense
Offense 220th of 366 against a defense 255th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNH 28.5, BRWN 28.1. Allowed: UNH 35.8, BRWN 37.6
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: UNH plays 68.9 a game (186th fastest), BRWN 68.0 (229th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Three-pointers
UNH hits 30.5% and allows 34.3%; BRWN hits 30.3% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 43.1% and 36.3% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNH 25.7%, BRWN 29.0%. Defensive: UNH 73.1%, BRWN 70.0%
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNH 16.5%, BRWN 19.4%. Forced: UNH 15.8%, BRWN 18.8%
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home favorites of 7 to 9.5 | 1806 | 78% | 49% | 50% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 832 | 79% | 51% | 51% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog | 4513 | 74% | 51% | 50% |
| Games with a total of 140 to 144.5 | 3570 | 72% | 50% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenBRWN -9.5
1 → UNH
NowBRWN -8.5
1 pt toward UNH
Total
Open142.5
▲ 1
Now143.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
UNH +360 · BRWN -500
Line movement
Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened BRWN -9.5 · now BRWN -8.5 · moved 1 toward UNHmodel BRWN -10
model BRWN -10
Opened 142.5 · now 143.5 · moved 1 upmodel 141.5
model 141.5
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Over 143.5TotalUnder 143.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Books
5 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | BRWN | Over | Under | UNH | BRWN | |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | -8.5-115 | +8.5-105 | 143.5-110 | 143.5-110 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | -9.5-110 | +9.5-115 | 142.5-129 | 142.5+100 | +360 | -530 |
| BovadaBovada | -8.5-115 | +8.5-105 | 143.5-110 | 143.5-110 | — | — |
| DraftKingsDK | -8.5-112 | +8.5-108 | 143.5-110 | 143.5-110 | +360 | -470 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | -8.5-111 | +8.5-101 | 143.5-108 | 143.5-108 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | BRWN -8.5 | BRWN -10.0 | BRWN +1.5 |
| Total | 143.5 | 141.3 | Under 2.2 |
| Projected score | — | UNH 65.7 · BRWN 75.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BRWN -5.8 | — |
| 1H total | 66.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNH 30.2 · BRWN 36 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-9 10% | 1-9 10% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNH 1–3 BRWNBRWN leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · BRWN has won the last 2 meetings · UNH 1-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025-26 | BRWN 59 @ UNH 47 | UNH +5.5 | BRWN W |
| Nov 15, 2024-25 | UNH 58 @ BRWN 76 | BRWN -8.5 | BRWN W |
| Nov 14, 2023-24 | BRWN 64 @ UNH 82 | UNH +5.5 | UNH W |
| Dec 21, 2022-23 | UNH 51 @ BRWN 67 | BRWN -6.5 | BRWN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Hampshire
28 games played
Straight up
7-21
25% wins
Against the spread
12-16
43% covers · avg −2.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 38-88 | +29.5 | L −20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 75-86 | +15.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 44-61 | +24.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 105 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 66-98 | +29.5 | L −2.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 47-59 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 68-72 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 68-69 | +8.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 88-82 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 134.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 59-58 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 117 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 79-93 | +34.5 | W +20.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 55-86 | +31.5 | W +0.5 | 146.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 61-80 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 74-75 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 65-48 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-82 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-72 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 66-61 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 84-92 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 57-80 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 70-76 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 63-85 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 56-78 | +3.5 | L −18.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 58-61 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 63-65 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 61-84 | +3.5 | L −19.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 88-83 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 69-84 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+4.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
+7.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
−2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−6.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
+5.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
+7.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+11.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−2.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+20.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
+0.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
−11.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
−6.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
+18.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
−3.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+5.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
+1.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
−6.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−13.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
−8.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
−19.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−18.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−6.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−4.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
−19.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+2.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 16avg −2.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CLEM
L 38-88
−20.5
9
@
HARV
L 75-86
+13.5
15
@
GMU
L 44-61
−39.5
18
@
PROV
L 66-98
+2.5
26
vs
BRWN
L 47-59
−30.5
30
@
FAIR
L 68-72
−7.5
3
@
DART
L 68-69
−10.5
6
vs
BU
W 88-82
+35.5
17
vs
STO
W 59-58
−21.5
21
@
SLU
L 79-93
+14.5
30
@
NEB
L 55-86
−5.5
3
vs
UVM
L 61-80
+1.5
8
@
NJIT
L 76-80
+18.5
10
@
UMBC
L 74-75
+5.5
19
@
ME
W 65-48
−16.5
22
vs
BING
W 88-82
+34.5
24
vs
UALB
W 80-72
+14.5
29
vs
UML
W 66-61
−19.5
31
@
BRY
L 84-92
+44.5
7
@
UVM
L 57-80
−1.5
12
vs
NJIT
L 70-76
+0.5
14
vs
UMBC
L 63-85
+1.5
19
@
UML
L 56-78
−17.5
21
vs
ME
L 58-61
−16.5
26
@
BING
L 63-65
−13.5
28
@
UALB
L 61-84
+6.5
3
vs
BRY
W 88-83
+35.5
7
@
UMBC
L 69-84
+10.5
over 15under 13avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Brown
25 games played
Straight up
7-18
28% wins
Against the spread
13-12
52% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-12
52% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | L 46-62 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 9 | vs | L 84-89 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 131.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 77-90 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 129.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 14 | vs | L 63-72 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 68-49 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 23 | @ | W 58-53 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 59-47 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | U 106 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 56-66 | +13.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 75-56 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 130.5 | O 131 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-86 | +19.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 53-70 | +8.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 73-81 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 86-80 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 67-89 | +2.5 | L −19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 53-63 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | vs | L 59-69 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 70-77 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 6 | @ | L 69-81 | +15.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 53-56 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 131.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 79-76 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 80-71 | -2.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 62-80 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 140.5 | O 142 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 80-86 | +9.5 | W +3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 61-82 | -1.5 | L −22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−12.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+0.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
−9.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−10.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
+16.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
−6.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
+3.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
+6.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
+3.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+12.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+12.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−8.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
−2.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+8.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−19.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−5.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−8.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
−8.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+3.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
+4.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+5.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+6.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
−12.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+3.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−22.5
covered 13didn’t cover 12avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
SIE
L 46-62
−34.5
9
vs
UVM
L 84-89
+41.5
12
@
BU
L 77-90
+37.5
14
vs
HAMP
L 63-72
−4.5
18
vs
HC
W 68-49
−24.5
20
@
STBK
L 70-80
+13.5
23
@
ME
W 58-53
−16.5
26
@
UNH
W 59-47
−30.5
2
@
URI
L 56-66
−16.5
5
vs
BRY
W 75-56
+0.5
9
@
PROV
L 79-86
+19.5
5
vs
YALE
L 53-70
−19.5
10
@
PENN
L 73-81
+8.5
17
vs
COLU
W 86-80
+22.5
19
vs
COR
L 67-89
−7.5
24
@
PRIN
L 53-63
−18.5
30
vs
HARV
L 59-69
−4.5
31
vs
DART
L 70-77
+4.5
6
@
YALE
L 69-81
+9.5
13
@
HARV
L 53-56
−22.5
14
@
DART
W 79-76
+15.5
20
vs
PRIN
W 80-71
+21.5
27
@
COLU
L 62-80
+1.5
28
@
COR
L 80-86
+9.5
6
vs
PENN
L 61-82
−3.5
over 13under 12avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Brown has the better starters
Position by position: New Hampshire 0, Brown 1, even 4
New HampshireBetterBrown
G T. Bike7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
=Even
G J. Jenkins8.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 5.3 ast
Score 47
G E. Oliver-Bush TR3.2 pts · 2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 7
=Even
G A. Uchidiuno9.1 pts · 2.8 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 20
F D. Poser6.9 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
=Even
G M. Wrisby-Jefferson4.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 25
F J. Squire5.8 pts · 5.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 34
=Even
G D. Rochester5.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 27
F D. McKenna TR3.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 47
→BRWNSmall
F N. Dabo7.1 pts · 5.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 72
New HampshireBetterBrown
UNH offense300th of 366 · -9.3
→BRWNBig
BRWN defense124th of 366 · -2.2
UNH defense255th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
BRWN offense220th of 366 · -6.7
Backcourt-3.5 · 2 players
←UNHBig
Backcourt-6.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-4.5 · 3 players
→BRWNBig
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
Bench-2.3 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-2.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNH betterBRWN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Bike24 minE. Oliver-Bush16 min · TRM. Blackley2 minA. SquireNewJ. ColemanNewJ. FaumuinaNew
Forwards
D. Poser29 minJ. Squire27 minD. McKenna11 min · TRR. Zan8 min · TRJ. O'Neill6 minK. MyersNew
Centers
G. Xanthopoulos6 min
Guards
J. Jenkins31 minA. Uchidiuno26 minM. Wrisby-Jefferson23 minD. Rochester22 minI. Langham21 minB. Loughlin18 min
Forwards
N. Dabo24 minC. O'Sullivan11 minW. DeGraaf8 minE. JamgbadiNewL. JonesNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.6 #339 | Points per game | 67.2 #330 |
| 0.96 #347 | Points per possession | 0.98 #338 |
| 68.9 #186 | Pace (possessions) | 68.0 #229 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.7 #344 | Effective FG% | 48.6 #299 |
| 30.5 #333 | 3-point % | 30.3 #338 |
| 43.1 #110 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.3 #244 |
| 28.5 #338 | Free throw rate | 28.1 #342 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.5 #166 | Turnover rate | 19.4 #334 |
| 25.7 #329 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.0 #236 |
| 10.6 #348 | Assists per game | 14.8 #99 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.4 #227 | Points allowed | 72.4 #115 |
| 1.11 #247 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #134 |
| 53.5 #282 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #176 |
| 34.3 #204 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #157 |
| 15.8 #227 | Turnovers forced | 18.8 #57 |
| 73.1 #32 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.0 #164 |
| 6.1 #222 | Steals per game | 7.5 #82 |
| 2.0 #345 | Blocks per game | 3.8 #104 |
New Hampshire
7-21 in 2025-26 overall · 5-12 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UMBC69–84
- Wvs Bryant88–83
- L@ UAlbany61–84
- L@ Binghamton63–65
- Lvs Maine58–61
A week or more of rest.
Brown
7-18 in 2025-26 overall · 3-11 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Penn61–82
- L@ Cornell80–86
- L@ Columbia62–80
- Wvs Princeton80–71
- W@ Dartmouth79–76
A week or more of rest.