CHI Health Center Omaha · at Creighton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CREI | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects CREI 87–61 · win probability CREI 99%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: CREI has more of the edges
MSM 2, CREI 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
MSM offense vs CREI defense
Offense 319th of 366 against a defense 43rd, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
MSM has played the 291st-hardest schedule, CREI the 40th. A record against a soft schedule means less
CREI offense vs MSM defense
Offense 33rd of 366 against a defense 199th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MSM 32.3%, CREI 26.9%. Defensive: MSM 70.9%, CREI 70.5%
Free throws
Free throw rate: MSM 33.3, CREI 28.3. Allowed: MSM 37.3, CREI 24.8
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MSM 22.4%, CREI 16.4%. Forced: MSM 15.3%, CREI 13.7%
Home court
CREI at home. This season: CREI 0-0 at home, MSM 0-0 away
Three-pointers
MSM hits 32.7% and allows 32.3%; CREI hits 34.1% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 42.6% and 48.2% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: MSM plays 68.0 a game (231st fastest), CREI 68.9 (187th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MSM 42%, CREI 53%. Transfers in: MSM 3, CREI 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: MSM 50.6 and allows 47.2; CREI 53.0 and allows 51.1
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | CREI -26.2 | — |
| Total | — | 147.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | MSM 60.6 · CREI 86.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CREI -15.5 | — |
| 1H total | 69.0 | — |
| 1H projected score | MSM 26.8 · CREI 42.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% |
Next 3 games
With how the last meeting with each opponent went
No more games listed yet.
No more games listed yet.
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Mount St Marys
31 games played
Straight up
14-17
45% wins
Against the spread
18-13
58% covers · avg −0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-21
32% overs · avg −3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 54-70 | +19.5 | W +3.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 62-73 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 74-66 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 140 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 55-72 | +25.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 90-95 | +17.5 | W +12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 60-83 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 60-113 | +30.5 | L −22.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 79-75 | -2.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 80-87 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 56-64 | +8.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 13 | @ | W 81-73 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 66-59 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 65-75 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 69-80 | +7.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 9 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 50-67 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 78-68 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 68-58 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 62-77 | +4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 71-61 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 58-66 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 72-65 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 70-87 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-76 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 65-55 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Feb 20 | vs | W 76-63 | -7.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 139 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 68-47 | -7.5 | W +13.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 69-77 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 69-47 | +4.5 | W +26.5 | 145.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 58-63 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WVU
L 54-70
+3.5
7
vs
BUCK
L 62-73
−12.5
11
@
SFPA
W 74-66
+1.5
16
@
CIN
L 55-72
+8.5
19
@
MD
L 90-95
+12.5
23
@
WMU
L 60-83
−21.5
25
@
OSU
L 60-113
−22.5
29
vs
HOW
W 79-75
+1.5
3
vs
SHU
L 80-87
−5.5
5
@
MRST
L 56-64
+0.5
13
@
L-MD
W 81-73
+5.5
19
@
DREX
L 67-75
−3.5
29
vs
IONA
W 66-59
+9.5
2
@
MRMK
L 65-75
−6.5
4
@
QUIN
L 69-80
−3.5
9
vs
SPU
W 70-65
+6.5
11
vs
SIE
L 50-67
−14.5
17
@
CAN
W 78-68
+6.5
19
@
NIA
W 68-58
+6.5
22
vs
QUIN
L 62-77
−10.5
24
vs
RID
W 71-61
+0.5
30
@
SPU
L 58-66
−2.5
1
vs
MAN
W 72-65
+0.5
5
vs
MRMK
L 70-87
−14.5
7
@
IONA
W 83-76
+10.5
13
@
RID
W 65-55
+4.5
20
vs
NIA
W 76-63
+5.5
22
vs
CAN
W 68-47
+13.5
27
@
SHU
L 69-77
−5.5
1
@
FAIR
W 69-47
+26.5
7
vs
SIE
L 58-63
−2.5
covered 18didn’t cover 13avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WVU
L 54-70
−12.5
7
vs
BUCK
L 62-73
−8.5
11
@
SFPA
W 74-66
−9.5
16
@
CIN
L 55-72
−18.5
19
@
MD
L 90-95
+39.5
23
@
WMU
L 60-83
−7.5
25
@
OSU
L 60-113
+21.5
29
vs
HOW
W 79-75
+7.5
3
vs
SHU
L 80-87
+14.5
5
@
MRST
L 56-64
−16.5
13
@
L-MD
W 81-73
+2.5
19
@
DREX
L 67-75
+4.5
29
vs
IONA
W 66-59
−28.5
2
@
MRMK
L 65-75
−1.5
4
@
QUIN
L 69-80
−1.5
9
vs
SPU
W 70-65
−6.5
11
vs
SIE
L 50-67
−22.5
17
@
CAN
W 78-68
+10.5
19
@
NIA
W 68-58
−5.5
22
vs
QUIN
L 62-77
−9.5
24
vs
RID
W 71-61
−7.5
30
@
SPU
L 58-66
−14.5
1
vs
MAN
W 72-65
−10.5
5
vs
MRMK
L 70-87
+22.5
7
@
IONA
W 83-76
+17.5
13
@
RID
W 65-55
−17.5
20
vs
NIA
W 76-63
+8.5
22
vs
CAN
W 68-47
−22.5
27
@
SHU
L 69-77
−4.5
1
@
FAIR
W 69-47
−29.5
7
vs
SIE
L 58-63
−14.5
over 10under 21avg −3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Creighton
34 games played
Straight up
16-18
47% wins
Against the spread
11-23
32% covers · avg −2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg +0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 92-76 | -29.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +12.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-45 | -33.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 129 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 75-60 | -29.5 | L −14.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-81 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-78 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 76-66 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 150.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 96-76 | -18.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 50-71 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 155.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-83 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 98-57 | +2.5 | W +43.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 84-63 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 92-69 | -19.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 89-85 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 54-56 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-72 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 73-90 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 86-83 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 16 | @ | L 88-93 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 94-93 | -8.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 187 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 62-86 | -1.5 | L −25.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-85 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 68-76 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 71-72 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-80 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-84 | +15.5 | W +22.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 52-81 | +12.5 | L −16.5 | 156.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 71-72 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 76-79 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 166.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 4 | @ | W 76-59 | +2.5 | W +19.5 | 155.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | U 133 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 82-69 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Apr 4 | vs | L 70-87 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
SDAK
W 92-76
−13.5
11
@
GONZ
L 63-90
−14.5
14
vs
UMES
W 84-45
+5.5
19
vs
UND
W 75-60
−14.5
24
vs
BAY
L 74-81
−3.5
25
vs
ISU
L 60-78
−8.5
27
vs
ORE
W 76-66
+7.5
2
vs
NICH
W 96-76
+1.5
7
@
NEB
L 50-71
−15.5
13
vs
KSU
L 76-83
−11.5
17
@
XAV
W 98-57
+43.5
20
vs
MARQ
W 84-63
+14.5
22
vs
UTU
W 92-69
+3.5
30
vs
BTLR
W 89-85
−1.5
4
@
HALL
L 54-56
+1.5
7
@
VILL
W 76-72
+8.5
10
vs
SJU
L 73-90
−14.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 86-83
−5.5
16
@
PROV
L 88-93
−7.5
21
vs
XAV
W 94-93
−7.5
27
@
MARQ
L 62-86
−25.5
31
vs
CONN
L 58-85
−20.5
4
@
GTWN
L 68-76
−6.5
7
vs
HALL
W 69-68
−0.5
11
@
DEP
L 71-72
−2.5
14
vs
VILL
L 69-80
−9.5
18
@
CONN
W 91-84
+22.5
21
@
SJU
L 52-81
−16.5
25
vs
DEP
L 71-72
−4.5
28
vs
PROV
L 76-79
−6.5
4
@
BTLR
W 76-59
+19.5
12
vs
HALL
L 61-72
−8.5
2
vs
RUTG
W 82-69
+8.5
4
vs
WVU
L 70-87
−15.5
covered 11didn’t cover 23avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
SDAK
W 92-76
−1.5
11
@
GONZ
L 63-90
−11.5
14
vs
UMES
W 84-45
−6.5
19
vs
UND
W 75-60
−20.5
24
vs
BAY
L 74-81
+0.5
25
vs
ISU
L 60-78
−14.5
27
vs
ORE
W 76-66
−8.5
2
vs
NICH
W 96-76
+28.5
7
@
NEB
L 50-71
−34.5
13
vs
KSU
L 76-83
−0.5
17
@
XAV
W 98-57
+3.5
20
vs
MARQ
W 84-63
−4.5
22
vs
UTU
W 92-69
+13.5
30
vs
BTLR
W 89-85
+17.5
4
@
HALL
L 54-56
−33.5
7
@
VILL
W 76-72
+5.5
10
vs
SJU
L 73-90
+10.5
13
vs
GTWN
W 86-83
+21.5
16
@
PROV
L 88-93
+19.5
21
vs
XAV
W 94-93
+31.5
27
@
MARQ
L 62-86
−6.5
31
vs
CONN
L 58-85
+0.5
4
@
GTWN
L 68-76
−2.5
7
vs
HALL
W 69-68
−3.5
11
@
DEP
L 71-72
+1.5
14
vs
VILL
L 69-80
+3.5
18
@
CONN
W 91-84
+31.5
21
@
SJU
L 52-81
−23.5
25
vs
DEP
L 71-72
+0.5
28
vs
PROV
L 76-79
−11.5
4
@
BTLR
W 76-59
−20.5
12
vs
HALL
L 61-72
−3.5
2
vs
RUTG
W 82-69
−0.5
4
vs
WVU
L 70-87
+19.5
over 16under 18avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Creighton has the better starters
Position by position: Mount St Marys 0, Creighton 5, even 0
Mount St MarysBetterCreighton
G A. Khadre Kebe7.5 pts · 5.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 55
→CREISmall
G B. Robinson TR17.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 6.7 ast
Score 86
G R. Thompson TR10.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 49
→CREISmall
G W. Enis TR16.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 72
G A. Arrington5.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 1 ast
Score 2
→CREIBig
F J. Green10.5 pts · 6.3 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 92
G M. So3.9 pts · 2.3 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 13
→CREIBig
F O. Erhunmwunse TR6.9 pts · 8.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 74
F W. Jr. Exacte TR7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 43
→CREIBig
C F. King TR13.1 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 92
Mount St MarysBetterCreighton
MSM offense319th of 366 · -10.5
→CREIBig
CREI defense43rd of 366 · +2.7
MSM defense199th of 366 · -4.8
→CREIBig
CREI offense33rd of 366 · +5.5
Backcourt-5.9 · 4 players
→CREIBig
Backcourt+3.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
→CREIBig
Frontcourt+8.6 · 3 players
Bench-2.4 · 4 players
→CREIBig
Bench+5.7 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMSM betterCREI betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Khadre Kebe22 minR. Thompson22 min · TRA. Arrington19 minM. So18 minA. Rozakeas14 minC. Orness3 min · TR
Forwards
W. Jr. Exacte19 min · TRY. Diop9 minL. JoyceNewR. BrzezanskiNewN. LimolNewC. GardNew
Guards
B. Robinson36 min · TRW. Enis34 min · TRB. Davis23 min · TRA. Swartz22 minH. Greer14 minK. Edwards7 min · TR
Forwards
J. Green28 minO. Erhunmwunse25 min · TRJ. McAndrew21 minI. Traudt19 minT. Carter-GivensNew
Centers
F. King25 min · TRW. RosaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.9 #315 | Points per game | 75.2 #159 |
| 1.00 #327 | Points per possession | 1.09 #156 |
| 68.0 #231 | Pace (possessions) | 68.9 #187 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.6 #208 | Effective FG% | 53.0 #103 |
| 32.7 #244 | 3-point % | 34.1 #167 |
| 42.6 #125 | 3-point attempt rate | 48.2 #23 |
| 33.3 #230 | Free throw rate | 28.3 #340 |
| Possessions | ||
| 22.4 #364 | Turnover rate | 16.4 #161 |
| 32.3 #115 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.9 #301 |
| 13.2 #196 | Assists per game | 15.4 #72 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.0 #74 | Points allowed | 75.2 #196 |
| 1.05 #84 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #197 |
| 47.2 #23 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.1 #165 |
| 32.3 #81 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #256 |
| 15.3 #262 | Turnovers forced | 13.7 #341 |
| 70.9 #114 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #132 |
| 5.8 #261 | Steals per game | 5.7 #278 |
| 2.9 #248 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #255 |
Mount St Marys
14-17 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Siena58–63
- W@ Fairfield69–47
- L@ Sacred Heart69–77
- Wvs Canisius68–47
- Wvs Niagara76–63
A week or more of rest.
Creighton
16-18 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Big East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs West Virginia70–87
- Wvs Rutgers82–69
- Lvs Seton Hall61–72
- W@ Butler76–59
- Lvs Providence76–79
A week or more of rest.