Abilene Christian Wildcats at Colorado Buffaloes: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 9:00 PM ETCU Events Center · at Colorado

LineCOLO -18.5moved 1 toward COLO

Total152.5no move

Season records: Abilene Chrstn and Colorado
ACU	This season	COLO
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects COLO 85–64 · win probability COLO 97%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

COLO -18.5

moved 1 toward COLO

Total

152.5

model 148.7 · Under by 4

Model edge

COLO by 3

model vs market

Public on the spread

98% ACU

92% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: COLO has more of the edges

ACU 1, COLO 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

COLOBig

ACU offense vs COLO defense

Offense 298th of 366 against a defense 80th, on the model’s ratings

COLOBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: ACU 47.5 and allows 56.5; COLO 52.9 and allows 52.6

COLOBig

COLO offense vs ACU defense

Offense 54th of 366 against a defense 200th, on the model’s ratings

COLOBig

Three-pointers

ACU hits 31.0% and allows 40.9%; COLO hits 35.1% and allows 36.3%. Threes are 32.8% and 35.2% of their shots

Context

Schedule so far

ACU has played the 183rd-hardest schedule, COLO the 58th. A record against a soft schedule means less

COLOSmall

Home court

COLO at home. This season: COLO 0-0 at home, ACU 0-0 away

ACUSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: ACU 31.0%, COLO 29.0%. Defensive: ACU 70.9%, COLO 70.4%

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: ACU plays 69.2 a game (167th fastest), COLO 71.0 (76th). Faster games mean more points

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: ACU 25%, COLO 40%. Transfers in: ACU 3, COLO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Turnovers

Turnover rate: ACU 20.8%, COLO 14.7%. Forced: ACU 23.4%, COLO 15.2%

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: ACU 41.7, COLO 36.6. Allowed: ACU 53.5, COLO 36.6

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 15 to 19.5	993	94%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	632	93%	49%	53%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 150 to 154.5	2755	75%	51%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenCOLO -17.5

1 → COLO

NowCOLO -18.5

1 pt toward COLO

Total

Open152.5

no move

Now152.5

No change since the open

Moneyline

ACU +1200 · COLO -3200

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened COLO -17.5 · now COLO -18 · moved 0.5 toward COLOmodel COLO -21.5

model COLO -21.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

ACU +18.5Spread

COLO -18.5

Bets

98%

Money

92%8%

Over 152.5TotalUnder 152.5

Bets

43%57%

Money

45%55%

ACUWinner

COLO

Bets

99%

Money

99%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	ACU	COLO	Over	Under	ACU	COLO
BetMGMMGM	-18.5-110	+18.5-110	152.5-105	152.5-115	+1200	-3000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-18-105	+18-115	152-110	152-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-18.5-112	+18.5-114	151.5-122	151.5-104	+1150	-3335
BetUSBetUS	-18-105	+18-115	152-110	152-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-18-105	+18-115	152-110	152-110	+1100	-2800
DraftKingsDK	-18.5-110	+18.5-110	152.5-110	152.5-110	+1400	-3200
FanDuelFD	-17.5-102	+17.5-120	152.5-110	152.5-110	+1400	-4000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-18-101	+18-111	152-108	152-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	COLO -18.5	COLO -21.3	COLO +2.8
Total	152.5	148.7	Under 3.8
Projected score	—	ACU 63.7 · COLO 85

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	COLO -12.5	—
1H total	69.5	—
1H projected score	ACU 28.5 · COLO 41	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
ACU WLLWL	14-16	47%	8-7	8-6
COLO LWWLW	17-16	52%	11-7	9-8

Venue/role: ACU away, as underdog; COLO home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
ACU OUUOO	16-14	53%	11-19
COLO OOOOO	17-16	52%	17-16

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
ACU	4-6 40%	4-6 40%	5-5 50%
COLO	4-6 40%	7-3 70%	6-4 60%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Abilene Chrstn

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs LAM	W77–42WU
Nov 11	vs SFA	L66–76LU
Nov 16	@ MOST	L69–87LO

Colorado

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs SDSU	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs USD	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ PROV	W97–88WO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Abilene Chrstn

30 games played

Straight up

11-19

37% wins

Against the spread

14-16

47% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

16-14

53% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

11-1937%

W L L W L W W L L W L W W L L L L L L L W W L W L L L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

14-1647%

L L L W L W W W W W L W W L L L L L W W W W L L L W L L W L

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

16-1453%

U U U U O U O O O O O O O O U U O O U U U U U O O O U U O O

2 straight overs2 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 6	vsOMA	W 73-71	-4.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 144
Nov 14	@SFA	L 66-76	+6.5	L −3.5	142.5	U 142
Nov 18	@TXST	L 49-63	+1.5	L −12.5	138.5	U 112
Nov 24	vsUTSA	W 61-50	-2.5	W +8.5	144.5	U 111
Nov 25	vsW&M	L 58-92	-1.5	L −35.5	147.5	O 150
Dec 2	@PEPP	W 71-63	-1.5	W +6.5	137.5	U 134
Dec 6	vsNMSU	W 77-69	+1.5	W +9.5	131.5	O 146
Dec 16	@ARIZ	L 62-96	+34.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 158
Dec 19	@BYU	L 67-85	+33.5	W +15.5	146.5	O 152
Dec 22	@TXSO	W 75-68	-4.5	W +2.5	138.5	O 143
Jan 1	vsUTU	L 64-79	-5.5	L −20.5	139.5	O 143
Jan 3	vsUVU	W 85-68	+7.5	W +24.5	139.5	O 153
Jan 8	@TAR	W 84-80	+4.5	W +8.5	140.5	O 164
Jan 10	@UTA	L 72-82	+3.5	L −6.5	134.5	O 154
Jan 15	vsCBU	L 58-74	-1.5	L −17.5	140.5	U 132
Jan 17	@SUU	L 52-74	-3.5	L −25.5	149.5	U 126
Jan 29	vsUTU	L 70-76	-3.5	L −9.5	145.5	O 146
Jan 31	vsSUU	L 76-79	-6.5	L −9.5	150.5	O 155
Feb 5	@UVU	L 55-68	+14.5	W +1.5	145.5	U 123
Feb 7	@CBU	L 63-65	+8.5	W +6.5	135.5	U 128
Feb 12	vsUTA	W 67-63	-1.5	W +2.5	134.5	U 130
Feb 14	vsTAR	W 73-59	-3.5	W +10.5	134.5	U 132
Feb 16	@TAR	L 62-65	-1.5	L −4.5	134.5	U 127
Feb 21	vsSUU	W 87-83	-8.5	L −4.5	143.5	O 170
Feb 26	@UTU	L 81-85	+2.5	L −1.5	139.5	O 166
Feb 28	@UVU	L 67-74	+14.5	W +7.5	140.5	O 141
Mar 5	@CBU	L 48-87	+9.5	L −29.5	136.5	U 135
Mar 7	vsUTA	L 57-64	-1.5	L −8.5	131.5	U 121
Mar 11	vsTAR	W 84-78	-1.5	W +4.5	134.5	O 162
Mar 12	vsUTU	L 74-80	+1.5	L −4.5	142.5	O 154

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

OMA

W 73-71

−2.5

SFA

L 66-76

−3.5

TXST

L 49-63

−12.5

UTSA

W 61-50

+8.5

W&M

L 58-92

−35.5

PEPP

W 71-63

+6.5

NMSU

W 77-69

+9.5

ARIZ

L 62-96

+0.5

BYU

L 67-85

+15.5

TXSO

W 75-68

+2.5

UTU

L 64-79

−20.5

UVU

W 85-68

+24.5

TAR

W 84-80

+8.5

UTA

L 72-82

−6.5

CBU

L 58-74

−17.5

SUU

L 52-74

−25.5

UTU

L 70-76

−9.5

SUU

L 76-79

−9.5

UVU

L 55-68

+1.5

CBU

L 63-65

+6.5

UTA

W 67-63

+2.5

TAR

W 73-59

+10.5

TAR

L 62-65

−4.5

SUU

W 87-83

−4.5

UTU

L 81-85

−1.5

UVU

L 67-74

+7.5

CBU

L 48-87

−29.5

UTA

L 57-64

−8.5

TAR

W 84-78

+4.5

UTU

L 74-80

−4.5

covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

OMA

W 73-71

−6.5

SFA

L 66-76

−0.5

TXST

L 49-63

−26.5

UTSA

W 61-50

−33.5

W&M

L 58-92

+2.5

PEPP

W 71-63

−3.5

NMSU

W 77-69

+14.5

ARIZ

L 62-96

+12.5

BYU

L 67-85

+5.5

TXSO

W 75-68

+4.5

UTU

L 64-79

+3.5

UVU

W 85-68

+13.5

TAR

W 84-80

+23.5

UTA

L 72-82

+19.5

CBU

L 58-74

−8.5

SUU

L 52-74

−23.5

UTU

L 70-76

+0.5

SUU

L 76-79

+4.5

UVU

L 55-68

−22.5

CBU

L 63-65

−7.5

UTA

W 67-63

−4.5

TAR

W 73-59

−2.5

TAR

L 62-65

−7.5

SUU

W 87-83

+26.5

UTU

L 81-85

+26.5

UVU

L 67-74

+0.5

CBU

L 48-87

−1.5

UTA

L 57-64

−10.5

TAR

W 84-78

+27.5

UTU

L 74-80

+11.5

over 16under 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Colorado

33 games played

Straight up

17-16

52% wins

Against the spread

17-16

52% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-16

52% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total

Straight up

17-1652%

W W W W W W W W L W W L L W W L L L L L L W L W L L W W L W L L L

3 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

17-1652%

L L W W W W W L L W L L L W W W L L L L L W L W L W W W L W W L W

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-1652%

O O O O O U U U O U O U O O U U U U U O O U U U U O U U O O O O O

5 straight overs4 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsMTST	W 84-78	-11.5	L −5.5	148.5	O 162
Nov 8	vsEWU	W 102-97	-16.5	L −11.5	152.5	O 199
Nov 14	vsPROV	W 97-88	-1.5	W +7.5	163.5	O 185
Nov 17	vsALST	W 94-66	-22.5	W +5.5	156.5	O 160
Nov 21	vsUCD	W 95-79	-14.5	W +1.5	152.5	O 174
Nov 27	vsSF	W 79-69	+1.5	W +11.5	150.5	U 148
Nov 28	vsWASH	W 81-68	+2.5	W +15.5	151.5	U 149
Dec 1	vsCBU	W 78-70	-13.5	L −5.5	150.5	U 148
Dec 6	@CSU	L 86-91	+1.5	L −3.5	149.5	O 177
Dec 13	vsUTSA	W 88-64	-22.5	W +1.5	154.5	U 152
Dec 17	vsPRST	W 84-73	-16.5	L −5.5	150.5	O 157
Dec 20	vsSTAN	L 68-77	-2.5	L −11.5	154.5	U 145
Dec 28	vsUNCO	L 81-86	-15.5	L −20.5	158.5	O 167
Jan 3	@ASU	W 95-89	+1.5	W +7.5	156.5	O 184
Jan 7	vsUTAH	W 85-73	-9.5	W +2.5	162.5	U 158
Jan 10	vsTTU	L 71-73	+5.5	W +3.5	161.5	U 144
Jan 14	@CIN	L 68-77	+8.5	L −0.5	145.5	U 145
Jan 17	@WVU	L 61-72	+6.5	L −4.5	141.5	U 133
Jan 20	vsKU	L 69-75	+4.5	L −1.5	155.5	U 144
Jan 24	vsUCF	L 86-95	-3.5	L −12.5	159.5	O 181
Jan 29	@ISU	L 67-97	+17.5	L −12.5	152.5	O 164
Feb 1	vsTCU	W 87-61	+1.5	W +27.5	153.5	U 148
Feb 4	@BAY	L 67-86	+7.5	L −11.5	155.5	U 153
Feb 7	vsASU	W 78-70	-3.5	W +4.5	158.5	U 148
Feb 11	@TTU	L 44-78	+13.5	L −20.5	155.5	U 122
Feb 14	@BYU	L 86-90	+15.5	W +11.5	161.5	O 176
Feb 21	vsOKST	W 83-69	-3.5	W +10.5	162.5	U 152
Feb 25	vsKSU	W 79-70	-5.5	W +3.5	163.5	U 149
Feb 28	@HOU	L 62-102	+20.5	L −19.5	139.5	O 164
Mar 3	@UTAH	W 92-78	-1.5	W +12.5	148.5	O 170
Mar 7	vsARIZ	L 79-89	+13.5	W +3.5	156.5	O 168
Mar 10	vsOKST	L 83-92	-1.5	L −10.5	164.5	O 175
Apr 1	vsOU	L 86-90	+9.5	W +5.5	162.5	O 176

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MTST

W 84-78

−5.5

EWU

W 102-97

−11.5

PROV

W 97-88

+7.5

ALST

W 94-66

+5.5

UCD

W 95-79

+1.5

W 79-69

+11.5

WASH

W 81-68

+15.5

CBU

W 78-70

−5.5

CSU

L 86-91

−3.5

UTSA

W 88-64

+1.5

PRST

W 84-73

−5.5

STAN

L 68-77

−11.5

UNCO

L 81-86

−20.5

ASU

W 95-89

+7.5

UTAH

W 85-73

+2.5

TTU

L 71-73

+3.5

CIN

L 68-77

−0.5

WVU

L 61-72

−4.5

L 69-75

−1.5

UCF

L 86-95

−12.5

ISU

L 67-97

−12.5

TCU

W 87-61

+27.5

BAY

L 67-86

−11.5

ASU

W 78-70

+4.5

TTU

L 44-78

−20.5

BYU

L 86-90

+11.5

OKST

W 83-69

+10.5

KSU

W 79-70

+3.5

HOU

L 62-102

−19.5

UTAH

W 92-78

+12.5

ARIZ

L 79-89

+3.5

OKST

L 83-92

−10.5

L 86-90

+5.5

covered 17didn’t cover 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MTST

W 84-78

+13.5

EWU

W 102-97

+46.5

PROV

W 97-88

+21.5

ALST

W 94-66

+3.5

UCD

W 95-79

+21.5

W 79-69

−2.5

WASH

W 81-68

−2.5

CBU

W 78-70

−2.5

CSU

L 86-91

+27.5

UTSA

W 88-64

−2.5

PRST

W 84-73

+6.5

STAN

L 68-77

−9.5

UNCO

L 81-86

+8.5

ASU

W 95-89

+27.5

UTAH

W 85-73

−4.5

TTU

L 71-73

−17.5

CIN

L 68-77

−0.5

WVU

L 61-72

−8.5

L 69-75

−11.5

UCF

L 86-95

+21.5

ISU

L 67-97

+11.5

TCU

W 87-61

−5.5

BAY

L 67-86

−2.5

ASU

W 78-70

−10.5

TTU

L 44-78

−33.5

BYU

L 86-90

+14.5

OKST

W 83-69

−10.5

KSU

W 79-70

−14.5

HOU

L 62-102

+24.5

UTAH

W 92-78

+21.5

ARIZ

L 79-89

+11.5

OKST

L 83-92

+10.5

L 86-90

+13.5

over 17under 16avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Colorado has the better starters

Position by position: Abilene Chrstn 0, Colorado 2, even 3

Abilene ChrstnBetterColorado

G N. Bolanga TR11.6 pts · 5.9 reb · 2.3 ast Score 38

COLOBig

G B. Hargress14.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 4.5 ast Score 93

G Y. Rivera7.4 pts · 1.5 reb · 2.3 ast Score 41

COLOBig

F J. Neely TR17.7 pts · 11.4 reb · 2.4 ast Score 96

G I. Dye1.7 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.1 ast Not ranked

No call

F I. Niagu TR4.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 42

G E. Boisdur TR1.3 pts · 0.4 reb · 0.3 ast Not ranked

No call

F D. Gomez TR5 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast Not ranked

F C. Hornecker5.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.1 ast Score 48

Even

C N. Feddersen TR9 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast Score 59

Abilene ChrstnBetterColorado

ACU offense298th of 366 · -9.2

COLOBig

COLO defense80th of 366 · +0.3

ACU defense200th of 366 · -5.0

COLOBig

COLO offense54th of 366 · +3.2

Backcourt-3.6 · 4 players

COLOBig

Backcourt+3.6 · 1 player

Frontcourt-0.2 · 1 player

COLOBig

Frontcourt+5.3 · 4 players

Bench-0.0 · 2 players

ACUSmall

Bench-2.7 · 4 players

Score, worst to bestACU betterCOLO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Abilene Chrstn

Guards

N. Bolanga34 min · TRY. Rivera25 minI. Dye6 minE. Boisdur6 min · TRT. Pons5 min · TRI. Neyhart3 min

Forwards

C. Hornecker16 minV. Yimga MoukouriNewS. RowleyNewW. Marie-AnaisNew

Colorado

Guards

B. Hargress33 minJ. Sanders18 minJ. Holland18 minI. Inman10 minA. JonesNewR. PortelaNew

Forwards

J. Neely33 min · TRI. Niagu21 min · TRD. Gomez20 min · TRN. Randall1 minG. MalualNewC. HillNew

Centers

N. Feddersen21 min · TRE. JacobsenNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

ACU67.9 #313

COLO80.2 #63

Points per possession

ACU0.98 #340

COLO1.13 #80

Pace (possessions)

ACU69.2 #167

COLO71.0 #76

Shooting

Effective FG%

ACU47.5 #326

COLO52.9 #108

3-point %

ACU31.0 #319

COLO35.1 #104

3-point attempt rate

ACU32.8 #318

COLO35.2 #267

Free throw rate

ACU41.7 #34

COLO36.6 #139

Possessions

Turnover rate

ACU20.8 #356

COLO14.7 #46

Offensive rebound rate

ACU31.0 #164

COLO29.0 #235

Assists per game

ACU12.5 #249

COLO15.4 #67

Defense

Points allowed

ACU73.9 #151

COLO79.8 #313

Points allowed per possession

ACU1.07 #123

COLO1.12 #272

Opponent effective FG%

ACU56.5 #352

COLO52.6 #243

Opponent 3-point %

ACU40.9 #365

COLO36.3 #319

Turnovers forced

ACU23.4 #3

COLO15.2 #267

Defensive rebound rate

ACU70.9 #113

COLO70.4 #144

Steals per game

ACU9.6 #4

COLO6.3 #196

Blocks per game

ACU2.6 #298

COLO3.3 #170

ACU		COLO
Scoring
67.9 #313	Points per game	80.2 #63
0.98 #340	Points per possession	1.13 #80
69.2 #167	Pace (possessions)	71.0 #76
Shooting
47.5 #326	Effective FG%	52.9 #108
31.0 #319	3-point %	35.1 #104
32.8 #318	3-point attempt rate	35.2 #267
41.7 #34	Free throw rate	36.6 #139
Possessions
20.8 #356	Turnover rate	14.7 #46
31.0 #164	Offensive rebound rate	29.0 #235
12.5 #249	Assists per game	15.4 #67
Defense
73.9 #151	Points allowed	79.8 #313
1.07 #123	Points allowed per possession	1.12 #272
56.5 #352	Opponent effective FG%	52.6 #243
40.9 #365	Opponent 3-point %	36.3 #319
23.4 #3	Turnovers forced	15.2 #267
70.9 #113	Defensive rebound rate	70.4 #144
9.6 #4	Steals per game	6.3 #196
2.6 #298	Blocks per game	3.3 #170

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Abilene Chrstn

11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · United Athletic Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Utah Tech74–80
Wvs Tarleton St84–78
Lvs UT Arlington57–64
L@ CA Baptist48–87
L@ Utah Valley67–74

A week or more of rest.

Colorado

17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Oklahoma86–90
Lvs Oklahoma St83–92
Lvs Arizona79–89
W@ Utah92–78
L@ Houston62–102

A week or more of rest.